Best Current Looking Pornstars Right Now?

[paulyshoresituation]

I use to love watching porn a while back because the women were gorgeous back then. By that, i mean specifically the private girls. To me Suzie Diamond is the best looking pornstar of all time. Nobody in porn i seen has even come close to her in terms of her looks. She has the best looking face i ever seen in porn. She has like the perfect body, round ass, small perfect breasts. And look at her legs. Also she is damn tall 5'11 like a supermodel. But not only that, she done lot of porn videos as well and she is damn gorgeous in almost all of them.



Another favorite pornstar of mine was Lucy Lee. Lucy Lee is just as gorgeous. If i had to rate them, suzie is 10/10. Lucy Lee would be 9.5/10 or 9/10 at the worst. She just looks so damn natural. And not only that, she seem to be very friendly as well if you look at her scenes. Another good looking pornstar is Anna Lacey Priscilla Russian. She to me is either the 2nd or 3rd best looking pornstar of all time. Its close between her and Lucy Lee and I think i pick Anna Lacey. When she has the blonde hair, she is gorgeous. She is easily 9.5/10. She is thin and had gorgeous face/body.



I still watch porn now but the girls that has been active or show up now or after suzie and lucy lee stopped doing porn... none of them even come close to suzie or lucy lee looks. Does anyone else agree on this? I mean i dont think anyone would come close to the private girls from the 2000s. Then you had other very good looking pornstars like bambi and nataly barbora etc.



When i look at porn now, very few girls make me go wow.



If you were to ask me who are the best looking current pornstars now... i think my list would be something like this



Vinna Reed

Freya Dee

Rebecca Volpetti



And i have a tough time naming many other girls because i don't think they are anywhere close to suzie or lucy lee. I mean the Maria Tara girl is damn gorgeous... she is easily 9.5/10. But the thing is she doesn't do porn but really nudes only. Rebecca is look good looking but she is cute.. not gorgeous.



Does anyone else feel this way? I mean someone mentioned Mina. I mean she is cute at best... she is not higher than a 7 to me out of a 10.



Also if any of you are familiar with premiumbukkake, they had some really hot girls in it a while back. 2 of the best looking girls in it was Kira and Monro. Now these girls don't do porn but when i saw their videos, i thought these has got to be 2 of the best looking women i ever seen in a porn video though it was blowjob and bukkake etc. So they don't count because they aren't active pornstars.



But which girls would you put right now as in your top current best looking pornstars now? I honestly don't find the girls to be even that good looking or close to what was the private girls from back then.

[IndyPleco]

Sounds to me like you're just stuck in one type, and that's fine, but it doesn't help when you ask a predominantly subjective question.

I can't help you with examples if you think Mina is "cute at best".

[paulyshoresituation]

What would you rate mina? I mean she to me is cute... but not gorgeous. I mean if she was in the private era and when girls like suzie and lucy lee was doing porn... don't you think she would not be talked much at all?


Also many of the girls now, they look way too girlish etc. I mean when you look at suzie and lucy lee, these girls look like women. They look like damn supermodels. Also what shocks me more is suzie and lucy lee when they were in their prime in porn were like 22-24 or so and they stopped porn really young. The girls you see at that age now, they look like young girls.


I mean could you imagine suzie and lucy lee back in the 2000s if they were to get into porn right now and they were the same age back then and was now? You don't think they would easily be top 3 best looking current pornstars now? It would be like them 2 girls top 2 or 3 and everyone else like mina etc much behind where the gap would be so huge. To me very few girls now or recent come close to them in terms of looks. Vinna Reed is damn good looking... easily 9/10. Freya dee i found out not long ago, she is very good looking but you know what made me find her very attractive? I found out she is also slovakian like suzie diamond. I could see a little of suzie diamond in freya dee. I mean back then the girls were gorgeous. I mean look at julia taylor. Or nataly barbora. Which girls now even compare to them? Even the American girls who im not a huge fan of... i would rate them better looking than the current talent right now and i rarely have american girls in my top 10 or 20 best looking pornstars of all time. Example, katie jordin i find very good looking... she is better looking than 95% minimum of the current pornstars now in terms of looks.

[Wotan29]

Easy to say:
Haley Reed

(But probably not your type of girl.)

[mydirtydigs151]

I am of surprised by whom I find attractive in porn, so I can't even begin to pick the 'best looking' due to my extreme eclectic tastes.

