PornBox.com

I wanted to get an updated opinion on where members preferences lie regarding 0% Pussy Content

I know there's a split between members and this topic has been discussed at length but wanted an updated as things evolve. I tried to include multiple options to allow some nuance into the discussion as it is not a black and white issue. Let the debate begin!

Sort of in between the two middle options, but I do believe anal should be the main focus on AnalVids.com

But honestly I'm not against seeing a pussy get fucked next to a wrecked/gaping asshole and I'll take a balls-deep DP versus a soft DAP any day.
But if they can take a DAP give em the DAP!

And if they can take a DAP and you don't put it in their pussy, that gets me off too! (especially when they say "no! I don't want it in my pussy" )

Thanks for the feedback. A few years ago I would have answered the last option but that excludes so much content and many girls. Veronica Leal comes to mind and more recently Kelly Oliveira at Gonzo. Veronica has done only a handful of DAP so no way I could pass up all of her amazing DP scenes, just too good!

Interested to see the rest of the feedback come in but intriguing the way is shaping up so far...

g1ndude wrote:Sort of in between the two middle options, but I do believe anal should be the main focus on AnalVids.com

But honestly I'm not against seeing a pussy get fucked next to a wrecked/gaping asshole and I'll take a balls-deep DP versus a soft DAP any day.
But if they can take a DAP give em the DAP!

And if they can take a DAP and you don't put it in their pussy, that gets me off too! (especially when they say "no! I don't want it in my pussy" )

I agree with everything in this post, and I voted for the third option.

I think intensity is the key to good porn and while DAP can look great in certain positions https://forum.pornbox.com/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=9121&start=40#p571718, many positions are just slow tip-fucking or doesn't show both dicks clearly thrusting the ass.

I do think both DAP and DPP should be included in the break in program for all girls that can handle it, but after that, I think it's up to the model to decide which way she prefers to get gangbanged.
(TP is an abomination since slow tip-fucking is pretty much guaranteed)

^^Mostly agree, though I can get into the occasional short TP Kind of surprised that the last option is currently ahead

There was a good span of time where Gio's Lab would bring in a new girl for an all anal 1on1, then DP 2on1, then go anywhere from 3-5 and a first DAP in the next few scenes and then they'd come to GG or Gonzo and do a bunch of gangbangs ranging from No Holes Barred to 0% Pussy and I always got off on knowing that progression. Got so many great scenes and girls out of that period and I'm not entirely sure why that doesn't happen as much anymore

Some of the newer studios are doing similar things but I guess I'm partial to Gio and Gonzo's styling and overall experience in filming in general

Shouts to Gonzo for still consistently releasing 4+on1s, that's what I'm here for

Yes, wish Gio would get back to DAP Destination 4on1 after the first few anal/DP scenes are under their belt and then never look back.

Most importantly, always start with deep anal from one guy. The girl should be warmed up beforehand.
Let the girl spread her pussy. Looks great during anal and if she squirts during anal.

I am not interested in DAP. Much better if two or more guys take turns on her ass. If DP, it looks great when the anchor guy lifts her and lets the pussy guy get some ass, especially when there is another girl taking ATOGM.

Pussy is boring and is easily accessible for most people in real life. Rough anal is a rare gem and harder to experience frequently. Most women won't let you go crazy in their ass in real life, so I personally enjoy seeing it on screen.

I always found 0% pussy ridiculous. But in a way, in porn, what is not ridiculous?

So far the number of votes heavily favour anal.

I think NHB (3rd option) will win eventually.
But although I learned to enjoy it I didnt vote for it having to decide where to cast 1 vote only.

g1ndude wrote:There was a good span of time where Gio's Lab would bring in a new girl for an all anal 1on1, then DP 2on1, then go anywhere from 3-5 and a first DAP in the next few scenes and then they'd come to GG or Gonzo and do a bunch of gangbangs ranging from No Holes Barred to 0% Pussy and I always got off on knowing that progression. Got so many great scenes and girls out of that period and I'm not entirely sure why that doesn't happen as much anymore.

You mean girls not returning for more scenes after 1on1 > 2on1 DP > 4on1 DAP or what?

I voted the 4th option but i want to do some clarifications.

In anal porn i prefer the 0% pussy genre: I have my tastes and my reasons about why i prefer this style instead of the other stuff.

The 4th option have some strictal statements. I dont want to change every scene here and turn them in 0% pussy, already there are a good production and releases of this genre to satisfy the fans, that part of the statement is to much.

The 2nd/3rd option are pretty fine for a lot of users here, being their priority instead of 0% pussy.

I really think these 2 options are necessary too for instruct or give the welcome for new girls. Personally i supported a several scenes based in these 2 options with new girls (2on1,3on1,4on1) / DAP destinations with DP.

I am used to it, is something that i consumed for a long time. But i changed my preferences and currently is something that i consum in a few ocassions(normally like i said, new girls or dap destinations).

Currently there are a good offer of all these options so user should be happy in general.

I'm certainly OK with DP scenes but DAP/No Pussy girls like Anna de Ville, Siliva Soprano, Vicky Sol and other established girls are to be cherished. It is comforting to know when a new scene of theirs is dropped at Gio's, you don't even to look at the tags to know it is a 0% Pussy. It raises their status in my mind.

dap-addict wrote:You mean girls not returning for more scenes after 1on1 > 2on1 DP > 4on1 DAP or what?

I meant pretty much exactly what I said.

For whatever reason lately the progression isn't there at GG anymore and a lot of girls are going 1on1 > 2on1 > 3-4on1 > 1-2on1 again or 1-2on2

Happened with Didi Zerati, happened with Blaze, happened with Jayla de Angelis, Yenifer CHP went from a 4on1 at Yummy to a 1on1 at GG and hasn't gotten past 2, Penny Archer went from a 4on1 to a 3on1. Jolee Love's last scene was a 1on1.

It's not exactly hard to notice, man

I'm somewhere between the first and second option, but voted for the second. I don't really care, but I'd prefer a scene to at least contain vaginal.

The aversion some people on this site have to regular sex gets a bit ridiculous. If a scene is released with vaginal sex, people come on to the forum talking about how they're repulsed by the disgusting act, and how terrible the site has become.

Yes, Lia and Yenifer both experienced girls in DAP/Anal did 4on1 for their Gonzo debuts and Yenifer's latest was 5on1. But conversely did 1on1 and 2on1 for the first 2 Gio scenes. Used to be 4on1 was a low as he'd go following the first scene...

g1ndude wrote:

dap-addict wrote:You mean girls not returning for more scenes after 1on1 > 2on1 DP > 4on1 DAP or what?

I meant pretty much exactly what I said.

For whatever reason lately the progression isn't there at GG anymore and a lot of girls are going 1on1 > 2on1 > 3-4on1 > 1-2on1 again or 1-2on2

Happened with Didi Zerati, happened with Blaze, happened with Jayla de Angelis, Yenifer CHP went from a 4on1 at Yummy to a 1on1 at GG and hasn't gotten past 2, Penny Archer went from a 4on1 to a 3on1. Jolee Love's last scene was a 1on1.

It's not exactly hard to notice, man

g1ndude wrote:For whatever reason lately the progression isn't there at GG anymore and a lot of girls are going 1on1 > 2on1 > 3-4on1 > 1-2on1 again or 1-2on2

Ok, I understand now what you mean.
Could be due to stud team problems actually. I mean GIO can of course get a 7on1 stud team together, but maybe not a 4on1/5on1 team on a regular basis anymore. Gonzo doesnt seem to have that problem. I guess its practical issues rather than conceptual ones. But we'd better discuss that in the GIO studio forum...

brian6902 wrote:The aversion some people on this site have to regular sex gets a bit ridiculous. If a scene is released with vaginal sex, people come on to the forum talking about how they're repulsed by the disgusting act, and how terrible the site has become.

It is indeed. The most funny is when a 0% pussy, and some guy put the tip of his cock for a tenth of a billionth of second in the pussy. Some become beserk, almost suing AV for irremediable psychological damage

ryukenmaster666 wrote:The most funny is when a 0% pussy, and some guy put the tip of his cock for a tenth of a billionth of second in the pussy. Some become beserk, almost suing AV...

