PornBox.com

kiki minaj, shrima malati, kitana lure

all awesome pornstars but no fully nude scenes.. leave the clothes on for some of the shoot but please have the girls end fully naked!

Both Chelsey Sun scenes too she has had tits covered whole scene.

xhobbesx wrote:kiki minaj, shrima malati, kitana lure

all awesome pornstars but no fully nude scenes.. leave the clothes on for some of the shoot but please have the girls end fully naked!

+1000 please

again with susana melo... why? are the girls asking to keep their clothes on? this site is so much better than sindrive... let them do the clothes thing.

Fully naked @ the last half scene is the best!!

-1000

xhobbesx wrote:why? are the girls asking to keep their clothes on?

No, the viewers are asking for them to keep their clothes on: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=8035

^ That's a very black and white poll. Having on stockings/socks/shoes technically counts as a clothing item thus not fully nude.

I guess I should clarify that I request to see the body fully nude without dangling dresses/corsets/bras etc.

LP could easily appeal to both. Start the scene off with clothes and gradually end the scene naked..

I fully agree with xhobbesx,
the fact that girls keep their clothes on for the whole scene distracted me from buying the last scenes at legalporno.
I prefer sexy nude girls. There are othe websites focussing on fullycothed... and so on. But I was never interested in buying a membership these sites because this does not tease me.

xhobbesx wrote:^ That's a very black and white poll.

What do you mean?
The poll is clearly phrased fully nude, isnt it?
Its 55% against fully nude, 40% in favour of fully nude.
More or less half-half and thats about what we got during the last half year at LP. And I thus doubt fully nude always would be a good maketing option for LP.

The small 55% majority asking for some cloths on during sex have called for a more refined stocking/heels and lingerie/corset approach recently, thats the only new input I see here. I personally dont dig fully nude at all, but I think all marketable fetishes should be catered for.

Well, dap-addict, but the vast mayority of the recent new scenes showed girls with clothes.
Thus, those 40% of custumers interested in fully nude scenes were "ignored" during the past couple of days.

Better look for a longer period of time, Berndt.
LP prodution always came in waves. Now we have a rather clothed wave, in a few days I bet a naked wave starts again.
Important rather is that all main consumer fetishes get catered for in a decent way.

.

100% nude is not that exciting. They should always have something on.

.

The poll has just 45 votes. It is not one to be taken too seriously.
Anyway, for those who like clothes, there is a number of sites that cater to this need but there are also plenty of scenes with the performers wearing clothes on LP, many more than totally nude scenes. Personally, I hate any kind of clothing in pornography and I wish people would stop complaining every time there is a totally nude scene on LP.

splotsky wrote:The poll has just 45 votes. It is not one to be taken too seriously.

Don't you think a poll with 45 votes is a better source of information than a few random complaints on the forum? Also, it seems very likely that anyone who didn't bother to vote doesn't care much one way or the other.

Anyway, for those who like clothes, there is a number of sites that cater to this need but there are also plenty of scenes with the performers wearing clothes on LP, many more than totally nude scenes.

So what? There are also lots of other sites that have totally nude scenes, aren't there? And I dispute the idea that there are more scenes on LP where the girls keep their clothes on for the majority of the scene, at least not in the Gonzo era. In fact, if you go back a couple of months, you'll see that almost every scene had the girls getting totally nude very early in the scene. Now, thanks to a few of us complaining, there is finally a little more balance.

Personally, I hate any kind of clothing in pornography and I wish people would stop complaining every time there is a totally nude scene on LP.

Well, I feel the same way when people complain every time they fail to strip every single stitch of clothing off the girl.

Exactly!
+ 1 for ATM

45 votes out of a pool of 1,000,000+ potential (based on some video views) is hardly a source of information at all. So, as Splotsky wrote, it's not to be taken seriously.

Also, I do think the aforementioned pool is skewed. Girls are either fully nude or not--black and white. heck, this forum title is too. leaving just one tiny sock on means the girl is not fully nude.

I want to clarify that I really don't mind stockings, socks, sexy shoes (anything worn below the pussy). I just want to get an unobstructed view of the sexy torso, especially the breasts.

