Current dissatisfaction of site: homoerotic bias creeping in

[netzerkaiser]

I'm trying to grasp something here... & its difficult to find out what:

I just watched scene of American starlet Adalind Gray... & something struck me.

There was no anal, but the camera work always focused on her ass...

The camera work always focused on her pleasure...

Cunnilingous was there, when do you see it here?

And the whole thing worried me that somehow, imperceptibly, this site is losing its way. Focusing far too much on the male element.

I'm only trying to help here, help site to maintain relevance & not become essentially niche GGG formula for bi-sexual appetites, which deserve respect, but which never deserve right to occupy central stationing, not on a site that started out at least, & earned admirers & members, for heterosexual content.

[Iddaoeeok]

When was this site ever about female pleasure?

[visigoth2020260]

i think that only LTP is letting the girls be shown as there are supposed to. most other studios are bum-rushed, and all you see is
a bunch of guys on top of the girls.
it is a balance and they have not figured it out yet.
they need to let the girls work out the cocks.

you can find these positions in almost all LTP scenes
and the ones that have the camera skill
do not even bother with it.

[netzerkaiser]

When was this site ever about female pleasure?

I understand, great & simple point.

And most pornography in general, not just on this site is like this too.

So then you don't even realise its not about female pleasure.

So refreshing to:

(i) see a lady really enjoying herself

(ii) see the action focusing on her

(iii) see the camerawork focusing on her, which amounts to a very subtle distinction

[Ultra-Gape]

I've wondered here before what might happen if the guys were given a bonus if they manage to make the woman orgasm...

For me the best porn is always about everyone involved getting turn on and enjoying sex (or at least managing to convince the audience that this is what is happening).