Some of my most attractive females don't do harder porn, but can have intense ride'um cowgirl scenes, others aren't pretty but have oddly attractive faces and body types I like. Some are just different, but are sexually talented.
I can't even pick a preferred eye colour because piercing icy-blue/grey are just as captivating to me as eyes that are so dark, they appear black.
I like disposition, sophistication, female bi-sexuality, modesty, sesuality, trashiness, kink and exoticness. Intelligent, wanting and penetrating eyes. Innocence, plain-janes, pixies, punks, rockers, hippies, gypsies, country bumpkins, witches and can even be captivated by physical androgeny.
I like thin/lithe fine-boned, to fit & fleshy heavy-set bodies with room to grow. Milky white paleness to the darkest ebony skin, Beurettes and all the mulatto in-between. Medium-rare to medium-well steak. White girls that look exotic and exotic girls that look white (if ya get my drift). Flat-chested titties, to natural jugs proportional to the body and even the occassional fake rack. Perky, hard nipples, a clit that pokes out, girls who can put their feet behind their head, visible contracting-orgasms and that natural thing which shines through porn make-up.
I grew up with 70's Swedish Erotica porn when bare was rare, so I don't mind when there's some hair down there. Pudgy muffins, tantalizing twats, quivering quim, slick slits, spicy tacos, fortune cookie, almond joy and bare beavers; I am fixated by the female perineum.

I can't even "Weird Science" all of what I like together to represent my ultimate female objectification in one model; which would be easier to find in the soft-core Hegre-type genre, and if we subtract all the sexual acts that influence and impede judgement, such as Anal and DP friendly, taking pleasure in and being talented at polishing the knob, isn't sperm shy, enjoys finishing the job and/or any kind of fetish that a person needs to get off....it makes the task more difficult to pick, when every porn woman I dig evokes a life-partner fantasy.

As far as hard-core porn models go, I have to make a list:
(Gypsies) Katty West, Shrima Malati, Cherry Kiss, Hime Marie, Lilu Moon, Stephanie Moon, Anita Bellini, Dellai Twins, Arwen Gold,
(Volumptuous Vixens) Angela White, Valentina Nappi, Francesca DiCaprio, Ella Knox, Riley Nixon, Lena Paul, Penny Pax, Angel Wicky
(Dames) Rebecca Lord, Lauren Phillips, Lyna Cypher, Texas Patti, Florane Russell, Joanna Angel, Tina Kay
(Girl Next-door) Haley Reed, Kristen Scott, Rebel Lynn, Sophia Grace, Annabel Redd, Anastasia Rose, Keira Croft, Whitnry wright, Alexis Crystal (as [retro] Anouk)
(Plain-Janes) Nataly Porkman, Charity Crawford, Claudia Mac, Blue Angel, Angel Piaff, Nicole Love, Selvaggia, Lina Luxa, Vienna Rose
(Punks, Pixies and Rockers) Anna de Ville, Bonnie Rotten, Charlotte Sartre, Lilly Lit/Ford, Kennedy Kressler, Lydia Black, Kacie Castle, Nikki Hearts, Leigh Raven, Luna Lovely, Lola Fae, Mary Solaris, Black Angel
(Witchery) Bree Daniels, Alex Harper, Alexa Nova, Arietta Adams, Maya Kendrick, Cayenne Klein, Jia Lissa
(Not so Innocent) Tera Link, Pinky Breeze, Nikki Hill, Mina, Harmony Wonders, Luna Rival, Cindy Shine
(Spice) Yasmeena Ali, Saya Song, London Keyes, Veronica Leal, Ella Cruz, Gina Valentina, Sara Luvv, Lilly Hall, Jureka Del Mar, Saritha
(Mocha) Ana Foxxx, Kira Noir, Noemie Bilas, Chanell Heart, Anya Ivy
(Oddly) Anna Bell Peaks, Tigerr Benson, Kizzy Six, Violet Monroe, Sasha Colibri, Ciara Riviera, Lexi Fox/Vera King, Holly Hendrix
(Eurasia/Russia/Far-east) Far too many to list
(Solo and Sappho-centric) Many surprising gems to be found down-under at AbbyWinters, GirlsOutWest, etc.

