PornBox.com

Some Inspiration for future LP scenes.

First up - Sara Bell...and her MOM!

sdimpalass wrote:Some Inspiration for future LP scenes.

First up - Sara Bell...and her MOM!

00155-453087227.png

00172-330131424.png

Wow, those are beautiful AI art!! Which software did you use? Stable Diffusion?

sdimpalass wrote:Some Inspiration for future LP scenes.

First up - Sara Bell..

00155-453087227.png

00172-330131424.png

Not bad.

With AI it might be more easier to capture difficult angles/positions like always seeing feet during DAP/DP/TAP and capture triple-blowjobs during DAP where you can really see all dicks going into the model´s mouth while also appreciate the dicks in the ass...

Otherwise AI might reduce my sessions where I imagine the DPs of Eliza Ibarra, Serena Santos. Willow Ryder and the DAPs of Clara Trinity.

It's going to suck when even AI is tip fucking.

gov0721 wrote:

sdimpalass wrote:Some Inspiration for future LP scenes.

First up - Sara Bell...and her MOM!

00155-453087227.png

00172-330131424.png

Wow, those are beautiful AI art!! Which software did you use? Stable Diffusion?

Looks like Stable Diffusion to me. These are the original png files to which Stable Diffusion automatically adds the original prompt as metadata. The model is Everclear PNY by Zovya v2 according to that.

Can someone explain step by step how to do this?

Which program are you using?

Jen

I will always prefer the real thing to AI...

Agreed, actually just knowing it's fake is a huge turn-off no matter how realistic it could potentially look one day. Even outside porn it's rather off-putting say with AI-upscaled live action films or series etc. Personally, I am very much inclined to keep paying a premium to see the real thing.

xxxVIPERxxx wrote:I will always prefer the real thing to AI...

That's because it doesn't look real yet, it will.

Jen

Porn needs to be real. AI can replicate a face but it can't replicate knowing that a whore was in pain for our pleasure.

turkmenbashi wrote:Porn needs to be real. AI can replicate a face but it can't replicate knowing that a whore was in pain for our pleasure.

Soon you won't know if i is real or not. Now you can still tell, but soon that won't be the case at all. It will be worst than fake cum. They can even use real models, and have the acts being all fake. The good news is that we are still a few years away from that.

The plus side is that anyone you know in real life can be fucked very rough and look completely authentic, global celebrities, local celebrities, coworkers, neighbors, classmates, students, extended family, friends of friends, anyone, you can even do them on VR, so it will be pretty crazy.

porn producers can become billionaires and even more with AI technology... they only need to train the AI with all their porn scenes they have ( a lot ) and then they release it on their website for everyone... so you pay and can generated whatever scene you want... like, you want a scene with Midget Pistolinha and Mike Chapman vs Susan Ayn and Tina Hot? You just generate it...or you want Jean Yves Le Castel and Mike Chapman kuckmal and jbeaaaaaaam all girls? You generated it. Imagine how awesome that would be, and the producers would earn so much money it's crazy... this could become a reality in future when AI become better

Just some examples of what can be done

For me the AI porn is a NO-NO, even if evolve to don't note the difference will be the end of the essence of porn, in the deepnest of you, can be excellent and good but you will know that is not real, and for me the essence of porn is knowing that what i'm watching was really performed and happened, i want to watch a real performance and see a real lady that taked and felt all these cocks in the ass, pussy and mouth performing as a good professional of sex.

YuriyProneBone wrote:

turkmenbashi wrote:Porn needs to be real. AI can replicate a face but it can't replicate knowing that a whore was in pain for our pleasure.

Soon you won't know if i is real or not. Now you can still tell, but soon that won't be the case at all. It will be worst than fake cum. They can even use real models, and have the acts being all fake. The good news is that we are still a few years away from that.

The plus side is that anyone you know in real life can be fucked very rough and look completely authentic, global celebrities, local celebrities, coworkers, neighbors, classmates, students, extended family, friends of friends, anyone, you can even do them on VR, so it will be pretty crazy.

I'm afraid that this will not be possible, at least that you pay for their audiovisual rights, you will not be able, legally, to create nothing with their face/bodies, less with a civilian person who doesn't know nothing about what some guy can be doing with that material.

