YuriyProneBone wrote:By the way, I just realized the question was for the "future".
That changes things because it clearly looks bad right now with the censoring from white knights and all the virtue signaling propaganda that snowflakes promote, and considering they are growing by the numbers as media brainwashing starts from an early age, there is good news for the future.
In my own opinion, things will eventually autocorrect and the call for censoring of cancel culture will stop simply because we are talking of a few years of open Open Society Foundations narratives literally against thousands upon thousands of years of natural biology.
So because natural selection doesn't stop, even in the advancement of technologies such as artificial intelligence, in fact, what natural selection is adapts to newer technologies, the most likely scenario is that the whole victim mentality trend will not sustain and many of these people, some with long term suicidal tendencies, will unlikely reproduce, and even if some do, it won't be enough against the bigger offspring from people in alignment with natural biology.
So do not worry, these trends do evaporate, it happened with the Evangelical movement of the 80s and 90s censoring stuff, it will happen again with the fruity mellow people.
But that's long term speaking, the future, as OP refers to. In the meantime, the NPC political correctness mindset is here to stay for a while longer.
YuriyProneBone wrote:By the way, I just realized the question was for the "future".
That changes things because it clearly looks bad right now with the censoring from white knights and all the virtue signaling propaganda that snowflakes promote, and considering they are growing by the numbers as media brainwashing starts from an early age, there is good news for the future.
In my own opinion, things will eventually autocorrect and the call for censoring of cancel culture will stop simply because we are talking of a few years of open Open Society Foundations narratives literally against thousands upon thousands of years of natural biology.
So because natural selection doesn't stop, even in the advancement of technologies such as artificial intelligence, in fact, what natural selection is adapts to newer technologies, the most likely scenario is that the whole victim mentality trend will not sustain and many of these people, some with long term suicidal tendencies, will unlikely reproduce, and even if some do, it won't be enough against the bigger offspring from people in alignment with natural biology.
So do not worry, these trends do evaporate, it happened with the Evangelical movement of the 80s and 90s censoring stuff, it will happen again with the fruity mellow people.
But that's long term speaking, the future, as OP refers to. In the meantime, the NPC political correctness mindset is here to stay for a while longer.
TheVulture wrote:
Where does "cancel culture" come into this discussion?
Would insisting that porn producers refrain from showing overly aggressive acts?
jjwhite1985 wrote:Log off and get some rest dude. Posting paragraphs and paragraphs of crank shit on porno forums isn't good for you.
YuriyProneBone wrote:By the way, I just realized the question was for the "future".
dap-addict wrote:Think of any girl you ever met, talked with and admired for whatever she stood for. Imagine to have her join porn and watch your fantasies with her: Would you want her dominated and demeaned without any visible joy? (ex-GIO rookie Sharlotte Thorne walking her dogs in the woods outside Prague, private foto)
dap-addict wrote:Think of any girl you ever met, talked with and admired for whatever she stood for. Imagine to have her join porn and watch your fantasies with her: Would you want her dominated and demeaned without any visible joy?
YuriyProneBone wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:Log off and get some rest dude. Posting paragraphs and paragraphs of crank shit on porno forums isn't good for you.
I made two posts. I think you are thinking of the others before me in the thread.
jjwhite1985 wrote:Nope, I was responding to the comment that I quoted, the one containing paragraphs of crank shit. It's why I quoted that one, and not the others before it in the thread. Save that BS for 4chan if you could. Thanks.
YuriyProneBone wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:Nope, I was responding to the comment that I quoted, the one containing paragraphs of crank shit. It's why I quoted that one, and not the others before it in the thread. Save that BS for 4chan if you could. Thanks.
Meh, you just got offended, The Vulture was way more vocal in terms of "paragraphs".
dap-addict wrote:SimplyStunning wrote:dap-addict wrote:Btw, please stop that beaten up anti-porner claim! Nobody does any harm to anybody at a porn set, girls can always call for a stop when it gets too much!
It's still the same. I didnt change and I dont take this quote back, because it's the truth. But if you read OP carefully you'll see that thats not the point here at all.
I repeat my quote from this sadly hijacked thread of PAF: SiStu,dap-addict wrote:Sixth, you realized in OP of this thread (viewtopic.php?f=96&t=57029) I included gifs of 2 AGO NHB incl. DVP shots of the same AGO Domination line, yes? One was intended to be a positive example (Vero Leal smiling) and one as a negative example (Kitty Doll vs. Deny Lou). It's the same studio, the same content basically, but a different atmosphere, sex portrayed in a different way.
This thread: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=56388&p=859877#p859877
jjwhite1985 wrote:The vulture's comments were actually on topic. Like I said this is an LP forum, people are here to talk about about chicks and porn. Doesn't matter that you've got a hard-on for andrew tate, nobody wants to see you vomiting up the contents on an incel blog
YuriyProneBone wrote:Who the fuck is Andrew Tate? Is he a vanilla producer. Funny how you got triggered. It seems you are a snowflake after all.
Iddaoeeok wrote:
On the contrary I'd say you were the one who got "triggered" when, not before time, you got called out as a tedious blowhard who, along with millions other of your fellow online tedious blowhards, feels the need to share his depressingly predictable opinions on the world at large with anyone unfortunate enough to be within earshot. This unfortunately is one the worst aspects of the internet.
dap-addict wrote:SimplyStunning wrote:dap-addict wrote:I'll start supporting AGO NHB when these very basic former common grounds of AVLP porn productions are kept again! Also there is indeed BTS details consumers dont know and better dont know. I'll not reveal them either. But be aware it's there and it indeed creates a business athmosphere destroys trust.
Two issues here:
(1) You are a consumer just like the rest of us so why do you keep portraying yourself like if you have some insider knowledge. (...) It doesn't give your statement a higher truthful weight than others on the forum.
(2) WTF is this "basic former common grounds of AVLP porn productions" you are talking about ? The only decree AVLP has had was when it banned PISS and formal PUBLIC calling out to Sineplex for their unscrupulous payment practices to their talent. So please elaborate, maybe I missed something.
It really seems like SELECTIVE OUTRAGE (with an Agenda)
I don't mean to demean, criticize, or make light of any pain Kitty may have suffered if it is true. Unfortunately, because of reasons above I will only believe it from her and not her fans which most likely have an agenda. Whether they are willing to admit it or not.
First of all I am glad there is finally some discussion going here again - and this in 2 threads at least.
Second you realize I made that Kitty Doll interview (viewtopic.php?f=96&t=25243&hilit=interview#p314583), yeah? It's not just a social media chat with a porn girl, everybody nowadays can have for sure, I hope you realize I go deeper than that, I really try to give this forum a bit more than just an agenda - be it DVP (yours) or DAP (mine).
Third, please read back xxx stances on rape and other fringe fantasies! It was once very clear what kind of porn LP produces. But I concede xxx has gone absent.
Forth, Angelo Godshack isnt a bad person, sure no women hater and I dont call him out personally. All I ask is to consider which picture of women and which picture of sex you convey in those films? Maybe my problem is that I always associated sex with joy?
Fifth, Kitty Doll didnt go back yet. Just saying. She might do so in May, but if she does maybe you care for her reasons or do you care only for the fact that you are not a fan of hers and/or she does/doensnt do DVP?
Sixth, you realized in OP of this thread (viewtopic.php?f=96&t=57029) I included gifs of 2 AGO NHB incl. DVP shots of the same AGO Domination line, yes? One was intended to be a positive example (Vero Leal smiling) and one as a negative example (Kitty Doll vs. Deny Lou). It's the same studio, the same content basically, but a different atmosphere, sex portrayed in a different way.
SimplyStunning wrote:As long as you are not hurting women, I don't care what type fetish or genre your scene falls under as long as it is LEGAL. I don't wish for any studio to fail. I just don't buy it if it doesn't appeal to me.
SimplyStunning wrote:One of the main reason I'm not a fan is that she looks in pain in the TRAILERS of most of the scene she does which is a turn off and an automatic skip.
SimplyStunning wrote:^ Same questions as above. Story line: prostitute does not bring back enough money, so her pimps teach her a lesson by fucking her ass even though she begs them not too. You she makes these pained faced and screams like a wounded animal throughout the scene.
SELECTIVE OUTRAGE
SELECTIVE OUTRAGE
mirranda75 wrote:SimplyStunning wrote:^ Same questions as above. Story line: prostitute does not bring back enough money, so her pimps teach her a lesson by fucking her ass even though she begs them not too. You she makes these pained faced and screams like a wounded animal throughout the scene.
SELECTIVE OUTRAGE
SELECTIVE OUTRAGE
Who is she, who gets fucked by bbc?
My boyfriend always tells me that girls should take a good pounding in the ass because it feels better for him and me because its tighter so he can enjoy the sex better and its easy for me because I can stand att all four and just get fucked from behind until he will cum in my mouth. Now he lets his friend fuck me to. So get fucked in the ass is not that good but its my duty to take it up the ass if he wants. And these girls gets paid for it. So I think they must put up with it.
YuriyProneBone wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:On the contrary I'd say you were the one who got "triggered" when, not before time, you got called out as a tedious blowhard who, along with millions other of your fellow online tedious blowhards, feels the need to share his depressingly predictable opinions on the world at large with anyone unfortunate enough to be within earshot. This unfortunately is one the worst aspects of the internet.
You actually strike me as everything you are describing here. Funny how that works.
Iddaoeeok wrote:YuriyProneBone wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:On the contrary I'd say you were the one who got "triggered" when, not before time, you got called out as a tedious blowhard who, along with millions other of your fellow online tedious blowhards, feels the need to share his depressingly predictable opinions on the world at large with anyone unfortunate enough to be within earshot. This unfortunately is one the worst aspects of the internet.
You actually strike me as everything you are describing here. Funny how that works.