From the Archives:
(Recently Missed) Yhivi, Remy Lacroix, Angel Smalls, Skin Diamond, Jodi Taylor, Claire Robbins, Annika Albrite, Keisha Grey, Sadie Pop, Ivy Wolfe, Anna Taylor, Belle Claire, Henessy, Linda Sweet, Afina Kisser, Kira Roller, Sheena Shaw, Taissia Shanti,
(Teencore/Sinplex etc) Alanova, April, Aspen Richardsen, Bailey, Coral, Keri, Lanny, Logan, Myranda, Sandra, Shyla, Sweet Lana, Little Rita, Nicoline/Yiki/Song
(Gone Too Long) Sasha Grey, Taylor Rain, Belladonna, Allison Pierce, Brooke Valentine, Jenna Haze, Jessie Andrews, Gigi Rivera, Aurora Snow, Audrey Lee, Avril Hall, Chanel Chavez, Gauge, Trinity Post, Sativa Rose, Shy Love, Chastity Lynn, Bobbi Star, Beata Undine, Aliz/Liz Valery, Sindy Vega, Aimee Ryan, Marina Visconti
(Dusty Archives) Kathy Heart, Michelle Wild, Julia Channel, Monic, Vanessa Chase, Anette Schwartze, Alisha Klass, Melissa Hill, Taylor St. Claire, Keisha, Tiffany Mynx, Angelica Bella, Zara Whites
(Magma/Teeny Exzesse/Classic Private) Far too many
(The Golden Age) Veronica Hart, Loni Sanders, Kelly Nichols, Serena, Hypatia Lee, Linda Wong, Christy Canyon, Little Oral Annie, Angel Kelly, Ebony Eyes
(Gone but not forgotten) Rebecca Linares, Nicole Clitman, Karen Lancaume

But right now, If I absolutely had to settle for one, I'll pick Katty West and all the rest can be her lovers that she brings home to share with me

[Jocke]

Wow!
I love them all too!
What are missing in the list are some beauties of late:

Kyler Quinn (absolutely lovely and cute)
Naomi Swann (stunning beauty)
Emily Willis (naughty as hell)
Nia Nacci (a body to die for)
Alexis Tae (what a smile and what a body)
Vina Sky (ready to please)
Kenzie Reeves (great piss scene with Hookup)
and more...

[avanfurwet]

(Plain-Janes) Nataly Porkman, Charity Crawford, Claudia Mac, Blue Angel, Angel Piaff, Nicole Love, Selvaggia, Lina Luxa, Vienna Rose

Seriously? What the fuck is wrong with you? Would you say that to her face? Or just while hiding behind an anonymous username, in a forum post which she might possibly see or have somebody send to her to try to hurt her?

Anyway, I think all the girls on your plain-janes list are fine, and some are classic beauties so WTAF were you thinking.

Every girl will have her admirers.

It's absolutely fine to post compliments about who you personally admire. There is no objective standard. Everybody's tastes vary. And porn isn't a fucking beauty contest.

[Iddaoeeok]

Angel Piaff a plain Jane?!?!?! Crazy!

[Jocke]

"Plain Jane" has many interpretations. One is someone who doesn't stand out in terms of dressing or being weird or different. I didn't take it as a negative comment since it is part of a list of "best looking porn stars". If you want you could be offended by Gypsy, Punk or Witch too. I took it as someone without tattoos, implants, coloured hair etc.
mydirtydigs151 wrote a whole poem to praise the diversity of women. I think you need to read his post again.

[Iddaoeeok]

"Plain Jane" has many interpretations. One is someone who doesn't stand out in terms of dressing or being weird or different. I didn't take it as a negative comment since it is part of a list of "best looking porn stars". If you want you could be offended by Gypsy, Punk or Witch too. I took it as someone without tattoos, implants, coloured hair etc.
mydirtydigs151 wrote a whole poem to praise the diversity of women. I think you need to read his post again.

Angel Piaff, Claudia Mac, Blue Angel and Nicole Love all have tattoos, so bang goes that theory.

[Jocke]

After having reread mydirtydigs151 post, do you honestly think it is not written as praise to the diversity of women?

[magizi877]

This is the kind of thread that requires pictures.

[Iddaoeeok]

... yes let's see some of those Plain Janes!

[Iddaoeeok]

After having reread mydirtydigs151 post, do you honestly think it is not written as praise to the diversity of women?

No, I'm questioning his use of the term Plain Jane, which, by the way, does not have many interpretations. There are certainly women who are not especially pretty or beautiful and could be descibed as 'plain' but who nonetheless are extremely attractive but I don't think Angel Piaff or Blue Angel, to name but two, belong in that category! He's ran out of descriptions for some of the girls, so he's invented some that don't make sense to anyone but him - I mean, what's the difference between Girl Next Door and Plain Jane? (By the way, I've just noticed that he put Alexis Crystal in the Girl Next-door category, too )

[avanfurwet]

"Plain Jane" has many interpretations. One is someone who doesn't stand out in terms of dressing or being weird or different. I didn't take it as a negative comment since it is part of a list of "best looking porn stars". If you want you could be offended by Gypsy, Punk or Witch too. I took it as someone without tattoos, implants, coloured hair etc.
mydirtydigs151 wrote a whole poem to praise the diversity of women. I think you need to read his post again.

Just maybe he meant something like vanilla in the context of his very odd personal categorisations. (Although I'm not buying it.)

So I'll pull my neck in.
A bit.

Because I still think if you call a young woman "plain jane" then she only ever hears "ugly betty" and that conversation ends badly.

And the girls he called "plain janes" are such a silly assortment, including some I who think are world-class beauties, that it just proves how pointless and degrading it is to try publicly to evaluate and categorise women.
There won't be any consensus and if there was then that would be even more depressing. They're different women with their own looks, personalities and feelings, not cattle to be classified and graded.

I think we should just celebrate and cheer for our own favourites, and not post mean or thoughtless comments about any girls.

Or place them in dumb "categories" which they might find hurtful or offensive if some little bitch decides to repost it on a girl's [spam] account.

This thread is becoming depressing. Should be a celebration of different beauties.

Guess I didn't pull my neck in far after all.
I'm done here. Hope others can post more uplifting content.

[paulyshoresituation]

So nobody finds Vinna Reed or Freya Dee to be one of the best current looking pornstars now?

[mydirtydigs151]

I think people are missing the context: The lists aren't specifically about the women themselves, it's about aspects of them as the "Weird Science" movie reference alluded to. The entire list makes up my ultimate single female. and not a challenge to others' perceptions.
Also, they are related to MY personal fantasy!
Instead of criticizing, show your own list...I would probably find everyone's list agreeable.
Attractiveness is not just about pleasing aesthetics, If one is compelled at look at and can't look away from the ugliest thing in existence, then that is the very definition of attractive.

Of course some placements don't quite fit the pop-culture's definition and could have easily created/placed some in different categories, And some of it is because of personality, more subjective than objective.
Also, the list was made in context that I had never been exposed to a hard sex scene, imagining all make-up and glam stripped away, living in abject poverty .... I also wrote, then reduced the lists by 2/3s.

Not all of them are my A-list stars by any means, but the lists are a generalization, trying to find a middle ground.
If Angela White became cottage-cheese obese, then aside from her sexual skills and appetite, only her pussy and head would be on the list. She's 100% a yes girl for me the way she currently is and not someone I would normally want to be with, but I like her stature.
I first noticed her when she was less fit, modelling for Abbywinters. If I was in a relationship and in love with her, I doubt I would be bothered if she put on too many pounds. So no this isn't anything like treating like cattle. It's just frankness.
I wish Lilly Lit/Ford had the sensuality and went as far as Angela does. Lilly Lit could have easily been in the plain-janes/G-N-Ds. but she is quite petite.

Plain-jane comes with highest regards from me, are more serious looking and usually comes with a natural beauty with little to no make-up are a bit more lady-like and yes, can have some Tattoos (though facial tattoos would cancel that). Someone I'd go camping with.
Blue Angel IS very plain, but that's her sex appeal and raw beauty.
Nataly Porkman's doe eyes are the only outstanding feature she has, very pretty face but her body sure isn't what I consider objectively 'perfect'...far from it, but I like everything about her...alot!
Old school reference: Cinderella is a Plain-Jane. Plain-Janes can transform into surprising Glamourous beauty, but are mostly modest in their disposition and by no means lack sophistication. The plain-jane has got your back without you even knowing it, she doesn't say 'here I am!'. And ya, sometimes they are even good looking or pretty, but that's also the underlining beauty that can be quite captivating.
Are Angel, Claudia and Alexis plain in their total asthetics?..far from no; they share many similarities with Charity to whom no one questioned. Pinky Breeze is plain, some might even consider her homely, but she's very exotic.
So Angel Piaff and Claudia Mac are naturally plainly beautiful in a rugged sort of way and hence not in my girl-next-door list.
And if people read closely:
I pointed out Alexis Crystal when she was called ANOUK, which was at the start of her career, though currently, she is quite chiseled like Claudia, now that the baby-fat is gone. All three could be Gypsies or the Girl-next-door, but too much make-up would take away from their looks... and everyone on the lists are bewitching, so I made the witches all 'redheads' just because.

Girl-next-door are softer looking and are the ones that would have the freckles, wear cut-off jeans, a little jelly-belly and look like their personality is more 'up' and spunky than the more serious plain-jane, but also more reckless. Should I have called them Country Bumpkins?
I'm sure that would have offended someone. I'm not from the South U.S., so it's a endearing pet-name to me.
The Dukes of Hazzard were 'Bumpkins' and not in the derogatory way. Mina is a pretty-plain-girl-next-door-type, but likes to bite her lip, so not so innocent...dig?

