PornBox.com

After reminiscing on the Isabella Clark scene (http://legalporno.com/watch/29062/isabe ... _dap_sz670) it just showed me how despite calling for as much DP as possible I do like a DAP fix on LP, too!

Rightly shot DAP I mean, not the DAP we get so much of where the guys are TIP FUCKING! This is LP of course and it is known for its intense balls deep hardcore style. I mean DAPs like the above mentioned in the Isabella Clark scene. It is still the best way after sometime to show a mastery of all sexual acts when a model can perform a proper balls deep DAP.
Intended or by coincidence, booked in advance or just trying his luck, doubling up on orifices whatsoever - it always makes up a nice surprise showing the expertise of a model.

Anyway, today I know I cannot live really without DAP in porn, also on LP.

Question is rather how much I still need DAP...1 in 5 scenes is enough I guess. Sure?

What are your feelings and consumer needs?

Right now my favorite scenes are one girl w/ 3-4 guys. DP is a must, DAP is great, but on the condition the girl is comfortable enough for it not to be painful or an issue with her to an extent she quits doing scenes.

The whole TAP thing It's hard to even get, the guys have to compile in such a way it looks almost silly. It's almost like a circus act. Hehe.

Mordecai35 wrote:
The whole TAP thing It's hard to even get, the guys have to compile in such a way it looks almost silly. It's almost like a circus act. Hehe.

Which is why the camera man needs to capture in such a way that the girl is taking 90% of the screen.

I think they need to incorporate handle bars so the guy in the middle of the TAP can use them to help himself go in and out.

I was thinking tubes coming from the sealing or similar.

Yes, half of all scenes should include DAP!!!

dpconnoisseur1 wrote:After reminiscing on the Isabella Clark scene (http://legalporno.com/watch/29062/isabe ... _dap_sz670) it just showed me how despite calling for as much DP as possible I do like a DAP fix on LP, too!

I knew it! Thanks for aknowleging, dpconnoisseur1!
Couldnt find my 80% of scenes dap option, but still voted for an option allowing dp still. As my gift to you!
IF all daps were as intense and deep fucked as your gifs, I would take more dap of course. But we all know how difficult it is to perform for the girls.
TAP on the contrary is merely circus in most cases. Isabella Clark ans a few other girls can perform it fine of course. But, honestly, I dont need it often.

Which scene is this picture from?


DAP in half of all scenes !!

^Jay Sin's 'Anal Buffet 5'

You were just a sec earlier, gapefan!
Btw, who is the bushy fishnet top girl?

Thanks GapeFan !
You are like the wikipedia of DAP

^^Vicki Chase, in Jonni Darkko's 'V for Vicki'

^Thanks Splatch, I do what I can

Thanks, mate, I shall order that dispite that bush and bbg only!
Or is it just a too short dap for LP standards?

You're welcome, mate!

It's a long intense DAP!!!

Right up there with LP standards!!!

Thanks, mate!
I shall put up with that thick bush of hers than...
Btw, how is Bonny Rotten in Anal Buffet 10 and Veronica Avluv in LeWoods MILF gangbang compared with LP dap standards than?
Better share postage with more dvds I guess.

IMHO, just because they produce more DAP doesn't mean they are better!!! I have found DAPs although scarce in other studios (even american) are more intense and with better camera angles! This might be due mainly, because the models are more experience. My assumption!!!

I can rattle of many GREAT DAPs at other studios but less than a handful at LP! The sex acts that LP does best and consistently is BALLS DEEP ANAL AND DP!

Also nobody does TAP well, to much of a circus act with a whole lot of man ass blocking the view!!! I know I'm going to catch hell for this statement. Sorry guys just my opinion!

dap-addict wrote:I Couldnt find my 80% of scenes dap option, but still voted for an option allowing dp still. As my gift to you!
IF all daps were as intense and deep fucked as your gifs, I would take more dap of course. But we all know how difficult it is to perform for the girls.

No gift to me ! I will always be here to parse your words and call you on it. Your crusade has been very obvious since you joined the site attempting to limit the quantity of DP and boost quantity of DAP produced. Unlike you, I really don't care how much DAP is produced as long as it is balls deep and intense! Where I push back is the obvious attempt at limiting DP by buried comments of 1 out of 5 should be enough right.

