Alan2008 wrote:grey00owl wrote:dap-addict wrote: Beware me from falling in porn-"love"!
I'm highly in danger as well.
Sorry folk, I was first. Please wait for your turn.....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
error01 wrote:I would love here even more with a teethjob.
What you mean?
New teeth
You need a new brain, she's fine how she is.
epic scene, can`t understand that is not top seller
You plead always for aesthetic jobs: can't you just enjoy a model so as she is, as nature made her? Stasia is perfect as she is.
I never said I’m not ok with her
You just want her to go for some expensive dental work.
Please let's encourage the girls to stay natural! Even a small flaw can be very attractive, certainly so much more than "perfect" unnatural body and face.
+ 1
Caveman39 wrote:"Staying natural" should be related to getting bolt-ons, tattoos, fake butts, wearing fake lenses.
dap-addict wrote:Guys, porn is part of entertainment industry and looks are important.
Girls working in this industry have to know that and be prepared for suggestions.
Crucial however is the tone of suggestions to a model and be it via this forum!
Please be aware that our lovely LP girls read this forum or at least their peers and/or agents do!
As with teeth I think its clear most girls want them fixed themselves, but its often a long and quite costly matter.
Tattopes are a more personal matter, if you can't accept it better keep it for yourself because girl can't change it, can she?
With tits we reach already very deep personal layers of every girl...
Me, I like Anastasia just the way she is!![]()
But of course for porn I want GIO's MU to take care of her a bit before she starts to work on set.
Iddaoeeok wrote:Caveman39 wrote:"Staying natural" should be related to getting bolt-ons, tattoos, fake butts, wearing fake lenses.
So what's the difference? Why not bolt-ons, tattoos and fake butts, fake lenses? You've rather eloquently, but unintentionally, set out the arguments for bolt-ons, tattoos and fake butts, fake lenses -
Iddaoeeok wrote:but it so happens that you don't like bolt-ons, tattoos and fake butts, fake lenses so your argument is completely subjective. But it's inevitable that the argument would be subjective because there is no such thing as the 'objective eye'.
Iddaoeeok wrote:Teeth like Tom Cruise and Cristiano Ronaldo? Or Chris Diamond (LOL)? Uh, no thank you! The argument that Chris is a lot happier and more confident with his fluorescent teeth is exactly the same argument that's made when models get boob jobs or nose jobs. I don't mind Stasia's teeth, I don't mind Juicy Leila's teeth - Linda Sweet's teeth weren't Hollywood Colgate (ugh) either, couldn't care less and neither could Linda it seems - and those are subjective opinions, of course.
Iddaoeeok wrote:I'm suspicious of ideals of physical perfection in general because it ends up in the idea that everyone should, ideally, look the same
Caveman39 wrote:No person with bad dentals would complain if they'd wake-up one morning, look in the mirror, and see a Colgate smile like Margot Robbie or Tom Cruise or Cristiano Ronaldo (who all fixed their teeth btw).
grey00owl wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:I'm suspicious of ideals of physical perfection in general because it ends up in the idea that everyone should, ideally, look the same
Of course everybody has his ideal canons of beauty and this is always in the eye of the beholder. Therefore attractiveness is absolutely subjective. I sure have my ideal of feminine beauty, but certainly don't want to see all girls reflecting these canons and resembling each other. Analysing Stasia's physical features, I notice that her teeth are not perfect, her tits are not perfect, her tattoo, even though I like tattoos, is not so nice, but the whole package "works" and she's so attractive. I generally like small tits, but can surely appreciate such perfect specimens like those of Lina Luxa or Sarah Cute. Variety is good and spicy: if you have all "perfect" girls, you can have as well just only one. I don't find "built" models attractive at all and have, with very few exceptions, no scenes featuring these "fuckdolls".
grey00owl wrote:Nice to have her again. This is certainly a new scene with Stasia, as Yum says, stuck in Piter unable to travel. (...)
Quite struggled DAP, especially in reverse cowgirl with Mr Anderson never managing to thrust more than the cock tip inside or with Nik slipping out. This interrupts the action flow and when too much prolonged is quite a turn-off.
dap-addict wrote:Yeah, 4th DAP for Anastasia!![]()
![]()
Piter shot this time, new scene of course.
Nice GIO's Piter team gives jobs and thus good money to earn now also to set-up post-first-Prague-trip Russian talent!![]()
grey00owl wrote:Nice to have her again. This is certainly a new scene with Stasia, as Yum says, stuck in Piter unable to travel. (...)
Quite struggled DAP, especially in reverse cowgirl with Mr Anderson never managing to thrust more than the cock tip inside or with Nik slipping out. This interrupts the action flow and when too much prolonged is quite a turn-off.
That's troubling and a pity to read.![]()
![]()
Does she perform DAP in other positions way better at least?
grey00owl wrote:... (BTW that visagist is cute) ...
MrBigNipples wrote:grey00owl wrote:... (BTW that visagist is cute) ...
She really looks like the one and only Lina Love! - whom I love more than I should...
WHAT A WASTE!!!
simplyme wrote:I hope in teh future waka waka scene.....
dap-addict wrote:simplyme wrote:I hope in teh future waka waka scene.....
Yep, Anastasia had no BBC DAP so far, thats missing actually!
dap-addict wrote:We have to!
Russia resumes flight traffic to Europe and beyond only on July 15th, and only 15 towns so far. PRG might have to wait some more and flying via Frankfurt, Paris or Milano makes import prices just more expensive.
But Anastasias pale skin will make a good contrast for BBC, also she's pretty petite.
YumYum74 wrote:Looks like she just announced her retirement from porn on IG.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 83 guests