PornBox.com

it's clear that the site is going down the drain, but here's the thing: every scene is performed by the same actress, has no one else come to Andrew's shit studio from good actresses, where's the scene with Marta Villalobos, what kind of crap are these scenes lately, there aren't enough of them, does no one else want to go/fly to shoot in Prague? has the porn capital really died? How many more unreleased scenes do you think are in the stash?

Its over i give it until end of year.

I think it is not what it was when it was in its peak years...but one thing I can say is that it will still survive. Money is still being made, and there is still some profit to be had.

Every few months people say this is what's happening and they've been saying this for many years now. This site like any other will have its ups and downs

Unfortunately, this is what people here want. For years, they've been making unimaginable efforts to get to where we are now. These aren't just my own words. Look, you can see it over and over again in this very forum. People here have always defended the porn being made now:

1) The same actress doing the same scene a million times.

2) Peeing, vomiting, prolapses, and other disgusting things.

3) Every time a new, pretty, young girl came along, they never supported her. Instead, they kept asking the same woman, who had already done a thousand scenes before, to do the same scene again.

4) Women are no longer the center of attention. Women here are basically an excuse to show off men. That's why I think a lot of people here are bisexual or even homosexual. Something that can also be seen in the inclusion of gay or trans scenes.

We've been saying this for years, that they were going to close all the studios and that everything would be over, but of course, they always told us this would never happen, that all the studios were making a lot of money and that the website was doing very well. Obviously, those saying this, to no one's surprise, were the same sick people who defend everything I mentioned before.

Now they simply have what they asked for, don't complain.

Chimpy.677 wrote:Unfortunately, this is what people here want. For years, they've been making unimaginable efforts to get to where we are now. These aren't just my own words. Look, you can see it over and over again in this very forum. People here have always defended the porn being made now:

1) The same actress doing the same scene a million times.

2) Peeing, vomiting, prolapses, and other disgusting things.

3) Every time a new, pretty, young girl came along, they never supported her. Instead, they kept asking the same woman, who had already done a thousand scenes before, to do the same scene again.

4) Women are no longer the center of attention. Women here are basically an excuse to show off men. That's why I think a lot of people here are bisexual or even homosexual. Something that can also be seen in the inclusion of gay or trans scenes.

We've been saying this for years, that they were going to close all the studios and that everything would be over, but of course, they always told us this would never happen, that all the studios were making a lot of money and that the website was doing very well. Obviously, those saying this, to no one's surprise, were the same sick people who defend everything I mentioned before.

Now they simply have what they asked for, don't complain.

This site has always had a high percentage of bisexual (DAP/DVP) content tho, so its nothing new. The other stuff is probably true tho

I mostly agree with Chimpy.677. But i will try to phrase it differently. I think the main issue with repetitiveness is that GIO and AGO are too obsessed with "gangbangs", especially if the actress is high profile then they are very compelled to get at least 5 studs in the scene. But the root of the problem is the "wall of men''. They are always in the background. Older GONZO scenes also were like 5on1, 4on1, 3on1, but in them there were plenty dynamics where 1on1 2on1 getting the screen time and trying to do something creative instead of wanking in a circle, which they did it too but not for full 30-40 minutes.
Another issue is over direction. Both male and female performers should get some freedom between set poses to do something off the script. Now every scene is just forcing girl into same exposition we have seen million times because it just works the best.
The most disappointing thing for every PB studio is that there is an archive of ten of thousands scenes and they always fail to look back at the best/most engaging scenes and must always try "their own" thing.
For final thoughts there is a snapshot of Susan Ayn 8 man gangbang.

Chimpy.677 wrote:I don't agree with that. I think DAP isn't bisexual; it's simply a porn method for achieving bigger gapes. And about DVP, I never liked it. It doesn't make sense if you consider that the videos are also uploaded to a site called ANALVIDS, and it's not a challenge for a woman to do that kind of scene.

Two dicks rubbing against each other in the same hole has nothing to do with gapes. If you want gapes then you could use an object to widen the asshole. Two dicks rubbing inside the same hole are two dicks rubbing inside the same hole - not the slightest bit heterosexual.

Chimpy.677 wrote:2) Peeing, vomiting, prolapses, and other disgusting things.

your phobias against piss, vomit and prolapses are pathetic & weak

vvvv84335 wrote:Two dicks rubbing against each other in the same hole has nothing to do with gapes. If you want gapes then you could use an object to widen the asshole. Two dicks rubbing inside the same hole are two dicks rubbing inside the same hole - not the slightest bit heterosexual.

i think whats really not heterosexual is to do feminine things

2 dicks sharing the same hole doesnt count as feminine, thus is not gay

a girl putting 3 fingers inside your asshole counts as feminine behaviour and thus not heterosexual



men that like to be penetrated by women with strap ons are white collar gays
white collar faggots
they like to behave like women, they like to behave like vaginas, thus not heterosexual

isis111 wrote:idoes no one else want to go/fly to shoot in Prague?

Are you blind!
Ever heard of Inky Lix?
Or Shana Germoire today:
Nice drinking by Shana Grimoire btw!

AH174: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/3778009

Chimpy.677 wrote:Unfortunately, this is what people here want. For years, they've been making unimaginable efforts to get to where we are now. These aren't just my own words. Look, you can see it over and over again in this very forum. People here have always defended the porn being made now:

1) The same actress doing the same scene a million times.

2) Peeing, vomiting, prolapses, and other disgusting things.

3) Every time a new, pretty, young girl came along, they never supported her. Instead, they kept asking the same woman, who had already done a thousand scenes before, to do the same scene again.

4) Women are no longer the center of attention. Women here are basically an excuse to show off men. That's why I think a lot of people here are bisexual or even homosexual. Something that can also be seen in the inclusion of gay or trans scenes.

We've been saying this for years, that they were going to close all the studios and that everything would be over, but of course, they always told us this would never happen, that all the studios were making a lot of money and that the website was doing very well. Obviously, those saying this, to no one's surprise, were the same sick people who defend everything I mentioned before.

Now they simply have what they asked for, don't complain.

The real problem was that none of the people shooting the scenes truly understood what made porn special - or made the very best scenes stand out. As crazy as it may be to say something like that - it's ultimately true.

The real problem came with the industrialization and commercialization of porn production - for the Internet - in the past fifteen years or so.

It's that the appetite became so large - and the options so infinite - that production itself had to skyrocket in order to remain relevant and keep the customers coming back for the next bite. Suddenly producers were shooting two to three scenes a week.

Do you think any artist has it within themselves to produce three hours of interesting footage over the course of a week? Of course not. If they try to do too much "new stuff" - it gets sloppy - because they haven't had the time to test or perfect the technique yet. If they rely on the "old stuff" - it gets same-y - because now every shot is identical to every other shot.

That's why NRX sold so amazingly well. Because it found the perfect balance between trying new things and actually perfecting them - instead of shooting the same scene for fifteen years straight. Nick did the actual music-video-esque intros with the girl slowly presenting herself - rather than just standing there awkwardly and gawking at the camera for three minutes straight. Nick tried to introduce stories to some of the shoots - and while it didn't always (or rarely) do anything for me - it kept things fresh, at the very least. Nick did the three-hour gangbangs - with different scenes and sets within the framework of each one - that built a different kind of momentum than we had been used to seeing up until that point.

It was something different at the very least - and while not everything about it worked - for the amount of new stuff that was tried - an amazing amount of it actually did. Didn't hurt that the girls were fan-fucking-tastic, and didn't look like they siphon gas outside the convenience store in the small hours of the morning.

The peeing, the vomiting, all that gross stuff could actually work - if they found a way to naturally add it into the scene. Like, have an actual "natural flow" go along with it, and not cut the scene apart into these vintages of little mini-scenes where everything feels like a lego block sitting next to another lego block. But there comes the next big issue.

The legality of it. It's probably not legal, and opens the producers to a lot of potential problems, if the girls going into what is a very public studio don't have it laid out in absolutely pristine clear detail exactly what the fuck is going to happen during the set. It's probably not possible to say, "Hey, well, we're just going to see where this goes." So - what do you get? The same fucking scene shot well over 2,000 times. And that's what needs to be done in order to satiate the release-almost-every-day schedule a lot of these studios were under pressure to do - lest the attention of the fans - and their dollars - go elsewhere, anywhere, on the near infinitum of porn that is the Internet.

And the problem with new girls is this ...

Let's say that you get an incredibly amazing, 11/10 eighteen year old girl, who's actually willing to do everything you can throw at her. That's great! Right? Well, yes, but ...

Suddenly, every other actress that was part of your team, let's be generous and say that they ranked as 7 out of 10s, will now look like 5 out of 10's after this new actress starts shooting and releasing scenes. So! Unless you have a steady stream of amazingly hot young girls who are willing to throw themselves at this kind of content (like in the old Russia days) - then ...

You're most likely going to get a small contingent of gasoline suckers who are willing to come in for their fiftieth double anal piss-glugging vomit-spewing gangbang - and likewise - the same small contingent of fans who are willing to buy their scenes.

Everyone else is on OF. Making either millions, or pennies, but believing they have a shot to make millions some day. And when you see some of the top tier girls on OFs, and what they're willing to do there, it's indeed a shame that OF came into existence. But it did. So, better scrounge your dollars up for the next gas-chugger that's willing to take a few rusty pipes in the ol' cheesecake factory, because that's all you'll be getting.

And while that may be really disrespectful to many of the (amazing) girls who do still shoot for the site - and quite honestly - the quality of girls has been going up from where it was a year ago or so - as have the scenes that have getting released on the front page - there are some ultimate realities and truths in what I said that mean that the decisions that were made were not necessarily done so out of choice ... but out of necessity.

Not all of it - but lumping all the faults into a gigantic basket and giving it to the guys running this site is not just unfair, but not reflective of reality either.