In the grand scheme of things the two of us don't matter is the collection of buyers that is why I love the LP purchasing system even if it might be more expensive. The largest group of buyers dictate what is mainly produced. It is not the best way to run your government this way but it is the best way to run a company because the only reason companies exists is to make profit. That is why I can't figure out what LP Sineplex is doing. I feel LP Sineplex invented this hardcore stuff but lost there way and LP Gonzo has perfected it. Shit if Sineplex gets there act together and Giorgio gets going the LP brand will be unstoppable for porn fans looking for hardcore sexual content.

Beautiful models, intense sex and balls deep anal, DP, DAP and DPP!!! Tip fucking is illegal and won't be tolerated on LP.

dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Beautiful models, intense sex and balls deep anal, DP, DAP and DPP!!! Tip fucking is illegal and won't be tolerated on LP.

Instead of quarreling better lets agree on this!!!

dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Unlike you, I really don't care how much DAP is produced as long as it is balls deep and intense!

The more dap LP produces the higher the chance to get the right intensity with double balls deep fucks!
In my opinion LP has yet to set its respected Prague standard for girls interested to work for their studio...which implies what most of Giorgio Grandis knew in Piter: No hard anal = no job & no dap = not much work.

And if I tried to limit DP in the past its just because I really cant stand pussy only fucking in porn anymore and DP has become way soft when a company like LP offers a new approach to hardcore porn. But as I said many times before I am also a porn nostalgic and thus I really do have a soft spot for DP.
In an ideal porn world each DP scene would end with DAP and both of us just watched/skipped what they enjoy that day.

(...) the only reason companies exists is to make profit. That is why I can't figure out what LP Sineplex is doing. I feel LP Sineplex invented this hardcore stuff but lost there way and LP Gonzo has perfected it.

LP Sineplex (SOS in Piter again) makes only sense in business terms if xxx manages to tap that cheaper talent pool again. Either he plans to import the girls to the LP Gonzo studio in Prague or set up an own studio later in Piter. All other considerations would be nich market expansion only.

dap-addict wrote:The more dap LP produces the higher the chance to get the right intensity with double balls deep fucks!

In concept I agree but sorry I don't wan't to pay higher ticket prices for failed or better said TIP FUCKING DAPs! Waste of time and money, IMHO!

dap-addict wrote:In my opinion LP has yet to set its respected Prague standard for girls interested to work for their studio...which implies what most of Giorgio Grandis knew in Piter: No hard anal = no job & no dap = not much work.

Disagree in the DAP standard fully!!! Only standard in my opinion, no anal no work everything else is a bonus!

dap-addict wrote:And if I tried to limit DP in the past its just because I really cant stand pussy only fucking in porn anymore and DP has become way soft when a company like LP offers a new approach to hardcore porn....

In the past, you try and limit it everyday!
Since when has DP become pussy only!
DP soft in your mind only. DP natural progression from Anal, so following your progression LP should be 100% DAP or 100% DPP. I know I don't want to see that.
The only new approach LP offers is every scene stands on its own because you have to pay per download. Also intense anal scenes with an assortment of niches dictated by consumer purchases.

dap-addict wrote:LP Sineplex (SOS in Piter again) makes only sense in business terms if xxx manages to tap that cheaper talent pool again. Either he plans to import the girls to the LP Gonzo studio in Prague or set up an own studio later in Piter. All other considerations would be nich market expansion only.

I really disagree, why cheaper talent we pay a premium per scene. LP is the most expensive site on the market because of its only pay for what you like model but I love it. So just like members begging for Mea Melone we finally got her at a premium that LP transferred to us and if we wanted to see more of her then the ticket sales would show if we didn't want to pay that price then she would not be asked to do anymore LP scenes because LP would be taking a loss. I would assume she was worth every penny as she did several scenes with LP and proved to be a very talented asset!

dap-addict wrote:And if I tried to limit DP in the past its just because I really cant stand pussy only fucking in porn anymore and DP has become way soft when a company like LP offers a new approach to hardcore porn....

In the past, you try and limit it everyday!
Since when has DP become pussy only!
DP soft in your mind only. DP natural progression from Anal, so following your progression LP should be 100% DAP or 100% DPP. I know I don't want to see that.

DP is pussy only at least in cgdp prior to the upper fucker plugging the girls ass. Thats a transition really hard to <FF> if you dont tolerate any pussy only fucking in porn as I do.
This said - and this is why I started my "Do you still need DP with LP (as I do)?"-poll - I dont want 100% DAP since I am still really a lot of a DP+surprise nostalgic. (DPP is no go for me because its pussy fucking only)

Better take me in a coop to make DP/DAP better in the future instead of limiting it.

dap-addict wrote:LP Sineplex (SOS in Piter again) makes only sense in business terms if xxx manages to tap that cheaper talent pool again. Either he plans to import the girls to the LP Gonzo studio in Prague or set up an own studio later in Piter. All other considerations would be nich market expansion only.

