Rebecca Sharon 8on1 DAP - iv288

[dap-addict]

https://www.legalporno.com/watch/42080/rebecca_sharon_goes_balls_deep_double_anal_with_8_black_guys_iv288

If camera was the only IV problem I would definitely buy more of their scenes...
The main probblem IMO, and I haven't noticed any change for years, is the lack of passion and intensity : It always look like everybody, and especially the boys, are doing the bare minimum they're told for. Also they doesn't display any feeling at all. Maybe some people like it, but dor me sex isn't just dicks in holes... Even some Glamporn scenes are more captivating than IV to me.

Recently there is a betterment here. I noticed that now also anchor stud moves his dick in cgdap or cgdp. Before he just lay there and kept it in the girls orifice or made it look like usually. Now both studs move. At times they do fuck even quite fast.
This said there is still a lot to be done, but as Joachim wrote here, if you dont like it dont buy it.
I bought my IV288 for Rebaccas painted toes in those semi-torn black stockings, not the porn-sex action. But I'll watch them only while Rebecca gets DAP-ed at the same time of course.

My main reason to buy this scene: Rebeccas painted toes in half torn stockings while DAP-ed. (iv288)

Total body view, but so much from side I can't see her face really. (both official LP caps of iv288)

As stated above I got this scene mainly for that 1 fetish of mine, which I still wanted to be presented in DAP of course, and also to support Joachim Kessef now he started to talk to us.
And I dont regret buying IV288.
But...

[dap-addict]

...but:

Some of my fairly well based critic before I forget it:
Screencaps to illustrate come later!

What I liked:
- great styling of Rebecca
- her painted toes and same color fingernails
- both her fuckers moving in-and-out constantly, no lazy fucking
- no real wood problems, really 2 good fuckers, one of them Joachim, the other that black MCT gonzo stud.

BUT...
- so its a 8on1 BBC team but all the DAP-ing is done by exactly the same 2 guys, other 6 BBC are just statists getting bj but not fucking the girl neither in DP nor DAP. Whats that?
- its all in all 15min of DAP in 3 main positions (cg, rc, kok) but nothing else happens, just monotonous fucking, no interaction whatsoever with the girl, she could be a sex doll basically.
- camera almost never show DAP or any other insertions. Camera pins to girls face, than moves to her orifices and there bingo - its a DAP! WTF?
- camera work in general is a bit better again, its not only zoom to orifices > zoom to her face, but still too much of that style.

I can't describe that camera style well because I lack vocabulary, but camera position creates a strange cold, uninvolved feeling. Camera is either zooming in or distant total showing the 6 BBC statists queuing up to get bj while Joachim and Mac dap Rebecca. On Rebecca camera zoom to her ass, swiftly goes along her torso to zoom on her face and that back and forth, on and on. Its getting really boring, the more as noting happens, just DAP- ing (this very good, both dicks moving, no lazy fucking, bravo!) - but no additional action.

I'd change 2 things:
1. Cameramen has to get more involved. Sorry to say, but just watch others, watch how Luis does it, how Stefano did it, or also Giorgio and Andrey. Don't copy this style, but take the good, the feeling of being involved in your own style. Camera shouldn't be that cold and that distant, imho.
2. Crew fucking girl should get involved with her much more, fumbling, kissing, manhandling, whatsoever, but connect to the girl, dont just fuck her like a sex doll! Also why have so many BBC on set, but only 2 work really?


This is really meant only as is constructive criticism.
Finally let me assure, I had lots of fun with that scene because I hot Rebeccas nicely painted toes and feet in those slightly torn stockings while she got cgDAP-ed really fine!
But lets face it, thats a minor fetish, and to sell good girl must be presented in a good way and get involved, and fucking should involve also the user and not be 'cold'.

[dap-addict]

Btw, if you check the official LP screenshots you already see that camera style basically, but watching the film it gets more obvious of course.
https://www.legalporno.com/watch/42080/rebecca_sharon_goes_balls_deep_double_anal_with_8_black_guys_iv288/screenshots#screenshots

Also just let me say iv288 is performing really well in sales actually!
Sure a lot is due to Rebecca Sharon back after a long break.

[joachim-kessef]

I suggest you to take a look again there is any zoom
my camera man doesn't zoom
and boys are not experimented better to have them do blow job i assume that choice
that how i can justify my choice

[TheVulture]

Great work dap-addict. Sounds as though much like the recent Silvia Dellai and Kizzy Six IV scenes I'll find the camerawork very frustrating but like you still be able to take something from the scene. For this reason I may buy (as well as recent Lydia Black IV scene) with my next ticket allocation but I know that if it wasn't for the camerawork issue I would have reloaded and bought both already.

[TheVulture]

I suggest you to take a look again there is any zoom
my camera man doesn't zoom
and boys are not experimented better to have them do blow job i assume that choice
that how i can justify my choice

Joachim it's great that you're responding to these posts but how on Earth can you say that your cameraman doesn't zoom!!??

