PornBox.com

Anselm_Weinberg wrote:If I understand OP correctly he was saying that there is a stigma attached to these things among users of this site itself, he wasn't really talking about society at large in this instance. But maybe I've misunderstood and he may correct me on this point if that is indeed the case.

Chimpy.677 wrote:It's always the same fools who say that. Also, and more importantly, it's ALWAYS the ones who say things like that who are the most depraved and misogynistic. It just happens that they need to say that in public to try to cover up what they really are. And it happens everywhere. These people act like saints and then you start investigating them and they end up being the worst.

AnalGooner7 wrote:Does anyone else feel that there is a shame or stigma attached to wanting to see hardcore porn.

netzerkaiser wrote:I think the OP is correct. I think there is a stigma attached to being the member of any porn site.

And I think it's unjustified, it's wrong. Personally my thing here is trying to finish off the old GG, NRFTA, Sineplex classic scenes, & much from 2012 - 2017, but I just never seem to find the time.

Now, I know that people have no problem telling me about their adventures on tacky hook-up sites. But no-one ever tells me about their being a member of a porn site. And yet most of them watch porn clearly.

So I think, yes, there is a stigma, & certainly there shouldn't be.

I don't think there is anything to be ashamed of. In fact, you are being honourable & paying instead of free loafing off of whatever 'guess which pixel' free site there is.

AnalGooner7 wrote:Does anyone else feel that there is a shame or stigma attached to wanting to see hardcore porn, particularly in this forum? I’ve seen myself and others add comments about wanting to see girls destroyed, and we are met with replies saying that we are misogynistic and want to see the girls in pain.

I don’t think that’s particularly fair given the titles of the videos are called “Anna DeVille is indestructible” or “7on1 anal destruction on slutty 19yo”. This language is encouraged by the producers and the videos and I don’t think it’s fair for fans to be shamed for engaging with it and wanting to see good, hard anal destruction.

latina-girls-yes wrote:

AnalGooner7 wrote:Does anyone else feel that there is a shame or stigma attached to wanting to see hardcore porn, particularly in this forum? I’ve seen myself and others add comments about wanting to see girls destroyed, and we are met with replies saying that we are misogynistic and want to see the girls in pain.

I don’t think that’s particularly fair given the titles of the videos are called “Anna DeVille is indestructible” or “7on1 anal destruction on slutty 19yo”. This language is encouraged by the producers and the videos and I don’t think it’s fair for fans to be shamed for engaging with it and wanting to see good, hard anal destruction.

you are ultimately responsible for the language you use. as with all of your behaviours, the moral buck stops with you
seeking to justify using language you feel awkward about (and it's purely between you and your conscience why you might feel like that) by saying that a site or another member uses it is a weak argument.
as Carla Jean says in the film 'No Country For Old Men': "The coin don't have no say. It's just you."

personally speaking, there are words i use here and words i don't. for example, i prefer to use girl/woman (as gender terms) and/or model/performer (as professional terms) to language with more insulting/degrading connotations that other members and sites use to mean the same thing (worthless whore, useless bitch and so on)
my personal reason for that (no one else has to share it) is that i don't use insulting/degrading language IRL towards women IRL, and that naturally carries over into my xxx life (accepting that porn is not a real life context but a fantasy context)
but i can also imagine that some people might be able to successfully compartmentalise their language and behaviours into two firewalled boxes; being polite and decent to women IRL, and getting into a dominant and abusive role in xxx life, and always conscientiously ensuring there is no overlap

from the other side of the equation, some women in the industry (as seen through their xxx socials) are clearly happy for others to use what some may consider insulting language towards them in the right context (xxx fantasy). they may even use it about themselves in the same context
BUT! should a fan attempt to use that same language towards them IRL (ie. in a way that they consider outside of xxx fantasy context) i suspect most if not all would (and justifiably so) block you online, or try to kick you in the teeth IRL
these are women who act in professional xxx content not only for money, but also for the pleasure of entertaining their fans (us) for which we should show all due respect. what they are most definitely not are verbal punchbags for every incel with a greivance who wants to let off steam

so ultimately choosing your language relies on a mix of your personal values (remembering/respecting that others values will vary) and your sense of appropriate/inappropriate context (remembering/respecting that others sense of that will vary). but forget what other members and sites say. "The coin don't have no say. It's just you."

AnalGooner7 wrote:Does anyone else feel that there is a shame or stigma attached to wanting to see hardcore porn, particularly in this forum? I’ve seen myself and others add comments about wanting to see girls destroyed, and we are met with replies saying that we are misogynistic and want to see the girls in pain.

ringstinger wrote:

AnalGooner7 wrote:Does anyone else feel that there is a shame or stigma attached to wanting to see hardcore porn, particularly in this forum? I’ve seen myself and others add comments about wanting to see girls destroyed, and we are met with replies saying that we are misogynistic and want to see the girls in pain.

Don't think I've personally experienced this myself. Never felt ashamed or criticised for using such words of enjoying watching girls beautiful asses being 'destroyed' by big thick cocks.

I do have to comment, thoughts on girls who talk this style of language? Had a friend with benefits, who used to watch LegalPorno videos together, and she used to be very vocal about wanting her pussy, and ass destroyed. Loved it!

netzerkaiser wrote:

latina-girls-yes wrote:"The coin don't have no say. It's just you."

Your intellect i don't doubt. But using the greatest psychopath I've ever seen does not make one comfortable in any respect. This guy was pure evil. I would hope most of us here aren't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZY0DG8rUnCA

latina-girls-yes wrote:

netzerkaiser wrote:

latina-girls-yes wrote:"The coin don't have no say. It's just you."

Your intellect i don't doubt. But using the greatest psychopath I've ever seen does not make one comfortable in any respect. This guy was pure evil. I would hope most of us here aren't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZY0DG8rUnCA

the point i was trying to make was that the OP should examine why they feel comfortable/uncomfortable or ashamed/unashamed about using certain words about certain subjects (to arrive at a personal resolution based on their own conscience), rather than try to delegate that decision making (and responsibility that goes with it) away from themselves and onto third parties

we can all comment to say why we do/don't use this or that term, and the OP can take that into consideration or ignore it, but ultimately the OP has to choose their own terms based on the bidding of their conscience

that's why i used the coin example from 'No Country For Old Men'
Anton Chigurh (a psychopath) uses the coin as a way of distancing himself from having to accept personal responsibility for his actions (and so from having to accept moral responsibility for his crimes), by trying to offload that life-or-death moral responibility (and the potential guilt that goes with it) onto an inanimate object

and Carla Jean (probably the weakest and least able to defend herself character in the film) is the only one who has the courage to call him out about it to his face, revealing him to himself to be (despite his prowess in the use of violence) a moral coward and a fundamentally weak and dysfunctional individual (irrational and extreme violence is usually a vice of the damaged, the dysfunctional and the coward)

it's a great moment in a great film (i'm glad you've seeen it too)

btw when checking imdb for the exact quote yesterday i noticed this interesting gem in the trivia section:
'According to a January 2018 article in Business Insider, a group of psychiatrists studied 400 movies and identified 126 psychopathic characters. They chose Javier Bardem's portrayal of Anton Chigurh as the most clinically accurate portrayal of a psychopath'

but the OP's topic is use of language (not film or psychology) and i'm on my luchbreak, so i will leave it there

AnalGooner7 wrote:Does anyone else feel that there is a shame or stigma attached to wanting to see hardcore porn, particularly in this forum? I’ve seen myself and others add comments about wanting to see girls destroyed, and we are met with replies saying that we are misogynistic and want to see the girls in pain.

I don’t think that’s particularly fair given the titles of the videos are called “Anna DeVille is indestructible” or “7on1 anal destruction on slutty 19yo”. This language is encouraged by the producers ...

Chimpy.677 wrote:It's always the same fools who say that. Also, and more importantly, it's ALWAYS the ones who say things like that who are the most depraved and misogynistic. It just happens that they need to say that in public to try to cover up what they really are. And it happens everywhere. These people act like saints and then you start investigating them and they end up being the worst.

Chimpy.677 wrote:According to 99,99 % of the world, I'm not saying it, go to any porn site in the world and always the most consumed content will be the traditional hardcore anal sex, the only crazy people who consume urine, vomit, prolapse (and who knows in the future what else) are you.

Chimpy.677 wrote:

Anselm_Weinberg wrote:

Chimpy.677 wrote:I'm being 100% objective

Chimpy.677 wrote:And even if there were scenes without urine, they would still sell more because nowadays the only customers left are those sick with urine and weird things, everyone else no longer buys or left directly

Sure, hun. You're the epitome of objectivity.

It's true, you guys aren't normal. To like that kind of thing you have to have some kind of problem, it's not just about different tastes.

AnalGooner7 wrote:Does anyone else feel that there is a shame or stigma attached to wanting to see hardcore porn, particularly in this forum? I’ve seen myself and others add comments about wanting to see girls destroyed, and we are met with replies saying that we are misogynistic and want to see the girls in pain.

I don’t think that’s particularly fair given the titles of the videos are called “Anna DeVille is indestructible” or “7on1 anal destruction on slutty 19yo”. This language is encouraged by the producers and the videos and I don’t think it’s fair for fans to be shamed for engaging with it and wanting to see good, hard anal destruction.

dap-addict wrote:It's basically a linguistic problem.
But I'd never shame a true porn fan for asking for very hard anal.
Its sure not misogynic as long as porn fans are aware that its still humans performing that anal sex for us on set and that these women have to be treated the best way possible, while of course performing the hardest anal sex possible including some pain that may happen.