eknbb2 wrote:Finally some fake tits again -> much appreciated, will buy it as soon as I cba to refill my tkts.
utopiaa wrote:She had great tits before the boobjob, I wonder why she wanted to get bigger ones.
Dhamon009 wrote:I passed on the scene due to the fake tits. 99.9% of fake tits I don't like. Sure, they might look great when fully clothed, but after the clothes come off, they tend to look funky.
Dhamon009 wrote:I passed on the scene due to the fake tits. 99.9% of fake tits I don't like. Sure, they might look great when fully clothed, but after the clothes come off, they tend to look funky.
seedfeeder wrote:I think we are well placed to express concern about the quality of this girl. As far as I can see so far much more people dont like her than people that like her. I think this is valuable information for the future booking plans of LP.
angelnomiluvr wrote:seedfeeder wrote:I think we are well placed to express concern about the quality of this girl. As far as I can see so far much more people dont like her than people that like her. I think this is valuable information for the future booking plans of LP.
I agree. Threads about a model should be about all the voices. If a girl is not performing well, not attractive to most, we need to be able to express it so xxx can make his decisions accordingly, about whether he will feature her in more scenes, or perhaps only on an occasional basis. Threads on models are not just for giving props.
realtip wrote:angelnomiluvr wrote:seedfeeder wrote:I think we are well placed to express concern about the quality of this girl. As far as I can see so far much more people dont like her than people that like her. I think this is valuable information for the future booking plans of LP.
I agree. Threads about a model should be about all the voices. If a girl is not performing well, not attractive to most, we need to be able to express it so xxx can make his decisions accordingly, about whether he will feature her in more scenes, or perhaps only on an occasional basis. Threads on models are not just for giving props.
In that case, I should just go into Timea's thread, or Linda Sweet's thread, or Mea Melone's thread, and start crusading about how they shouldn't be on here just because I don't like the way they look, right? Who gives a fluff about who else likes them? I guarantee that if I did that, then their fans would be up in arms.
Yet, you guys who like seeing the same small-titted broads over and over again somehow feel that you're "well-placed" to go into the threads of girls that you don't like just to complain about how they don't fit into your preference for scrawny flat-chested broads. It's not about sharing your voice. It's about being an donkeyhole and thinking that everyone has to share the same preference as you, so much so that you have to go out of your way to childishly insult, berate, and ridicule every girl who doesn't in some stupid effort to keep every girl on here looking exactly the same.
If you don't like her, then don't watch her scenes. That's what I do with girls I don't like. But quit trying to keep girls off the site so those of us who do like them can't see them.
realtip wrote:angelnomiluvr wrote:seedfeeder wrote:I think we are well placed to express concern about the quality of this girl. As far as I can see so far much more people dont like her than people that like her. I think this is valuable information for the future booking plans of LP.
I agree. Threads about a model should be about all the voices. If a girl is not performing well, not attractive to most, we need to be able to express it so xxx can make his decisions accordingly, about whether he will feature her in more scenes, or perhaps only on an occasional basis. Threads on models are not just for giving props.
In that case, I should just go into Timea's thread, or Linda Sweet's thread, or Mea Melone's thread, and start crusading about how they shouldn't be on here just because I don't like the way they look, right? Who gives a fluff about who else likes them? I guarantee that if I did that, then their fans would be up in arms.
Yet, you guys who like seeing the same small-titted broads over and over again somehow feel that you're "well-placed" to go into the threads of girls that you don't like just to complain about how they don't fit into your preference for scrawny flat-chested broads. It's not about sharing your voice. It's about being an donkeyhole and thinking that everyone has to share the same preference as you, so much so that you have to go out of your way to childishly insult, berate, and ridicule every girl who doesn't in some stupid effort to keep every girl on here looking exactly the same.
If you don't like her, then don't watch her scenes. That's what I do with girls I don't like. But quit trying to keep girls off the site so those of us who do like them can't see them.
Shotgun00 wrote:angelnomiluvr wrote:seedfeeder wrote:I think we are well placed to express concern about the quality of this girl. As far as I can see so far much more people dont like her than people that like her. I think this is valuable information for the future booking plans of LP.
I agree. Threads about a model should be about all the voices. If a girl is not performing well, not attractive to most, we need to be able to express it so xxx can make his decisions accordingly, about whether he will feature her in more scenes, or perhaps only on an occasional basis. Threads on models are not just for giving props.You're new to the forum angelnomiluvr so I'll forgive your answer not beingangelnomiluvr wrote:
I will go to those threads if I feel like doing that. If I don't, I won't.
"Oh the irony"
Tastes Like Ass wrote:Of course, the action was lousy, as I have come to expect from these 3 on 1 scenes. I shouldn't have wasted my tickets, but I was drawn in by the girl, only to be disappointed (again) by the almost complete lack of ATM.
Seriously, why bother to book hot girls, when your director/cameraman is so totally incompetent?
Maybe if I ask really nice: Please, pretty please, with sugar on top, could you just for once keep the dick in the camera frame from the time it leaves the girl's ass until it goes in her mouth, and make sure neither the guy nor the girl touches it?
Don't let the guy run away, don't zoom in on the girl's ass, don't zoom in on the girl's face. Just let us see an occasional honest ass to mouth, with no cheating.
Is that really so much to ask?
angelnomiluvr wrote:seedfeeder wrote:I think we are well placed to express concern about the quality of this girl. As far as I can see so far much more people dont like her than people that like her. I think this is valuable information for the future booking plans of LP.
I agree. Threads about a model should be about all the voices. If a girl is not performing well, not attractive to most, we need to be able to express it so xxx can make his decisions accordingly, about whether he will feature her in more scenes, or perhaps only on an occasional basis. Threads on models are not just for giving props.
dap-addict wrote:Her first two scenes released actually sold quite fine.
Those kept for a while performed badly.
No re-booking. Reasonable decision.
Users browsing this forum: EmiBrow, Google [Bot], jose249 and 150 guests