It might "strike" you that way but that's only because you don't know anything about me or my posts on this forum. So you need to make up some strawman that best fits your banal prejudices - the world being too complex a place for to process without good guys in white hats and bad guys in black hats - metaphorically. In your case however, no-one has to rely on guesswork or intuition, the evidence that you will shovel your opinions on the world into any discussion, regardless of whether it's relevant or whether anyone gives a flying fuck, is there for all to see.
SimplyStunning wrote:dap-addict wrote:Third, please read back xxx stances on rape and other fringe fantasies! It was once very clear what kind of porn LP produces. But I concede xxx has gone absent.
Third -
What does rape that have to do with this scene ? Let me get this, weren't you the one warning other fans be careful what words they use so other that want to do harm to this site don't read something into it and use it out of context. It sounds to me that you are indirectly accusing AGO of raping Kitty otherwise it makes no sense to even mention this point.
dap-addict wrote:I'm sure not accusing AGO of rape during shooting of this scene, because we all know it was all consensual and Kitty Doll always had a save word, she could always have stopped the action. But the Deny Lou standing anal gif I posted makes it look like rape, which was a red line for xxx for all those past years.
TheVulture wrote:Genuine question....has any girl ever used the "safe word" and do we know for what kind of reason?
dap-addict wrote:TheVulture wrote:Genuine question....has any girl ever used the "safe word" and do we know for what kind of reason?
It happens all the time that girls stop the action, take a break and if needed re-assess what is gonna be shot. For instance I happen to know every step of Ava Harris DAPbreakin' @ GIO (https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/215645) and she stopped the DAP-ing many times. At the same time she was booked for DAP and ofc she tried to perform that act still. And before you get tempted to refer to her career break after that scene let me inform you it was for personal reasons and she's coming back in a few days. Kitty Doll might have asked for less breaks during that AGO shot, and ofc it's always a personal decision of what is too much and what is better just to get through instead of prolonging the shooting process.
dap-addict wrote:SimplyStunning wrote:dap-addict wrote:Third, please read back xxx stances on rape and other fringe fantasies! It was once very clear what kind of porn LP produces. But I concede xxx has gone absent.
Third -
What does rape that have to do with this scene ? Let me get this, weren't you the one warning other fans be careful what words they use so other that want to do harm to this site don't read something into it and use it out of context. It sounds to me that you are indirectly accusing AGO of raping Kitty otherwise it makes no sense to even mention this point.
I'm sure not accusing AGO of rape during shooting of this scene, because we all know it was all consensual and Kitty Doll always had a save word, she could always have stopped the action. But the Deny Lou standing anal gif I posted makes it look like rape, which was a red line for xxx for all those past years.
SimplyStunning wrote:dap-addict wrote:Third, please read back xxx stances on rape and other fringe fantasies! It was once very clear what kind of porn LP produces. But I concede xxx has gone absent.
Third -
What does rape that have to do with this scene ? Let me get this, weren't you the one warning other fans be careful what words they use so other that want to do harm to this site don't read something into it and use it out of context. It sounds to me that you are indirectly accusing AGO of raping Kitty otherwise it makes no sense to even mention this point.
Michael_Ko1 wrote:SimplyStunning wrote:dap-addict wrote:Third, please read back xxx stances on rape and other fringe fantasies! It was once very clear what kind of porn LP produces. But I concede xxx has gone absent.
Third -
What does rape that have to do with this scene ? Let me get this, weren't you the one warning other fans be careful what words they use so other that want to do harm to this site don't read something into it and use it out of context. It sounds to me that you are indirectly accusing AGO of raping Kitty otherwise it makes no sense to even mention this point.
I'm sure not accusing AGO of rape during shooting of this scene, because we all know it was all consensual and Kitty Doll always had a save word, she could always have stopped the action. But the Deny Lou standing anal gif I posted makes it look like rape, which was a red line for xxx for all those past years.
FitFilthyPervert wrote:Not everyone that enjoys these type of scenes is an incel or hates women. The vast majority are probably normal.
A lot of people simply like to see pain, degradation, humiliation, etc. If they didn't, these scenes wouldn't sell.
I've never had issues with women and I like seeing women dominated and degraded in scenes.
My take on it is most 25+ year old guys don't get to pound an attractive 18 year old in the ass as hard as they can. Most normal women couldn't handle that type of anal even if you were able to talk them into it. So when you see a girl who's willing to take that treatment, I think the mentality is she's a whore and whores are meant to be used like objects, not to make love to.
I don't hate the girl getting pounded in, but I don't have empathy for her either. It's like seeing an escort, I don't care about them on a personal level and would never have a relationship with one, but I don't hate them. They're just something you use to get off.
Not very kind but yes whiteknighting is a bad look. Dont like it? Dont watch.oshie42060 wrote:nobody gives a fuck to worry about the girls fun- this bitches will not even look at any of legalporno users if they cross in the streets. and your boring interwiews sucks, you are not the white knight in shinny armor protecting the poor and abused damsdels. you and the other fag netzerkaiser are the cancer of this forum.
have a nice day. fy
Users browsing this forum: bbbear52 and 33 guests