PornBox.com

Why bother having a stud in a film with a huge pecker if he is only gonna use the tip? It frustrates me that many movies say there is huge cocks penetrating small women but then the actor only uses about the first 3 inches. Why not just use average guys and go balls deep. For that matter, why dont the actors with the huge dicks go balls deep?

Seraph0257 wrote:Why bother having a stud in a film with a huge pecker if he is only gonna use the tip? It frustrates me that many movies say there is huge cocks penetrating small women but then the actor only uses about the first 3 inches. Why not just use average guys and go balls deep. For that matter, why dont the actors with the huge dicks go balls deep?

I would rather see a huge cock or more specifically huge cocks (meaning two or MORE). While tip-fucking is something that needs to go away, I would never prefer the alternative of watching an undersized male in a scene. For me, a woman subjecting herself to a massive rod is a bigger turn-on. But let's all agree on your last question. Balls deep is very much appreciated.

For me, the important thing is not just how deep they go, but how hard. Tip fucking sucks, but balls deep also sucks when it's really slow and gentle.

I want to see the girls getting pounded like a jackhammer. If they can do that with huge dicks, that's great. If not, then I would rather see really hard fucking with average dicks than tip fucking or slow, gentle fucking with huge dicks.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:For me, the important thing is not just how deep they go, but how hard. Tip fucking sucks, but balls deep also sucks when it's really slow and gentle.

I want to see the girls getting pounded like a jackhammer. If they can do that with huge dicks, that's great. If not, then I would rather see really hard fucking with average dicks than tip fucking or slow, gentle fucking with huge dicks.

But we can all agree that slow balls deep fucking is way better, than tip fucking, right?
SZ846


I personally like those moments when the girl is being fucked balls deep and at some point the dude, stops moving at the deepest and stays inside for a prolonged time.
SZ510

This one was pieced together to make it look like MYA can barely take it. In the actual video her facial expression comes from Franco licking her asshole.

or when he changes rhythm from fast to slow, and then fast again, hard thrust style. (Hard anal?)
SZ810

Balls deep is always better, but some models cannot always take it deep straight away and i would rather have a hot new women who maybe gets tip fucked to start with then rough old hags with used arseholes.

magizi87 wrote:But we can all agree that slow balls deep fucking is way better, than tip fucking, right?

No, I wouldn't say it's "way" better. It might be "slightly" better, but for me, it's still unsatisfying.

Look at a guy like Tony Brooklyn. He has a pretty big dick, and he often goes balls deep (or close to it), but he usually averages about 1 stroke every 5 seconds. That just doesn't do much for me.

Cynewulf30 wrote:Balls deep is always better, but some models cannot always take it deep straight away and i would rather have a hot new women who maybe gets tip fucked to start with then rough old hags with used arseholes.

There is a third possible choice, which is have the fucking guy take his time with the young lady and slowly work his way inside her nice ass, until she is able to take him all the way to his balls at full speed.

This kind of thing takes time, of course. But there is more than enough time for this, if you take away the usual tease and plastic dildo foreplay. Why not have the fucking guy foreplay the lady's nice ass with his cock, instead of having her do it with a plastic dildo and not doing a good job of it either?

An inexperienced lady doesn't know how to foreplay her nice ass well. And that's why she isn't ready, when her fucking guy comes.

And if the fucking guy is going to foreplay her, then he might as well do it with his cock, rather than with a plastic dildo. A plastic dildo doesn't look much better than a condom to me. I'd rather have the guy do it with his cock.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:For me, the important thing is not just how deep they go, but how hard. ... I want to see the girls getting pounded like a jackhammer. If they can do that with huge dicks, that's great.

+1

magizi87 wrote:But we can all agree that slow balls deep fucking is way better, than tip fucking, right? ... I personally like those moments when the girl is being fucked balls deep and at some point the dude, stops moving at the deepest and stays inside for a prolonged time.

+1

Seraph0257 wrote:Why bother having a stud in a film with a huge pecker if he is only gonna use the tip? It frustrates me that many movies say there is huge cocks penetrating small women but then the actor only uses about the first 3 inches.

+1000

cyberhog59 wrote:... tip-fucking is something that needs to go away

+1000

Dan7373 wrote:There is a third possible choice, which is have the fucking guy take his time with the young lady and slowly work his way inside her nice ass, until she is able to take him all the way to his balls at full speed.

+1000

Deeper harder longer and more of it

+1

Agree 100% with the above.

Sadly there's been threads like this on the forum for over a year, and nothing seems to change. I don't even bother with the SIneplex trailers any more, let alone purchase a scene.

I know I'm gonna get hate for this, but at least Woodman's anal scenes have intensity to them.
The only reason I visit LP now for Giorgio and Belle Claire ..

I'd say that wrong anal foreplay for the lady is what leads to less than balls-deep penetration for her in her scene.

Because when ladies foreplay their asses with dildos at the start of the scene, then they do only shallow penetration. They emphasize gaping, while neglecting deep penetration. Which means that the lady isn't ready for deep penetration, when her guy comes.

Perhaps the problem is with the way plastic dildos are shaped. Ladies often use thicker dildos than natural cocks, which makes deep penetration extra difficult for the lady. And that's why ladies don't do it.

And that's why I say that ladies should throw away their plastic dildos and have guys foreplay them with their natural cocks. It doesn't make sense to use a differently shaped plastic dildo, which doesn't fully prepare the lady for her guy's cock.

There is something to Dan7373s post, the more that I get increasingly bored by the repeated dildo forplay antiques - well, I <FF> most anyway to tell the truth.
But, however it is done, crucial is t prepare the girls for deep anal penetration be it off set/bts or on set by an actor or some decent dildo works.
And than...camera focus on lenghty fast hard balls deep anal, showing the girls face and reaction, of course!

^

That's the risk of having too many guys in the scene. Everyone wants to take a turn, which leads to so much turnover, that few, if any of the guys, do a good job.

To make it better, you either need fewer guys, so that each guy gets plenty of time between the cheeks of his lady. Or you need to have a gang with an obvious leader, who hogs the lady's nice ass for himself, while the other guys play supporting roles with their big poles.

It's not much of a gang-bang, when the gang is just a crowd of guys and not a real gang with an obvious leader. A real gang always has a leader. And this leader needs to be either one of the guys, or the lady herself. And the lady can show her leadership role by nailing every guy's pole with her nice ass cowgirl-style.