isis111 wrote:crisis, they film the same crap with the same actresses, while stupid people will buy the same crap, this trend will continue, I like how directors sell crap and fans spend their hard earned money to eat this crap
netzerkaiser wrote:I could & did tell you this 3 years ago.
Only very few beauties interested in DAP, absusive scenes etc,
but of course, no one listened..
Now you have what you have.
patosucio wrote:I send you my love <3 <3 <3
patosucio wrote:the rise of OF
Iddaoeeok wrote:patosucio wrote:the rise of OF
Took me ages to figure out that this was!
patosucio wrote:Is there porn on the 'gram? Im not very familiar with that app so I have no idea, I'm pretty surprised if that's the case
ArcanaCaelestia wrote:patosucio wrote:Is there porn on the 'gram? Im not very familiar with that app so I have no idea, I'm pretty surprised if that's the case
No, but before gram there was no way to easily monetize the sex appeal. You could either got to modelling or entertainment (Hollywood, Pop music) or do porn. Then gram happened and good looking women started to get paid by doing selfies and other kind of photos/videos. More so, the modelling standards were thrown out of the window, meaning all the big assed, big boobed who were rejected before become a valuable commodity and become less rare in porn. Gram like OF operates on the same parasocial mechanism. OF just added subscription and pornographic content.
netzerkaiser wrote:I could & did tell you this 3 years ago.
Only very few beauties interested in DAP, absusive scenes etc,
but of course, no one listened..
Now you have what you have.
nilis wrote:netzerkaiser wrote:I could & did tell you this 3 years ago.
Only very few beauties interested in DAP, absusive scenes etc,
but of course, no one listened..
Now you have what you have.
The point you're trying to make being that...?
(Seriously asking though)
netzerkaiser wrote:nilis wrote:netzerkaiser wrote:I could & did tell you this 3 years ago.
Only very few beauties interested in DAP, absusive scenes etc,
but of course, no one listened..
Now you have what you have.
The point you're trying to make being that...?
(Seriously asking though)
I think it just got too extreme, too niche in tastes. That left other studios to capitalize on the more moderate stuff. I know someone else said, well, you have Pornworld & Private on the same menu, but it's not the same. LP style around 2012-2017 was generally masterful. That's just my opinion of course.
Chimpy.677 wrote:I have already said it a million times... for several years the users themselves with ugly and strange tastes destroyed the page.
1) They always want the same actress over and over again even if she has literally 1000 scenes doing the exact same thing.
2) If young and pretty girls appear, they ignore them to continue asking for the same 10 actresses as always. They have a totally distorted sense of taste.
3) The strange preference of users for urine, prolapse, vomiting, etc. scares away novice girls. But if they don't do such scenes here, nobody wants them. Which ends up making all the big studios do these practices.....
But what happens is that most of the world's porn consumers hate that kind of content, I mean, urine, prolapsing, vomiting, etc. IT IS A NICHE PRODUCT, it's not made for everyone, that's why many people stop consuming it and go to more "normal" porn, that's why GONZO had his golden age all over the WORLD, when he made scenes with young girls and new ones with the classic 3on1 or 4on1 scenes, strong DP/DAP but that didn't go out of the classic porn format and it was porn aimed to all kind of consumers.
Iddaoeeok wrote:I remember when the owner of LP/AV, back when he used to occasionally contribute to the forum, would say the reason he didn't want piss scenes, back when he didn't want piss scenes, was because he didn't want the site to be a niche site for extreme fetishists. Now look where we are. (By the way, I don't mind the occasional piss scene myself).
netzerkaiser wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:I remember when the owner of LP/AV, back when he used to occasionally contribute to the forum, would say the reason he didn't want piss scenes, back when he didn't want piss scenes, was because he didn't want the site to be a niche site for extreme fetishists. Now look where we are. (By the way, I don't mind the occasional piss scene myself).
This line... "niche site for extreme fetishists' is so eloquent, well done man, you put something there that I couldn't express. Most of us I think are just ordinary guys who fantasize about seeing the remote bespectacled local attractive librarian or bank clerk in a fantasy situation of regular sexual activity. No more no less, just innocent if you like, heterosexual inclination. So beautifully & economically expressed, Iddaoeek.
netzerkaiser wrote:I could & did tell you this 3 years ago.
