xxx wrote:dap-addict wrote:xxx wrote:I'm having the guys shoot a new series, it's called "0% pussy". It will be no vaginal even with 2 guys. We'll see how these scenes do.
GREAT THANKS for listening, xxx!!!![]()
![]()
Just wondering:
Is the Anita Bellini scene the first one of those 4 already shot?
http://legalporno.com/watch/28366/anita ... ussy_sz503
No big deal at the begining, but though it says 0% pussy they do fuck it towards the end.
If this happens on the set despite all directors instructions, just cut that footage out on the desk later, ok?
Wishing you luck shooting really 100% anal - 0% pussy footage in the future!
Damn I did not notice. She's gonna have to be punished! First scene of a few shot yes.
seedfeeder wrote:yaeh, treat pussy as emergency hole only when the asshole is already fully occupied.
laura. wrote:Agree with the majority, 100% anal 0% pussy for me. As intimate as vaginal sex is and always will be, it just doesn't have that effect on film for me. I associate vaginal penetration with love making, anal with hard core porn. Anal porn is exciting, raw, a little bit dangerous and thoroughly satisfying to watch. Main reason for me joining this place. Still, if lots of people like it then keep on showing it. We can pick n choosex
laura. wrote:Still, if lots of people like it then keep on showing it. We can pick n choosex
dap-addict wrote:laura. wrote:Still, if lots of people like it then keep on showing it. We can pick n choosex
Its not as easy as that. And the worst is if an actor uses his pussy-ass-pussy interchange fuck antiques, a fetish quite common about 10 years ago.![]()
I think they should consider to cut two versions in case demand to still have some pussy sex is big enough.
Just cut a shorter 100% anal/0% pussy version and a longer full version.
One more question is how much is the demand to keep dp footage still?
Even in my own porn watching fetishes I am not decided as I always liked airtight.
dap-addict wrote:One more question is how much is the demand to keep dp footage still?
Even in my own porn watching fetishes I am not decided as I always liked airtight.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:dap-addict wrote:One more question is how much is the demand to keep dp footage still?
Even in my own porn watching fetishes I am not decided as I always liked airtight.
Same question you asked in so many different threads and I roll my eyes every time. I'll change it again on you:
One more question is how much is the demand to keep DAP footage still?
In my porn watching DAP is a gimmick that only few porn models can perform with any LP style intensity so it is trivial to me. When you have a talented model like Isabella Clark then DAP is enjoyable to view BUT a great example of boring, tip fucking, gimmicky DAP is Blanche Bradburry. I use to love watching Blanche scenes when she was doing anal and DP. The problem is now in her scene they try again and again to force a DAP and with the large cocks that Gonzo uses and it is a boring exercise in futility. Blanche beautiful ass is way to tight but they keep insisting on trying to do DAP. Tina Hot had this problem also with a tight ass that made it almost impossible to DAP and the expression of horror and pain on her face didn't do anything for eroticism IMHO.
The Gonzo guys can barely tip fuck models which used to be a sin on this forum but for some reason but an exception is made for DAP. So the way I look at it
(1) is you have about 6 current models that can perform and intense DAP for fans enjoyment with large Gonzo cocks (Arwen Gold, Linda Sweet, Isabella Clark, Karina Grand, Proxy Page and Nataly Gold) so concentrate on shooting DAP with them mostly.
(2) is imitate Giorigo by drastically reducing the cock size in scenes to increase quantity of models that could do intense DAP. Giorgio is the DAP Master his DAP scene have the intensity, balls deep fucking and great camera angles that we have come to expect from LP. I was worried about the camera angles with smaller cock men than Gonzo but Giorgio captures all the action with perfect angles.
*** Anything else is just boring, tip fucking crap scenes that can be tagged with a gimmick label of DAP ***
So I ask again, how much is the demand to keep DAP footage still?
dap-addict wrote:dpconnoisseur1, I agree on Blanche Bradburry, but I still think LP should always try dap with every new model ready to do it.
Please remember that for years also Natali Gold couldnt do it despite two dap attempts, but no she is really fun to watch in balls deep dap mode.
Tina Hot couldnt really perform it and thus switched back to jolly dps, no idea why Blanche doesnt do the same. Guess despites all her dap flaws it sells still fine.
For me - I cannot enough stress it again and again - a lot of porn attraction would be lost if I wouldnt get classical DP airights anymore once in a while!
How do others feel about that?
Have you the same dilemma as I as a 0% pussy fan - have?
How important is balls deep dap/dp fucking for you?
Maybe another poll could be appropriate as we have many new forum members since this one...
dap-addict wrote:
Some more ideas needed what inventing studs can do with pussy during anal not necessarily fucking it?
dap-addict wrote:(1) For me - I cannot enough stress it again and again - a lot of porn attraction would be lost if I wouldnt get classical DP airights anymore once in a while!
(2) Have you the same dilemma as I as a 0% pussy fan - have?
(3) How important is balls deep dap/dp fucking for you?
(4) Maybe another poll could be appropriate as we have many new forum members since this one...
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:(2) No dilemma with 100% Anal or 0% Pussy or whatever they call it. I rarely buy it as it is a tip fucking or very low intensity session and when finally it is not we notice that the model is left to play with her clit or finger bang herself to finally orgasm. No explanation needed for this fetish because as fetishes go you either like it or don't. There is no rhyme or reason to say one is better or worse than the other. IMHO 100% anal or 0% pussy is no different than 100% pussy or 0% anal just boring and limited with they both containing their own extreme act DAP in the former and DPP in the latter.
magizi87 wrote:All this talk about Blanche being unable to do DAP could be interpreted in the wrong way, so just to clarify
dap-addict wrote:dpc, you ignose porn history, which might be important for all those of us who have a longer porn watching habbit than just 1-2 years.
dap-addict wrote:Same might happen with anal/dap 2016-2030 you might be tempted to say...but the difference is 0% anal/dap footage was never a problem to get.
0% pussy footage on contrary is still rare to buy, and what is rare is in high deamand usually.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:... I truly love seeing a woman in ecstasy in an intense sexual scenario(orally, vaginally or anally) with all her senses being teased, explored and stimulated...
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:....
I truly love seeing a woman in ecstasy in an intense sexual scenario(orally, vaginally or anally) with all her senses being teased, explored and stimulated until she explodes ....
laura. wrote:To all the anal fans contributing in this thread, was your preference for anal like that for the beginning or did you start watching pussy penetrations and then move onto anal as a natural porn progression step? I am unsure if it is all part of the desensitization that I think we all go through or if it's the taboo of it that entices us from first watch? ....
analsexonly wrote:All anal, all the time. It's much more appealing visually to see an asshole fucked than a pussy, and pussies look their most attractive unfucked and empty. Since porn is a visual medium, anal works best for it. (Plus I just prefer anal and anal only in real life as well, so there's that.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests