POLL: Better distinction between women/men/gay/TS on forum

Make a better distinction on the forum/in model threads titles to accommodate peoples (sexual) orientation /preference
POLL: Make a better distinction between women/men/gay/shemale performers in the model section: viewforum.php?f=104
PornBox seems to be working okay now with all the filters you can use to exclude certain stuff:
https://pornbox.com/application/filter
and 2): "show scenes with" filter option at the top right corner under V (https://pornbox.com/application/store/) also seems to be working okay.
Also 3) you can filter for:
Female / Male / Gay / Trans to see the category you prefer:
https://pornbox.com/application/model/list
In other words: many effort has been made to accomodate peoples tastes and preferences on PornBox.
That said it baffles me as to why zero effort has been made to do so on the forum.
On certain days (especially when new shemale/gay studios and dozens of their performers are being added to PornBox) it literally is a sausage fest when opening (new) model threads in the model section: viewforum.php?f=104 Why does the forum shove certain categories (e.g. shemale) down peoples throats?
Especially since shemales always use women's names there is no way to bypass opening such threads it in the model section of the forum since it's never obvious from the thread title that they're (pre-operative with cock or post-operative without cock) transsexuals.
I don't think it's user friendly to have to open and close dozens of topics every day hoping/expecting to discover a new cute female performer. It's almost never obvious from looking at the thread titles if it's a real girl or TS model. It's not like people all of a sudden get "converted" to liking things they previously didn't like.
I can see how people don't even want to open model threads any longer (especially with models with latin/hispanic artist names) as one might be greeted by close-up-in-your-face pictures of shemales with baseball bats between their legs and twinks subsequently getting facials. Why do heterosexuals need to be obligated to see this because there is no filter/color coding/TS abbreviation in the model topic title? Is this because wgcz wants to be political correct and see shemales as women? (like iafd who deleted the TS category all together and put all shemale models in the women category?) I can see how this can harm sales for latina models.
Can't the forum also have some form of customization?
Or is it already in the planning to update the forums in that respect?
I believe the kink com forums once had it done also before the forums supposedly got cracked down by the US government:
https://www.kink.com/page/forum-fosta
Some examples for distinction purposes on the forum in the model section: viewforum.php?f=104
1.Have all model threads with shemale models start with TS e.g. TS Nataly Souza | (TS) Nataly Souza | [TS] Nataly Souza | Nataly Souza TS | Nataly Souza (TS) | Nataly Souza [TS] and be consistent about it. Some (mostly forum member started) model threads have it in the thread title for models, but I'd say 95-99% % created by bot does not.
2.Color code the shemale model threads for example blue. It used to be blue on iafd before the aforementioned imposition. They forgot to remove this text, but nowadays the blue color coding has been removed unfortunately.
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid= ... grandi.htm
Why can't this blue color coding be done for the model threads on the forum?
For example:
viewtopic.php?f=104&t=46925
3.Have the icon before the name indicate if it's a shemale or not.
This generic icon doesn't say anything usefull and I bet nobody even knows what these icons stand for.
Same could be asked for strictly gay actors, but this is less of an issue since a) not many male actors fall into this category of ONLY doing gay movies. b) since male actors have male artist names, you can easily choose to not open those threads that have male names.
However, with the shemales it's never obvious when opening a model thread that you're not opening a woman's topic since they have women artist names. It really gets old to open and close topics because you were expecting to discover a new female cutie.
4.Straight/Gay OR Straight/Gay/Shemale OR Female/Male/Shemale switch on the forum to only show model threads of your preference.
Xvideos asks this also when opening it:
I don't know why one needs to be confronted with this type of content on the forums where there is zero customization/filters/color coding, when there is so much that has been done to not having to see certain categories on PornBox?? It's like a box of chocolate on the forum: you never know what you're gonna see or get confronted with. It's also a waste of time to open and close topics dozens of times.
POLL: Make a better distinction between women/men/gay/shemale performers in the model section: viewforum.php?f=104
PornBox seems to be working okay now with all the filters you can use to exclude certain stuff:
https://pornbox.com/application/filter
and 2): "show scenes with" filter option at the top right corner under V (https://pornbox.com/application/store/) also seems to be working okay.
Also 3) you can filter for:
Female / Male / Gay / Trans to see the category you prefer:
https://pornbox.com/application/model/list
In other words: many effort has been made to accomodate peoples tastes and preferences on PornBox.
That said it baffles me as to why zero effort has been made to do so on the forum.
On certain days (especially when new shemale/gay studios and dozens of their performers are being added to PornBox) it literally is a sausage fest when opening (new) model threads in the model section: viewforum.php?f=104 Why does the forum shove certain categories (e.g. shemale) down peoples throats?
Especially since shemales always use women's names there is no way to bypass opening such threads it in the model section of the forum since it's never obvious from the thread title that they're (pre-operative with cock or post-operative without cock) transsexuals.
I don't think it's user friendly to have to open and close dozens of topics every day hoping/expecting to discover a new cute female performer. It's almost never obvious from looking at the thread titles if it's a real girl or TS model. It's not like people all of a sudden get "converted" to liking things they previously didn't like.
I can see how people don't even want to open model threads any longer (especially with models with latin/hispanic artist names) as one might be greeted by close-up-in-your-face pictures of shemales with baseball bats between their legs and twinks subsequently getting facials. Why do heterosexuals need to be obligated to see this because there is no filter/color coding/TS abbreviation in the model topic title? Is this because wgcz wants to be political correct and see shemales as women? (like iafd who deleted the TS category all together and put all shemale models in the women category?) I can see how this can harm sales for latina models.
Can't the forum also have some form of customization?
Or is it already in the planning to update the forums in that respect?
I believe the kink com forums once had it done also before the forums supposedly got cracked down by the US government:
https://www.kink.com/page/forum-fosta
Some examples for distinction purposes on the forum in the model section: viewforum.php?f=104
1.Have all model threads with shemale models start with TS e.g. TS Nataly Souza | (TS) Nataly Souza | [TS] Nataly Souza | Nataly Souza TS | Nataly Souza (TS) | Nataly Souza [TS] and be consistent about it. Some (mostly forum member started) model threads have it in the thread title for models, but I'd say 95-99% % created by bot does not.
2.Color code the shemale model threads for example blue. It used to be blue on iafd before the aforementioned imposition. They forgot to remove this text, but nowadays the blue color coding has been removed unfortunately.
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid= ... grandi.htm
Why can't this blue color coding be done for the model threads on the forum?
For example:
viewtopic.php?f=104&t=46925
3.Have the icon before the name indicate if it's a shemale or not.
This generic icon doesn't say anything usefull and I bet nobody even knows what these icons stand for.
Same could be asked for strictly gay actors, but this is less of an issue since a) not many male actors fall into this category of ONLY doing gay movies. b) since male actors have male artist names, you can easily choose to not open those threads that have male names.
However, with the shemales it's never obvious when opening a model thread that you're not opening a woman's topic since they have women artist names. It really gets old to open and close topics because you were expecting to discover a new female cutie.
4.Straight/Gay OR Straight/Gay/Shemale OR Female/Male/Shemale switch on the forum to only show model threads of your preference.
Xvideos asks this also when opening it:
I don't know why one needs to be confronted with this type of content on the forums where there is zero customization/filters/color coding, when there is so much that has been done to not having to see certain categories on PornBox?? It's like a box of chocolate on the forum: you never know what you're gonna see or get confronted with. It's also a waste of time to open and close topics dozens of times.