PornBox.com

No, I don't agree. Marcus is fine. He fucks the girls hard and he has a good sense of positions that look good on camera. I've no problem with him at all.

I kind of get the impression that Opium could write, star in, direct and produce a scene and he'd still say it's shit

The scene is, imo, certainly not ruined by that one dick. Also, the scene can't be "ruined" because Linda is such an incredibly hot performer.

However, the scene failed to make a possible all time five star rating on my list because ***for me***, a scene where the actress keeps her clothes on and upper body covered not only through parts but through the full length of the scene is a serious failure to make full profit of the potentials the setting had. But again, this is only my five cents, I will not put myself in the "ranting about everything"-league.

Quite generally, I think the kick a scene gets by having the female performers in a more formal or everyday outfit in the beginning rather than this cheap "ah, an eastern European whore"-look is widely underestimated by both the GG and the Sineplex producers or directors or whoever makes the call for the given outfits (which are certainly and obviously not the girls' choices).

Interesting point, everyday jeans and a little top can look hot as hell. I agree, I'd like to see a bit of variety on top if the stripper clothing.

As for Marcus, he is a great performer but given that Opium will not renew his membership unless he is sacked he will just have to go!

AMAZING SCENE!!!
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE MOAAAR SCENE LIKE THIS PLEASE BUT WHY WHY WHY THIS MASK???
NEVER AGAIN PLEASE LP.
Thank you in advance.

SEMU wrote:AMAZING SCENE!!!
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE MOAAAR SCENE LIKE THIS PLEASE BUT WHY WHY WHY THIS MASK???
NEVER AGAIN PLEASE LP.
Thank you in advance.

Finally, someone who gets it.

SEMU wrote:AMAZING SCENE!!!
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE MOAAAR SCENE LIKE THIS PLEASE BUT WHY WHY WHY THIS MASK???
NEVER AGAIN PLEASE LP.
Thank you in advance.

But her mask is off after 16 min. video, so whats the problem?

gapelover wrote:

SEMU wrote:AMAZING SCENE!!!
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE MOAAAR SCENE LIKE THIS PLEASE BUT WHY WHY WHY THIS MASK???
NEVER AGAIN PLEASE LP.
Thank you in advance.

But her mask is off after 16 min. video, so whats the problem?

THE PROBLEM ?16 min with this mask...too much minutes!!
For us during the first minutes,its very very important to see the girl's face.

Single girl with multiple guy scenes are not usually my favourite but I thought this scene was great. Linda Sweet really got pounded and I loved the nasty cum play and swallowing at the end. Agree that the mask spoilt things a little but it was only on for part of the scene and there was plenty of action to enjoy after it came off.

+1 for Marcus being a top performer. He always fucks the girls hard and I'm surprised anyone could have any complaints about him.

gapelover wrote:But her mask is off after 16 min. video, so whats the problem?

People keep saying this, but it makes no sense. People get upset about the camera losing focus, and that only lasts for a few seconds. Or how about when they blurred the girl's asshole? That lasted less than a minute, and people were outraged.

But we're not supposed to get upset about not being able to see the girl's face for 16 minutes? That's virtually a third of the entire scene, including all of the warmup, all of the oral and even some of the anal.

I get the feeling that if they had waited to take it off until right before the cumshots, some people would be saying, "What are you idiots complaining about? It's not like they left it on the whole time. Just shut up and enjoy those last 2 minutes!"

I would have bought it, but it looks like she kept her top on the whole scene. Hate the stockings too. Oh well, it looks a little rougher than the standard LP vid, could have been great.

.

I love the stockings and her keeping the top on.

.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I get the feeling that if they had waited to take it off until right before the cumshots, some people would be saying, "What are you idiots complaining about? It's not like they left it on the whole time. Just shut up and enjoy those last 2 minutes!"

Except that's not what happened. She DID actually take off the mask after 16 minutes. The reason people keep saying it is because it's true. Rather than responding with hyperbole, try to stick with the facts.

Slippery Pete wrote:

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I get the feeling that if they had waited to take it off until right before the cumshots, some people would be saying, "What are you idiots complaining about? It's not like they left it on the whole time. Just shut up and enjoy those last 2 minutes!"

Except that's not what happened. She DID actually take off the mask after 16 minutes. The reason people keep saying it is because it's true. Rather than responding with hyperbole, try to stick with the facts.

The rest of my post (the part you conveniently ignored) was filled with facts. You know, this part:

People get upset about the camera losing focus, and that only lasts for a few seconds. Or how about when they blurred the girl's asshole? That lasted less than a minute, and people were outraged.

But we're not supposed to get upset about not being able to see the girl's face for 16 minutes? That's virtually a third of the entire scene, including all of the warmup, all of the oral and even some of the anal.

My point is that people are acting as if 16 minutes is some trivial part of the video. I'm using hyperbole (in addition to facts) to illustrate the absurdity of that claim. What is difficult to understand about that?

If there was no audio for the first 16 minutes, and people complained about that, and other people responded by saying, "So what? It's only 16 minutes. After that, you can hear everything fine", would that be a reasonable response?

Tastes Like Ass wrote:

Slippery Pete wrote:

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I get the feeling that if they had waited to take it off until right before the cumshots, some people would be saying, "What are you idiots complaining about? It's not like they left it on the whole time. Just shut up and enjoy those last 2 minutes!"

Except that's not what happened. She DID actually take off the mask after 16 minutes. The reason people keep saying it is because it's true. Rather than responding with hyperbole, try to stick with the facts.

The rest of my post (the part you conveniently ignored) was filled with facts. You know, this part:

People get upset about the camera losing focus, and that only lasts for a few seconds. Or how about when they blurred the girl's asshole? That lasted less than a minute, and people were outraged.

But we're not supposed to get upset about not being able to see the girl's face for 16 minutes? That's virtually a third of the entire scene, including all of the warmup, all of the oral and even some of the anal.

My point is that people are acting as if 16 minutes is some trivial part of the video. I'm using hyperbole (in addition to facts) to illustrate the absurdity of that claim. What is difficult to understand about that?

If there was no audio for the first 16 minutes, and people complained about that, and other people responded by saying, "So what? It's only 16 minutes. After that, you can hear everything fine", would that be a reasonable response?

The difference being that no audio for 16 minutes would effect everyone whereas there are a people who had no problem with the mask (about 71,000 of them so far). You don't hear the people who liked the mask bitching because she took it off after 16 minutes. We get it you don't like masks but seriously change the fucking record. Not every scene is shot specifically for you so there's going to be scenes you don't like.

Shotgun00 wrote:The difference being that no audio for 16 minutes would effect everyone whereas there are a people who had no problem with the mask (about 71,000 of them so far).

First, that is irrelevant to the point I was making. I was responding to the ridiculous (but often stated) claim that something which affects a third of the scene is a trivial detail. I am fully aware that a few people liked the mask (although I can't fathom why, unless they hate the sight of a beautiful girl's face), but that has nothing to do with whether 16 minutes is "long enough" to get upset about.

Second, the 71,000 is just the number of people who have viewed the trailer. I guarantee you nowhere near that many people actually spent the 4 tickets for it, and besides, several people here have said that they disliked the mask, but bought the scene anyway.

You don't hear the people who liked the mask bitching because she took it off after 16 minutes.

Actually, I've heard very few people who said they liked it at all, and only 5 out of 24 so far have voted for masks in the poll. The real question is if there's anyone who bought the scene just because of the mask. If not, then LP definitely cost themselves at least a little bit of money, because we know there's at least one person who didn't buy it just because of the mask (and the same is true of the Zuzanna scene).

We get it you don't like masks but seriously change the fucking record. Not every scene is shot specifically for you so there's going to be scenes you don't like.

I have never demanded that they shoot scenes specifically for me. There are plenty of things that I'm not crazy about (Kreme, for one) that I never complain about because I understand that there is a lot of demand for them. However, I have not seen any demand for these damn masks. No one came on here and said, "I'm sick of looking at the girls' faces. Please cover them up with a mask", did they? And even though the reaction to the first mask scene was less than enthusiastic, that did not stop them from promptly releasing another one.

The fact is that even though I complain a lot about the way the site is run, and about some other stuff (like camerawork), I don't complain nearly as much as many people about the content of the scenes. In fact, I almost never complain about the girls that they choose, and I very rarely complain about the type of sex they perform. But when they do something really stupid, for no apparent reason, yes, I'm going to complain. If they turn right around and do it again, I'm going to complain even more. And if other people keep coming to their defense with ridiculous arguments (like saying that covering up the girl's face for a third of the scene is a "minute detail"), then I'm definitely going to respond to those absurd claims.

I was hoping her clothes would get thorn apart by the guys at some point. I thought the clothes made great contrast with her pale skin, although IMO it would be better if the clothing accentuate Linda's body in a sexier way.
About the mask. I think the colors on the mask made it look like a carnival mask. Kind of funny looking. Maybe a color that match her hair color could had been better.
Overall I liked the scene. I'm starting to hate that couch because it limits the camera man movement and it also seems to restrict the positions of the sexual acts.

Anyway keep Linda as much as possible and keep doing gang bangs

Your last sentence is really the bottom line, we spend so much time bitching about concepts and camera angles that we don't give enough praise to the performers. Love Linda, she's been totally fearless so far and seems to always give 100%. Beautiful too.

loxx4444 wrote: Love Linda, she's been totally fearless so far and seems to always give 100%. Beautiful too.

+1

I wasnt so fond of her styleing, the mask incuded, even if it comes off soon.
But what to complain if the over all heat, the sex action including dap, the gapes are so good!
Of course I would have wanted her to keep her heels on and Franco to shoot a better load at the end. but lets get it straight, this girl is just really TOP!
Please shoot as much of Linda Sweet as possible and as hard sex as possible!
I can take easily 20 more daps of her!