PornBox.com

Would be interesting to see why you guys prefer a specific amount of male models in a scene with 1 female model.
I mean, do you need enough guys to perform DP/TP with Blowjob at the same time? Or do you simply need 10 guys, and 5 of them are simply watching the show, doing nothing and generate additional costs which result in higher prices?
Even for a performance with a TP (eg. DAP + Pussy) + a cock in mouth + 2 other cocks in the hands only 6 males are needed?! So why the hell people want 10? 20? 30? 30000?

I like variety. Some scenes with several guys and some scenes with just one.

Most of the time I want scenes with two or three girls regardless of the number of guys but some scenes have to be with one guy sampling a number of butts!

I just watched John Price passionately fucking Sandra Soul and it was heartwarming at the same time as very sexy. They managed to both get intimate and explicit at the same time. Great work of all including the camera guy!

I voted 3-5, 5-8, 10 options because the kind of anal scene i expect watch is a "Gangbang" and thats means a several number of guys fucking 1 girl in turns.

My personal preference is between 5-7 guys fucking 1 girl, 3 is the minimun to be called a gangbang and 10 is my maximum.

Doesnt mean that i cant enjoy 2on1 or 1on1 as i do with scenes from "Double anal creampies" or 1on1 with Dylan.

But watch gangbang with several guys provides me some things like:

- See the girl surrounded by several cocks is something fascinating, watch a girl enjoying a lot of cocks turns me on

- I like watch the girl on knees doing a grupal blowjob with a lot of cocks

- If there are several guys, they can use their turns to fuck her hard because they can take breaks and switch with other, each guy is different and provides me different performance and sizes/kind of cocks, also the girl can perform blowjobs and handjobs to the other guys, normally with nice airplane positions.

- At the end, when more guys, more cum loads for the girl for facials, swallow or creampies.

Same for me regarding the first points. About the last two points, I think a little different...

misangrenegra2 wrote:- If there are several guys, they can use their turns to fuck her hard because they can take breaks and switch with other, each guy is different and provides me different performance and sizes/kind of cocks, also the girl can perform blowjobs and handjobs to the other guys, normally with nice airplane positions.

Understand. My problem (or maybe the problem in general) is that the performane is totally different. I bought many 7 or 10on1 scenes and I think in many scenes, just 2 or 3 guys perform great - i mean constantly ballsdeep-fucking, a hard cock, no tip-fucking, interaction with the model, controlling her pody posture and keep her under control... for example. So, unfortunately the performance of the other guys turns me off totally. My personal conclusion is that I really would like to enjoy all 10on1 scenes because of the first points you mentioned. But considering what I mentioned, I rather buy scenes where these 2-3 top-performer guys fuck the model, only. Sad situation...

misangrenegra2 wrote:- At the end, when more guys, more cum loads for the girl for facials, swallow or creampies.

The same situation with cumming. Most male models don´t really cum with a hard massive shot in the mouth, or straight on the face like "Danny D/Whitezilla" or "Mandingo". They simply drop a little on the model´s face or fail with that, too. So I really can´t enjoy these moments and prefer to skip to the 2-3 better cumshots, only.

My message is, that I would rather prefer quality instead of quantity -> NOT simply having 10 guys in the scene and 5 of them are tip-fuckers or have limb/short cocks and cant provide a proper cumshot.

Jocke wrote:I just watched John Price passionately fucking Sandra Soul and it was heartwarming at the same time as very sexy. They managed to both get intimate and explicit at the same time. Great work of all including the camera guy!

I totally agree with you, I liked the trailer, I´m thinking about to purchase that scene, too, but my today´s TKT went to Sasha Kray

I voted for 3-5 option, with the classic 4on1 being the default number after many years of watching Gio (4on1 DAP Destination, Destruction etc)

I like a variety but the best action is 4 or 5, 5 gives you the option to do a proper Airplane position with 2 in the ass, 1 in the mouth and both hands full

I use to think the more the merry and while I look forward to the occasional 10on1, usually the male talent wanes when you go that big plus the camera and the girl can only really entertain 5 at the most that why I usually hope for this ratio. 3 or less works but doesn't feel like it fits the "gangbang" definition (whatever that means I guess to each individual)

Although Rebecca Black (Lindsay Sharon then GIO353) handled 7 at once time, triple anal, 1 in each hand and double oral, quite the feat. Classic old Gio, but still got to go with 4-5on1, more than that you get the occasional moments where the girl is blocked by all the guys, don't want that.

zeusanalfreak299 wrote:Same for me regarding the first points. About the last two points, I think a little different...
Understand. My problem (or maybe the problem in general) is that the performane is totally different. I bought many 7 or 10on1 scenes and I think in many scenes, just 2 or 3 guys perform great - i mean constantly ballsdeep-fucking, a hard cock, no tip-fucking, interaction with the model, controlling her pody posture and keep her under control... for example. So, unfortunately the performance of the other guys turns me off totally. My personal conclusion is that I really would like to enjoy all 10on1 scenes because of the first points you mentioned. But considering what I mentioned, I rather buy scenes where these 2-3 top-performer guys fuck the model, only. Sad situation...

