kidloco2 wrote:I agree the scene should be more anal heavy intensive and gape focused. Even some DAP wouldn't hurt, but for those who don't like DAP could be a way to have a nice anal scene.
I see it as a replacement for classic anal scenes shot circa 2010-12.
dap-addict wrote:Anna De Ville DAP - instant buy
Sofy Soul 1st Gape scene - no STA and too much pussy fucking = skip
Lesia No Rest scene - free scene, whats bad, the more as the anal is quite good
Nothing to complain especially using such harsh words if you dont seem to almost hate LP in 2016 as OP does.
Btw, there is some logic in drevokocur66's resoning, though.
dap-addict wrote:Mmmh, one would think the more and the better scenes the better.
But some posts by xxx about gonzo backlog make me wonder wheter drevokur is all that wrong. Also IV seems way designed to support gonzo rather than just be a studio of its own fully. Dont get me wrong, but at this very moment the idea doenst seem like publishing as many scenes per day as possible but rather 1-2 really good LP-style ones per day. Besindes, its nothing about conspiracy theory but rather sales researches. Id happily buy 2-3 scenes per day, but I am in a minority I think.
Also for heavy LP porn consumers there is no suitable membership offer really, which again shows that most of us just dont spend much more than 40 tkts/mt.
I hope I am wrong of course and soon we'll have a deluxe membership offering 100tkts/month.
drevokocur66 wrote:It is just business.
Most customers will probably purchase one scene per day or less. So lets say LP releases 3 high quality scenes. Most will pic the best of the three, and buy that one. Why would LP release 3 high cost scenes and have them compete against each other. You release one good scene along with crap, which costs way less to produce. It also guarantees the quality scene good sales as it is the one most likely picked. The crappy scenes are there to give the illusion of choice, lower the production costs and set up the cost for the higher quality scene. If the crappy scene is (for example) 2 or 3 tickets, you will most likely pay few tickets more for the better scene, and if you pick the crappy scene the profit is the same. So it is a win win for LP, it is just business.
avanfurwet wrote:That said IDK how it makes business sense to be sitting on 1 years worth of updates for which the models do not have indefinite recognition and popularity.
The scenes must have a shelf-life like any product.
Also, what if the market moves to "8k" HD, or finally achieves a popular 3D technology, or something else? It would be like getting caught with a warehouse full of VHS tapes when the market moved to DVD.
avanfurwet wrote:If this thread is about last night's update, I don't understand what the complaints are about? It looks like a standard LP nightly update.
Often I don't find anything I like in a particular night's update. A few times I want 2 or even 3 scenes from the same night. I think that's normal for any site.
Anna De Ville Gonzo scene - looks OK to me but she's not my type. Price looks normal. The usual suspects will complain about her male screen partners who I guess were hired partly to communicate with the American actress.
Sofy Soul 1st Gape scene - I bought immediately. Price looks reasonable.
Lesia No Rest scene - Shows for me as a free extra. What's not to like?
Ass2Die4464 wrote:avanfurwet wrote:That said IDK how it makes business sense to be sitting on 1 years worth of updates for which the models do not have indefinite recognition and popularity.
The scenes must have a shelf-life like any product.
Also, what if the market moves to "8k" HD, or finally achieves a popular 3D technology, or something else? It would be like getting caught with a warehouse full of VHS tapes when the market moved to DVD.
+1,000,000 agree, especially with the shelf-life!
I remember in one of the many threads in this or Sineplex forum when LP first launched. XXX said that we don't have a coming soon section because we released scenes as soon as we are done editing them. It is wasted effort to create trailers for the coming soon section because it delays releases, what happened to that thought process. Why are we now holding onto content for years that it seems customers want to see.
Boshanks wrote:Ass2Die4464 wrote:avanfurwet wrote:That said IDK how it makes business sense to be sitting on 1 years worth of updates for which the models do not have indefinite recognition and popularity.
The scenes must have a shelf-life like any product.
Also, what if the market moves to "8k" HD, or finally achieves a popular 3D technology, or something else? It would be like getting caught with a warehouse full of VHS tapes when the market moved to DVD.
+1,000,000 agree, especially with the shelf-life!
I remember in one of the many threads in this or Sineplex forum when LP first launched. XXX said that we don't have a coming soon section because we released scenes as soon as we are done editing them. It is wasted effort to create trailers for the coming soon section because it delays releases, what happened to that thought process. Why are we now holding onto content for years that it seems customers want to see.
After waiting 17 months for the Arwen Gold and Linda Sweet scene, I can relate to these points. The problem is, Gonzo themselves produce 2 to 3 scenes a day I believe, if we take the lower number and look at a daily release, they can't help but have a stockpile of at least 300+ scenes a year.
Boshanks wrote:Not that I'm aware. I would have thought a mention of another publisher would have popped up by now, especially from one of the more active contributors to the forum like John or Gapefan. If xxx reads this perhaps he'll provide us with some insight on the topic, he posted recently that LP have enough releases in stock to cover the whole of next year
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 27 guests