I really disagree, why cheaper talent we pay a premium per scene. LP is the most expensive site on the market because of its only pay for what you like model but I love it. So just like members begging for Mea Melone we finally got her at a premium that LP transferred to us and if we wanted to see more of her then the ticket sales would show if we didn't want to pay that price then she would not be asked to do anymore LP scenes because LP would be taking a loss. I would assume she was worth every penny as she did several scenes with LP and proved to be a very talented asset!

Just tried to explain what I dont understand myself yet with xxx business concept really.
Guess the high Sineplex SOS ticket prices reflect the costs of setting something up in Piter again (after that forced 2011 pull-out). Sure some extra payment changes hands in Russia to create a safe porn shooting climate again. Go immagine yourself how many $$$ that might cost!
First lets see wheter the Sineplex SOS ticket price goes down in 2015, wheter SOS can really use LP in the future to sell his scenes etc.

Mea Melone...she just asked a fantasy price from xxx first. Accepting it he would have set a false signal inside Prague biz! Later they reached agreement and sure the revenues she created was worth every penny invested in her scenes. Thats the good thing with LP: Clients have a say who is booked and what for provided they buy the footage and it thus good profit.
LP also proofs what I said for years in other forums: DAP sells!!! - thus shoot it!!!

I am speaking for myself, but I think that fans of (strictly) double anal scenes will still download dp scenes; however, I don't think dp fans are downloading (strictly) double anal scenes. Any dp fans feel the same way? Just saying, because I haven't downloaded a single (strictly) double anal scene.

Mordecai35 wrote:Right now my favorite scenes are one girl w/ 3-4 guys. DP is a must, DAP is great, but on the condition the girl is comfortable enough for it not to be painful or an issue with her to an extent she quits doing scenes.

The whole TAP thing It's hard to even get, the guys have to compile in such a way it looks almost silly. It's almost like a circus act. Hehe.

I have exactly the same. DAP is great, but only if it is done thoroughly and deeply. I do not like when one guy is inside the ass, and the other guy barely puts a cock inside (do not even know if passed through the anal sphincter). In such situations, I prefer the traditional DP. On the other hand, due to the fact that she is now doing very shallow DAP, can ever learn to do it deeper. And if we come to the conclusion that "if you do not do this deep, do not do it at all", it will never live to see this girl with a decent scene DAP.

BTW, I miss in the survey responses:
"I want to DAP, but also want to see the DPP (and DP of course)"
Recently, very rarely I see DPP

[quote="dpconnoisseur1"][/quote]

WOW So fucking hot!

personally i like doubleanal myself......i enjoy the no pussy scenes

Girls doing just anal (even 1 on 1) or dp (2 on 1) shouldn't disqualified. Some of them are nasty but for some reason they don't do dap and I don't like LP trend to force them to do it if they are not physically able to. That ruins the scene - it's just a trick circus, not hot nasty passionate even smiling face porn.

What are you talking about?!
LP forces no girl to dap!!!

dap-addict wrote:What are you talking about?!
LP forces no girl to dap!!!

No real accusations, but I think sure they do by the means of talking them into it and offering ridiculous money, you can tell by the looks and emotions in the video it's manytimes over their limits even if they will finally agree (under the pressure?), they will know they shouldn't..some girls stopped anal after LP treatment to be honest, I don't like the fact LP tries to shoot with almost every girl in the shop recently, but exactly like GG said, not every girl can do it and it ruins the purpose of porn = to enjoy sex

The purpose is to entertain...

kidloco wrote:...even if they will finally agree (under the pressure?), they will know they shouldn't...

No accusations?
Its exactly stupid ungrounded anti-porn crusader accusations you write down here!
These girls know what they are booked for! They agreed to try this of that act! If they cant handle it they can stop it anytime! What are you talking about?!

And rdidiculous money...dap isnt payed THAT good, you know. Its just payed better than DP.
Every girl decides for herself what she wants to perform on a porn set.
Its her body, only hers! And only she can decide!!!

Also, truth is what magizi writes: Porn's purpose is to entertain. Nothing more really!!!!

Yes...DAP, DPP, more more more!!! Add some fisting too.