mariska2005 wrote:
I ask myself, How can you be so dirty and at the same time so elegant? The dirtier, the better, because she gives greater status to her interpretations. I repeat that her wonderful tone of voice and way of speaking helps her a lot. I don't forget that, in addition, she's very pretty in the face and has a great body, including her beautiful tits. Giorgio prepares something very dirty, the dirtiest, for Alexxa, please.
BR_Razor86 wrote:mariska2005 wrote:
I ask myself, How can you be so dirty and at the same time so elegant? The dirtier, the better, because she gives greater status to her interpretations. I repeat that her wonderful tone of voice and way of speaking helps her a lot. I don't forget that, in addition, she's very pretty in the face and has a great body, including her beautiful tits. Giorgio prepares something very dirty, the dirtiest, for Alexxa, please.
For rimjob scene you need verbal male performers to make the scene interesting it's so fucking Boring when those dudes are mute.
Best example is Brittany black buster scene when Brittany is about to suck and lick that man asshole and he says here come here get some piece of chocolate baby . Just watch the scene to see how they keep talking and humiliating her.
The way mike says Brittany is a whore , Brittany is a whore like he's is singing a song is hilarious.
The more verbal male performers you add to a scene the better and interesting the scene would be.
Six_String wrote:I don't know how to say this without being offensive, it is not my intention and I only want to be frank. I get it, you're hooked on Alexxa and admire everything she does, I am the same if that helps. But I have a slight suspicion that when she visits the forum again and sees this onslaught of posts of yours and (especially) the accompanying captions, she will totally freak out. I dont know if I am the only one who sees something problematic here, but at various points there are parts that are downright creepy. The captions can be funny if read with David Attenborough's voice as part of a BBC series about the evolutiion of Alexxa's asshole, other than that I can only see them as an assortment of red flags. This can't lead to any good in the long run.
I will say again that this is only my personal view, if the other members are OK and find nothing weird about this, it's OK, moving on.
jjwhite1985 wrote:Six_String wrote:I don't know how to say this without being offensive, it is not my intention and I only want to be frank. I get it, you're hooked on Alexxa and admire everything she does, I am the same if that helps. But I have a slight suspicion that when she visits the forum again and sees this onslaught of posts of yours and (especially) the accompanying captions, she will totally freak out. I dont know if I am the only one who sees something problematic here, but at various points there are parts that are downright creepy. The captions can be funny if read with David Attenborough's voice as part of a BBC series about the evolutiion of Alexxa's asshole, other than that I can only see them as an assortment of red flags. This can't lead to any good in the long run.
I will say again that this is only my personal view, if the other members are OK and find nothing weird about this, it's OK, moving on.
Nope, you're not wrong. He's been spamming the thread for weeks and it's totally fucking weird.
mariska2005 wrote:She has already worked with Louise Lee before. I think Alexxa works better alone, and with a minimum of 4 males, less is a small matter for her. I think she should work completely naked, since her tattoos serve as a dress, and so we can see her beautiful entire body, from her toes to the top of her head. With clothes it distracts our vision.
Users browsing this forum: beursaap465, giassledo, Google [Bot], Kumozora and 103 guests