Well, as much as we want to say all humans are equal, we can't deny objective reality
Here we go...
black studs simply look better fucking girls than us white dudes do, they generally have bigger dicks, and they look more like what a warrior would look like
#1 is your own opinion, #2 is not statistically true, and #3 is just a fucking weird thing to say. Like what a warrior would look like? What does that even mean? Dude, look at Charlie Mac. Jon Jon. Sean Michaels. Joachim Kessef. Oscar Batty. All great performers and nice guys, and I've met or spoken to most of them (except Oscar, wassup man I know u reading lol), but let's be honest, they do not look like warriors. No offense to those guys, but I can't see any of them charging a fort or snapping some dude's neck like General Butt Naked. That is
your racism projecting a primitive "feral man" archetype onto black men.
Alright, fine, let's talk about the race thing for a minute.
First of all, I'm not completely retarded. Let's just lead off with that. I do realize that racial differences are not limited to skin color, and I also realize that there are objective, measurable genetic deviations between whites and blacks (and Asians and Native Americans, et cetera) which cannot be ignored. Black people, for example, are far more prone to have sickle cell anemia, which began as a genetic mutation favored by natural selection because it protects against malaria. Black people have also been shown to have higher natural athletic ability. (
Yes, scientifically.) That's all true, and I acknowledge it and don't really care about treading lightly to avoid some "politically correct" bullshit.
But that's all very different from the stuff you're talking about. The existence of racial differences does not validate every single racist notion you have rattling around in your head by default, nor does it give you
carte blanche to project those notions onto other people. The image of the strong, well-endowed black warrior, whose untamed nature grants him primal sexual proficiency that women can't resist, comes straight out of the old "Mandingo" caricature from the days of slavery over 150 years ago. It's clearly racist, since it contrasts the base "primality" of black men against the civilized order of white men, which also implies that black men must be "tamed" like animals to adapt to our system, but will always retain some element of their animal nature no matter what you do. Don't even deny it, man. You know it, I know it, we all know it. Too often, the interracial genre feeds into this image, which is a big reason why everyone thinks "interracial" is a racist category and you now have websites like IAFD getting rid of it entirely. (It doesn't
have to be a racist category, and I don't personally have a problem with the label itself, but too often it is
used in a racist way and that's what I'm talking about here.)
Now before you say anything, this has nothing to do with BLM, SJWs, or any other three-letter movements pushed by three-letter organizations
*cough* allegedly *cough*. (That's a totally separate discussion anyway; I am not going to open the Pandora's Box of tension and political rage that BLM carries with it today. No discussions about communism or cultural Marxism here.) I've been talking about racism in porn, here and elsewhere, for years. Not very often, but on occasion... and I've been consistent in my views the entire time.
