Annie kitty

Moderators: aleksey_k, admin

nickelblack18
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 12:05 am
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby nickelblack18 » Thu Jul 31, 2025 3:20 am

I want to be honest. I really don't like the scenes that look forced. She looks very dissatisfied.

KZPTS
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2024 5:50 am
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby KZPTS » Thu Jul 31, 2025 4:34 am

nickelblack18 wrote:I want to be honest. I really don't like the scenes that look forced. She looks very dissatisfied.

You mean kind of r a p i n g feeling, or they are pretty good actors or maybe it's no actin at all, Lancelot should avoid make that kind of shots.

xxxVIPERxxx
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 14399
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:49 am
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby xxxVIPERxxx » Thu Jul 31, 2025 8:59 am

It's acting.

She will get used to it, and will enjoy it more with much more training.

jjwhite1985
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1819
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:32 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Annie Kitty - New colombian model

Postby jjwhite1985 » Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:08 am

latina-girls-yes wrote:obviously Lancelot and Natasha have no access to the pornbox system, so blaming them for what pornbox does with their trailers once they hand them over (along with the scene) doesn't make sense

Why are you so sure they're submitting the correct trailer to porn box? What makes even less sense is the theory you've come up with, since every other studio's trailers work fine and always have done... Add to this we already know that NTP/lancelot has a history of screwing up their releases by not submitting what they need to, odds are pretty good it's another issue in the studio end.

jjwhite1985
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1819
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:32 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Annie Kitty - New colombian model

Postby jjwhite1985 » Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:09 am

latina-girls-yes wrote:obviously Lancelot and Natasha have no access to the pornbox system, so blaming them for what pornbox does with their trailers once they hand them over (along with the scene) doesn't make sense

Why are you so sure they're submitting the correct trailer to porn box? What makes even less sense is the theory you've come up with, since every other studio's trailers work fine and always have done... Add to this we already know that NTP/lancelot has a history of screwing up their releases by not submitting what they need to, odds are pretty good it's another issue in the studio end.

User avatar
Kslvt
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 2344
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2022 12:25 pm
Location: ButtRose City
Karma: 0

Re: Annie Kitty - New colombian model

Postby Kslvt » Thu Jul 31, 2025 7:26 pm

cman00 wrote:Anal Annie is back with another fantastic scene and her first DAP! :cool: Gosh, I love this girl so much! :)
Annie Kitty DAP (1).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (2).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (3).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (4).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (5).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (6).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (7).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (8).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (9).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (10).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (11).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (12).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (13).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (14).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (15).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (16).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (17).jpg
Annie Kitty DAP (18).jpg



So f.cking hot ... MORE MORE MORE OF HER PLZ !!!!!!!!
BEURETTES ARE THE BEST ! PISS / PUKE / ROSES : THAT'S ALL WE LOVE !

suwasantoonnok1150
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:06 am
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby suwasantoonnok1150 » Thu Jul 31, 2025 7:59 pm

next try deep dap.

User avatar
latina-girls-yes
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2024 11:27 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Annie Kitty - New colombian model

Postby latina-girls-yes » Fri Aug 01, 2025 7:39 pm

jjwhite1985 wrote:
latina-girls-yes wrote:obviously Lancelot and Natasha have no access to the pornbox system, so blaming them for what pornbox does with their trailers once they hand them over (along with the scene) doesn't make sense

Why are you so sure they're submitting the correct trailer to porn box? What makes even less sense is the theory you've come up with, since every other studio's trailers work fine and always have done... Add to this we already know that NTP/lancelot has a history of screwing up their releases by not submitting what they need to, odds are pretty good it's another issue in the studio end.

re trailers:

i didn't say i was "sure", i said that my suggestion for why this trailer situation was happening was "a reasonable deduction, possibly being due..." etc

latina-girls-yes wrote:re cropped 30 seconds trailers v full ~2 minute trailers:

it seems to be the case that for an hour or so immediately after release, only the first 30 seconds of the official trailer is visible on pornbox and analvids. then in the following hours (~6 hours later) the full trailer can the be viewed (on the analvids site anyway, pornbox often takes longer to update)

the reason for this delay in the full trailer release (i presume, at least a reasonable deduction) possibly being due to a technical decision by pornbox, made in order to reduce the stress on their servers from so much content being downloaded (and so many trailers being viewed) within that inital hour after release (a ~2min 4K trailer at 60fps is ~500mb)

the studio always produces a full 4K trailers for their scenes (Adali Wood being only exception i can remember to this), so if people want to know why they are rolled out by pornbox as they are perhaps contact pornbox to ask them

obviously Lancelot and Natasha have no access to the pornbox system, so blaming them for what pornbox does with their trailers once they hand them over (along with the scene) doesn't make sense

i qualified my comment that way because none of us have any inside information from either party as to why this trailer situation is happening. it's one rational deduction that could be made, based on all the available evidence, and until i am presented with a better one (something you have failed to do) that's my hypothesis

re "NTP/lancelot has a history of screwing up their releases by not submitting what they need to":

if you are referring to scenes being delayed and/or temporarily pulled as a consequence of how pornbox handles paperwork issues, NTP/Lancelot has suffered from this as have a number of studios here. NRX, Erika Korti, Oscar at Mambo, and these are just complaints from content makers who also use the forum (most don't)

for example:

oscar re technical issues.png

and when problems affect those studios you empathise, say you are sympathetic them, and are unequivocal in your condemnation of "incompetent" pornbox for their "pornbox fuckery screwing everyone over"

nrx eks mambo technical issues at pornbox.png

and yet when there is a problem affecting anything to do with an NTP/Lancelot release, rather than pin the blame on "pornbox fuckery screwing everyone over" (as you do for every other studio), now it's suddenly all the studio's fault

jjwhite1985 wrote:we already know that NTP/lancelot has a history of screwing up their releases by not submitting what they need to, odds are pretty good it's another issue in the studio end.


and "none of the other studios seem to screw this up"

jessica scene technical issues at pornbox.png

there is no such thing as credibility without consistency, JJ. either the studios are to blame when things don't work, or it's "pornbox fuckery"

to say it's "pornbox fuckery" when it happens to studios you like, but it's the studio screwing things up when the same thing happens to a studio you don't like, is just prejudicial nonsense and not serious comment

i have no idea why you do this. if you don't like the studio that's fine, each to their own thing (and good luck in your search to find one you do like). but trolling the studio (perhaps because you are bored and annoyed that other studios are not releasing the content you want to see) is negative behaviour that achieves nothing
lucy mendez, daniela garcia, lenis diamond, sussy sweet, katia sweet
hot for 2025: andrea frank, annie kitty, viper juicy, sara taylor, dulce miller
natasha and lancelot make the xxx world go around

jjwhite1985
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1819
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:32 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby jjwhite1985 » Fri Aug 01, 2025 8:58 pm

latina-girls-yes, are you aware of how the passage of time works? You pulled a comment from November 2024, before it was clarified that the reason for pulled scenes was incomplete paperwork from the studios, in order to accuse me of hypocrisy for criticizing a studio now. Please be serious.

You also didn't make a "reasonable deduction", you made a dumbass one since NTP/lancelot are the *only* ones of the currently active major studios who can't seem to put a trailer on pornbox. How exactly did you manage to "deduce" that it's likely a pornbox issue from that information? Again, please be serious.

User avatar
latina-girls-yes
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2024 11:27 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby latina-girls-yes » Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:23 pm

back to Annie's latest scene, i thought it was another decent scene.

Annie looked as adorable as ever and - in terms of acts and content - being a dap scene it was obviously another increment above everything Annie has done before on the difficulty scale. so another opportunity for me to watch a model i am crazy about atm, and Annie's is able to tick that act off her list (and add it to her resume as a performer)

that said i'm not a big dap fan and tend to think that dap sections always takes more out of the scene than they add (they tend to slow the action right down to a slow grind and, especially with new performers, such sequnces often requires multiple attempts and changes of position to get a satisfying visual result)

but as we have had two 1-on-1's and a dp before this scene, i suppose it was something the studio was keen to attempt to appeal to those who love the dap thing (and hopefully they felt it ticked their boxes)

i also agree with someone else in this thread who said she seemed to be having difficulties in some sections of the scene. i'm not sure if they were referring to the dap bits (which i thought she coped really well with), but it seemed to me that those moments during the scene in which Annie didn't seem as comfortable in her performance as she usually is, seemed to coincide not with the dap bits but with the deep 1-on-1 anal sections later in the scene. which is curious, as in the three scenes prior to this one, Annie seems to have been entirely confident during the hard 1-on-1 anal parts

so it may be that hard 1-on-1 anal immediately following dap sections is something that causes Annie problems, or it may even be a case of Annie suffering a minor injury during that dap section that is not obvious to viewers, but affected her ability to do any intense anal from that point on. pure speculation of course, but a possible explanation as to why Annie seemed to struggle in some places during the final third of the scene

so if Annie is to shoot any further dap's perhaps that could be resolved by both putting the dap section at the end of the scene rather than in the middle, and being more gentle while Annie adjusts to what is quite a difficult act to accomplish for a new performer

but i liked the scene a lot so can definitely recommend it to all of Annie's fans, and also (obviously) to anyone who likes watching gorgeous women fucking as hard as they can


Annie Kitty -Lancelot Styles 07-29-25 1.png

Annie Kitty -Lancelot Styles 07-29-25 2.png

Annie Kitty -Lancelot Styles 07-29-25 3.png

Annie Kitty -Lancelot Styles 07-29-25 4.png

Annie Kitty -Lancelot Styles 07-29-25 5.png

Annie Kitty -Lancelot Styles 07-29-25 6.png

and this bit made me laugh. Annie is such a little trouper in the way she just laughs it off and gets straight back down to business. she's a star and she knows it
annie kitty tumble smaller.gif
annie kitty tumble smaller.gif (9.35 MiB) Viewed 169 times
lucy mendez, daniela garcia, lenis diamond, sussy sweet, katia sweet
hot for 2025: andrea frank, annie kitty, viper juicy, sara taylor, dulce miller
natasha and lancelot make the xxx world go around

User avatar
latina-girls-yes
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2024 11:27 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby latina-girls-yes » Fri Aug 01, 2025 10:24 pm

jjwhite1985 wrote:latina-girls-yes, are you aware of how the passage of time works? You pulled a comment from November 2024, before it was clarified that the reason for pulled scenes was incomplete paperwork from the studios, in order to accuse me of hypocrisy for criticizing a studio now.

8 months ago is hardly a century, JJ. history doesn't reset just because the things you said then get in the way of you making a consistent point now. but, you have it whichever way you like

and i look forward to the next time any studio other than NTP/Lancelot has trouble with a scene being held up for review, or being pulled, and seeing you immediately jump in to comment "we already know that Erika/NRX/Mambo etc has a history of screwing up their releases by not submitting what they need to, odds are pretty good it's another issue in the studio end". then you can shrug off your mantle of hyprocrisy... but not until then


jjwhite1985 wrote:How exactly did you manage to "deduce" that it's likely a pornbox issue from that information?

as i said in my original comment, my deduction was based on:

the fact that the scene is not available in it's entirely during peak demand (immediately at the hour of release) when there is maximum stress on the servers from users wanting to download scenes and watch trailers, but is available after a period of ~6 hours

and the fact that NTP/Lancelot trailers are 2 minutes long full 4K at 60fps, which add up to around ~500mb each (even bigger in some cases). neither Giorgio or AGO for example offer trailers in this definition, their trailers are FHD 1080p at best, and consequently are around a third of the size in mb of the NTP/Lancelot trailers

hence my proposition that the delay in pornbox posting the full length NTP/Lancelot trailers *may be* to do with size (ie. other studios trailers - being smaller - do not place the same demand on the servers at peak times and so get posted in full at those times)

do i know this to be exactly what is happening? no. it's the best theory i can think of to fit the available data
do you know that your ideas (that you seem to consider NTP/Lancelot to be uniquely incompetent in all things) explain what is happening? no

but I am at least proposing a reasonable mechanism by which such a circumstance could come about.

how are you explaining that fact that the 30 second trailer is not available at peak demand times, but available six hours later? are you suggesting the studio makes two trailers (a 30 second trailer and a ~ 2 minute trailer) for every single release, and asks pornbox to release one at midnight and the other at 6am? because they are incompetent (or something)?

come up with a more coherent scenario than that which i have proposed for the phenomena and i will give it my full consideration. but all i see at present by way of an alternative explanation is that it must all be NTP/Lancelot's fault because... you always think it is
lucy mendez, daniela garcia, lenis diamond, sussy sweet, katia sweet
hot for 2025: andrea frank, annie kitty, viper juicy, sara taylor, dulce miller
natasha and lancelot make the xxx world go around

jjwhite1985
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1819
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:32 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Annie kitty

Postby jjwhite1985 » Sat Aug 02, 2025 1:05 am

latina-girls-yes wrote:
jjwhite1985 wrote:latina-girls-yes, are you aware of how the passage of time works? You pulled a comment from November 2024, before it was clarified that the reason for pulled scenes was incomplete paperwork from the studios, in order to accuse me of hypocrisy for criticizing a studio now.

8 months ago is hardly a century, JJ. history doesn't reset just because the things you said then get in the way of you making a consistent point now. but, you have it whichever way you like

No, read my comment again. Nov 2024 was *before* it was publicized that the issue was to with studios not submitting the right documentation. Since then no other studio has been regularly affected by this. Generally when new info comes to light people change their position accordingly.

latina-girls-yes wrote:the fact that the scene is not available in it's entirely during peak demand (immediately at the hour of release) when there is maximum stress on the servers from users wanting to download scenes and watch trailers, but is available after a period of ~6 hours

What are you talking about. At the time I'm writing this, only 1 out of 20 lancelot scenes from the last month has a trailer on pornbox. And there's such huge demand on the servers that they can't post their trailers, but every other major studio has their trailers online and scenes available to download in 4k? So what, they're sabotaging NTP/lancelot specifically? Come on.

You display this almost neurotic need to defend one specific studio from any criticism, but the thing is you aren't doing them or their performers any favors by doing it. When they don't post trailers, mis-tag stuff, and screw up scene releases, they're only hurting their own sales and thereby success of the girls. If you have a genuine interest in these girls doing well then you should be more focused on feeding back to the studio when they screw up than rushing onto the forum to defend them as if they're paying you a commission to do it.

Previous

Return to Models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 111 guests