Moderator: admin
Giorgio Grandi wrote:- Who is not supported from audience, unfortunately will not have more scenes.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:The point is to exploit new performer step by step.
- Who is not supported from audience, unfortunately will not have more scenes.
DPraved wrote:The models are the greatest determining factor for sales, and attempting to DAP all of the as soon as possible and then continue to only shoot DAP with them will only lead to many of them never returning at all.
DPraved wrote:This is not a discussion worth having, since neither one of us is objective on this matter.
I simply pointed out that your claim in the thread title was not supported by available data and it still isn't.
dap-addict wrote:edited the title.
Are you a DP fan than?
dap-addict wrote:Defensive posters are good for real analysis!
Gonzo DP sells fine because studio has other roots, long standing NHB history and other production priority.
GIO (GG) was actually able to sell a few DP from mid 2019, but only with exceptional girls and mainly BBC as you noticed. One thing I wanted to point to is that GLab customers buy like GIO customers and not gonzo ones. One could have thought that new Piter studio reaches more beyond GIO users but they seem not to.
You have the feeling you get too little DP really?
My suggestion was mainly sales based,since I realized GLab customers have same porn shopping habits like GIO users. Plus its really no problem to shoot anal and than soon directly DAP for GLab to get the girls accustomed to harder porn sex scenes step by step varying with number of studs, manhandle, bdsm and piss.
Problem may rather be on investment side for local directors cause DAP fee is of course much higher than DP fee.
DPraved wrote:What I take offence to is your constant arguing for nothing but DAP for the entire platform. Not all models will be comfortable with this, and even if you think it's OK to never see those girls again, there are many customers on this platform who would gladly buy other types of content with them.
dap-addict wrote:DPraved wrote:What I take offence to is your constant arguing for nothing but DAP for the entire platform. Not all models will be comfortable with this, and even if you think it's OK to never see those girls again, there are many customers on this platform who would gladly buy other types of content with them.
Read above and read my posts and you see you are probably just another poster misguided by my avatar.
Different studios have different core customer base, but me, too, like almost all of us, buy from different LP studios. I buy a lot of gonzo with lots of DP footage included actually and I buy a lot of 1on1 anal scenes.
I also made pretty clear that GLab rookies shot by Piter studios get a lot of lighter scenes for other studios, thus your "Do DAP or get out" seemingly driving girls out of porn makes no sense at all. Plus: Many girls ask them to shoot DAP with them and not the other way round. DAP fee payed in Russia is just too good compared to 1on1 anal or DP fee. Not only in Russia, btw.
Finally in terms of sustainability I really want all hardcore anal users happy here, but I do include also those who want DAP and not only those who want DP. Its always a mix, but please go and compare sex act sales performance of GIO/GL vs. gonzo. Its so obvious that these studios have different core production formats, while shooting for a wide range of users still.
And last but not least: Did I write already (here or in their model threads) how much I enjoyed watching Mia Sanders, Lagoona Blaze e.a. DPs? Its really not b/w, but we both have different core fetish needs, thats true.
Sweep11 wrote:Lobbying for any fetish is pretty pointless anyway. Only money talks in the end.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:^I vehemently disagree with your analysis but you knew that was going to be expected
Remember we can only tell that one scene sold more than another based on the position it holds on the list. We don't know the profits the scene made for the studio but I don't care about this as it is the studios business. What I do care about is the erroneous conclusion you came too. Based on the Giorgio's Lab bestseller scene positions the things that are evident to me from the 30 released scenes are:
- 1on1 scene are most profitable (8 of the Top 15)
- Piss scenes are a close 2nd (6 of the Top15)
- Freak stuff like Transvestites and Mother/Daughter are in Top10
- Nata Paradise, Sweetie Plum and Light Fairie continue to prove that models are important in scene selection and are demanded.
- Fetish doesn't always guarantee a scenes success or failure as the 5 worst performing scenes in July are ordered from worst sales described by content focus:
30. DAP / No Piss
29. DP / No Piss
28. 1on1 / No Piss
27. DP / No Piss
26. DP / Piss
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:^I vehemently disagree with your analysis but you knew that was going to be expected
Remember we can only tell that one scene sold more than another based on the position it holds on the list. We don't know the profits the scene made for the studio but I don't care about this as it is the studios business. What I do care about is the erroneous conclusion you came too. Based on the Giorgio's Lab bestseller scene positions the things that are evident to me from the 30 released scenes are:
[list=1]
[*] 1on1 scene are most profitable (8 of the Top 15)
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:[*] Fetish doesn't always guarantee a scenes success or failure as the 5 worst performing scenes in July are ordered from worst sales described by content focus:30. DAP / No Piss
[/list]
29. DP / No Piss
28. 1on1 / No Piss
27. DP / No Piss
26. DP / Piss
Giorgio Grandi wrote:- It does not matter if the DP gets maybe less sales than a bga, to shoot the DP is a way to have the girl performing harder stuff in future.
drevokocur66 wrote:dpconnoisseur1 wrote:^I vehemently disagree with your analysis but you knew that was going to be expected
Remember we can only tell that one scene sold more than another based on the position it holds on the list. We don't know the profits the scene made for the studio but I don't care about this as it is the studios business. What I do care about is the erroneous conclusion you came too. Based on the Giorgio's Lab bestseller scene positions the things that are evident to me from the 30 released scenes are:
[list=1]
[*] 1on1 scene are most profitable (8 of the Top 15)
Check your math, I count two in the top 15 in July 1 on 1.
10 out of top 15 are piss. Not that piss sells the entire scene, but a wet version will always outsell the dry version.
dap-addict wrote:dpconnoisseur1 wrote:[*] Fetish doesn't always guarantee a scenes success or failure as the 5 worst performing scenes in July are ordered from worst sales described by content focus:30. DAP / No Piss
[/list]
29. DP / No Piss
28. 1on1 / No Piss
27. DP / No Piss
26. DP / Piss
No piss here indicates that there is also a piss version except for the 1on1 in rank 28. Piss version always outsells non-piss version in case there are two. Its the same as in GIO and gonzo and IV. DP no-piss are again ranked last because also if you take 1st five ranks there you find no DP scenes at all, also no piss DP scenes. Juggle it around as you want, except for the girls mentioned above DP performs worst in sales. Exceptional girls DPs always sold also @ GIO and Giorgio Grandi also always mentioned that fact that DP sells only with exceptional girls.
Models in this care are important in scene selection, here you are right.
Also, if my OP analysis was completely wrong, why would Giorgio have answered this first?Giorgio Grandi wrote:- It does not matter if the DP gets maybe less sales than a bga, to shoot the DP is a way to have the girl performing harder stuff in future.
Thus so far DP low sales are calculated for a higher cause or for strategic long-term reasons.
I just pointed out to the fact that in this special Russian rookie setting, shooting DP isn't needed because local culture would allow an anal sex only step by step approach.
Finally as end users we have also to see this in context of comparably high GLab prices.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:No piss does not indicate that there is a piss version. I threw out all scenes from the analysis that had another lower purchased version which if included would bring the total scene count from July to 40 not 30 scenes.
avanfurwet wrote:Looking at Gio Labs scenes released in the month of July 2020 and sorted by popularity (sales) per screenshot:
I think that:
There are 5 1x1 scenes in the top 15.
There are 6 wet versions in the top 15.
So what?
We customers have no clue about profitability.
We have no clue about numbers of copies sold.
All we know is scene rank in a “popularity” list.
We don’t even know if published “popularity” is measured by numbers of copies sold, or by cash revenue generated.
The #1 scene may have generated just a few more copies (or Euros) in sales than the #2, or #3, or #15 scene, or it may have outsold them by many thousands.
We don’t know.
So I don’t think we can say DP doesn’t sell when it might sell almost as well as other acts, and might be quite profitable for what it costs to produce.
