Tastes Like Ass wrote:Unfortunately, I fear that the recent decision to ban piss scenes signals the beginning of the end of the "porn paradise" on LP, not so much because of the lack of piss itself (although many of us will miss that dearly), but rather, because of the change in direction that it seems to foreshadow.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:... the only thing that makes sense is that XXX wants to take the entire LP site in a much different, much tamer direction. I think this is what Giorgio was referring to when he said that getting rid of the piss scenes was an attempt to "clean up the image" of the site. In other words, XXX wants to make the site more of a typical, vanilla site, like 21S or DDF.
oA_Ao wrote:. and why do you think XXX/LP want such a change? What could be the reason in the end?
Perhaps it is an attempt to gain more money. If this is successful, you can't blame him to do so. If not, he will change back to extreme fetishes. We will see what will happen.
xxx wrote:I'm expecting SIneplex to release more cream scenes since the one from yesterday did fine (but probably because of DAP).
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I understand the point of xxx somehow. Pissing Keeps LP in a kind of "getto" of extreme porn, but on the other side dap and fisting was in the same position till 2 years ago... It's complicate to take decisions, xxx knows what he is doing so somehow I'm sure everyone will get benefits from a "clean up" of the home page (i mean studios)... time will tell us smt, will be fast to understand if sales increase or decrease
gapefan wrote:
My guess? xxx opened the floodgates when he removed attestation, and suddenly saw an increase in sales of scenes without piss, rather than the opposite. Afterall, any fan of piss had likely already jumped through the hoops of passing attestation to be able to access LegalPorno's material because, as many others have said, this is (or was) the only place to find such material. He had likely been considering the removal of piss for other reasons as well, which I'll address shortly, but the results of removing attestation put the nail in the coffin.
Is it a coincidence that these two scenes were released concurrently, the day before xxx made his announcement?
http://legalporno.com/watch/29780/nina_heaven_roxy_dee_double_anal_teen_cream_ass_full_of_cream_dap_ed_rs63
http://legalporno.com/watch/29571/piss_drinking_sluts_meg_magic_maggie_enjoy_anal_fucking_dp_atm_atogm_creampie_sz763
The cream scene outperformed the piss scene based on it's position in http://legalporno.com/hot-videos, and currently has almost twice the views.
gapefan wrote:^You know what else those scenes all have in common?
DAP
gapefan wrote:Is it a coincidence that these two scenes were released concurrently, the day before xxx made his announcement?
http://legalporno.com/watch/29780/nina_heaven_roxy_dee_double_anal_teen_cream_ass_full_of_cream_dap_ed_rs63
http://legalporno.com/watch/29571/piss_drinking_sluts_meg_magic_maggie_enjoy_anal_fucking_dp_atm_atogm_creampie_sz763
The cream scene outperformed the piss scene based on it's position in http://legalporno.com/hot-videos, and currently has almost twice the views.
xxx made the following statement afterward:xxx wrote:I'm expecting SIneplex to release more cream scenes since the one from yesterday did fine (but probably because of DAP).
gapefan wrote:I see you revised your original post. You must have cleaned your glasses
gapefan wrote:Besides. All scenes released are listed in the 'hot scenes' list. It doesn't matter that they're there. It matters what position they hold relative to the date they were released.
gapefan wrote:^You know what else those scenes all have in common?
DAP
You know how I know those scenes sold better because of DAP?
Because I'm one of the customers who bought them for that very reason, regardless of the fact I'm not a fan of piss.
gapefan wrote:My guess? xxx opened the floodgates when he removed attestation, and suddenly saw an increase in sales of scenes without piss, rather than the opposite. Afterall, any fan of piss had likely already jumped through the hoops of passing attestation to be able to access LegalPorno's material because, as many others have said, this is (or was) the only place to find such material.
shark1 wrote:Everyone is entitled to their opinion. However, LP started to shoot more and more pissing scenes, and they started to include drinking and multiple men pissing on the girls. They wouldn't have started increasing the pissing scenes if they didn't sell well, usually you would only do this if a certain style of scene was making you lots of money. Now, if the pissing scenes started being less frequent, and only shot every 20 scenes or so, that would mean they weren't profitable and saw no reason to shoot them as much. The very fact that the frequency of scenes was more and more and that there was more pissing in these scene means it was making xxx money. If it was because of social acceptance, then xxx would likely just remove all piss scenes altogether as they are all over the best seller page and will continue to be.
Until xxx tells us the real reason, it's all speculation.
gapefan wrote:
I think continuing to produce piss scenes right up until the end makes perfect sense. What business signals the end of a product, or service (or the beginning of a new one for that matter) or anything else major, to the general public prior to making the official announcement? The answer is, no business does that (at least not on purpose).
gapefan wrote:
I think continuing to produce piss scenes right up until the end makes perfect sense. What business signals the end of a product, or service (or the beginning of a new one for that matter) or anything else major, to the general public prior to making the official announcement? The answer is, no business does that (at least not on purpose). If a business did that, it might very well impact profitability, and return on investment.
I think xxx was testing his decision, before he made the final call. He wanted to see if he was making the right decision. So he made the best, nastiest, most perverted piss scenes he could possibly make, and then opened the floodgates to see what would happen. The rest is history.
TomUK wrote:An alternative theory is that xxx wanted a post-announcement buffer of piss scenes to be fair to those who recently renewed their memberships and to ensure that there is no cause to complain that those memberships were mis-sold.
Regardless of the details, it would appear the piss scenes are gone for good. I feel for you guys who enjoyed them but if I'm honest I always found piss to be a complete turn off and will not miss it here.
TomUK wrote:An alternative theory is that xxx wanted a post-announcement buffer of piss scenes to be fair to those who recently renewed their memberships and to ensure that there is no cause to complain that those memberships were mis-sold.
Regardless of the details, it would appear the piss scenes are gone for good. I feel for you guys who enjoyed them but if I'm honest I always found piss to be a complete turn off and will not miss it here.
gapefan wrote:If my logic is so tortured... what happened here TLA?
http://legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=7003
Yes, that poll is over two years old. And taken today, it would likely show an increase in the requests for pissing. But that's easily explained by the fact that piss fans have gathered here, while the fetish was catered to.
I believe that the overall target market of 'hardcore anal' fans, still looks very similar to the results of that poll.
My guess? xxx opened the floodgates when he removed attestation, and suddenly saw an increase in sales of scenes without piss, rather than the opposite. Afterall, any fan of piss had likely already jumped through the hoops of passing attestation to be able to access LegalPorno's material because, as many others have said, this is (or was) the only place to find such material. He had likely been considering the removal of piss for other reasons as well, which I'll address shortly, but the results of removing attestation put the nail in the coffin.
Is it a coincidence that these two scenes were released concurrently, the day before xxx made his announcement?
http://legalporno.com/watch/29780/nina_heaven_roxy_dee_double_anal_teen_cream_ass_full_of_cream_dap_ed_rs63
http://legalporno.com/watch/29571/piss_drinking_sluts_meg_magic_maggie_enjoy_anal_fucking_dp_atm_atogm_creampie_sz763
The cream scene outperformed the piss scene based on it's position in http://legalporno.com/hot-videos, and currently has almost twice the views.
I think xxx is getting rid of piss altogether because:
- It isn't as profitable as fans of the genre would like to believe (not once has xxx made a decision that didn't keep the overall goal of being as profitable as possible in mind)
- It isn't socially acceptable
I am, and always will be, here for the hardcore anal. I don't think I'm alone on that. And I don't think that aspect of the site will ever change, regardless of what you might like others to believe.
tgcfc26 wrote:...the melodramatic responses because you won't be able to view a woman drinking piss anymore are incredible.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:tgcfc26 wrote:...the melodramatic responses because you won't be able to view a woman drinking piss anymore are incredible.
Do you think the responses would be any less "melodramatic" if XXX announced that there will be no more anal scenes, thus depriving us of the ability to see a woman take a dick in her ass?
Tastes Like Ass wrote:I would expect the same here. In fact, I fully expect to see a GF post here within the next 2-3 years that sounds something like this: "OMG!!! I just downloaded the new scene with [insert name of popular new model]. This girl is absolutely fantastic! What a scene! My only complaints are that there's no anal, and they use a condom. Because of that, I wasn't sure whether it would be worth 5 tickets. But I decided to take a chance on it, and man, I'm glad I did! Thanks to XXX for delivering another amazing scene! LP is the greatest!!!"
Tastes Like Ass wrote:tgcfc26 wrote:...the melodramatic responses because you won't be able to view a woman drinking piss anymore are incredible.
Do you think the responses would be any less "melodramatic" if XXX announced that there will be no more anal scenes, thus depriving us of the ability to see a woman take a dick in her ass?
Users browsing this forum: Vancouver and 20 guests