The Official PUSSY Fucking Campaign - Say "NO" to 0% Pussy!

[kuaheyden513]

So much time and effort starting this thread. Good luck vawkes!

every time during a shoot when a LP stud put his cock inside of a pussy HE wins.

[Vawkes]

Nobody likes the feeling of being left behind, just ask the pissing fans, that's what we feel when DP and other vaginal niches are absent for too long.

This is exactly the point. The intention is not to change LP/GG from being a mostly anal-fucking site, but just to stick a dick in the pussy too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there a reason why this topic was moved into the General Discussion forum?

The campaign was aimed at Giorgio's production, not LegalPorno as a whole.

[luvs2_wank]

As was noted elsewhere - a girl has three holes - they should be fucked hard and deep.



A problem with so much of the DAP/TAP etc is that its motionless tipfucking.

In reality this is an Anal site, it should feature in every scene, no-one will dispute that.

But there are girls who can do hard DAP - Isabella Clark, Proxy Paige etc - but there are a lot of girls who end up with 2 slow moving cocks in their ass. I'd rather see cocks in all holes pounding hard than motionless DAP tipfucking.

[dpconnoisseur1]

In porn yes, the same.
I <FF> all pussy fucking in porn since almsot 20 years.
More 0% pussy garanteed porn would be a big relief for me.

And, as probabely known by many here, I also dont tolerate pussy even touched by dick in 0% pussy/no pussy billed LP scenes.

I'm exactly the opposite, but I do make exception otherwise 0% Pussy scenes are a skipped. So less of them would be perfect for me as 95% of them IMHO are unwatchable. I commend the OP attempt with this thread but XXX already settled the argument. Here is the direct quote so the battle has been lost before it began.

For the record I don't like DAP. Directors shoot this stuff because that's what people buy. Ultimately customers vote with their money. I can assure you that producers and directors would prefer to shoot softer porn but forum comments don't pay the bills.

We also release plenty of non-DAP scenes, even some b/g but everyone talks about the DAP scenes, as if the others didn't exist.

So I just don't buy scenes labeled "0% Pussy", "100% Anal", "No Pussy" or "100% DAP". I think some members have become so jaded that they cannot get a rise from just seeing a beautiful woman and they are willing to skip every scene that does not meet there "0% Pussy" demand so that is all they buy skewing scene purchase numbers. The reason I say skewing is because I use to buy both "0% Pussy" and "Non 0% Pussy" because the model is the most important thing to me. This is why I make it a point now to skip "0% Pussy" scenes. Just like XXX stated, comments don't pay the bills. The only way I figured I could make my point is through purchasing only what I want to see and skipping the "0% Pussy" stuff. Even though I don't mind it with the right model occasionally.

[Kriss1986]

Damn! All you guys want to do is hate.

If you are not interested in seeing more pussy in scenes, then how about you restrict yourself from commenting in a topic about pussy, if you have no interest in it. Many of you have made your point perfectly clear, so leave it at that. I wouldn't repeatedly come into a pro-DAP topic to complain about the same thing and insult other members.

All you're doing is answering questions with questions. Your view is your view. Let me and others have ours.

The same as in 0% pussy scenes, pussy lovers spread hate? Do you see similarity?

[Kriss1986]

If a girl doenst perform anal she simply cant work for LP Prague. Basta!
(She can work for DDF Budapest, owned by LP now, though)

Some people just can't understand it... What do ?

[Vawkes]

What a beautiful sight. Would love to see more of this type of fucking.

So I just don't buy scenes labeled "0% Pussy", "100% Anal", "No Pussy" or "100% DAP". I think some members have become so jaded that they cannot get a rise from just seeing a beautiful woman and they are willing to skip every scene that does not meet there "0% Pussy" demand so that is all they buy skewing scene purchase numbers. The reason I say skewing is because I use to buy both "0% Pussy" and "Non 0% Pussy" because the model is the most important thing to me. This is why I make it a point now to skip "0% Pussy" scenes. Just like XXX stated, comments don't pay the bills. The only way I figured I could make my point is through purchasing only what I want to see and skipping the "0% Pussy" stuff. Even though I don't mind it with the right model occasionally.

I'm in complete agreement. I never expect LP or GG to change their style completely just to satisfied my preferences. The purpose of this campaign was to simply raise awareness that not everyone lusts for pure DAP and leaving a pussy untouched for an entire scene is just plain wrong. Unless it is with a top, top star, I will always skip 0% pussy scenes myself.

Again, this topic was started off in the Giorgio Grandi forum as it was focused at his recent wrong of releases. I feel Gonzo already produce a lot of DP (I just don't like their video quality compared to GG).

[kuaheyden513]

I like this thread, more pussy!

