Do you want to see scenes with makeup-free models?

by **melovehotties** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:36 pm

I've never ever been a fan of makeup on screen or in real-life--it makes porn even more fake than it already is and it saves a lot of time for the girls. Without makeup, you know precisely when it's time to dump a gf! Yes, it makes a girl more photogenic, but what's the point if she wears so much that she could be a clown in a circus? LP can take away even more of Woodman's customers since many of his scenes are purposely makeup free. I would like to see at least ONE scene where the girl doesn't wear it--I'm sure you can at least find ONE model (younger than age 30) who would agree?

by **Iddaoeeok** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:05 pm

I like girls with make-up and without make-up, I prefer make-up to be minimal, a natural look is my favourite. Some girls don't suit a natural look, and are more photogenic with heavier make-up... and vice versa.

by **melovehotties** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:08 pm

GG can save a lot of money and time if he didn't hire all those makeup artists. Girls can choose to do their own minimal makeup at home, even hair. Unless the girl is hideous without makeup, I don't think most fans would care if it's au naturale up to half of the scenes.

by **mrbadself** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:47 pm

The more makeup the better. I prefer slutty trashy looking girls that swallow cum and lick a mans ass. LOL what's wrong with you people. What You want to see Snow White in porn... blockheads.

by **DoubleOrNothing** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:49 pm

*puke*

by **DoubleOrNothing** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:53 pm

melovehotties wrote:Without makeup, you know precisely when it's time to dump a gf!

Without makeup, she's never making it to girlfriend, never mind beign dumped.

What else do you look for in a frump? Dyed-green hairy armpits?

by **DoubleOrNothing** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:54 pm

http://sobadsogood.com/2015/06/16/famous-pornstars-without-their-makeup/

"without makeup" .... funny, they're still wearing degrees of makeup in those "without makeup" pictures.

by **maxxxno1** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:23 pm

With the right amount of make up.

by **dap-addict** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:18 am

DoubleOrNothing wrote:http://sobadsogood.com/2015/06/16/famous-pornstars-without-their-makeup/
"without makeup" .... funny, they're still wearing degrees of makeup in those "without makeup" pictures.

Exactly, no-MU is less MU. LOL!
Porn is entertainment industry and just doesnt work with 0% MU.
With all the lights some girls would also just look hideous. PW with his low-fi amateur approach can maybe shoot without MU, but LP sure not. Makes no sense.

by **billyraeb** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:41 pm

Noooo. ?At least some MU is essential. How much? A nice variety

by **Bummer-Harris** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:12 pm

Yes. Up for this. Ria Sunn, May Thai and Arwen Gold please.

by **laird.cameltown** » Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:32 am

Yes.

I prefer anything that makes a scene seem less staged. And too much make-up feels fake.

Maybe a good compromise is to just go with the make-up the women show up to studio with. That's what I want to see. Who the actress is before they are manipulated by others. Their own clothes and make-up is an interesting form of personal expression.

My attraction is to the actress. Not to what the studio thinks the actress should be. If they manipulate everything about her, it is more difficult to have any idea about what type of person she really is.

by **kidloco2** » Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:21 pm

I voted yes, but I mean not completely without make-up (many girls aren't comfortable with it), but rather a very light make-up. so yes!

by **blktyp2** » Sat Mar 18, 2017 4:45 am

I would like to see a before make-up and after as part of a BTS extra.

by **melovehotties** » Sat Mar 18, 2017 5:33 am

A woman who has to wear makeup to be beautiful is NOT a beautiful woman.

by **dap-addict** » Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:53 am

kidloco2 wrote:I voted yes, but I mean not completely without make-up (many girls aren't comfortable with it), but rather a very light make-up. so yes!

The currently 63% in this way yes, but without any MU hardly possible.
Get the impression most voters here have no idea about cosmetitcs and girls.

by **kidloco2** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:01 pm

dap-addict wrote:
kidloco2 wrote:I voted yes, but I mean not completely without make-up (many girls aren't comfortable with it), but rather a very light make-up. so yes!

The currently 63% in this way yes, but without any MU hardly possible.
Get the impression most voters here have no idea about cosmetitcs and girls.

LOL, thanks for the comment, yes you're right

by **maxxxno1** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:11 pm

Absolutely not.

by **melovehotties** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:52 am

let's see some zero makeup girls, GG!