PornBox.com

Hello,

I am a new member and really excited with legalporno. I find it really interesting and can't wait to see even more new scenes with even more rough and intense sex.

Deepthroating taken as an example is a thing that you have to increase and improve during scenes...i know that is hard for the model to make a prolonged deep-throating while she is also taking a DP but u have to work on that..is really sexy and nice picture when it is achieved.

I invite all members to post in this thread what they would like to see more during scenes;where directors should lay emphasis on; some things/details that make the scenes even more arousing and wanted...

Personally, I like the rough stuff, 3 on 1 scenes (or more precisely scenes where men,women and [even ts-girls with big dicks if possible] are combined and sharing a female where they penetrate/fuck/abuse that model in every way possible), spitting, gaping, constant face-fuck/deep-throat action,wide ring-o-gags on mouth, domination, bondage, clothespins or nipple clamps on tits and/or pussy lips and clitoris, marks of lipstick all over the body(either by other girls kissing the face/lips/tits/ass/pussy of the submissive model or by just drawing on her flesh words like "slut","whore","cunt") or even using whipping cream applied on big cocks and forced deep within model's mouth during face-fucking or applied on the open mouth of the girl and then force it deeper with a cock

1.All that aforementioned concepts can sometimes get even better and exciting if the scene starts like a soft porn where the model is teasing us with some strip-tease and close-ups of the camera and after using a vibrator or dildos on some of her holes for several minutes at the start ( u do that already sometimes and it's nice). You can then just use one guy were he will try to be soft at the beginning by softly groping the girl and kissing her. And gradually he will become even more violent,aggressive and pervert by spitting on her face and in her mouth, groping,squeezing,sucking and slapping her tits,pussy,ass and face, grabbing /pulling hair and neck. This guy can abuse her as much as possible (i guess up to 20-25 minutes or so) and then cum all over her face. And this will be just the warming-up. You won't remove the cum from her face, the guy will handcuff or tie-up her hands behind back with sth (like his tie that he might have wearying at the beginning of the scene) and he will leave her like that.

Then 3 or more men(or even a woman with strap-on) will appear and they will have their own way again with this girl in even more intense,gang-bang,hardocre and dominating way. Hands of the model should be kept tied-up behind back of the model during the rest of the scene if possible.

There is nothing more arousing (in my opinion) than a girl being tied-up on knees giving full and rough face-fucking/deepthroating (with cum already on her face) being also generously spitted and kissed,tits slapped,sacked and squeezed or even with clothespins and then being gang-banged like the way u do in "3 on 1 scenes" of Legal Porno and also adding some or all (and even more things that u might want) of the aforementioned concepts.

These guys should cum in or out of her holes (all holes included;ass,pussy and mouth that is). Is this enough? Maybe. I think the icing on the cake of such a culminating and breathtaking scene would be a one more round of guys (of even the same ones) fucking her and focus on her bouncing body and tits which will be full of stains of cum and spit. Or just a last face-fuck on her cum-covered face. A girl still being used while cum is all over her face,tits and pussy its not for the faint heart.

I know that such a scene is kind of tough to be achieved but will be an unprecedented one and will mark a new era on the hardcore-intense sex if it can be materialized.

One other thing that imo gives a hard boner is when the panties/string of the girls are ripped off and are forced in the pussy or asshole or even within mouth during face-fcuk. And will be even better if you can keep it inside while penetration takes place and some part of them is still visible on camera..

Please don't misunderstand me. I love your scenes anyway. All that constant anal fucking with all that big cocks around a girl (or even one cock on a girl) is already arousing and satisfactory. All I am trying to say here is if there are any possibilities to lead the intensity of a scene to even more extreme levels...

sisla7676 wrote:Please don't misunderstand me. I love your scenes anyway. All that constant anal fucking with all that big cocks around a girl (or even one cock on a girl) is already arousing and satisfactory. All I am trying to say here is if there are any possibilities to lead the intensity of a scene to even more extreme levels...

much appreciated!!!! thanks for your input

+1 on everything. the more dirty, kinky, nasty, humiliating, forceful taking advantage of the submissive slut, the better. we want to see girls do whatever is demanded of them. to be used and abused (not bruised or smacked unless they agree to it off-camera). all holes forcefully filled. cum all over them. make them push it out of their ass and down their throat. high slutty heels, short skirts, lacey tops being ripped off. 1 girl vs. however many guys want to use her. she's a cum slut rag doll. big gapes, choking, slapping, hair pulling, triple stuffed and filled with cum.

Well, I agree with you about the need for more hard deep throat/throat fuck action. There used to be more of that here, with some of the old performers like Kid Jamaica and Ed Junior, but now, it seems to be much less common, unfortunately.

Having said that, I strongly disagree with most of your other suggestions, especially the bondage stuff. For me, any sort of bondage totally ruins the scene. I like watching submissive girls that will do whatever they are told, and in that case, what is the point of tying them up? The only reason to tie a girl up is to force her to do things that she doesn't want to do, and I'm not interested in that.

I also dislike the clothespins, nipple clamps, and other S&M-type stuff because they are basically gimmicks that are less about sex, and more about pain. Basically, I prefer the sex to be super nasty, rather than super rough. I don't mind a bit of rough sex (choking, slapping, etc.) as long as they don't go overboard and allow the rough stuff to overshadow the actual fucking, which should always be the focus of the scene. In fact, some of the scenes that they have been putting out lately have come close to crossing that line, and have certainly been every bit as rough as I would ever care to see.

Of course, you're free to suggest whatever you want, but I certainly hope that LP doesn't make any drastic changes of the kind you're suggesting. Their product is already fantastic, and I would hate to see them turn into a European version of Kink.

All I want to see is more standing DPs in the DP scenes! Not a fan of kink like "bound gangbang" or "hardcore gangbang" rough stuff!

anon7073 wrote:the more dirty, kinky, nasty, humiliating, forceful taking advantage of the submissive slut, the better. we want to see girls do whatever is demanded of them. to be used and abused (not bruised or smacked unless they agree to it off-camera). all holes forcefully filled. cum all over them. make them push it out of their ass and down their throat. high slutty heels, short skirts, lacey tops being ripped off. 1 girl vs. however many guys want to use her. she's a cum slut rag doll. big gapes, choking, slapping, hair pulling, triple stuffed and filled with cum.

+1000

I just want more creampies

why do you dont do more creampies???

I think kink would be a lot better if it wasn't for all for all the clamps, electric wands, ropes, bad acting and girls repeating "yes mistress" (or whatever) like a broken record. That is all the generic S&M gimmicks.

I do like hardcore gangbangs however. And the fact that "hardcore gangbangs" have kind of replaced "bound gangbangs" over there i think shows that this sort of scenes have a bigger appeal to the porn audience at large.
I mean why watch a girl being restrained by ropes when it is so much hotter to watch a girl being restrained directly by the manhandling from the guys.

The closest thing to that i have seen on LP is probably the Misha Cross 3 on 1. I would love to see more rough scenes like this, but i think a lot probably depends on finding the right girl for the job. I would guess that the majority of the regular porn girls wouldn't be able to do it like Misha did.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:Well, I agree with you about the need for more hard deep throat/throat fuck action. There used to be more of that here, with some of the old performers like Kid Jamaica and Ed Junior, but now, it seems to be much less common, unfortunately.

Having said that, I strongly disagree with most of your other suggestions, especially the bondage stuff. For me, any sort of bondage totally ruins the scene. I like watching submissive girls that will do whatever they are told, and in that case, what is the point of tying them up? The only reason to tie a girl up is to force her to do things that she doesn't want to do, and I'm not interested in that.

I also dislike the clothespins, nipple clamps, and other S&M-type stuff because they are basically gimmicks that are less about sex, and more about pain. Basically, I prefer the sex to be super nasty, rather than super rough. I don't mind a bit of rough sex (choking, slapping, etc.) as long as they don't go overboard and allow the rough stuff to overshadow the actual fucking, which should always be the focus of the scene. In fact, some of the scenes that they have been putting out lately have come close to crossing that line, and have certainly been every bit as rough as I would ever care to see.

Of course, you're free to suggest whatever you want, but I certainly hope that LP doesn't make any drastic changes of the kind you're suggesting. Their product is already fantastic, and I would hate to see them turn into a European version of Kink.

Thanks for that. What about human bondage? Meaning that boys are just holding her hands in a restraint way.

Well, bondage for me, just adds more to the "submissive" and "helpless" concept of the scene rather than on the idea of forcing her to do things without her will. All should still be consenting. Couples around the world do that bondage and other hard things during sex for their own satisfaction and they even sometimes record themselves and the result might even make you believe that is not consenting while it is. For me, bondage just adds more to the intense of the scene. Nothing more. Is just about the idea that you desire the model so much that you want to overwhelm her in every way possible. You just want her so much...You can just see it as an extreme expression of love and passion all over her. And I thing there are models that see it that way and love the idea of doing it. Or at least are ok with it.

I really agree with you that rough stuff should never overshadow the actual fucking. Should always have a cooperative role on the actual fucking. All that "gimmicks" as you name them can really be used as part of that actual fucking. They just increase the intense of the scene ... just as an icing on the cake. But of course, to decide when such a limit is crossed, it's really subjective and a matter of personal preference.

I do not try to change the mainstream mentality of LP to even more BDSM-like scenes. Such change will not be good. Because as you say it might spoil what they already have and we like. All I am saying is to keep what they already have and just add some things to make a scene even more intense. They can just try such stuff occasionally, like one-two scenes per week or even per month if it something that most member won't prefer.

For example, LP has very nice freaking ANAL-(ass and asshole using)- during scenes. Maybe one of best on the Net. It will be a pity if they add -let's say- nipple clamps or bondage or throat fuck action in the expense of losing that ANAL thing. I do not want that as well.

anon7073 wrote:+1 on everything. the more dirty, kinky, nasty, humiliating, forceful taking advantage of the submissive slut, the better. we want to see girls do whatever is demanded of them. to be used and abused (not bruised or smacked unless they agree to it off-camera). all holes forcefully filled. cum all over them. make them push it out of their ass and down their throat. high slutty heels, short skirts, lacey tops being ripped off. 1 girl vs. however many guys want to use her. she's a cum slut rag doll. big gapes, choking, slapping, hair pulling, triple stuffed and filled with cum.

Thanks. This is what I am saying. All that staff should be part of the actual fucking. Not an end in itself.

This is why some scenes on hardcoregangbangs that was mentioned are kind of bad. Because they use all that staff as an end in itself. They lose the passion of the actual fucking and they concentrate on the madness.

One more example, I am getting a hard boner when a model is generously spitted on her face or in the mouth or tits,pussy and within her open asshole by the men that are using her (and I prefer that girl not to spit back on them). Again and again can happen that during scene...but that always as part of the actual fucking even if it will be a bit exaggerated.

But I have seen some brazilian movies where a girl is just spitting on another girl's face without any other sex action and it is disgusting and gets me completely off. Actually I couldn't watch such things till the end. I watched few minutes...I strongly disliked that.

And I would also like to see more kissing of the girl. Not only spitting or not.

hjohjole wrote:I think kink would be a lot better if it wasn't for all for all the clamps, electric wands, ropes, bad acting and girls repeating "yes mistress" (or whatever) like a broken record. That is all the generic S&M gimmicks.

I do like hardcore gangbangs however. And the fact that "hardcore gangbangs" have kind of replaced "bound gangbangs" over there i think shows that this sort of scenes have a bigger appeal to the porn audience at large.
I mean why watch a girl being restrained by ropes when it is so much hotter to watch a girl being restrained directly by the manhandling from the guys.

The closest thing to that i have seen on LP is probably the Misha Cross 3 on 1. I would love to see more rough scenes like this, but i think a lot probably depends on finding the right girl for the job. I would guess that the majority of the regular porn girls wouldn't be able to do it like Misha did.

Mischa Cross's that scene was kind of cool and hot.... though I would have preferred the girl not to overreact like crazy and spit back. I very enjoyed that scene anyway. Ripping-off gradually the lingeries of the girl during scene as had happened there is sth that I like to see more for example.

And what u said about boundgangbangs that became hardcoregangbangs was not about the bigger appeal. "Boundgangbangs" was kind of committed by its name to present scenes of girls being gangbanged and getting bound/tied-up at the same time. Which was something that couldn't happen frequently on the scenes since there are many models that don't want to try ropes and bondage especially during a gangbang scene. After some updates boundgangbang started to release, quite frequently, scenes without bondage and they were getting many complaints by their members that they don't see any bounding on the models during scenes. Therefore kink, in order to be relieved by all that complaining, decided to change the name. So now with hardcoregangbangs can still use bondage whenever a model is ok with that but are not committed to do it in every update.

What a constructive thread. I agree with most of it, except the TS girl and strap-on, for that do a separate site. I would love to see bondage, but I must add, IMO kink does it wrong. They ALWAYS make the girl look somewhat ugly. Even extremely good looking girls like Polly Sunshine look bad with their awful lightning and boring action. And she looked so uncomfortable. It must be exciting to watch, NOT THE OPPOSITE.

The director should study in what positions the girl looks extra beautiful and from which angle it should be captured, add bondage only if the girl fantasies about it, so she assumes the role.

sisla7676 wrote:What about human bondage? Meaning that boys are just holding her hands in a restraint way.

Well, that's better than the ropes or chains type of bondage, but what I really prefer is "mental bondage", by which I mean that if you tell the girl to put her hands behind her back or whatever, she does it, with no hesitation, no questions, period. I really find that sort of mental domination, or control, or whatever you want to call it, much more exciting. If you control a person's mind, then you also control their body, with no need for ropes or chains. Having those things present is just an indication that you are not truly in control of the other person (i.e. you do not fully have their trust, or consent, or whatever), and thus, you are attempting to use force to compensate.

Also, another problem that I have with bondage that I forgot to mention, is that it destroys the illusion of spontaneity. When I watch porn, I always like to imagine that the sex is happening spontaneously, since, in my opinion, spontaneous sex is much more exciting and enjoyable than having everything planned out. But with all the ropes and other S&M-type paraphernalia, it totally ruins that illusion, as a lot of preparation obviously went into setting all this stuff up. (Incidentally, that's one thing I dislike about kreme scenes. After all, who the hell keeps a dozen cans of whipped cream laying around the house? However, unlike bondage, the presence of kreme does not automatically ruin a scene for me.)

Anyway, I have tried to watch bondage and S&M-type stuff with an open mind (especially when the scene has other elements that I really like), but it just doesn't work for me. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on this subject.