[geralt_]

Dunno. In porn I do prefer pussy fucking in the context of double vag, triple penetration. But dunno, some like all anal. Probably would say in porn pretty much anal is the best, but don't leave the pussy totally unattended to!

[DoubleOrNothing]

Chiquita Lopez's bbc dp examplifies what a dp fucking should look like. Not slow tip-fucking where only one cock is moving, but balls-deep simultaneous double piston action. The last part of the reverse cowgirl is legendary.

[drevokocur66]

Chiquita Lopez's bbc dp examplifies what a dp fucking should look like. Not slow tip-fucking where only one cock is moving, but balls-deep simultaneous double piston action. The last part of the reverse cowgirl is legendary.

+1 agree on that. Same goes for ass fucking. I can't stand the slow tip insertions. Also, there is nothing wrong with 0% Pussy series. Having the girl pumped in the ass like this the entire scene is also just as rewarding.

[Boshanks]

Despite the fact that I don't support these scenes with my wallet (unless it's one of my favourite models) I can't support this topic.

0% is a niche that has a fan base here, therefore it should be catered for.

If it got to the point where it was all that was on offer, I'd be the first to complain, but as it stands, I don't agree with attempts to get it removed.

[Vawkes]

The tagline of this topic may have been exaggerated somewhat. The intention was never really to have 0% Pussy removed altogether, simply to reduce it.

As I've already said. This topic was started in the 'Giorgio Grandi' forum to address his more recent scene releases, where pussy fucking was becoming very limited.

Great DP fucking GIFs posted above. That is exactly the way it should be done. I can't think of any studio in the industry who does DP fucking that good.

[Kriss1986]

The tagline of this topic may have been exaggerated somewhat. The intention was never really to have 0% Pussy removed altogether, simply to reduce it.

As I've already said. This topic was started in the 'Giorgio Grandi' forum to address his more recent scene releases, where pussy fucking was becoming very limited.

Great DP fucking GIFs posted above. That is exactly the way it should be done. I can't think of any studio in the industry who does DP fucking that good.

First of all - the title of this topic suggest to crusade against 0% pussy. You didn't used something like "more attention for pussy" or "reduce amount of anal action in GG scenes", no you didn't. You choosed other way and now you can see the results, from all dark nooks and crannies crept the ugliest trolls and started offend people. Second - topic isn't anymore linked to GG board, now it's in "General Discussion" and claims that most of all LP scenes are 0% pussy which is of course completely balooney. If we take LP as a whole, I mean all studios, 0% pussy "genere" is in significant minority. Third - LP is anal concentrated site so it shouldn't be surprise that ass is involved in almost each scene right? You like DP action, fine. Create "DP request" therad and I will suport it in contrast to this subject.

[vlatava393]

If a girl doenst perform anal she simply cant work for LP Prague. Basta!
(She can work for DDF Budapest, owned by LP now, though)

I know that DDF is owned by LP. And I had hoped there the same kind of Porn is made like with LP (3on1, 4on1 etc), but more focussed on Pussy, however is not in such a way.
et would be a chance to see others girls (who dont prefer) gangbang. But DDF has never changed also not after the takeover by LP.

[analsexonly]

More 100% anal, 0% pussy scenes, please. I won't buy a scene if it contains vaginal sex.

[Vawkes]

10on1 Gabriella Lati brought to her limit / GIO409

I was so excited to see the gorgeous Gabriella performing in a 10-on-1 gangbang for Giorgio, but, oh wait....

0% PUSSY! 10 cocks and not a single one entering the pussy. Oh come on FFS!!

In what way is this fair for fans who need pussy fucking. Would 5/10 minutes of DP fucking really have killed the scene for people?! This is just cruel.

0% Pussy = NO PURCHASE!

[analsexonly]

Yes, 5 to 10 minutes of DP would have killed the scene.

[dpconnoisseur1]

0% Pussy = NO PURCHASE!

+1, No one is listening and we are in the minority so I just don't buy them. Full disclosure except for fucking Crystal Greenvelle, she is my Kryptonite, just too beautiful! I even bought her intimacy scene No will power with Crystal I spend 90% of my tickets on Gonzo now and if IV ever fixes its tip fucking like they did in the Henessey scene I'll spend more there too!

[matnr1]

Yes, 5 to 10 minutes of DP would have killed the scene.

Cmon.. a DP scene should include at least 3-4 minutes of hard fucking without interruption. Anything else is what I call a waste of opportunity...

[IIdarksoulII]

Less circus, more diversity.

[ultimo]

Thanks for the show of support, people. It is pretty much what I expected initially.

You easily say "choose another site" if you like pussy so much, but it isn't that simple. Giorgio produces the best porn around. There is no one else who films gonzo styled porn with such intensity. Therefore, I can't choose another site with the same quality. The main issue here is that GG was regularly releasing scenes that had standard DP and pussy fucking in the past, with these always leading to DAP. Why can't GG continue releasing this variety of sex in his scenes to satisfy everyone?

Imagine all of a sudden GG stopped filming anal and DAP - I imagine a lot of you would be pissed off? Well imagine how I and others feel currently.

Completely agree with you. I used to be a frequent purchaser of scenes but that has fallen off a lot with all the 0% pussy and the DAP or TAP that has bombarded the releases.

[mistress_cindy2008]

When will you be starting the campaign at KFC to demand they sell hamburgers?

Man comes to site dedicated to anal sex, and demands vaginal sex. Perhaps I should go to the Brazzers forum and demand Triple Anal?

[luvs2_wank]

When will you be starting the campaign at KFC to demand they sell hamburgers?

Man comes to site dedicated to anal sex, and demands vaginal sex. Perhaps I should go to the Brazzers forum and demand Triple Anal?

Nobody is asking solely for vaginal sex. They just want to see the pussy fucked at the same time as the ass.

DP can be delivered harder than DAP for most of the performing girls on this site - I would always take a hard DP over tipfucking DAP anyday.

DAP is excellent when girls like Isabella Clark, Brittany Bardot, Arwen Gold, Linda Sweet etc are let loose - why? because they can take hard DAP.

For so many of the other girls it is clearly a difficult act - all we want to see are girls taken to their hardest balls deep fucking limit (like the recent Hennessy IV scene), not the limit of how many stationary cocks they can fit in their ass.

[analsexonly]

We don't want to see pussy involved at all. It ruins the scene.

[morgankane1]

Less DAP, more hard DP fucking? Yes please.

[morgankane1]

For me, watching a girl getting properly fucked in DP is just hotter than watching male performers playing just the tip game in DAP.

[albertoconr324]

For me, watching a girl getting properly fucked in DP is just hotter than watching male performers playing just the tip game in DAP.

agree +1000

[ultimo]

Less DAP, more hard DP fucking? Yes please.

agreed

[evando4441]

For me, watching a girl getting properly fucked in DP is just hotter than watching male performers playing just the tip game in DAP.

I couldn't agree more strongly. No matter what actually "sells" here on LP -- I'm always going to look for the scenes that predominantly feature PURE-CLASSIC ballsdeep DP fucking. One cock for the cunt .. another cock for the asshole .. and preferably a 3rd cock in the girls cum-dripping mouth (for example -- see Psycho Henessy 3 black bulls IV081). That unbeatable & superbly erotic combination will ALWAYS catch the full attention of my cock -- and will guarantee the scene will be purchased & added to my personal video collection.

[triple_anal_fanatic]

The monotony of vaginal sex is boring, in LP the stigmatisms are broken. More 0% pussy!!

[cyberhog59]

Actually, I find quite a few 0% or NO pussy titles mis-labled. The latest of which I purchased, Lara DeSantis' GG scene, is a perfect example: there is a good amount of straight ahead DP in the scene and even some brief pussy only fucking. It's still a GREAT scene featuring a lot of double anal and TP, but it isn't even close to NO pussy or 0% pussy.

[analsexonly]

Agreed, there's been a misuse of the term lately, especially with GG scenes. It's not 0% pussy if it has any vaginal penetration. DP, and "triple penetration" where there are two cocks in the ass and one in the pussy do not count as 0% pussy! Really annoying.

[Roller22]

Actually, I find quite a few 0% or NO pussy titles mis-labled. The latest of which I purchased, Lara DeSantis' GG scene, is a perfect example: there is a good amount of straight ahead DP in the scene and even some brief pussy only fucking. It's still a GREAT scene featuring a lot of double anal and TP, but it isn't even close to NO pussy or 0% pussy.

Yes, I had that too.
It's a real bummer when there is vag/dp when it should only be anal. Can really kill a scene.

Worst case you get so fully disappointed and frustrated that you stop enjoying the scene.
What you DO NOT WANT is the pontential threat of vag in a good anal scene you really enjoy.
Once there is vag when there should NOT be it is VERY undermining for FULL pleasure and enjpyment of the scene.
The notion that the scene can or will turn vag is the worst. Totally disruptive for the enjoyment and pleasure of what should be only anal.

[triple_anal_fanatic]

totally agree!!!

[dap-addict]

Me, too!
Worst is misleading titles and not post-production edited wrong orifice fucking (read: pussy only fucking in a clearly anal themed film) as well as the ever so popular pussy only fucking run-up for shoot-off with certain actors known to all directors.

These need clear directors instructions and - if it still happens - clear post production attention.

Generally I am still waiting for a really consistant 0% pussy porn line of even own LP studio.