Gypsies....if you can't imagine them dressed in flowing layered skirts, while singing and dancing to music played around a fire etc., then I don't know....
Valentina Nappi is totally a qypsy sorceress.

Interesting that my (oddly) list wasn't questioned.
Holly of course is a Pixie/punk and has an exoticness to her that would easily fit into qypsy, her oddness is plainly obviously attractive.

Why are Mary Solaris & Black Angel included in my Pixies and Punk/Rockers?
Well it isn't because of their mind-blowing, angelic looks. If ya'll got the gist of that, then it all should have been a no-brainer.
Lola Fae is very photogenic, skanky, odd and not what I would call pretty, nor is she homely. But there is something about her that I'd like to have in a partner, and not because she looks wicked, having her tiny body, filled airtight...
Charlotte role-plays trash, but her disposition comes across in a ladylike/sophisticated manner and I think Lydia is a plainly pretty, kinky, girl next-door. Lydia and Katty have the same kind of dark gypsy/Egyptian 'thing' about them.
All three are similar, their goth looks and body types visually turn me on...that's quite a contrast compared to how attractive I find Francesca DiCaprio.
It's not about the tattoos or piercing per-say.

I could have made more lists, but that is wrapped up in the archives list, and, now I'm glad I didn't add my Butterface to it.. Perhaps my flaw seems, was to not be more specific: like using body types/hair/eye shape/mouth/hair/nipple size/aureola shades/pussy lip length/36'B verses 32"C cup breasts.
However, I don't seem to have a fetish and yes, there are many more stunning women.
There are also a abundance of L.P. women that I could have highlighted like: Megan Venturi's bottom-heavy lithe body, Roxy Del's look, Brittany Bardot's constitution, Mika Bakhtiari's spunkiness, Mila Milan's raunchiness, Anita Blanche's androgeny, Elley's retro look, Polly Petrova's gaping holes and all the others people mentioned.
I wish I could have listed far more ethnics: Beurettes are the bomb, Hispanics I always want to like, The Blacks and Asians I dig, I dig... and I have an eye and appetite for Indian Women that aren't 'big'.
I also could have included chubby girls, like Proxy Paige and Annabel Redd, but the generalization would not have translated well, so insert Penny Pax.

If a woman or female star reads any of what I wrote as insulting or degrading, then that part of her personality/insecurity needs reflection upon by her. I don't think there is any chauvinism to what I wrote or how I wrote it.
I want to be able to find everyone beautiful, no matter what they look like and do my best to appreciate what they are given.
And no, I don't go around in real life checking needs to have boxes.
As I original mentioned, I am surprised more-often-than-not by whom I'm attracted to and sometimes she isn't the pretty one.
And a reminder: The lists aren't specifically about the women themselves, it's about aspects of them as the "Weird Science" movie reference alluded to. The entire list makes up my ultimate single female, which I can't even imagine and not a challenge to others' perceptions.

Anyway, It's easy for me to be long-winded, so apologies. the discourse is interesting.
Thank you to those who saw deeper into what I summarized.
Cheers!

[avanfurwet]

Blue Angel, "very plain".

Angel Piaff, "rugged".

Should have gone to Specsavers.

[mydirtydigs151]

@ avanfurwet

You know, I can handle constructive criticism, which is something to which you clearly have no skill in.
Perhaps going out and picking up a Thesaurus would help.

[DoubleOrNothing]

The most underrated LP model of all time.

[avanfurwet]

@ avanfurwet

You know, I can handle constructive criticism, which is something to which you clearly have no skill in.
Perhaps going out and picking up a Thesaurus would help.

OK, this is Angel ...

angel piaff.jpg (37.97 KiB) Viewed 20839 times

And you said she is ...

Something in this picture is rugged ...

I understand you're just trying to be enthusiastic about your opinions; but seriously, who calls a girl "rugged"?

This thread deserves better than a petty bitch-fight, so I'll fuck off now. Hope others can contribute more positively.

Peace.

[Jocke]

I wouldn't call her rugged, but she is an actor and definitely can show different character traits. I just love this photo as much as the cute ones. Actually I love the contrast between the nice girl look and the raw sex look. When nice girls do naughty things there is an extra tension to it.

About this photo. When I was a kid I was shocked to see dogs licking each others ass. As an adult I cannot see a picture like this not thinking that I would put my tongue in her gape if I got the chance. We are truly still animals!

