DPraved wrote:Spot on analysis, except for the bolded part which I strongly disagree with. In fact I think this myth has become self-fulfilling in that models are expected to climb the ladder and once they reach the top customer interest will start to drop. But that's only what's to be expected if the only scenes she gets to shoot are DAP, TAP, TVP or TP scenes! The customer base who bought her earlier scenes might not all be interested in those advanced things and suddenly that's the only type of content that gets produced. Only the fans of that particular fetish will still support her, and even they will soon find that all new scenes are more or less the same. Meanwhile her old fans would love the opportunity to buy more of the less advanced stuff, but that's no longer an option because she can only climb upwards. This bullshit needs to stop!
That's the problem, though. It can't "stop." It's not a
preference. Much like someone doesn't
prefer for their leg muscles to get tired after running for ten kilometers, one cannot just
prefer to "un-see" something.
Once you've seen a girl take two gigantic black cocks up her ass at the same time ... watching her shoot a single 1 on 1 anal scene with a white guy ... like, honestly ... honestly now. Is your wallet coming out for that?
The only two things that can mitigate this are if the girl disappears for a while or just continuously, non-stop, starts shooting scenes that are "not as intense." Like, after six months of one-on-one scenes, suddenly when the girl reappears in a DP gangbang, things are kind of getting spicy again. But, even then ...
Nothing's deleting the previous BBC DAP scene she had done. Which is what brings us to this ...
chimpy.677 wrote:This is what I have been saying for years, these are the causes of AV's failure, but there is always a group of weirdos defending this madness.
By making scenes with gallons of piss, vomit and prolapses, the only thing you get is that:
1) Many young and beautiful girls don't want to film. So you end up bringing the same women 1000 times doing the same thing over and over again, which is what has been happening in recent years.
2) The scenes are more expensive because you have to pay a higher price for the girls to want to do this, in addition to a lot of other factors, such as: you have to pay more to the male actors to do this; the scenes are longer so each scene needs more storage space on the server; you have to make two versions, one dry and one wet, which also leads to fearing more storage space on the server, in addition to the editing work; a higher cost in cleaning the studio for obvious reasons, etc.
Those two things alone led us to having the same scenes with the same women a million times over, but people here are obsessed with saying that it's all OF's fault. When the website's debacle is their fault.
These are all excellent points.
They are. But ... and there's always a but here ...
These things were introduced as career-extensions for all the girl's careers who
committed to DAP-breakin'. Because, after DAP-breakin' ... then what? You go to all the other studios - anywhere - and they won't pay you as much for a DP scene as they once would have because of everything I first listed above in this comment. "You've already been on the BBC DAP train," they'll say, "Nobody wants to see you get DP'd by a couple of white guys. So, if I accept you for this shoot, your pay is going to be way less than for somebody who this act is new for."
So, in a way, introducing tiers of "make-believe totally non-sexy stuff" was the only way for the studio itself to survive, because once you take somebody to pretty much the apex of "traditional degenerate porn" - there's nowhere else to go than actual full-on degen porn.
Somebody here made the topic about, "What's next? Shitting?" And it's like ... they inadvertently hit the nail on the head, because ... yeah. There always has to be one extra ladder rung to go. And ... ironically!
Ironically. It's for the girl's who shoot the porn's benefit, because, in a way, it still gives them work. It still gives them a reason to hang around.
I don't want to say that porn is like prostitution, but ...
it kind of is. In that ... the audience ... or the "Johns" ... pay
a lot less for the girl's who've already been used and put through "the system."
There's that saying that gets used, usually with a lot of edge, "Getting spit out at the bottom of the porn industry."
Well, what that essentially refers to is someone who, no matter how beautiful they might actually be, has essentially destroyed any "moral" worth they may have had by, essentially, filming themselves doing the most degrading shit. And, for all the degens out there, watching them drink another bowl of piss is just like ... yeah, whatever.
Their innocence
has already been destroyed.
That's what people are really watching for.Which, in a way, is a shame. Because the BBC DAP essentially brings people over that threshold entirely. Or, even the DAP in general. Where,
once a girl has gone there ... she can't go back.So ... all of this is like ...
yeah.As awesome as it would be for folks to
get excited with their wallets and fork over cash en-masse for a BWC DP scene on a girl that's already done BBC DAP ... that
typically doesn't happen.Which is why you saw girl's like Eden Ivy, who had the beauty required to essentially keep on doing BWC DP scenes
non-stop, never go beyond that. Because she knew the line she would be crossing.
She knew she could never uncross it.Which is why categories like piss and puke exist.So that the career for all the girl's who did cross it ... isn't just
automatically over.
I know it goes deeper than that, but honestly ...
That plays a large role in it.