I haven't seen this scene but please take a look at the recent Silvia Dellai and Kizzy Six scenes, very large parts of which are filmed purely in close-up via zoom-ins and in fact where the camera often zooms from close-up to close-up (from penetration area to girl's face generally).

You need to fix this and I don't understand the denial. I have very many IV scenes and until these recent scenes this has never been a factor.

[joachim-kessef]

Hi
you just said you did watch those scenes
again about silvia and rebecca there are close up but it not zoom it not denial from my part that what we are talking about you want to give me lesson how to perform and how to shoot i mean you buy scene so you need to learn me right?

[dap-addict]

I suggest you to take a look again there is any zoom
my camera man doesn't zoom

Maybe its not zooming. As I wrote I dont know how camera work and dont have vocabulary.
BUT what is done is that picture jumps from close-up to girls ass to close up to her face constantly, kack and forth, with little total shots showing all her body and if there is a total than its so much from the side you can't see the girls face.
This style is very frustrating.
Also its so cold scenes.

[joachim-kessef]

if it close up and face that is not zoom ok during the scene we have something i dont want to speak about here because she was nice and anal not so clean but she is good so we edit that why it give that impression there is no zoom at all close up face yes but no zoom

[TheVulture]

dap-addict has explained it very well.

However, the reason I call it "zoom" is that with the Silvia and Kizzy scenes, within the context of all the close-ups there are some very fleeing profile shots (this is what dap-addict refers to as "total shots showing all her body") but what happens is rather than hold these shots for any decent length of time the cameraman, yes, zooms back in to one of the close-ups (either penetration area or face) and then begins the sequence dap-addict describes (which I suppose you could describe as "gliding" rather than "zooming").

So basically lots and lots of glide (across close-up areas), very definitely some zoom and very, very little profile (shots of the whole body), meaning it's impossible to really take in the action.

This is by no means the first time I've come across porn scenes filmed this way. I've been consuming porn for about 20 years and it always happens on occasion. The "glide" thing is a little different though, because usually with this type of frustrating scene it would be lots of cuts from close-up of penetration to close-up of face (Harmony was particularly bad with this a few years ago). But it has never happened with IV before, which is why it's so frustrating and is making me wary of buying more IV scenes.

[TheVulture]

"fleeting" profile shots I meant there, not fleeing.

*unable to edit post

[dap-addict]

dap-addict has explained it very well.
(...)
So basically lots and lots of glide (across close-up areas), very definitely some zoom and very, very little profile (shots of the whole body), meaning it's impossible to really take in the action.

This describes it maybe better, thanks Vulture.
Its very little profile shots of the girls whole body, sometimes camera is so fast moving from ass to her face I can't select girls body at all.
And even if I get a full body profile shot of the girl its shot with an angel that never lets me also see her face, her reaction to DAP fucking, Its really frustrating that way.

[dap-addict]

if it close up and face that is not zoom ok during the scene we have something i dont want to speak about here because she was nice and anal not so clean but she is good so we edit that why it give that impression there is no zoom at all close up face yes but no zoom

But, Joachim, it is not only once, but all the time like that.
And the problem we dont wanna speak about can have occurred only 1 time.
Please have a look again at this camera style!
Please take that serious, as it really creates a 'cold' and detached feeling and really makes it hard for the viewer to get immersed into hot action.
An this is not only case in this Rebecca scene and scenes shot around the same time, but I also noticed it in the all in all good+hot DAPbreakin' scene of Gisha Forza (iv225).

Maybe its such a style you want to keep, but as you noticed yourself it doesnt sell that good. Better cameraman could sell your scenes set with so much care better. I'd wish you that!

[joachim-kessef]

we will see

[dap-addict]

I'd change 2 things:
1. Cameramen has to get more involved. Sorry to say, but just watch others, watch how Luis does it, how Stefano did it, or also Giorgio and Andrey. Don't copy this style, but take the good, the feeling of being involved in your own style. Camera shouldn't be that cold and that distant, imho.
2. Crew fucking girl should get involved with her much more, fumbling, kissing, manhandling, whatsoever, but connect to the girl, dont just fuck her like a sex doll!
(...)
This is really meant only as is constructive criticism.
Finally let me assure, I had lots of fun with that scene because I hot Rebeccas nicely painted toes and feet in those slightly torn stockings while she got cgDAP-ed really fine!
But lets face it, thats a minor fetish, and to sell good girl must be presented in a good way and get involved, and fucking should involve also the user and not be 'cold'.

Let me some back to point 2 above: Studs getting really involved with the girl especially during double preparation.
Joachim, just have a look it this trailer to see what I am talking about, please: https://www.legalporno.com/watch/42475/balls_deep_dp_edition_2on1_mary_monroe_with_balls_deep_anal_dp_atm_facial_gio1017

And now my question: Why at IV it looks always so detached, so cold etc. ?

[joachim-kessef]

And now my question: Why at IV it looks always so detached, so cold etc. ?
what you mean cold?