PornBox.com

In the newest scenes just one or two boys fucked a girls. Please use 4-5 guys and at the end jizz on the girl face. Maybe the girls swap sperm in ther mouths

More studs = higher ticket prices.
But basically production comes in waves always. Now its rather a 2on1/1on2 wave. Next week maybe 3/4on1 again. Also Giorgio Grandi is shooting a 7on1 this Friday. Just keep in mind that good studs cost their price, too. Thus I would rather opt for good girls standing harder fucking in the 3/4on1 ratio.

How do u know what scenes will come? Send a PM to me thx

I don't mind two or three guys with one girl...as long as there is some good DP and the guys (preferably Ian, Markus, Mike A, Christian, Tony, Neo, Ed Jr, Chris, Michael) do some double doggy DP or double missionary DP.
I imagine using all the guys I just mentioned in one scene would cost a fair amount since they are prime performers.
If you use first timers or lower level male performers you could have 5 or 6 guys on 1 girl without incurring the cost, since the prime list would cost double I would think.
More than 5 or 6 guys on 1 girl gets too crazy with too many guys standing around not do anything, that is why two or three (or four at most) is good.
But for me its about the position - so a DP scene without double doggy or double missionary is a tad less good (like the scene released today and yesterday or day before with Ian, Tony and Markus...DP but no double doggy dp! Missed a perfect opportunity with these three guys, who do it all the time...

Cheers!

2 dick in the anus 1 in the pussy and the ither 2 got a jerking off from the girl

^Don't forget, she might like one in her mouth too!!!

Most boys during the scenes?
I have not doubts:

absolutely YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS
....BUT with more than 4-5 guys... at least 10 guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AND if the girls agrees why don't you do it?
The girls of LP are fantastic and see them in Bukkake with great Cum and Piss Drinking is the top of the top for me!

I always love the Gang Bang and i like the scenes of Bukkake cum and Piss.......... Sorry I forgot with DAP, obvious......ahahahahahahahah

Lets be realistic: Who will pay more than 5 tickets on a more or less regular basis?
If the girl is really hot, yes. But just for a gb/bukkake?
Nothing against a X-mas 20on1 bukkake in 2015, though!

I think more than 4-5 guys for a girl is useless... More comples for booking, more expensive scene, all of that for what ? One more cumshot ?
I'd rather like to see 4 guys, but all on them on the girl the whole time, using all her holes, hands, feet, boobs and stuff. Not turn by turn.

Yes 4-5 guys enough

Hmm no , 3 guys should be the maximum.
Otherwise its just too much and as already said, they have to get paid.

More than 3 is too many for me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iOVroDmWcs

Hummmmm ..... for me serve many guys, at least 10.

See my models preferred full of cum in the face it's the maximum. However, the girls must drink all .... eheheheheheh

I repeat: the girls of LP are fantastic and see them in Bukkake with great Cum and Piss Drinking is the top of the top for me!

3 guys is plenty. The girls only have 3 holes, so why waste money hiring extra guys to stand around doing nothing?

No No ATM ... eheheheheh
girls have 3 holes but are full of desire, and are never surfeited people ... ahahahahahahah.... :-)
It is better 7-8 guys for one, believe me! :-)

And then see a beautiful face full of cum and Piss is the best for me .... huuuummmmmm and sluuuuuuurp

A Min. of 2 and a Max. of 3 is reasonable!!!Instead this amount(used to hire extra guys)can used to hire more beauties!!!

Only 2-3 guys .... uhmmm ... I hope not!

Sorry but why LP does not create a video section to the whole to the Gang Bang /Bukkake/Piss/DAP ...
so LP is meeting all of our tastes.

So techio,If I understand everything,you want:

_DAP with humiliation
_7 guys minimum
_bukkake pissing and creampie swallows
_everything right now



LIKE ME!!!

..........ahahahahahahahahah..........

