Moderator: admin
crash.mjf wrote:I don't understand why you can't stuff all the holes of the female body but only the anus and the mouth. What's wrong with the pussy? Seriously, why do you hate vaginas so much?
I'd like to buy a lot more scenes, especially wet ones, but it's a real downer that almost all of them feature no vaginal sex at all. I mean, I could live with a huge part being anal sex but why 0% pussy? I don't get it.
I love vaginas and I love to see guys fucking vaginas just as much as I see girls being pissed on and fucked in the ass. Please don't fall into that ultra niche of vaginal haters for almost every scene, that's so sad.
How about at least a bit more balance? Why don't you ever do vaginal creampies anymore? Is vaginal sex really that horrible for you guys?
crash.mjf wrote:I love vaginas and I love to see guys fucking vaginas just as much as I see girls being pissed on and fucked in the ass. Please don't fall into that ultra niche of vaginal haters for almost every scene, that's so sad.
ryukenmaster666 wrote:Now it is said, I've read somewhere here some models don't want to do pussy anymore, no idea why or if it is real.
misangrenegra2 wrote:Giorgio explained this before.
He said before in some threads that he is not obssesed with anal/DAP sex but
in their sales numbers for years, he noticed that "0% pussy" scenes are sell better and more consistently than scenes with DP/vaginal sex, even if they are DAP breakings, some people prefer no watch vaginal sex (DP)/TP/DVP in them.
At the end, even maybe it was not its him original purpose, their studio built a solid of costumers looking and buying mostly scenes with 0% pussy and DAP, even a big fame as a studio focused mostly only in anal.
As Dap-addict said, there are other studios that shoot a lot of DP in their scenes like Gonzo, N&F, Latina teen productions, etc, the offer is big if you want DP/DVP sex in this site.
crash.mjf wrote:Yes and no. The other studios rarely feature the same girls Grandi does and their production values are often less good.
And I don't ask that 0% pussy should be gone completely. I just bothers me that lately almost every scene features no vaginal sex anymore which is imho just stupid. Personally, I buy some of these myself but only because of the girls and the pissing etc. I wanted to buy the latest two-parts scene with Anna and Veronica but I didn't once I noticed that it again features zero pussy sex.
cumdump wrote:Yes, DP is much better, nicer intensity, if only anal or DAP, slows down the action, maybe TS is better for those who only want anal since 0% pussy.
Should be more balance, I agree. But also must realize this is predominantly anal site. It is called analvids now as we know. Definitely best Anal site of all time.
misangrenegra2 wrote:crash.mjf wrote:Yes and no. The other studios rarely feature the same girls Grandi does and their production values are often less good.
And I don't ask that 0% pussy should be gone completely. I just bothers me that lately almost every scene features no vaginal sex anymore which is imho just stupid. Personally, I buy some of these myself but only because of the girls and the pissing etc. I wanted to buy the latest two-parts scene with Anna and Veronica but I didn't once I noticed that it again features zero pussy sex.
Well, i gave you the reasons about why Gio mostly shoots 0% pussy porn, at least is what i understood when i read their posts explaining why.
i can empathize with you in the girls case, i had the same "problem" skipping some purchases when some girls are very exclusive from some particular studio(Cindy shine or Kelly Oliveira for example), including the sex acts, in my case mostly skiping scenes with a lot of DP when i prefer only anal, and check the male performers (is about performance and other things).
I think is not a stupid thing, is based on tastes preferences, and in that case, you are choosing the content instead of the girl sometimes, as me did it or other users too.
In you example, at least, Veronica is not an exclusive Gio's girls as can be Anna, if you like Veronica, you can find a lot of anal/DP scenes of her here, including pee.
crash.mjf wrote:misangrenegra2 wrote:Well, i gave you the reasons about why Gio mostly shoots 0% pussy porn, at least is what i understood when i read their posts explaining why.
i can empathize with you in the girls case, i had the same "problem" skipping some purchases when some girls are very exclusive from some particular studio(Cindy shine or Kelly Oliveira for example), including the sex acts, in my case mostly skiping scenes with a lot of DP when i prefer only anal, and check the male performers (is about performance and other things).
I think is not a stupid thing, is based on tastes preferences, and in that case, you are choosing the content instead of the girl sometimes, as me did it or other users too.
In you example, at least, Veronica is not an exclusive Gio's girls as can be Anna, if you like Veronica, you can find a lot of anal/DP scenes of her here, including pee.
Well, I do respect everyone who isn't into vaginal sex at all. I don't judge anyone, we're all perverts around here, lol.
But vaginal sex could easily be skipped if people are not interested in it or there could even be two versions, like it's done with wet scene. You know, making a version without any vaginal sex for the 0% pussy crowd and making a version with vaginal sex for those like me who don't exlusively like anal sex but "no holes barred" sex, you know.
And I don't get the excuse about the girls not wanting to shoot vaginal sex? That's imho just pure bollocks, seriously. Anna DeVille said that she prefers DAP to DP but she never said that she simply hates vaginal sex, just to name an example. Girls who appear here in 0% pussy scenes have zero issues shooting vaginal sex for other (non LP) studios.
So yeah, I do understand that Grandi thinks that 0% pussy scenes sell better because there actually seems to be people (like you, based on your signature) who indeed like anal-only scenes. But imho that's just an assumption and balance is king anyway. I remember the old scene with e.g. Luna Rival with extended pussy sex and even pussy creampies - besides all the heavy anal action which I also like. Seems like this times are gone forever for whatever unknown reason (and no, there isn't a single(!) LP studio that shoots extended vaginal sex anymore or even pussy creampies with the rare exception of some of the French guys). I know that this site is mainly about anal sex but nobody said that all people who like anal sex don't also like vaginal sex. I don't know why this has to be an "either - or" thing. They should make anal porn for everyone, not only the most hardcore niche fans. I guess that's why they also offer dry scenes because not everyone is into wet content. That's cool, I support that. Just give us something similar for all the people who enjoy watching guys fucking girl's asses AND pussies...
misangrenegra2 wrote:crash.mjf wrote:misangrenegra2 wrote:Now is when each studio have their own styles/fame and a loyal fan base. In this particular studio it seems, with the things i read here of him, that their loyals costumers "belongs", in general, or are more in favour of 0% pussy content and this has been marking the trend because the sells are more consistent when are shooted in that way, something similar happens with IR scenes, are more often because sells well.
chemonro5 wrote:YOU CAN GO TO LITTERALY ANY OTHER PORN WEBSITE/STUDIO ON THE ENTIRE INTERNET IF YOU WANT TO SEE DP
LEGALPORNO IS KNOWN FOR DAP AND 0% PUSSY.
WHY COME ON THE FORUM OF THE BIGGEST MOST ANAL DAP CENTERED WEBSITE AND SHOUT FOR DP WHEN YOU CAN GO WATCH THAT AT ANY OTHER STUDIO
LMAO
crash.mjf wrote:.
crash.mjf wrote:But please tell me, which other studio shoots orgies and gangbangs with two girls and at least 4 guys and watersports on a regular basis?
I doubt you can name even one. Because such studio outside LP simply doesn't exist.
dap-addict wrote:crash.mjf wrote:But please tell me, which other studio shoots orgies and gangbangs with two girls and at least 4 guys and watersports on a regular basis?
I doubt you can name even one. Because such studio outside LP simply doesn't exist.
So, crash, have you even tried gonzo @ LP?![]()
![]()
Because they have released and constantly shoot gangbangs with two girls and at least 4 guys and watersports on a regular basis in NHB format, ie. DP/DVP/DAP.
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:I would disagree that there is 0% pussy in almost every scene.
If you took at the number of releases (granted, there are a lot of lower tier scenes) and compare that with how many are exclusively 0% pussy. You may find the % is nowhere near 100% as you seem to suggest.
crash.mjf wrote:I only spoke about GIO, not the whole Pornbox catalogue. And yes, for GIO 0% pussy seems to be the rule now with only a few expections...
