PornBox.com

Why do porn companies hire the same SAME GUYS all the time over and over? For example LP basically rotates between using the same 7-10 guys in every single scene? Surely there are more than 10 guys who can perform on screen and fuck the girls properly? Yet porn companies do this all the time where they use the same male performers, anyone have any ideas why they do this?

Echelon wrote:Why do porn companies hire the same SAME GUYS all the time over and over? For example LP basically rotates between using the same 7-10 guys in every single scene? Surely there are more than 10 guys who can perform on screen and fuck the girls properly? Yet porn companies do this all the time where they use the same male performers, anyone have any ideas why they do this?

I know it's hard to believe, but it just isn't as easy as it looks. There just aren't that many guys that can measure up and perform.

cyberhog59 wrote:

Echelon wrote:Why do porn companies hire the same SAME GUYS all the time over and over? For example LP basically rotates between using the same 7-10 guys in every single scene? Surely there are more than 10 guys who can perform on screen and fuck the girls properly? Yet porn companies do this all the time where they use the same male performers, anyone have any ideas why they do this?

I know it's hard to believe, but it just isn't as easy as it looks. There just aren't that many guys that can measure up and perform.

I basically agree.

My only point is that there has to be more than the current small roster of guys who are super-prolific when it comes to doing porn scenes. That's what I find very hard to believe, there must be more than just these same fucking guys who can get their dicks hard on screen and fuck a hot slut in the ass.

.

The answer is simple: Most guys - despite their bragging - would never do porn, even if they're fantastic at fucking. A lot of guys may want to do their favorite porn girl, but in private. Not with cameras rolling for their family and friends to see.

The personal cost is simply too high.

.

crema wrote:.

The answer is simple: Most guys - despite their bragging - would never do porn, even if they're fantastic at fucking. A lot of guys may want to do their favorite porn girl, but in private. Not with cameras rolling for their family and friends to see.

The personal cost is simply too high.

.

I don't think the personal cost for guys is any higher than it is for women.

Many people would argue that the personal cost for women is much higher than it is for guys. Because the word 'slut' is a kind of an insult that women use among themselves. But the word 'stud' is often used as complement, rather than as an insult. There is a double standard in society where having sex outside of marriage is much worse for women than it is for men.

I think the main reason why they keep using the same guys again and again is because it takes some time to train a new stud and give him enough practice with women to make him good on the set. Most guys are probably capable of becoming porn-studs. But guys need to get used to the atmosphere of doing it in public, before they can reliably get their erection going. And there isn't any easy way for a guy to get this kind of training and practice.

the melone challenge shows a little bit about it

It's a serious personal concern for most of capable guys, just like that. Plus it's easy, just like in any other businesses, if you don't come right cross
some new strong stallion who you know will win the race (like Chris Diamond) you just use the same old horses to win the race.
Be it's realiability, proven experience or just a custom..but it's like that.

Personally I don't like most of the overused LP guys except Neeo, GG, Tarzan, Chris Diamond or Franco R., but do we have
something better?

Neeo and Chris are two serious stallions, I agree. I think LP needs to broaden its stud base. There are some new actors appearing alongside the usual stud line up. That Gina 10 man gangbang had a few new faces.