[IndyPleco]

Jesus fucking christ, this thread devolved even quicker than I expected.

@mydirtydigs151, whoa calm down, Adonis, you're not exactly the wordsmith you think you are.

Of course you're entitled to an opinion (and you clearly have many about women), but don't claim shit like:

So no this isn't anything like treating like cattle.

And play all innocent while proceeding to call this woman's body "far from perfect":

Nataly Porkman

And then claim it's her fault if she gets offended.

[Jocke]

I don't understand the casting pics from Czech casting and I think this pic is the same. Any other pose looks better than this stupid straight pose. Are they using camera men without an eye for beauty? Is there any benefit in showing the girls like this?

[mydirtydigs151]

Plain-Jane



And let's try a comparison:
Having to choose, who is the Plain-Jane in these photos and who is the Girl-Next-Door?

[DoubleOrNothing]

I don't understand the casting pics from Czech casting and I think this pic is the same. Any other pose looks better than this stupid straight pose. Are they using camera men without an eye for beauty? Is there any benefit in showing the girls like this?

Yes. Ginebra has one of the most magnificent torsos ever. Like ever ever. The shape of her waist and hips and their ratio is incredible. A marvel for science. And in this picture you can see just how incredible.

Opposed to this



which is the the straight-up, straight-down body shape of a child.

[Iddaoeeok]

Plain-Jane

Yes, well done on finding some unflattering pictures of a girl to illustrate up some entirely arbitrary categories you dreamed up to describe her, what a genius. Face it, most of the descriptions you hung on these models were nonsensical anywhere but inside your skull - I mean, Anita Bellini Gypsy? What?

[bicraney]

I am of surprised by whom I find attractive in porn, so I can't even begin to pick the 'best looking' due to my extreme eclectic tastes.

I enjoyed your post. The classification system was thoughtful and amusing.

[paulyshoresituation]

So you don't consider freya dee or vinna reed to be one of the best current looking pornstars right now?

[mydirtydigs151]

So you don't consider freya dee or vinna reed to be one of the best current looking pornstars right now?

I'd be too shy to talk to Freya

Unless she regarded me like this:



Held my attention like this:



Because she is striking like this:



And I want her to know that she is absolutely lovely like this:

[Iddaoeeok]

We agree on something then!

[mydirtydigs151]

“How do I look to him?" she asked herself. She got up and brought a long mirror towards the window. She stood it on the floor against a chair. Then she sat down in front of it on the rug and, facing it, slowly opened her legs. The sight was enchanting. The skin was flawless, the vulva, roseate and full. She thought it was like the gum plant leaf with its secret milk that the pressure of the finger could bring out, the odorous moisture that came like the moisture of the sea shells. So was Venus born of the sea with this little kernel of salty honey in her, which only caresses could bring out of the hidden recesses of her body.”
― Anaïs Nin, Delta of Venus

[Mizar5]

there's a great photo above. looks like it was a photo shot on a boat ride going up a fjord.

that might make a great context for a porn scene. Fjord Fucking. I took a ride on a fjord in early October '89, when I camped in Flam, Norway and the next morning took off from the docks at Aurland, heading to Stalheim. Incredibly scenic. A wonder of the world. But cold as fuck. Wish I'd had some fjord fucking to warm me up that morning. That blond scandinavian piece of ass would've been perfect.

[paulyshoresituation]

Any new pornstars since my thread was created that could certainly fit this description? I dont know of the new pornstars that has been coming up but I can't imagine any new ones even being close to attractive as say Vinna Reed or Freya Dee now.

[netzerkaiser]

you're so passionate, thats cool. But where have you been past 3 months, before blitzing forum? I find that intriguing. I support you by the way.

[mydogziggy22]

What would you rate mina? I mean she to me is cute... but not gorgeous. I mean if she was in the private era and when girls like suzie and lucy lee was doing porn... don't you think she would not be talked much at all?


Also many of the girls now, they look way too girlish etc. I mean when you look at suzie and lucy lee, these girls look like women. They look like damn supermodels. Also what shocks me more is suzie and lucy lee when they were in their prime in porn were like 22-24 or so and they stopped porn really young. The girls you see at that age now, they look like young girls.


I mean could you imagine suzie and lucy lee back in the 2000s if they were to get into porn right now and they were the same age back then and was now? You don't think they would easily be top 3 best looking current pornstars now? It would be like them 2 girls top 2 or 3 and everyone else like mina etc much behind where the gap would be so huge. To me very few girls now or recent come close to them in terms of looks. Vinna Reed is damn good looking... easily 9/10. Freya dee i found out not long ago, she is very good looking but you know what made me find her very attractive? I found out she is also slovakian like suzie diamond. I could see a little of suzie diamond in freya dee. I mean back then the girls were gorgeous. I mean look at julia taylor. Or nataly barbora. Which girls now even compare to them? Even the American girls who im not a huge fan of... i would rate them better looking than the current talent right now and i rarely have american girls in my top 10 or 20 best looking pornstars of all time. Example, katie jordin i find very good looking... she is better looking than 95% minimum of the current pornstars now in terms of looks.

I agree, Katie Jordin was one of the best looking porn stars to me.

[Starrio]

You guys have this whole thing wrong because looks are important, but they can only get someone so far.

There is something about a top girl that is hard to put into words that goes beyond the physical.

Obviously they are attractive, or they wouldn't have a chance either, but more often than not, that's not the reason why they are top girls.

I'm pretty sure all of you guys see it because with your money you choose the top girls.

The ones that don't do 3 or 4 scenes, but instead they do 20+, 40+, 60+.

Obviously there are many other factors why a girl may only end up doing a couple scenes instead of 20+, but what I'm talking about is besides that.

If you look at the top girls, not just on the site, but on the industry overall, none of them look remotely the same, but they have that common denominator.

I'm a photographer, and for me the answer is not attitude, and it is not personality.

A good attitude, and a cool personality can definitely make any girl to be in 60+ scenes, easily, but even after that many scenes people would still not consider her a top girl.

Someone can probably say that if you mix attitude, personality, and looks, then you can be a top girl.

That's not true either.

The way I see it, what truly makes a top girl is not attitude, personality, or looks. Those things obviously help tremendously. They help so much that some probably won't even notice the difference between that, and what really counts, but they are not the answer.

Also if a girl has attitude, personality, and looks she can often end up developing that characteristic that makes a girl special, eventually.

In fact, most girls don't really have it at the beginning, but they had other things like looks, personality, or attitude, maybe not all of those, but at least one, and eventually they develop into something greater.

That something greater to me is self awareness. Self awareness is something you can see in a girl's eyes even if she is trying to put a show.

Self awareness is different than self conscious. So it is very important to not confuse the two.

Self conscious is basically having no confidence, so that's something completely different.

Self awareness is knowing you exist and that you have a point of view in the Universe that is unique to others, important for you, and irreplaceable for all.

This is very easy to see.

There are some not very physical attractive girls that have so much self awareness in the way I'm talking that her looks don't matter anymore, and they become instantly attractive.

Then there are those physically gorgeous girls that have all the perfect physical attributes, and yet, you look at these girls and you know they simply don't have that special thing.

You like them of course because of their looks, but you quickly forget about them and dismiss them because they don't seen that special after all.

A lot of newbie girls don't have developed that yet, but you can see the potential by just looking at them, and if you come back after some time, they have it, it is there.

It's pretty crazy how that works.

Some develop it more than others, and the ones that have more of it usually go on top.

If you combine that with looks, personality, and attitude, then you have something insane.

I have to say that attitude and self awareness are different. Attitude is more like disposition, or willingness. Self awareness is not that.

Also it is important to clarify that self awareness may sound like confidence, but it is not confidence either.

Confidence is more about how you respond to things, and how you carry yourself, or someone that just doesn't care, which is a form of confidence too.

Confidence is being fearless, and you can have fear, and still be self aware. Those are different things.

I honestly think confidence is one of the least important aspects that make a girl special. It can help for certain things, but not for everything.

Self awareness is something she can't fake, she either has it or she doesn't, but I believe all girls can develop it, but it is a lot harder for some.

[101mike101]

You guys have this whole thing wrong because looks are important, but they can only get someone so far.

There is something about a top girl that is hard to put into words that goes beyond the physical.

Obviously they are attractive, or they wouldn't have a chance either, but more often than not, that's not the reason why they are top girls....

I'd say that the most popular porn ladies are both good looking and they are good in bed with guys. All those other abstract things, such as attitude, character, self-awareness and so on you don't really know much about, until you see the hot chick meet hard dick.

If the lady meets her guys with open arms, open mouth, open pussy, and open ass. And she is hot on top of that. Then she is someone you want to see in a good anal and DP.

It's a mistake to look at the ladies in isolation and try to figure out their personal qualities that make them popular with guys. Because a lot of it is in how these ladies interact with their guys and get them going with their big dicks between their sexy ass-cheeks.