Some might of course like that, I don't. And I thought the forum was the right place to voice such feedback.
cumdump wrote:if only anal or DAP, slows down the action, maybe TS is better for those who only want anal since 0% pussy.
JEYjosbizarreadventure wrote:Lmao this thread is the very definition of the vocal minority
dap-addict wrote:crash.mjf wrote:I only spoke about GIO, not the whole Pornbox catalogue. And yes, for GIO 0% pussy seems to be the rule now with only a few expections...
Some might of course like that, I don't. And I thought the forum was the right place to voice such feedback.
Its the right place, but feedback is not in favor of your wish as you can see.
This said of course there is also pussy fucking @ GIO, every girl usually has at least 1 DP scene without DAP and also some DAP scenes have also DP and TP. But generally as others have already written, gonzo studio caters more for your needs.
Which girls you want to watch in DP are not on gonzo from time to time also?
TheVulture wrote:I think there is just that extra heat value in knowing that a girl doesn't want her pussy to be fucked. It is kind of the Premier League level of porn if you like.
misangrenegra2 wrote:AnalVids make here is very hard and something to appreciate.
dap-addict wrote:crash.mjf wrote:I only spoke about GIO, not the whole Pornbox catalogue. And yes, for GIO 0% pussy seems to be the rule now with only a few expections...
Some might of course like that, I don't. And I thought the forum was the right place to voice such feedback.
Its the right place, but feedback is not in favor of your wish as you can see.
This said of course there is also pussy fucking @ GIO, every girl usually has at least 1 DP scene without DAP and also some DAP scenes have also DP and TP. But generally as others have already written, gonzo studio caters more for your needs.
Which girls you want to watch in DP are not on gonzo from time to time also?
crash.mjf wrote:I respect your taste etc. but I really don't understand that one sentence above. Why do you think that there was some "extra heat" because a girl doesn't want to do something???
In my books, the Premier League level of porn is girls who do EVERYTHING, not limit themselves to only SOMETHING.
In my humble opinion there's A LOT more heat in scenes in which girls take dicks in ALL of their holes instead of only one or two.
TheVulture wrote:....which is why I get so frustrated that Giorgio zooms into facial close-up so frequently and particularly just as an anal section is getting underway. But that's another story.
TheVulture wrote:crash.mjf wrote:I respect your taste etc. but I really don't understand that one sentence above. Why do you think that there was some "extra heat" because a girl doesn't want to do something???
In my books, the Premier League level of porn is girls who do EVERYTHING, not limit themselves to only SOMETHING.
In my humble opinion there's A LOT more heat in scenes in which girls take dicks in ALL of their holes instead of only one or two.
Well each to their own but I think that's a strange take on it. Most people would I think agree that anal sex is the "harder" of the 2 options (anal and vaginal). Thus by definition if a girl is only doing anal then she's maximising the "hardness" of her scene.
Heat and hardness are obviously not the exact same thing but for me there is an implicit heat in a girl who only likes anal sex. This doesn't mean it will automatically translate to a hot scene, because there are other factors in play there.
I do agree with you that a scene doesn't have to be anal only to be hot. But for me I think the vast majority of hot scenes will be very, very heavily anal focused. And if they're not then I'm unlikely to even watch them.
I stand by the "Premier League" comment, because I just think it is the pinnacle of modern porn for girls to do anal only scenes at least on occasion. And it's the girls who clearly love anal sex so much that they seem not to be even interested in pussy fucking that I will always come back to.
It's definitely a bit of a hierarchy thing in general. Lots of girls outside of porn obviously love sex but only a relatively small percentage will do anal sex regularly. When you're talking about porn girls - and certainly the kind we see on AV/LP - they have already long since reached the pinnacle of that "normal" level and generally are in porn to take it to the next level. As a rule that means to perform lots of anal sex so ultimately why not anal only? To me porn is basically synonymous with anal sex so my preference will always be for that without any of the trimmings.
crash.mjf wrote:Like I said, I respect your opinion but it's nothing more than that, an opinion.