Well, from practice I can tell you that these protests sharpened AVLP director's and performers awareness to a great extent last few years. Its maybe a bit like piss drinking maybe, just piss running into and out of a girls mouth is not drinking actually, although it is piss ofc still.

dap-addict wrote:

ryukenmaster666 wrote:The most funny is when a 0% pussy, and some guy put the tip of his cock for a tenth of a billionth of second in the pussy. Some become beserk, almost suing AV...

Well, from practice I can tell you that these protests sharpened AVLP director's and performers awareness to a great extent last few years. Its maybe a bit like piss drinking maybe, just piss running into and out of a girls mouth is not drinking actually, although it is piss ofc still.

Haha, I knew there would be reaction involving piss My complains about piss drinking is, if tagged and sometimes in the title there is piss drinking and obviously there is no drinking in the scene, it is a...mislabel, let's say.
I will not make a drama and almost faint because it says drinking and there is a drop she didn't drink.

Its all about tagging.
Tags have to be consistent!
Or if not, than better left out.
And true fetish fans should help studios, directors and performers to pay attention.

You might be wrong assuming some psychological damage was done to me by not adhering a 0% pusssy tag, though. I've grown pretty tolerant actually, also since knowing more about how these scenes are shot. And pussy fucking for sure is not disgusting but great fun! Just not in porn, please! In porn pussy has to get maximum exposed, ideally spread by the girls herself with well groomed fingers.

dap-addict wrote:And pussy fucking for sure is not disgusting but great fun! Just not in porn, please! In porn pussy has to get maximum exposed, ideally spread by the girls herself with well groomed fingers.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. It's fine to have preferences, but stop trying to claim all porn should be catered specifically to your kinks.

Brian, look, I dont do that, I think its pretty clear in my 1st post of this thread:

dap-addict wrote:I think NHB (3rd option) will win eventually.
But although I learned to enjoy it I didnt vote for it having to decide where to cast 1 vote only.

it = NHB, btw.

I'll always choose anal only/ 0% pussy! I am the anal aficionado after all

Although I love 0% pussy, I can understand what you're all saying, except for the guys asking for more pussy more anal is always the answer ahahah

dap-addict wrote:You might be wrong assuming some psychological damage was done to me by not adhering a 0% pusssy tag, though. I've grown pretty tolerant actually, also since knowing more about how these scenes are shot. And pussy fucking for sure is not disgusting but great fun! Just not in porn, please! In porn pussy has to get maximum exposed, ideally spread by the girls herself with well groomed fingers.

I don't remember if it was you or ther, but there was a mini drama about it at one time. Personaly I find in fun, it makes some animations in the forum. I always takes some distances with things, it makes me cool about stuff and sometimes I don't get why it seems so important, but the consequence is it makes me less passionate, which is sometimes sad cause it makes harder to enjoy simple things. Nothing is perfect in this world.

I don't visit Analvids.com. The name of the site is Pornbox. Like it or not.

ryukenmaster666 wrote:

brian6902 wrote:The aversion some people on this site have to regular sex gets a bit ridiculous. If a scene is released with vaginal sex, people come on to the forum talking about how they're repulsed by the disgusting act, and how terrible the site has become.

It is indeed. The most funny is when a 0% pussy, and some guy put the tip of his cock for a tenth of a billionth of second in the pussy. Some become beserk, almost suing AV for irremediable psychological damage

Well I would never sue! Haha seriously the reason I have softened my stance on allowing DP action into the scene I buy would for example Kelly Oliveira. For one she's too hot and too good of a performer but for her the DP or DP/DAP mixture scenes are better. She squirts like a fountain in all the videos with at least some DP. Her last release was her one and only DAP No Pussy, she didn't squirt much if it all. A few points she gets close, rubbing her clit hard but can't climax. I can only guess because her pussy isn't stimulated enough. Some girls prefer DAP (Natasha Teen, Valentina Milan, Anuskattz, Lydia Black, Vicky Sol) I hope they get as much DAP No Pussy as possible. Others prefer DP (Yenifer CHP admitted while she handles DAP very well DP is much more pleasurable for her). Giving the girls what they prefer makes for a hotter scene IMO while I still support the DAP No Pussy girls more due to my preference.

And wrong hole pussy insertions, when they protest by pulling it out, adjusting their cocks/position, or telling them or shooting a dirty look is the hottest thing

justinwarren41 wrote:Haha seriously the reason I have softened my stance on allowing DP action into the scene I buy would for example Kelly Oliveira.

Same to me exactly!
Kelly Oliviera. And also my experience with Ava Harris, who completely new to porn just really needed that 2on1 DP prior to her 4on1 DAP in 0% pussy format to get 'smitten in' on set.
Sometimes it just doenst work without DP, its just as it is!

Looks like 10% has lost themselves in the wrong website...

Anyway polls like this are easier to vote by your wallet and for me it´s easy I buy only 0%pussy videos even sometimes if I don´t like the models only to support 100% anal content. One second of pussy fucking even with my favorite models and my wallet will stay closed

pussyhater wrote:One second of pussy fucking even with my favorite models and my wallet will stay closed

Well, problem is to spot that without buying, isn't it?

Big fan of both DPP and DAP, so it's win win for me either way

dap-addict wrote:

pussyhater wrote:One second of pussy fucking even with my favorite models and my wallet will stay closed

Well, problem is to spot that without buying, isn't it?

Well if people would buy only content with the tag 0%Pussy, it should not be a problem right?

Customers only buy what they want. The studios have accurate sales information.

I think that nobody in the studios cares what one or a few forum posters say they will or won't buy, or what they say in a poll.
The numbers posting in the forum are just too small, even if some fool made multiple accounts to promote some idea or other.

The forum is a place where people can discuss and exchange views.
Occasionally a studio owner may listen to one or more posters who appear genuine and make sense.
Probably they won't listen to posters who just want to promote their own personal fetishes, whatever they are.

These numbers don't surprise me. Multiple accounts from users to skew results? A lot of effort to what end? As mentioned the studios have the real numbers plus they post the best sellers for reach month, year and this lines up. Polls are for just for fun and doesn't carry weight, just curious of where others tastes lie. And this site especially those whose post here have a passion for anal sex.

avanfurwet wrote:Customers only buy what they want. The studios have accurate sales information.

I think that nobody in the studios cares what one or a few forum posters say they will or won't buy, or what they say in a poll.
The numbers posting in the forum are just too small, even if some fool made multiple accounts to promote some idea or other.

The forum is a place where people can discuss and exchange views.
Occasionally a studio owner may listen to one or more posters who appear genuine and make sense.
Probably they won't listen to posters who just want to promote their own personal fetishes, whatever they are.

This is the most reasonable answer in the thread by far.

Basically 56 votes doesnt define or have any kind of influence as avanfurwet said.

And.. who is go to waste their time creating new accounts and posting in favour of X thing?

misangrenegra2 wrote:Basically 56 votes doesnt define or have any kind of influence

There is an influence of such polls because a small number of voters is still the tip of the iceberg. This poll however shows the tendency we already know for years: Its 50 vs 50 between NHB and 0% pussy. Only new data is the 10% pussy for fans, but that had to be expected after the US porn friendly business moves.


Btw, multiple accounts to influence polls, I rather doubt. But in forum discussions some phrasings indeed are very similar, especially of a few non-elaborative 'cheap' posters.

dap-addict wrote:Only new data is the 10% pussy for fans, but that had to be expected after the US porn friendly business moves.

I'm actually surprised its only 9-10%!
But I am glad at the same time!

this site was a real groundbreaker for a mainstream venture 10 years ago when it regularly dropped DAP content featuring fit women under 30. to find its edge again it needs to bring DVP, pussy fisting and prolapse, bondage gangbang & younger/thinner models. the world has moved on and there are options a plenty copying its formula from 10 years. innovate or perish

Vagabundo1 wrote:I don't know if it's okay to name suspected multiples, but I have a few in mind already.

No idea, but I think it wouldnt harm, because without your claim sounds quite empty. Some syntax is indeed suspicious, I do agree here. But its not TOP100 active posters rather. Maybe its ppl who just forgot their password and than remembered it again.