The reason why good looks aren't enough by themselves is because in the real world outside of porn, most attractive ladies choose a guy or two and keep the rest at bay. So, these ladies look rejecting and unfriendly to most guys who try to make friends with them.

And that's why friendliness and good interaction with guys is so important for good-looking ladies in porn. The lady can still look unfriendly and rejecting, even when she is neutral in her interaction with guys. Because this is the default view guys develop of such ladies. So, the lady need to go out of her way to show some friendliness and goodwill towards the guys to make herself popular among porn-fans.

[Starrio]

I'd say that the most popular porn ladies are both good looking and they are good in bed with guys. All those other abstract things, such as attitude, character, self-awareness and so on you don't really know much about, until you see the hot chick meet hard dick.

If the lady meets her guys with open arms, open mouth, open pussy, and open ass. And she is hot on top of that. Then she is someone you want to see in a good anal and DP.

It's a mistake to look at the ladies in isolation and try to figure out their personal qualities that make them popular with guys. Because a lot of it is in how these ladies interact with their guys and get them going with their big dicks between their sexy ass-cheeks.

The reason why good looks aren't enough by themselves is because in the real world outside of porn, most attractive ladies choose a guy or two and keep the rest at bay. So, these ladies look rejecting and unfriendly to most guys who try to make friends with them.

And that's why friendliness and good interaction with guys is so important for good-looking ladies in porn. The lady can still look unfriendly and rejecting, even when she is neutral in her interaction with guys. Because this is the default view guys develop of such ladies. So, the lady need to go out of her way to show some friendliness and goodwill towards the guys to make herself popular among porn-fans.

Self awareness can be seen sometimes through a photo. A good photographer can try to fake it, but on video it's very hard to do this. You can instantly see it.

The way she fucks can definitely help a girl, but that takes time to see, while with self awareness most guys do an instant buy.

What happens is like I explained before, self awareness gets confused with looks because it can be seen in the way she looks.

It is abstract yes, but most people see.it, they are just not aware they are looking at it.

In fact, often the girl doesn't know she has this, it takes a good scouter to see this, but those guys work on music, and movies, never in porn, but a lot of porn girls have some of it, some others have too little.

A girl can be shy, inexperienced, and not even smart, but have that and people will see it, and they will get it.

I wish I could explain it, once you see it, you can't unseen it. It looks like a hole in their soul where by looking at her look, it gives you the sensation that you can connect, even if her mannerisms are telling you otherwise.

That's probably why a lot of costumers and directors hammer so much on the eye contact thing because it can be very powerful. Although if a girl has a lot of it, it is not even that necessary.

But yeah, like I mentioned earlier looks always help, no one is going to deny that, but without a level of self awareness it is easy to forget about those girls until they develop it.

Although like I said, there are exceptions. I have seen girls that are established, and I honestly don't see it, so they probably get there because of other things, but these are rare occurrences.

[101mike101]

....
But yeah, like I mentioned earlier looks always help, no one is going to deny that, but without a level of self awareness it is easy to forget about those girls until they develop it.

Although like I said, there are exceptions. I have seen girls that are established, and I honestly don't see it, so they probably get there because of other things, but these are rare occurrences.

I agree that self-awareness is important, but I think this is only half of what the lady needs to connect with guys in terms of feelings and emotions. The other half is awareness of the other, which is the guy or guys she is with.

It needs to be an I-You kind of thing, where she is aware of the other as much as she is aware of herself. And this kind of awareness of the other the lady can show in many different ways. It can be her eye-contact with the guy. It can be her talking to him. And it can be her grabbing, touching, or hugging him. But the more effective ways of the lady showing such awareness comes from a combination of two or more such things.

For example, the lady can be in a cowgirl DP with two or more guys taking turns inside her ass. So, the lady can look over her shoulder, make eye-contact with her next ass-guy, say to him "Now you!", then grab his cock to guide his pole inside her asshole, she might say "Come on. I need you in my ass.", and then she would react to his pole entering her asshole for the DP both verbally and non-verbally.

There is nothing mysterious about it. Basically it's the lady acknowledging the guy and interacting with him both verbally and non-verbally, instead of just staring at the wall and not even looking back to see which guy is now doing her DP.

The thing is, outside observers and viewers can't see or read the lady's mind. They can only see her non-verbal language and hear what she says. And it's from the things they see and hear that viewers infer the lady's feelings, self-awareness, and awareness of the other. So, this kind of thing any lady can practice and learn and become good at it. It's not some kind of natural inborn talent. It's just a way of behaving, which any lady can understand and learn.