I understand your point and here is the importance of the male cast.

I have preference for some of guys instead of others to watch in action, the performance and the dedication are part of the reasons.

When more guys, for stadistic, there will be someones that doesnt meets your expectations in performance as Justin explains very well in their post (nice pic to define what kind of things i expect to see in a proper gangbang), when you surely expected watch a fully balls deep treatment by all the guys.. but the factor of watch a girl handle with 7-10 guys is hot and exciting

zeusanalfreak299 wrote:The same situation with cumming. Most male models don´t really cum with a hard massive shot in the mouth, or straight on the face like "Danny D/Whitezilla" or "Mandingo". They simply drop a little on the model´s face or fail with that, too. So I really can´t enjoy these moments and prefer to skip to the 2-3 better cumshots, only.

My message is, that I would rather prefer quality instead of quantity -> NOT simply having 10 guys in the scene and 5 of them are tip-fuckers or have limb/short cocks and cant provide a proper cumshot.

The poor cum loads have been a problem for a while here, the guys are fully busy shooting and shooting scenes, if i remeber well even 2 per day.

Even with that some of them have some decent cum loads sometimes.

I noticed that in the last year the number of guys have been reduced in general per scene and your current comment about increase the price of the scene can be "true" but if you take a look to scenes with a number of guys between 6-10 you will see that the price was very much acceptable (5-6 TKTs)

IMHO, I don't understand any count over 7 and the model must be physically interacting with all 7 males. Any circle jerk male must not be taking up valuable real estate in the chosen camera angle. Before I found a home in AnalVids, I use to think only 2 males were needed for a perfect multiple penetration scene and 3 males was needed for the insatiable model that needed to be stuffed airtight. After years at AnalVids and the popular Airplane position (5on1, Airtight, BJ plus double HJ) I realized there are more hardcore configurations than a 3on1. I do believe AnalVids like always has pushed the envelope further than any other company and a model can't go any further with the scene remaining watchable than the rare Extremely Airtight (7on1, TP, double BJ, double HJ)
I still think only 2 males are needed for a perfect multiple penetration scene but my view of males in a scene has expanded to 7 males actively interacting with the model, as shown below. I use to wonder what came 1st the chicken (actual 7on1) or the egg (illustration of 7on1) but now I just want to see a well shot angle with a beautiful and talented model doing this Extremely Airtight scene occasionally.

Great gif^ Is that Kira Thorn? So any others than Kira and Rebecca that have had 7 at once in airplane position (5 internally, 2 handjobs)

That is a good rationale regarding no need to go over 7. The only reason I do like the occasional 10on1 is when they all line up and take turns. Probably not worth the extra cost and effort but this can provide a hot momentMaking a good argument to change my vote to 7on1 as the best number

dpconnoisseur1 wrote:

justinwarren41 wrote:

Nice to see girls working.

justinwarren41 wrote:Great gif^ Is that Kira Thorn? So any others than Kira and Rebecca that have had 7 at once in airplane position (5 internally, 2 handjobs)
...

Yes it is Kira Thorn and there are more models that have tried this 7on1 position. I think the number is less than 10 models to have tried it with varying success because of the double BJ. The combination of various movement in the scene with AnalVids larger cock size and smaller models mouths it is tough.

So I won’t purchase a scene now if there are less than 3 cocks. There should be at least enough cocks for the airplane position. I do like the blackened scenes where they start off with 4 bwc and end with 4 bbc. I rather see talent rotate 2 sets of 4 cocks and 2 cumshots then a 8 cock gangbang with 1 cumshot. I have purchased a few 10on1s but they aren’t my go to. The more cocks the better but sometimes the male performer talk too fucking much.

Good point! If you are talking about the double session type scenes like Blackened or Indestructible then by all means go with 8 or 10 guys. Never more than 5 around the girl at anyone time. Plus love when the first group of guys finish with their cumshots and a few set of cocks are ready for the girl, it is like a line change in hockey. Miss Blackened, haven't seen it in awhile.

dpconnoisseur1 wrote:IMHO, I don't understand any count over 7 and the model must be physically interacting with all 7 males.