Only very few beauties interested in DAP, absusive scenes etc,
but of course, no one listened..
Now you have what you have.
Jocke wrote:I have a different take!
The flow of new talent is on average about the same. We get new fresh girls who disappear quickly and we get porn stars who are building a career. The reasons are many but one can speculate that many new girls didn't find what they were looking for or never intended to stay. The women who do work hard to stay relevant often manage to do so. There are hundreds of pornstars with decade long careers and nobody complains, "oh no not another Reily Reid or Megan Rain scene".
Actually I miss many LP stars more than I long for the new girls.
Arwen Gold, Alysa Gap, Polly Petrova, Lola Taylor, Tina Hot, Barbie Sins, Megan Venturi, Rita Rush, Anita Bellini, Sasha Zima, Angel Piaff....
Netzerkaiser who prefers vintage porn isn't the one I expected to complain about lack of new girls?
netzerkaiser wrote:Thanks, I think you've hit on something here re: myself. I'm just not into the Latina look, secondly while the Russian ladies still are coming & are still gorgeous, it just seems so abusive that its not even sexual to a normal guy any more. I mean where is it going? The last video trailer I saw of Sofia Weber was a load of douches blowing off in her face. This is kind of obscene to me. Its not sexual, not least vanilla heterosexual, which is all I am or ever wish to be.
netzerkaiser wrote:Jocke wrote:I have a different take!
The flow of new talent is on average about the same. We get new fresh girls who disappear quickly and we get porn stars who are building a career. The reasons are many but one can speculate that many new girls didn't find what they were looking for or never intended to stay. The women who do work hard to stay relevant often manage to do so. There are hundreds of pornstars with decade long careers and nobody complains, "oh no not another Reily Reid or Megan Rain scene".
Actually I miss many LP stars more than I long for the new girls.
Arwen Gold, Alysa Gap, Polly Petrova, Lola Taylor, Tina Hot, Barbie Sins, Megan Venturi, Rita Rush, Anita Bellini, Sasha Zima, Angel Piaff....
Netzerkaiser who prefers vintage porn isn't the one I expected to complain about lack of new girls?
Thanks, I think you've hit on something here re: myself. I'm just not into the Latina look, secondly while the Russian ladies still are coming & are still gorgeous, it just seems so abusive that its not even sexual to a normal guy any more. I mean where is it going? The last video trailer I saw of Sofia Weber was a load of douches blowing off in her face. This is kind of obscene to me. Its not sexual, not least vanilla heterosexual, which is all I am or ever wish to be.
squirtjunkie wrote:my point of view:
The main problem is, that
new girls were waisted in low budget productions, close to amateur- porn.
Give em a proper studio, proper make-up and outfit, and they will start and sell....
Wasted talents dont sell and disapear, not girls fault, its the fault of the producers.
I don't want see an amateur fucked in a standard bedroom or in a bad enlighted living room.This is what most men can have in real live.
Only few girls can make the step to come to the big studios and shoot high quality content before the fans loose their patience.
Therefore wellknown girls are shooted again and again ( what i like!) and sell allways good the high quality produced stuff from the big studios.
squirtjunkie wrote:Only few girls can make the step to come to the big studios and shoot high quality content before the fans loose their patience.
Therefore wellknown girls are shooted again and again (what i like!) and sell always good the high quality produced stuff from the big studios.
sumacs3 wrote:Some well-known girls, like Tina Hot (Nina Love), who retired from the big studios after 2014, resumed making studio-quality videos, this time at OF, as customs for her subscribers...
sumacs3 wrote:Some well-known girls, like Tina Hot (Nina Love), who retired from the big studios after 2014, resumed making studio-quality videos, this time at OF, as customs for her subscribers, including myself. Her customs had fine video quality (1080), good make-up, and wardrobe. . . Tina made high-quality customs, and usually within a few days. Guys are afraid to complain to a girl they really like, for fear of getting unsubscribed or seeming like a nuisance. I find that having rapport with a model helps improve their content. But I like to have rapport anyway. It makes for a better experience for both of us.
visigoth2020260 wrote:
Users browsing this forum: ArcanaCaelestia, Bussonniere_Charly and 37 guests