Yes of course.... :-)

1-3 guys is all a scene needs with 2-3 girls. Anymore would just be a cockfest though thats what LP is now becoming. It might be time to change LP's name to Legalgangbang or legalcockfest

ElJab78 wrote:1-3 guys is all a scene needs with 2-3 girls. Anymore would just be a cockfest though thats what LP is now becoming. It might be time to change LP's name to Legalgangbang or legalcockfest

Dunno about that but I DO wish they would change the fucking name! Legalporno sounds weird, like some kind of site that dresses 18+ girls up as if they are younger (which is NOT what happens here ofc) and worst is that the word is written on the scenes.

Perhaps they should do an ALS scan type thing and justbuse the acronym...... LP.com?

Dear "ElJab78" .... maybe more Gang Bang in LP ...
and with the same name

Everything evolves in the life

I'd like to see less 2 on 2's and more 1 on 3-4's and when you have 2 girls in the scene, match them with 3-4 guys, not just 2.

I'd like to use Kitana Lure's 8 it all scene as the shining example of why I signed up here. One girl pleasing a group of guys - something most of us never get to experience in real life, and thus why it's so fantastic. (Imagine fucking a girl you and your buddies picked up, together!?)

I've said it a couple times here in a different thread- One on ONE sex regardless of performer, I'm likely not going to buy it because it's not appealing to my current desire.

1 to 3 guys is imho perfect. Above that you need at least another girl and it becomes basically an orgy (something that LP should do more often...). For fucking a girl you don't need a huge number of cocks, just enough to fill all her holes (thus, 3 is the most).
What would be a great improvement instead would be a random number of random guys at the end of the scene that cum and then piss (if it's a pissing scene, of course) over the girl face. Those should be as many as possible (4-5 being the minimum). Not required to be professional actors either, nor to show the face, just random dudes that get jerked off and sucked by the girl.

^ I agree with that. There was an American series called "Cum coat my throat" It would feature a 1 girl on 2-3 guy scene, followed by their cumshots, then, another 10 or so guys (who didn't fuck her) all blast their loads into her mouth, and then she would swallow it all down. (and w/ LP piss on her, hopefully)

That would work just as well!

The ideal number of guys would be 4-7 .
4 is the minimum if the girl wants to suck 2 cocks simultaneously while getting dp´ed ( recently seen here in the Luna Oara gangbang - hot airtight with simultaneous double blowjob ) .

5 or more guys are required if the girl wants to do some airtight skiing ( stroking other guys while getting airtighted ) . Unfortunately I don´t see that much of this action here . The useless bystanding of unused guys is not helping the scenes .

Let the girl clean up the cum while stroking them simultaneously or alternately , and sometimes take 2 or 3 cocks in her mouth .
Watch the older Hose Monster movies if necessary to learn how it´s done .

blackdom wrote:1 to 3 guys is imho perfect. Above that you need at least another girl and it becomes basically an orgy (something that LP should do more often...). For fucking a girl you don't need a huge number of cocks, just enough to fill all her holes (thus, 3 is the most).

I agree, except for the part about orgies, which are too difficult to capture properly. Look at the 4-on-4 they shot a little while ago, or the 5-on-5 they shot before that. They used 2 cameras in those scenes, and they still missed tons of stuff.

What would be a great improvement instead would be a random number of random guys at the end of the scene that cum and then piss (if it's a pissing scene, of course) over the girl face. Those should be as many as possible (4-5 being the minimum). Not required to be professional actors either, nor to show the face, just random dudes that get jerked off and sucked by the girl.

This is a good idea. I wouldn't want them to do it in every scene, but I think it would be great to do this occasionally.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I agree, except for the part about orgies, which are too difficult to capture properly. Look at the 4-on-4 they shot a little while ago, or the 5-on-5 they shot before that. They used 2 cameras in those scenes, and they still missed tons of stuff.

That's the issue with orgies, to really capture everything worthy of capturing they should last 2 hours. I'd buy a scene that long once in a while if there's a girl or two that are among my top ten ever, even if it'd cost like 12 tickets. Keep orgies with only the "premium" girls and they'd be worth watching.