In fact already exist some sentences of some guys that used the AI for create own porn of some persons and were judged an put in prison, so i'm quite sure that this will not happen

misangrenegra2 wrote:
I'm afraid that this will not be possible, at least that you pay for their audiovisual rights, you will not be able, legally, to create nothing with their face/bodies, less with a civilian person who doesn't know nothing about what some guy can be doing with that material.

In fact already exist some sentences of some guys that used the AI for create own porn of some persons and were judged an put in prison, so i'm quite sure that this will not happen

Perhaps for profit, but for personal use unless we have an authoritarian Marxist style of communism I doubt they can stop this from happening. Not to mention deepfakes are still quite common with the technology we have now.

The problem becomes the absolute abundance of it.

Do you know why AI technology took off? Because of exactly this. It essentially said to the World: "Brave New Frontier in Porn!" If you don't think that a literal ton of people got a personal collection of some of this stuff - hand me what you're smoking.

How many times do you think someone has found an amazingly hot Insta model - just to type into Google - "So-and-so Nude" - and find out that they don't have an OF account (just pretend for a minute here), and then ... well ...

So, obviously.

The examples shown here were great for the lack of errors, but suffer from what I call the "early AI glossy-plastic look." Like, what AI can do now ... it can get it to pretty much 2% within the standards of photorealism. You can still tell it's ... probably not real, but ...

The real thing that's going to hold this back is power. It takes an insane amount of energy to run the chips needed for AI. That being said - there seems to have been some green light given from somewhere to allow this to exist in abundance, because ... holy hell ... almost 50% of Google searches for things like, "Hot nude teen" come up with an endless stream of AI pictures.

Those are replacing the pictures of traditional porn and OF models - so, already the effects are being felt - even if not overtly in the beginning.

Yeah - AI can do waaaaaaaaaaaay better than what has been shown here so far, but, nevertheless, the fact that they got such good BBC DAP shots down, even if the "image quality" (as in, the realness of it) is still fairly primitive, should tell you how far this is going to go.

The pictures are nice. But, once AI gets videos down, and they learn how to successfully compile photo-to-photo scenes (that is - animate one photograph moving to another) without any of the existing "AI video physical glitches" occurring - that's when things are going to get ... pretty real in terms of market impact.

What we're seeing here is the equivalent of Chat-GTP 3. Chat-GTP 4 powered image creators make these photos look like amateur hour. And they're currently in the process of "introducing" Chat-GTP 5.

This all happened in less than a year.

Brace yourselves.

I think those look great.
They'll even be better with animation and sound and especially if the user can get video clips from text, eg "cheerleaders getting gangbanged by football team and doing ATOGM," and that prompt producing a video.

What is the workflow to produce those images?

Is this free software or subscription or pay?

Stable Diffusion is the tool you're looking for.

Stable diffusion...does it do porn? I went to the site, searched for porn and xxx and nude and the site said it couldn't find that.
Many sites do not do pown images.
Have you used it? free? subscription?

Thanks for then input

To the point where AI generated porn looks just as good as, or even better than the very best, real life porn...I think we are still 30-50 years away from that.
By which point...I am pretty sure I will be dead...

I have hardly used it myself, thus my knowledge is really sketchy and maybe someone else can chime in and correct me on some points, but from what I understand you will have the biggest freedom if you install it locally, though from what I know, it requires quite a bit of GPU horsepower and can be a chore to set up.

Also, there are quite a few different online-based solutions available, the free ones tend to only offer a limited contigent of images you can generate, both from text and images. I think if you extend the search to "Stable Diffusion NSFW" you'll find quite a few that don't censor porn. Maybe OP could help along by telling which prompts he's been using to get at that level of quality.

Thanks, Anselm, I have tried a few free online sites and very few do unclothe, even. And they do leave some to be desired...you get what you pay for.
There is another site called unstable diffusion that looks to be more porn centric, but I have n ot yet tried.
And, Viper, I doubt your 30-50 year horizon. Prob less than 2-5 years, if that long. This stuff is moving too fast to be that long.