Just as we can’t say a model didn’t sell. Of course some models are more popular. But only Pornbox and the studios know her actual sales numbers and profitability relative to other comparable scenes.
In addition to developing models as GG wrote, I think DP can be popular with some fans who might not be in the market for endless DAP’s, and who might represent lost sales if they aren’t catered for. So I think it’s better to cater for those fans, and give the models some more paid work to develop their skills, and make some more sales.
DPraved wrote:Nata Paradise 4x1 is DP. Tags and title are wrong and misleading.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:I think I will write something to extract the results you presented in the 2nd screenshot @avanfurwet in JavsScript for my own practice. It has been a while since I coded in JavaScript.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Redoing the raw counts it is clear that DAP is most popular at Giorgio Lab in July and I agree with dap-addicts conclusion.
stratogustav wrote:Personally I like 1 on 1 and DP more than DAP.
The problem with DAP is that you don't want to imagine your own penis touching another penis.
What you do want to imagine or feel in your mind with the neurotransmitters activated by watching porn, are the walls of the girls rectum, and the tightness of her anus covering your dick, also your penis going deep inside feeling her inner insides, not other dude's dick rubbing on you.
That said, DAP can be fun sometimes because visually you can see the girl facial expression of feeling two dicks in her ass, but it is a more casual treat, not the main thing to go after.
If the girl is very attractive, looks clean, with minimum tattoos, or no tattoos at all, I usually end up getting all her videos anyway because of how good she looks.
I also wish they had Mike in Russia because those girls would definitely benefit from getting older black cock, but Mr. Anderson is fine, I prefer him over most performers any day.
magizi87 wrote:stratogustav wrote:The problem with DAP is that you don't want to imagine your own penis touching another penis.
This made me giggle, but also, YEAH.
dap-addict wrote:magizi87 wrote:stratogustav wrote:The problem with DAP is that you don't want to imagine your own penis touching another penis.
This made me giggle, but also, YEAH.
Neither do I, really not!
But who tells you you have to imagine that instead of fully concentrating on the girl?
Btw, I just watched a DAPbreakin' of a GLab girl who just couldn't perform DAP really even she had 2 DP scenes shot prior to her 1st DAP. They both sold soso, but may have rendered investment into that act at least. I hope so for GLab studio. GL199 just shows me step-by-step helps not much really if the girl has not the anal talent needed for DAP. It only may help her moving into right positions, which makes shooting process faster, which is good for all workers involved.
All I basically say is 1on1 > DP > DAP step-by-step approach doesnt really fit Russian culture and work ethics because girls will do on porn set what director asks them to do anyway. DP thus should be shot only if it can be sold fine really and this renders good profit due to girls exceptional beauty.
Position training can be done also with DAP scenes instead of DP scenes. Its better pay for girls, same investment into studs fees and all other costs are the same.
dap-addict wrote:GIO is shooting DP as a next step from 1on1 to DAPbreakin' when they doubt the girl can do it straight and calculation of lower sales still renders enough profits. Sugar Lya obviously didnt need that step. Shooting DAP always pays much better for the girl than much lower payed DP.
@avan: Russian rookies perform what directors ask them to perform on a porn set. Its another cultural setting. I simply dont see why sacrificing scarce shooting slots makes sense for an act selling worse and rendering less profits.
This said, for girls not planning to stay in porn more than 1 shooting session of 1-2 weeks its better to shoot 1on1, DP and DAP and not only 1on1 and DAP only of course. For the studio however it would make more sense to test the girls deeper waters fast. If she can't perform DAP that's it. No drama, but she can't work for GIO in Prague than and investment into her career makes no sense lest they find another co-oporating agency for her.
magizi87 wrote:What's the point of hardcore movies if I mentally block out the males, lol. Doesn't that become a softcore video?
avanfurwet wrote:Maybe it's true, but since you have an obvious partisan agenda, you cannot expect neutral readers to believe you without evidence.
avanfurwet wrote:Is shooting slots really the critical constraint? So they've scouted so many hot new models they don't have enough slots to shoot them all?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests