Better Without the "Footing"

Moderator: dan

Sir Noel
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:40 pm
Karma: 1

Better Without the "Footing"

Postby Sir Noel » Thu Dec 26, 2024 11:07 am

Angelo's studio is now the only one here (and his own website) where I still purchase from.

However, this recent inclusion of enldess "footing" i just don't get. Fisting I love. Always have. So why not "footing"?:

1) I do have some concerns regarding toenails and internal scratching. Intense, aggressive, even (cincensually) violent sex I have no issue with but I do like to leave feeling the models were safe. With your hand you have knowledge of where your nails are and you can tuck them away. Toenails are not the same and to film such intense scenes where a girl could be cut inside quite early on in the scene worries me.

2) Every discussion over fisting, every view I have heard, almost everyone dislikes fisting where the whole hand fails to get inserted. I love dfisting but I'd rather watch a scene without it than it not get past the knuckle and most other lovers of it seem to feel the same. This is why "footing" falls so flat for me, in that it is always a "fail": it is just a few toes and ball of the foot going in. Given that inserting the entire foot is not going to happen (a couple of very extreme webcam models and a female foot aside) I would sooner this was just left out.

So the "100% HELL" series is a bit different and I was enjoying it..... but the trying (and failing) to awkwardly ram their foot into the girl is more of a turn-off, for me at least, than a turn-on.

Anyone else? Agree? Disagree?

User avatar
dap-addict
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 41825
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:57 am
Karma: 1

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby dap-addict » Thu Dec 26, 2024 5:48 pm

I agree.
Most studs have much better control over their hands than their feet. And control is important for fisting as to not hurt the girl.
Also male feet for me look gross.
ex-Eurobabeforum DAPlist responsible - PM contact: dap-a@seznam.cz
TWO DAP SCENES PER DAY! - More true fast balls deep DAP! More 0% pussy! - Dress them to fuck and pop their eyes - Heels on! No condoms!!! - Lets lets get a GONZO non-vanilla successor!!!

jjwhite1985
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:32 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby jjwhite1985 » Thu Dec 26, 2024 6:27 pm

Yeah completely agree. The fisting is great but the insistence on focusing on male feet is just gross

SnowySnowastic
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:02 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby SnowySnowastic » Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:05 pm

I disagree, I absolutely love this. There's something about the dominance of the act. So hot.

The only thing is, feet need to be well groomed.

mralfxp
Member
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:58 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby mralfxp » Thu Dec 26, 2024 11:37 pm

I don't buy the male foot fetish scenes, it's horribly ugly. I wish more focus on female legs. If it should be rough foot fisting, let it be a another female just like in some scenes with Francys Belle. AGO did a great footbang scene with Mia Brown and that's something I would buy again.

SnowySnowastic
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:02 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby SnowySnowastic » Thu Dec 26, 2024 11:46 pm

On the contrary, I love it. Feet need to well groomed but it's hot.

SnowySnowastic
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:02 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby SnowySnowastic » Fri Dec 27, 2024 4:41 pm

I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.

fister2
Established Member
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2024 2:19 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby fister2 » Sat Dec 28, 2024 1:52 pm

Footing is ok but only when it is performed by women. I hate to see male feet :mad:

paobroncix01
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 3:42 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby paobroncix01 » Sat Dec 28, 2024 7:04 pm

Sir Noel wrote:2) Every discussion over fisting, every view I have heard, almost everyone dislikes fisting where the whole hand fails to get inserted. I love dfisting but I'd rather watch a scene without it than it not get past the knuckle and most other lovers of it seem to feel the same. This is why "footing" falls so flat for me, in that it is always a "fail": it is just a few toes and ball of the foot going in. Given that inserting the entire foot is not going to happen (a couple of very extreme webcam models and a female foot aside) I would sooner this was just left out.


I agree with this. The vaginal fisting by the studs, how it is introduced by AGO is a very nice feature. But, as mentioned above, important is that the whole hand should be inserted. Somehow the footing is less interesting as the fisting, probably for the reasons that it is just inside with the tip of the foot, and it is a really different sort of action as the fisting. I prefer seeing fisting instead of footing.

SnowySnowastic
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:02 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby SnowySnowastic » Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:24 am

Can I get an explanation as to why my posts aren't approved? I can't seem to contact the administrator or the moderator.

Can somebody private message me and explain the issue?

I was only trying to say that personally I love footing and that it's okay how there's something for everybody. There are plenty of scenes without the footing or male feet being worshipped that one can enjoy, let these ones be. There are many of us that enjoy them!

I was being constructive, I wasn't being disrespectful which is why I don't understand why the posts aren't approved. Thanks!

fister2
Established Member
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2024 2:19 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby fister2 » Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:08 am

paobroncix01 wrote:
Sir Noel wrote:2) Every discussion over fisting, every view I have heard, almost everyone dislikes fisting where the whole hand fails to get inserted. I love dfisting but I'd rather watch a scene without it than it not get past the knuckle and most other lovers of it seem to feel the same. This is why "footing" falls so flat for me, in that it is always a "fail": it is just a few toes and ball of the foot going in. Given that inserting the entire foot is not going to happen (a couple of very extreme webcam models and a female foot aside) I would sooner this was just left out.


I agree with this. The vaginal fisting by the studs, how it is introduced by AGO is a very nice feature. But, as mentioned above, important is that the whole hand should be inserted. Somehow the footing is less interesting as the fisting, probably for the reasons that it is just inside with the tip of the foot, and it is a really different sort of action as the fisting. I prefer seeing fisting instead of footing.

Of course the footing that Hotkinky Jo and Siswet have performed where whole foot, including heel, is inserted is the most satisfying performance.

oualidknoazrh
Member
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2023 8:00 am
Location: Morocco, Rabat
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby oualidknoazrh » Sun Jan 05, 2025 4:59 pm

Agree AGO videos can be better without the footing.
Oualid Meskaoui
OM.

User avatar
DPraved
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1932
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 10:26 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby DPraved » Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:05 pm

+1
Tweeting clips of my favorite porn moments at
https://twitter.com/DPraved1

Lange
Member
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:41 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby Lange » Sat Jan 11, 2025 4:42 pm

Hate all that footing - i ruining the scenes imo

msndorennanff406
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 2:21 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby msndorennanff406 » Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:34 pm

Agreed. Its ugly to see and unsafe for the girls. Angelo has so much to lear from GIO...

liko19
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:08 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby liko19 » Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:53 pm

msndorennanff406 wrote:Agreed. Its ugly to see and unsafe for the girls. Angelo has so much to lear from GIO...


It's just that Angelo learned a lot from GG. His constant covering of women's legs in stockings, socks and knee highs and his hatred of barefoot and naked women is quite obvious. It hits you right in the eye.

liko19
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:08 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby liko19 » Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:57 pm

SnowySnowastic wrote:I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.



Oh yeah, that silly scene-skipping talk again. Yes, if it's going to be one scene out of ten starring hairy asses and male hairy legs, then of course we can skip it. But if it's nine scenes out of ten, what do you want to skip? Then, for most users, this studio may not be in the world, when the bearable scene is once every two months. Do you get it?

SnowySnowastic
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:02 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby SnowySnowastic » Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:07 am

liko19 wrote:
SnowySnowastic wrote:I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.



Oh yeah, that silly scene-skipping talk again. Yes, if it's going to be one scene out of ten starring hairy asses and male hairy legs, then of course we can skip it. But if it's nine scenes out of ten, what do you want to skip? Then, for most users, this studio may not be in the world, when the bearable scene is once every two months. Do you get it?


I don't. Is this the only studio in the world? Are there no other studios that cater to your interests? It's like complaining about somebody producing apples, when you want them to produce pairs. Well, find somebody that produces pairs.

Personally, I don't care about hairy asses either but there are other elements of this kind of hardcore style that I do prefer, like footing. Which is why I like their content. If I didn't like it, I wouldn't care about it.

liko19
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:08 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Better Without the "Footing"

Postby liko19 » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:54 pm

SnowySnowastic wrote:
liko19 wrote:
SnowySnowastic wrote:I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.



Oh yeah, that silly scene-skipping talk again. Yes, if it's going to be one scene out of ten starring hairy asses and male hairy legs, then of course we can skip it. But if it's nine scenes out of ten, what do you want to skip? Then, for most users, this studio may not be in the world, when the bearable scene is once every two months. Do you get it?


I don't. Is this the only studio in the world? Are there no other studios that cater to your interests? It's like complaining about somebody producing apples, when you want them to produce pairs. Well, find somebody that produces pairs.

Personally, I don't care about hairy asses either but there are other elements of this kind of hardcore style that I do prefer, like footing. Which is why I like their content. If I didn't like it, I wouldn't care about it.


Please stop telling people what to like or not to like and what studio to choose. That's what communists like to do, they send others who don't agree with them elsewhere. And here in the Czech Republic, we are very sensitive to that. Or are you a communist? I believe not. Every studio that makes films must also accept criticism, because if it were only about admiration, they would not realize the mistakes they are making. So yes, let there be scenes that you and a small part of users like, but in most scenes it shouldn't be, because the users who clearly don't like it, as we can read here, are the majority. So if men's hairy legs and asses are in the main roles, maybe in two scenes out of ten, it's fine. But not as it is now.


Return to Angelo Godshack Original

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests