PornBox.com

yep ... sorry guys ...

1.no interaction...

2-no interview

3-LP eroticism differs ((SINEPLEX) from "others" there is no eroticism represented by the performers ...

4-There is, then, no eroticism in the LP world: (SINEPLEX) no bodily eroticism, no emotional eroticism, and no sacred eroticis ! (LP NEEDS french directors )

5-no ass worship ... (i love Mike Adriano's style )

6-too extreme AT FIRST .... take your time man ...

7-home page : Explicit anal fuck MUST END !!!

8-girls have a slutty look ... that turn me off ...

9-their recruiting skills are... average .... (but lately ... I have been impressed )

10 -no "Latest Girls" http://www.legalporno.com/model/list

1.no variety in settings

2.no variety in action (though the billy star 10 man scene is a nice start.)

3.no consideration to cinematography. Study how giorgio does it.

4. not enough gaping and plungering.

5. far too much emphasis on dps and dap during a scene. Taking turns on the girls is often far more erotic.

6. For the love of god, please get rid of the sterile lighting and sterile backgrounds. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!!! put the action in
everyday surroundings.

It kind of depends on which studio are we talking about.

SINEPLEX

They just need to understand that despite producing unique, excellent porn, at the end of the day, they are trying to make money, and if the product is never released or takes forever to be available to the public, they are not making money. And this is causing them to have money issues, (they are complaining money in the other tread) and can't continue to grow and expand. They are failing to do what they set out to do, which is making money. Consistency is usually the thing that makes you profitable. If they can figure this one out, THEN, we can talk about what other things could be improved.

Giorgio

Well man, just keep doing what you are doing. At this rate, my top 10 favorite scenes of 2015 will probably be monopolized by you. LOL. If I were to nitpick it would be, that all your scenes seem to have the same "sperma party" ending, some variety would be beneficial I think. But not at the cost of the quality of scenes (where quality also includes, but is not limited to, beautiful girls doing nasty things for one hour ^_^).

Gonzo

As of late scenes have a cold look to them. IMO this makes the girls look less good. But my biggest concern about their scenes is how often, this happens:
look at how much space is the MEN occupying in the screen

This is not me searching for that one moment in a 50 minute movie where he fucked it up, this is consistent in every video that has SZ on it.
This is so frustrating when some of the most beautiful women in the planet, like Blanche, are being captured this badly


in RED is all the space the camera man could have aimed the camera lower to the ground, with the goal of making the girl the centralized focal point of the action.

HOW is this BETTER compared to this:
Look how much more pleasing is to look at a girl curves when you can actually see her completely



At least try to center the girl and capture it from a distance and angle that captures how pretty she is
I mean this one has 5 (FIVE) men on the screen and still the girl is the star, she gets all the attention. she is the center of the scene





I wonder if Giorgio can train the Gonzo camera man. Look, I'm not trying to get him fired, but, I don't think he realizes that he is doing it wrong

^Absolutely spot on, 100% agree on all three perspectives.

I largely agree with magizi87's comments, especially about the Gonzo camerawork.

I would also add that it's very frustrating, for example, to have a girl wearing sexy heels while getting fucked, but never getting to see them because of the camera angle (and I'm sure others would say the same about the girl's bare feet).

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I would also add that it's very frustrating, for example, to have a girl wearing sexy heels while getting fucked, but never getting to see them because of the camera angle (and I'm sure others would say the same about the girl's bare feet).

+1000

All studios:
Loooong solo intros - I suspect most people are like me and the first fifteen minutes are just a waste of time. A couple of minutes tease, maybe another minute of dildo play. Id rather see the guys there at the beginning or just five minutes of lesbian play for 2 girl scenes. Really hored with the same old opening routine.
Piss ban - no more needs saying on this
Julmodels fall out - understand and not blaming xxx but it is a shame
Limited movement of models between studios
Awful site layout - Awful. Horrible advert for the site.
The name "legalporno". Sounds wierd and like the content is borderline illegal.
Encoding issues that takes weeks/months/never get resolved - This annoys me. If something is wrong get it fixed.

GG:
Fake cum - never ever. Weak cum shots are better than fake cum.
Pictures not rotated. I like Giorgio's photos. He spends time and effort on then then doesn't rotate them so the watermark is sideways on.

Gonzo:
Poor pictures - grainy and low res. Why???
Badly framed shots - mentioned by many others. Xxx puts out many good scenes that are well set and lit but often the camera angles show a lack of thought with regard to framing and shot composition.
Ian Scott and Franco Roccoforte - I let out a little groan when I see either of these two in a scene.

Sineplex:
Erratic and unreliable the only thing you can rely on with Sineplex is that just as they get everythingright they will suddenly stop producing scenes.
Man handled gapes - Something seems different about the way SP does gape shots. Too often, tather than using a naturally very gapey position or having the girl spread her ass cheeks we get two fat fingered man hands spreading the buttocks. I find it ugly in comparison with what I see from GG and Gonzo.


Much ti love on this site but these are my negatives.

Only a few real negatives,

1. Location variety and set is non existent from all three studios, sometimes it can become a bit boring with the scenes all shot in identical settings.

2. Gonzo studio and Gorgio can be a bit hit and miss in the female talent department

3. Fake cumshots from Gorgio.

4. Sineplex girls need to act as if they are enjoying it a bit more, it spoils my fantasy when they look bored.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I largely agree with magizi87's comments, especially about the Gonzo camerawork.

I would also add that it's very frustrating, for example, to have a girl wearing sexy heels while getting fucked, but never getting to see them because of the camera angle (and I'm sure others would say the same about the girl's bare feet).

I am one of those others! But, yes, if you are not gonna give me bare feet, at least let me see her high heels!!! When the camera chops the women's legs off below the ankles, it makes me feel as though I'm watching amputees.

Something I wanted to add with my points about Sineplex but wished to check out first is that the lighting is very variable and often is poor. For me, occasionally unwatchably so.
The general lighting for the scene is usually fine but in probably 50% of the scenes the actual penetration is frequently is shadow/poorly lit so that after a few scenes you know in advance which positions will look good (ie piledriver) and which will not (doggy etc) because too much reliance is on the ambient lighting.
Also, Gonzo scenes get criticised for chopping bits 9ff the girl with too tight framing in non-closeup shits but I think Sineplex is worse for this. Some scenes are full of shots where I just wish the camera would pull back a bit. In other words distance shots and close ups not shot after shot from somewhere inbetween. And in 2 girl scenes it would sometimes be better to focus on one girl and frame it well than try and force a way of showing both penetrations and frame neither well (or move back to frame the shot).

Please give us a way to vote for an specific model that we want to see perform at LP again.
Where the counter resets when a new scene is released with that actress.

And disable the button to vote under these circumstances:
A vote for that X model has been cast already (one vote per model per account that has spend money on the site) or that model is known to be retired.

Obviously the guy that set the model to "retired" status can only be done by someone working at LP.

And promote this feature in the front page so that all users become aware of it.

Agree with all that. This complete lack of eroticism or any suggestion of enjoyment is well illustrated in the RS119 with Leona Levi and Lindsey Logan.
They looked and performed as if they were utterly bored, disinterested or even turned off by what they were doing. Clearly neither enjoy anal eroticism (so why sign them up for such scenes at all?)
And instead of licking each other's asses, both have this annoying habit of faking it, by wiggling their tongues about a centimeter from their co-performer's asshole, fluttering their eyelids and groaning.
Which is as sexy as chewing razor blades.
But I suppose Sineplex would claim this is part of their hallmark style.
They ought to check out the great scenes of the past starring Hennessey, Timea et al to see how it is properly done.
Sineplex should cast performers who at least give the impression of enjoying themselves, because otherwise this dearth of enthusiasm transmits itself immediately to the viewer.

Peach Fuzz wrote:

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I largely agree with magizi87's comments, especially about the Gonzo camerawork.

I would also add that it's very frustrating, for example, to have a girl wearing sexy heels while getting fucked, but never getting to see them because of the camera angle (and I'm sure others would say the same about the girl's bare feet).

I am one of those others! But, yes, if you are not gonna give me bare feet, at least let me see her high heels!!! When the camera chops the women's legs off below the ankles, it makes me feel as though I'm watching amputees.

Never felt like watching amputees as the centre is between a girls legs not at their end.
But with all the rest I fully agree! More and more girls are luckily nicely dressed and wearing hot high heels, but as soon as the action starts camera forgets about it.


Btw, most of Baikens comments are just n/a. You could well have called that thread I want LP to become Dorcel. Too extreem, too fast, too much anal...what the fuck are you talking about?! Lots of good points by sirnoel, magizi and others who really support that site constructively, though. Hope we all can fine-tune it a bit!

Edmund03 wrote:And instead of licking each other's asses, both have this annoying habit of faking it, by wiggling their tongues about a centimeter from their co-performer's asshole, fluttering their eyelids and groaning.
Which is as sexy as chewing razor blades.

Haha, chewing razor blades is sexy!! Seriously though, I agree, they can't even seem to fake enjoying it very well.

1. 1000 Ass Licking gets shot way more then doing a clear toys straight from the ass to her mouth. Always ass lick then ATM. Why can't we just get no ass licking for the ATM part and a nice stay put shot of her doing ATM when we just saw ass licking 1000 times before that. (Gonzo & Sineplex)
2. 1000 Non-Gaping assholes gets shot way more then doing a clear toys straight from the ass to her mouth (Gonzo & Sineplex)
3. When Model is about to suck on a toy atm, camera inexplicably zooms in on her ass when it been shot 1000 times already and it's not even gaping. What's even worse, is that is done every single damn time for some odd reason. (Sineplex)
4. Camera either zoom extreme or non-stop movement extreme. Gonzo is back to the zoom in extreme with this latest batch. Why can't we just a get a middle of the pack shot. or just break it into 3 smart shots. This has been ongoing since SZ001 and still hasn't been fixed. It is one thing that is killing the eroticism of the scene (for me the toy scenes). So like to see outfits, feet, legs etc.
5. Lack of balls deep anal toy penetration. Gonzo has been much better then before. Improvement definitely.
-Sineplex is still doing the tickle my asshole with the top of the dildo. I can understand if the model is new. But I have seen other scenes where these models take it balls deep with amazing deep sucking, good girl clean up ATM of the dildos.
6. Too large of toys for me personally. Somethings just aren't to meant to fit for some of the models. No balls deep effect.
7. Solo scene - using double ended dildo ATM cheating. There has been I think 2 or 3 recent scenes where the model sucks clean end of the dildo.

Some have said that they can do without the toy tease scene. Too much of the above Ass Licking and Non-Gapings shots is not helping it and it's pretty tame.

Can we please just see balls deep dildo anal and then dildo straight from her ass and to her mouth deep sucking/throating Good girl TOYS ATM clean-up please instead of the same acts over and over again. Put some emphasis back on ATM. Rather then exclusive ass licking and non-gaping shots.

If they can improve on the above it should improve the toy/tease eroticism of the scene.

I'm not into prolapsing or piss but don't deny others rights to enjoy.

I just like good old hard fucking with beautiful girls.

LP girls just love it.