There is no hierarchy thing in general. I'd even say though that in "real life" a lot more girls do anal than DP. I'd say only VERY few girls in real life would ever do DP, much, much less girls who'd be down for an anal-only sex session. I don't think that these "what might real women do in real life" stuff has any significance anyway, quite the contrary. Such discussions only show how pointless such attempts at creating an "assumed objectivity" are.
Every girl is different and for every girl there are different levels of "escalation". For some, anal isn't something really spectacular. Anal only for sure isn't something spectacular. Why should a girl see anal-only more extreme or hard or anything than DP? That's like saying that slapping a girl only on one cheek was harder than slapping her on both cheeks, you know.
Don't get me wrong, if you prefer anal-only and if that's the stuff that gets you going, good for you. But it's not harder than DP in any sense of the word and there's no "Premier League" of girls how shoot anal-only. Every girl who does anal sex can do that, it doesn't need any escalation for her to do that. DP and DAP might be other beasts and clearly something like DAP combined with pussy or DVP + anal is the "real" Champions League.
And when we actually want to go down the escalation thing we might end up with Perverted Family. Pretty funny though that Anna DeVille seems to have no real issues to shoot both anal and vaginal sex for that stuff...
TheVulture wrote:Others can make up their mind but really I think you're making an argument to suit your tastes rather than one based on hard evidence and common sense.
Not sure what you're getting at with the Perverted Family thing. That has nothing to do with this debate as far as I can tell. I have only been discussing porn star hierarchy (as I see it) in terms of actual sex acts and their hardness.
crash.mjf wrote:Don't you see the irony? You were the one bringing up this pointless "hierarchy" stuff, not me. I don't make an argument, I just refute yours because there simply is no hard evidence for your opinion on the topic. Like I said, this "hierarchy" is totally subjective, first to the girl actually producing it and second to the individual watching it. In my books DP is kind of "harder" than anal-only and in you books it's the other way round. That's fine, everyone's different and there are reasons to be found for both views, based on personal preference, personal experiences and personal attitude. The fact that you don't see how the Perverted Family thing fits into this dicussion shows me though that it's indeed you who doesn't understand that this is a purely artificial and pointless discussion.
TheVulture wrote:crash.mjf wrote:Don't you see the irony? You were the one bringing up this pointless "hierarchy" stuff, not me. I don't make an argument, I just refute yours because there simply is no hard evidence for your opinion on the topic. Like I said, this "hierarchy" is totally subjective, first to the girl actually producing it and second to the individual watching it. In my books DP is kind of "harder" than anal-only and in you books it's the other way round. That's fine, everyone's different and there are reasons to be found for both views, based on personal preference, personal experiences and personal attitude. The fact that you don't see how the Perverted Family thing fits into this dicussion shows me though that it's indeed you who doesn't understand that this is a purely artificial and pointless discussion.
It's not pointless, because your original point was that there is no justification for 0% pussy. "All holes should be used" and that. I'm making the point that IMHO the justification for 0% pussy is that it is more hardcore than including pussy fucking. You don't have to agree with that but it isn't pointless. It's exactly as valid a position as yours and people can make up their own minds.
I don't even know what Perverted Family is but I'm guessing some hideous incest thing that I would never go anywhere near. That is pointless here, because we're not discussing that. How does a very edgy/taboo/essentially illegal theme fit in with a (subjective) hierarchy of the actual sex acts being performed? It doesn't so there was basically no point to it within this thread.
You don't have to agree with me and I don't expect you to but it's pretty poor form to suggest that someone's position is "pointless" when it's very much within the parameters of what is being discussed.
crash.mjf wrote:The whole discussion about your "hierarchy" of whatever whatever is pointless, not your position on what you like or don't like. You said it yourself, it's subjective and so it IS ultimately pointless.
People are so easily insulted these days for no reason at all, sigh...
And maybe you shouldn't talk about stuff you don't even know. Just say that you don't know it. So who's using poor form here? Me, who just thinks that the whole discussion was pointless in the end or you, who makes ridiculous assumptions about stuff you know absolutely nothing about?
Well, you can answer the question to yourself since it's pretty obvious. Apart from that, this conversation leads nowhere so we should leave it at that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests