Edmund03 wrote:Clearly reading is not your strong point, eh sunshine? but lying is apparently.
I have never asked for cockfests to be "toned down" (evidence please!) , merely that LP also focus on their other niches to cater for all tastes, some of which are the reason I joined.
For a while all they were producing was muilticocks fests, to the exclusion of all else. Balance is what I asked for (but never got sadly!).
And unlike some other posters, I reserve passing judgement on other people's tastes. Each to his/her own.
What's the difference ? Stating the intent behind your past requests doesn't mean you've never asked for it. OP is clearly asking for the frequency of this sort of content to be reduced, how is that any different from what you've done in the past with regards to cockfests ? There has been an abundance of piss related content on here for several months and for some members that limits what's on offer for them; this request differs to some of yours in the past how exactly ?
Edmund03 wrote:What an amazing surprise! Yet another multimen-on-woman scene! Just like yesterday, the day before and the day before that.... and just like the past months in fact. Is there no chance of something different for a change? Not all (paying) customers enjoy these cockfests. Many of us joined for creme, piss and gapefarts, but are being ignored.
Edmund03 wrote:Oh what a surprise. The latest release features multiple men on one woman. Wow. Who'd have thunk it? In fact just like yesterday, or the day before, or the day before that... ad infinitum. Any chance of LP catering to the tastes of other paying members and perhaps including a few lesbian pee or creme scenes as a welcome alternative to this unrelenting cockfest? Or has it abandoned these once celebrated, trademark niche categories? If so, pray please tell, thus stopping some of us from continuing to squander our money here. The question is, of course, rhetorical. As LP, unlike any other company in this sector, does not debase itself by responding to the enquiries of paying customers.
Most of the time these were gross exaggerations that were often pointed out to you, but what you were doing is complaining about a particular type of scene in a bid to reduce it's prevalence on the site. Whatever way you try to spin it, these posts were a request to reduce one type of content and provide something else, i.e "tone down".
For someone to say that they "reserve passing judgement on other people's tastes" and "each to his/her own", you sure took no time in ripping him to pieces for expressing that he finds piss disgusting. He made no mention of his preferences being acceptable or normal, or that anything that isn't to his taste shouldn't be on offer, and yet you felt the need to go off on a rant and run him in to the ground. It wouldn't be because he had an opinion that conflicts with something you like would it ?
I actually find your diplomacy on here quite refreshing, Edmund, and I'm not particularly interested in a war of words with you, but this topic to me seemed like a simple request without any ill feeling or malice, and you destroyed him for it.