laura. wrote:... I just won't be anything with more than 20% pussy in it xx
laura. wrote:Now do I vote for what I like or what I think there should be? This is tough as I have zero interest in vaginal porn, it does nothing for me. I like the idea of vaginas to be untouched and savoured for making love in a non porn environment, aesthetically I think it looks boring also.
But, for two reasons I voted 'some pussy'. Number one I think it provides a respite to those performers less comfortable with the idea of an hour or so of having a penis or two inside their arse, it may also be a necessity for the newer girls to the scene. Secondly, for the greater good and for the simple reason a 100% anal site may result in the loss of some of our loyal members and board friends.
I have a finger to press fast forward anyhow and I just won't be anything with more than 20% pussy in it xx
laura. wrote:Diversity is good , I suppose, but genuinely surprised by the 7 votes for 'lots of pussy'. Didn't expect that on these boards if I am honest. Although I guess that may be how I am interpreting it, is it just 'lots of pussy' as well as lots of anal, or, more pussy than anal?
laura. wrote:Diversity is good , I suppose, but genuinely surprised by the 7 votes for 'lots of pussy'. Didn't expect that on these boards if I am honest.
gapefan wrote:These polls are pretty pointless. Anyone with the motivation to do so, can easily skew the results.
Multiple email accounts, used to register multiple LP accounts, allows any one person to vote as many times as they want.
Sock puppet poll? Anyone?
The best gauge is, and always will be, the sales performance of the scenes.
paobroncix01 wrote:Im also a fan of double vaginal. its more in the LP style as just one dick in the pussy. And its best if a model does triple penetration, with both her ass and pussy in action. double anal plus vaginal, or double vaginal plus anal.
Chazzum wrote:... This is all fantasy and part of that fantasy, for me, is the notion that the woman is insatiable and losing herself to the acts being performed. Building act upon act up to DAP or TAP is part of that attempt to slake her desire.
awwnuts wrote:Any pussy fucking in porn is a disappointment. I'll tolerate it for a little DP, but there better be a cock in that shitter at all times
hjohjole wrote:I feel the need to explain the 0% pussy fetish a bit more since there seems to be many that don't understand it. I will try to explain only from my point of view and there might of course be others that enjoy it for different reasons than me.
What i find exciting about it is that there is something seemingly very unequal and unfair about strict anal/oral fucking. It is sex where the male genitalia gets pleasured and serviced in every imaginable way while the female genitalia gets absolutely nothing. I see it as an act of submission from the female to give up the vagina as a source of pleasure for herself in order to focus fully and completely on the enjoyment of the male/males. It is this game of dominance/submission that holds all the erotic tension.
However 0 vaginal stimulation is not at all the same thing as 0 enjoyment for the woman. Women of course also do enjoy anal sex, quite a lot in fact. And while this is true, it is also true that for many women the love for anal remains more of an acquired taste.
This is another reason why anal sex is so exciting to me. When you are watching anal porn you often get to witness women going on a sexual journey. She can go from having discomfort/pain to tolerating it to enjoying it and finally all the way to enjoying it immensely to the point of climax.
This is what i want to see, and i want to see it without any annoying distractions that ruins the mood (like vaginal sex) or pauses that ruins the intensity.
Roller22 wrote:Nice, I see that most members are in favour of zero pussy or at best minimum pussy. Hope we get more 0% pussy scenes now! Cheers
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests