Page 1 of 1

Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 5:35 pm
by dap-addict
This is another post trying to focus users DAP demands on good DAP vs. lame or even faked DAP in order to make the DAPs we are served by studios better.

A good DAP includes the fellowing:
- upright bent back position in cgDAP (with no stiff back)
- both studs pounding into the girl during DAP-ing
- DAPgasm reached by girl really (or at least convincingly faked)

It's clear that such DAP proficiency takes some training. Most girls reach this state only around her 10th DAP. Some master it earlier, but it's usually helped by anchor stud not banging into her ass but staying passive or even not entering her ass at all. This is sure not what DAP fans want!


To make clear what I am talking about I post two cgDAP examples:
A) Good full-fledged cgDAP:
Kira Thorn started to perform cgDAP fine from her 12th DAP scene:
Image Kira is still way low, but Mike Angelo later also manages his trademark manhandle grip with her without slightest problem, which means she's DAP-ed in fine now also in cg position - finally!
Image Mike Angelo pushing Kira to high DAP-lust! :D :cool:
sz1683: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/32378


B) Lame anchor stud = no good DAP:
Image This is Stacy Blooms 3rd DAP only and in this booking she reaches the right position and good DAP, but anchoring Dylan doesnt bang really into her ass.
It's a good DAP training maybe, but as long as anchor cant bang fast and deep into the girl DAP isnt full-fledged and thus not good.

GIO1326: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/62748 (shot end of 2019)

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 5:41 pm
by dap-addict
Btw, I took these examples from my Kira vs. Stacy DAP comparison thread (viewtopic.php?f=96&t=89466&p=1345458&hilit=Stacy+Kira#p1319454) dedicated to two of the greatest LP DAP talents and LP actresses as such.

Both examples are still early porn works for both girls.

I specially took a basically good BBC scene for Stacy because BBC fetish blinds the eyes of many users. First fucking has to be good and performance of all actors and actresses involved makes a good scene not color of skin!

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 10:33 pm
by sharpsharp
100% agreed.

Tip dapping is very boring

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 11:16 pm
by jjwhite1985
I'm not too bothered with the girl's back being completely upright, when they're lower can also be a super hot position, the most important thing is the back arch. Both cocks thrusting simultaneously and balls deep is the ideal - problem when they alternate is that one cock is in while the other is just the tip. It's also why I'm not a fan of TAP, you never get all three cocks penetrating fully, because of physics, it's almost always slow and lame tip-fucking.

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2025 10:59 pm
by dap-addict
jjwhite1985 wrote:the most important thing is the back arch.

Could you post a pic?

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2025 8:25 am
by Niffty
I agree, DAP needs to be long and hard from both cocks. All the way to the balls with every stroke. The cocks get thicker at the base, for this reason I want to see both cocks rammed to the balls simultaneously to really stretch her asshole out. Pound it out, gape her to admire your work, then go in for more. Again and again.

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 12:03 am
by DD_hh_sgp
you get more speed and rhythm to it with the top guy doing 2/3 of the penetration work

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 1:27 pm
by dap-addict
DD_hh_sgp wrote:you get more speed and rhythm to it with the top guy doing 2/3 of the penetration work

But your last gif shows the top or upper stud doing 100% of the penetration work - and the anchor stud doing no fucking at all. :(
It may look fast, but it's no double pounding.

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 1:29 pm
by dap-addict
add:
If the anchor stud, that lower fucker isnt moving it's much easier for the girl to perform that DAP, but it's what I tried to describe in OP. It's not a full fledged DAP for me.

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 4:03 pm
by dap-addict
Here an other good example showing the effect of anchor studs work on the girls DAP: 10years ago @ Gonzo anchoring Markus Dupree is fucking the girl as deep and as fast as possible during DAP no matter whether its her 1st DAP after a long time. Effect is that they have to abandon that cgDAP position after 1min.

A critical re-view of Bibi Fox comeback-DAP @ sz661 (https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/29030):
Image Only in his 2nd take Clay manages to really dap Bibi. She react livelier than during her very brief DAPinsertion now, we see it's not easy for her to perform that DAP, the more as both studs bang into her pretty fast. What to expect after so many years off-set? - A DAP battle ofc, but not to abandon it after only 1min! I see now they couldnt really dap her in cg, she's broken-in in that position, but she cant do DAP in cowgirl really. Today many directors would slow down anchor stud and prolong the cgDAP position by 5min.
Thats a much longer DAP ofc, but quality is pretty low.

10y ago this was the end ofter just 1min: :(
Image They once more try to accellerate speed and feel she cant do it because she bows her back and thus evades the thrusts.
Good studs work here is that both of them fuck her during DAP, if anchor stud wouldn't move and just lay there lazy with his tool inside her ass they could get her to dap longer ofc. ;)

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 5:24 pm
by dap-addict
Btw, a few months later Gonzo re-booked Bibi for DAP and this time Ian Scott (anchor) and Mike Angelo (top) try to get a good cgDAP out of her:
Image Gif shows the end of that cgDAP workout: This time studs leave her at flat belly position first and only much later they lift her up a bit. Position is less important to them than cgDAP-ing her in first - a good decision I think. Again Bibi Fox struggles a quite bit, but she performs cgDAP 3 times longer and comes close to crossing that thin line into DAPlust. :cool:
Her 2nd Gonzo cgDAP (sz791) is a clear progress and I am sure if there had been a next DAP booking she'd succeeded and given a good day maybe even reached DAPgasm in cowgirl.

Now Bibi Fox wasnt a rookie and it was the 5th DAP in her career after DAPbreakin' 2005, this helped ofc. Studs first had problems finding a rhythm, but important is both studs bang into her during DAP.

sz791: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/29670

Re: Double pounding DAP vs. lame anchor DAP

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 8:46 pm
by RawMeat
Meh a great deal of these GIFs are way too slow to be qualitative to me
Slow motion shagging is as annoying and lame as tip fucking

Back in the golden 2000s era you could appreciate the quality of rough brutal DPs merely by the sound of balls clapping on the chicks ass at the speed of a jackhammer