It's not about having merely 7 dicks in airplane config but rotating a bunch of 7 different dicks around the cumbucket slut
It sure takes more financial resources but the degree of slutiness gets higher the more sexual partners are engaged
Ergo, having like:
- 3 or 4 rolls of 7on1 using a squad of 21 / 28
OR
- 5 rolls of 5on1 using a squad of 20 dicks
would have the chick's holes swollen and turned inside out

My bad, I meant 5 rolls of 5on1 using a squad of 25 dicks
That would definitely keep the roughness energy going and I wouldn't mind having 5 rolls of 5 simultaneous cumswallowing

justinwarren41 wrote:...when the first group of guys finish with their cumshots and a new set of cocks are ready for the girl, it is like a line change in hockey.

I really like this analogy!

For me porn is as much conceptual as it is visual, and I just find the concept of a single girl getting fucked by a lot of guys so much hotter than regular 1on1. I like to watch girls going beyond what any ordinary girl would normally do in real life. The idea of innocent looking 18 year old girls getting gangfucked by more guys in a single session than many women twice their age would have had in total, is extremely exciting for me.

I used to get very excited about the concept of a cute girl getting used to her absolute limit, as described by the 5-7 guy proponents, but in practice, when watching actual scenes, I definitely appreciate nice camera angles and good focus on the girl's expressions more than how many dicks she can handle at the same time. To that effect, I actually think 5-8 guys would be sufficient for running trains on the girl, passing her around and taking turns on her holes in good looking positions, rather than limiting a scene to relatively boring positions just because they are the best for filling the girl up completely. I'd rather have guys waiting their turn, but with quick and intense sessions, than 7 guys barely moving in a single positions that takes half the scene to set up.

I also really would like to see more emphasis on scenarios and short plot lines added to gangbangs, either acted out, spoken during the intro or just written in the scene description. Kink really did some excellent work in that regard with their BoundGangBangs and HardcoreGangBangs series, although the struggle porn isn't really my thing. If some PornBox studios were able to incorporate more of that, while having a lighter tone, I think the results could be really great. For example; Schoolgirl advanced sexual classes gangbang, Girl entering the wrong dressing room/showers gangbang, Birthday party gangbang, and so on.

Glad Eat_Abooty mentioned the Blackended series, the first one in quite awhile was released last week with Chloe Lamour. Been more than 2 years, first one at Gio's new studio. But what a much better use of 8 guys than 4on1, finish, then 4 more on the same girl. Hope this series is rekindled

justinwarren41 wrote:Glad Eat_Abooty mentioned the Blackended series, the first one in quite awhile was released last week with Chloe Lamour. Been more than 2 years, first one at Gio's new studio. But what a much better use of 8 guys than 4on1, finish, then 4 more on the same girl. Hope this series is rekindled

I saw that I need to buy it when I reup on txts…Chloe Lamour is an instabuy, she’s so thick now and she always have some good titty fucking…I would love to see a Kelly Oliveira blackened or Canela Skin, Tina Fire, Teh Angel and Natasha Rios (just to name a few)…I’d like them to bring back Charlie Mac and Rico Strong those are my personal favorite uncircumcised and circumcised black dicks.

I like gangbang scenes better
when the camera manages to show us,
all or most of the involved male participants,
but still, displays the female model as the main character
in the center of the screen.







In this Lily Carter movie, there are a bunch of dudes who
are not participating in the sex, but make the scene hotter, by being in the background.

(In my opinion)

justinwarren41 wrote:Great gif^ Is that Kira Thorn? So any others than Kira and Rebecca that have had 7 at once in airplane position (5 internally, 2 handjobs)

That is a good rationale regarding no need to go over 7. The only reason I do like the occasional 10on1 is when they all line up and take turns. Probably not worth the extra cost and effort but this can provide a hot moment

Screenshot 2022-02-20 183558.jpg (26.8 KiB) Viewed 3167 times

Making a good argument to change my vote to 7on1 as the best number

The picture above is great in the sense that its displays the ludicrous amount of guys queued to fuck Natasha
But I think the perspective is too far away from the main character

For me, as a fan of gangbangs. More males is better, so long as the male participants
are good at making the sex look good, look spectacular.

To put Gonzo in the spotlight, I don't like when they inflate the male count number
including guys who are just average in every sense of the word.
Males who are short, obese, with regular or small cocks and low skills in the fuck a woman hard department.

What the fuck are they thinking right now, lol

I like your 2nd pic, May Thai on a pedestal (who I actually put on a pedestal) When there's a big number, of course focus on the girl, the main attraction of course but short reminders but showing the whole crew is good too.