smurf90 wrote:bdsmpretty wrote:frederon wrote:That sucks but on the other hand we'll see a large influx of Ukrainian girls.
Anyone here rubbing their hands and sweating with excitment at the thought of women displaced and/or impoverished by war being forced into porn to make ends meet needs urgent psychological help. Not a remotely funny or clever comment or position.
Maybe your comment was carelessly expressed and you didn't intend it to sound vile and inhumane, but it does.
It's been happening for years and hypocrites like you continue to purchase porn, so don't take the moral high ground.
You can draw a distinction between performers who get into porn for all the usual reasons (= 99% of performers; eg. money for cosmetic surgeries/education/luxuries/travel-migration, or for a different/independent way of making a living)...
... and those who may now be drawn in (out of desperation) as a consequence of being a refugee displaced by war and trying to survive with no means of support. Or drawn in (out of desperation) because they stay in a country involved in a live conflict, which results in their extreme impoverishment.
Those are two totally different categories.
One is the status quo (as most here would recognise and accept).
The second is *exceptional* and these women will be desperate and vulnerable to exploitation.
Anyone wanting to see a woman who is without shelter, without means, is dependent on charity and essentially living out of a backpack (or whatever she could carry out of Ukraine), drawn into adult work at this time needs to grow a human heart.
Surreal that I am branded an 'anti-porn crusader' for stating what should be a basic humanitarian position. But here we are.