I created this topic in haste (without considering what I really wanted) after seeing scenes like

http://legalporno.com/watch/29129/shrim ... creenshots
http://legalporno.com/watch/28884/susan ... ussy_sz624

where they keep a shirt/corset on the entire time, without a single view of their breasts. or scenes like

http://legalporno.com/watch/29004/kitan ... _all_sz655

where we really miss out on some of Kitana's truly sexy body. I do not mind sexy stockings

http://legalporno.com/watch/27055/gg_ex ... 53_abby_dp

or fishnets

http://legalporno.com/watch/27306/lana_ ... orno_sz212

i could make a more detailed topic with additional poll categories but I think a vast majority of LP users don't read the forums anyway.

A little sexy outfit first 10-15 min is ok,but then all clothes off,i mean a whole scene without seeing the girls tits,wtf is that!!!?its porn,not fashion show

klapphatt wrote:A little sexy outfit first 10-15 min is ok,but then all clothes off,i mean a whole scene without seeing the girls tits,wtf is that!!!?its porn,not fashion show

+1000 +1000 AND + 1000

Personally i have not seen the new DAP scene with isabella cauz i have seen the trailer and guess Isabella didn't remove her "FUCKING BOOTS" and her "FUCKING POLICE CAP"
Pleazzz LP do anything for us!
I hate this!!!

The police cap annoyed me quite a lot. But the girl is too good to pass.

Have to agree, at least for the remainder of scenes, 10 -20 minutes, have the girls fully naked (minus heels).

Can you please have the girl's torso be fully exposed for major gangbangs?

The following scene could have been 10x better if you just took off her dress so that it does not cover her breast or torso:
http://legalporno.com/watch/29039/linda ... _ass_sz663

It's like the guys get so interested in fucking her they didnt care to show off her sexy body.

It's pretty upsetting to see a hot girl in a gang bang and not have all her clothes taken off. I mean i don't know what they are thinking with leaving articles of clothing on. Sometimes it gets in the way. Also, is it really that hard to take off an outfit? Sometimes i see them trying to move it out of the way but wouldn't taking it off be a better solution. Get it together LP cmon.

http://legalporno.com/watch/29137/shrim ... creenshots

Two scenes with Shrima and I still have no idea what her boobs look like. What gives? Am I looking at some softcore porn? Please LP, I really think you are seriously ruining scenes that have huge potential.

Please at least show the torso fully nude. Throw on all the stockings, stilettos, crowns you want but please fully nude torso... I feel like LP chops out a bit of my heart everytime

Wait for the next scene and they show giveyou a glimpse to the titties, too!
Softcore? Wasnt hard/soft defined via sex act?!

I totally and violently support this pledge. Nobody has a problem when a scene builds up slowly and - even for half or two thirds of a scene - the girl has parts of her outfit still on her.
But it really is so easy to please everyone here - just *please* have her naked by the end of the scene, and that includes the shoes which sometimes are spoilers in itself (but that might just be me).
There is no big deal in following the idea that to make everybody happy, you just give everybody what they want, in their own time. I really cant imagine that there are a lot of "cumshot while clothes on" fetishists (CFNM enthusiasts excluded, but thats a completely different story), so just let it go with the flow.
Did you ever fuck a girl who was insisting of keeping her top on? And if you did, did you really give in? And if you did, did it really turned out to be the fuck of your life?
(P.S. And did you really only fuck in a white room on a white couch? Exclusively? Ok, I agree, thats a different story again ...)

xhobbesx wrote:Can you please have the girl's torso be fully exposed for major gangbangs?

The following scene could have been 10x better if you just took off her dress so that it does not cover her breast or torso:
http://legalporno.com/watch/29039/linda ... _ass_sz663

It's like the guys get so interested in fucking her they didnt care to show off her sexy body.

YES! YES! YES! What a spoiler! What a waste of potential! What an insult to Linda, in this case! I can't believe someone is paying SEVEN performers and a female star for a really well executed gangbang and then ruin it all by only removing 20% of the outfit. HELLO?!?

@dap-addict, instead of waiting for the next scene, which I assume there will be, I just want LP directors to shoot it properly the first time.

I was kidding about LP being softcore. LP is FAR from softcore. I was just exaggerating that by leaving the clothes on, LP is akin to running a softcore porn site.

I would think many people pay for porn to see...porn, which includes nudity above all else.

@GatosNunez, I'm glad we're on the same page, well almost--I don't really care if they have shoes or stockings on.

Why LP pays 7+ male performer for these "8 it all" series and then fucks it all up by leaving the clothes on, beats me. Could they literally not take the two seconds to remove the clothes? 2 seconds, literally. 2 seconds to make the 40+ minutes of footage entirely awesome.

On a side note, I actually find the very act of removing the clothes super hot.

To your point of fucking a girl insistent on keep her clothes on, maybe if she were my gf of several years, perhaps, but just for the sake of spicing things up. However, LP shouldn't really be trying to spice things up, and especially not with new girls. I really appreciate that LP is a hardcore pornsite, no, a SUPER hardcore pornsite, however, it could be even better if they just take the tops, bras, corsets (anything that could possibly cover the torso) off.

You guys just don't get it, do you? They don't leave the clothes on because the girl wants them to, or because they're too lazy to remove them, or any of these other ridiculous reasons.

They leave them on because most of the viewers prefer it that way. Is it really so hard for you to understand that not everyone agrees with you that totally nude girls are better?

I could sit here and list the reasons, but why should I bother? I (and others) have given plenty of reasons before, and yet the same couple of people always ignore them, and continue with the non-stop whining.

"Oh no! We can't see the girl's belly button! What a travesty!"

^Fairly certain they're not leaving them on because of 5 more votes.

When I don't get to see their tits it makes me sad Sucked, squeezed, a few light slaps, they should always make an appearance at some point during a scene. I really couldn't care less about clothed or fully nude, but not getting to see their breasts at any point throughout, that's a travesty IMO.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:You guys just don't get it, do you? They don't leave the clothes on because the girl wants them to, or because they're too lazy to remove them, or any of these other ridiculous reasons.

They leave them on because most of the viewers prefer it that way

And you base this claim on what? One flawed poll that had 45 votes only? please let me know if you prefer sports illustrated bikini edition to playboy.

Fact is, nudity sells. I personally would like to see the download stats on some of these videos. i'm willing to bet the download stats would be a lot higher if they had featured fully nude but we'll never know.

http://legalporno.com/watch/29275/arwen ... creenshots

Now there's a scene done right!

tgcfc26 wrote:When I don't get to see their tits it makes me sad Sucked, squeezed, a few light slaps, they should always make an appearance at some point during a scene. I really couldn't care less about clothed or fully nude, but not getting to see their breasts at any point throughout, that's a travesty IMO.

I can sympathize with the request to see the girl's tits at some point during the scene. In fact, I would actually prefer that.

However, that doesn't mean that the girl's top has to be totally removed. It can be pulled down, or pulled up, or unbuttoned, or whatever, so that the tits are made visible.

But it seems that some people won't be happy unless they take off all her clothes and even her earrings, so that we can see her earlobes in all their naked glory!

xhobbesx wrote: I personally would like to see the download stats on some of these videos. i'm willing to bet the download stats would be a lot higher if they had featured fully nude but we'll never know.

There have been download stats displayed openly for each scene all last year!
Believe me there was no siginficant correlance between naked/clothed and downloads - what counts for LP fans is at foremost sex acts including piss, LP big name girls like Timea Bella-Linda Sweet-Susan Ayn and to some part also novelty effect.

I think there should be more variety nude, not only many scenes with clothes from the beginning to the end or more scenes with simple and poor naked. For example, dynamic and complete stripteases (some actresses are also dancers, it would be nice to exploit its potential in this regard). Furthermore during the sexual part is very exciting to see the actresses take their clothes off, especially when changing position or scene. Play naked woman, both before and during the sex scene is one of the weak points of LP.

I actually like it when they keep their top on, it leaves something to the imagination (well, as much as there can be when the girl is getting airtight from three cocks).

As long as the girl isn't wearing shoes, I don't really care that much... would prefer fully nude or in stockings though

.

No. Way.

.

Take off all the clothes.