PornBox.com

You guys shoot the best scenes ever. We all agree. You also do the worst in one category out of EVERY major porn site, even sites going back to 2005-2006 and that's pictures.

They're important, very important. They allow you to promote your material, and pictures are what initially draw people to sites. They capture a moment in time, there's nothing like a picture of a beautiful girl getting DP'd.

So why the hell do you continue to upload pictures that look like they've been taken on a Motorola Razr from 2004? Go to EvilAngel's picture galleries and take notes please.

+1

HardX takes the best pictures IMO. Both in terms of technicality and artistic value. There is a lot of eye candy in her pictures (Mason).

I agree LP takes subpar pictures. I'm happy they started offering them. But improvements are ALWAYS welcome.

I agree the pic sets are poor quality and seem like an afterthought. Imo I have always loved Rocco Soffredi's photosets - he tends to release a couple of dozen of the best pictures and the images are always posed to look dynamic and intense.

100% agree. It looks like they have decent camera kit then set the resolutions to 640x480, low res jpegs with poor choice of shutter speed/ISO/aperture! They go to all the effort of getting the actors to pose for stills, good positions, lighting not too bad and then don't take decent technical quality pics - which would not add cost to set time at all!

LP - as a semi pro photographer I'm offering my services for free to fly over to you and take the next few scenes of stills!

look here, I opened a thread about the bad pic quality last year but didn't get an answer and nothing changed... still the worst pic quality in internet porn site:

viewtopic.php?f=96&t=8194

Just do it already. It's angering you guys are unable to change a setting on your f****** cam...

What's the f****** problem???? Don't have the manual of your cam... goddamit A donkey makes better photos.