mistress_cindy2008 wrote:you must feel very passionate about this issue to go to the long hours of clipping movies and making gifs
HwtOxc8K wrote:This is too robotic. Please do something about it!
dap-addict wrote:HwtOxc8K wrote:This is too robotic. Please do something about it!
+ 1
I especially really wanna see every anal/dap insertion you can possibly show.
It makes porn just so much hotter, not only with DAPbreakin' scenes!
Pissing wrote:Indeed, the girls going from 1 position to another position is very sexy.
dap-addict wrote:I especially really wanna see every anal/dap insertion you can possibly show.
It makes porn just so much hotter, not only with DAPbreakin' scenes!
magizi87 wrote:Hey guys and gals. Today I'm gonna review SZ1672 with the extremely beautiful Emily Thorne.
[url=https://www.legalporno.com/watch/32336/emily_thorne_anal_threesome_with_dap_dp_sz1672]
The real issue with this movie was the editing. I think XXX should kindly ask their editors to rework this one.
There is simply too many cuts between each position change. 13 cuts in total during the sex. The sex only last 25 minutes, that's also a negative.
On average there is a cut every 1 minute and 55 seconds. This makes the movie feel extremely choppy. It's annoying.
BTW there were not 13 different positions, there are cuts even within one same position. What is the editor doing?!
I'm pretty sure the editing it's outsourced. Because there are movies that are very fluid and some are butchered in pieces.
Also the watermark is always in a different place and sometimes says Gonzo and sometimes Legalporno.
Please work to make it consistent and better. Avoid cuts as much as possible.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests