Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Moderators: aleksey_k, admin

Zeok
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:24 am
Karma: 0

Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Postby Zeok » Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:03 pm

Hi everyone. In last years I have been observing that in Analvids dp / dap scenes the variety of female bodies is increasingly scarce. This is something that is accentuated in the two main studios: Gonzo Studio and Giorgio Grandi, mainly in the first one.

These are the most common morphotypes today.

Morphotype 1.
Height: low to very low: 1.65 m or less.
Low or very low weight: less than 50 kg.
Childish-looking body.
Very small tits.
Very small ass.

Morphotype 2.
Height: low to medium. 1.60m to 1.70m. Some case from 1.70m to 1.75m
Low or very low weight. About 50 kg.
Straight and rectangular body.
Very small or small tits. In some cases moderately small tits.
Small to medium ass, with very little movement of the buttocks during penetrations.

Morphotype 3.
Highly operated women.
Tits and lips operations.
Sometimes buttock and belly operations.

Morphotype 4.
T-Girls.


The four aforementioned morphotypes have the peculiarity that they are the best sellers. Then the reason why the wide variety of other female morphotypes appears infrequently is due to economic reasons or sales strategy. Again it is shown that money kills variety (and even creativity). However, I have observed that only a small number of girls with these morphotypes actually sell. The rest of the actresses with these morphotypes sell as any actress of another morphotype would sell. But, for some reason, the directors of Analvids insist on bringing more and more new actresses belonging to the morphotypes outlined. Curiously, some actresses, such as Kristy Black, come to rival those actresses in sales. Kristy sells a lot, but a new actress with the same body type as her is rarely added. That Gia Derza has appeared on Analvids and sold is great news.

Therefore, I think it is no excuse not to bring girls other than morphotype 1, 2, 3 and T-Girls.

These are some morphotypes that could, and in my opinion should, be more represented.

Morphotype 5.
Height: low to medium (around 1.60m - around 1.65m)
Normal weight. About 55 kg.
Hourglass shaped body, pear shaped body or triangle shaped body.
Very small to medium tits.
Medium to big ass.
Example model: Febby Twigs.

Morphotype 5 990.jpg


Morphotype 6.
Height: low to medium (around 1.60m - around 1.68m)
Normal weight. Around 55 kg to 60 kg.
Hourglass shaped body, pear shaped body or triangle shaped body.
Very small to medium tits.
Very big ass.
Example model: Kristy Black.

Morphotype 6 974.jpg


Morphotype 7.
Height: tall and very tall. (around 1.70m - around 1.75m).
Slightly low to normal weight. 50 - 60 kg.
Hourglass shaped body or straight body with slightly wide hips.
Very small to medium tits.
Medium ass.
Example model: Sidra Sage.

Morphotype 7 1089274-sidra-sage.jpg


Morphotype 8.
Height: tall and very tall. (1.75m - more than 1.80m).
Normal weight. About 60 kg.
Hourglass shaped body or straight body with slightly wide hips.
Very small to medium tits.
Medium to large ass.
Model example: Katrina Colt.

Morphotype 8.094.jpg


Morphotype 9.
Height: tall and very tall. (1.75 m - more than 1.80 m).
Normal weight. Around 60kg-70kg.
Hourglass shaped body.
Very small to medium tits.
Very big or huge ass.
Example model: Bella Rolland.

Morphotype 9 Bella-Rolland-53-560x840.jpeg


Morphotype 10.
Girls with medium natural tits (firm or saggy) o little saggy tits.
Small to medium ass.
Normal weight in relation to their height.
Example model: Anastasia Mistress

Morphotype 10..jpg


Morphotype 11.
Girls with medium natural saggy tits.
Normal weight in relation to their height.
Example model: Natasha Ink.

Morphotype 11 43.jpg


Morphotype 12.
Girls with big natural tits.
Normal weight in relation to their height.
Example model: Lena Paul.

Morphotype 12 229.jpg


Morphotype 13.
Girls with very big natural tits.
Normal weight in relation to their height.
Example model: Tina Fire.

Morphotype 13 21.jpg


Morphotype 14.
Girls with huge natural tits.
Normal weight in relation to their height.
Example model: Lucie Wild.

Morphotype 14 10.jpg


Morphotype 15.
Mix of morphotypes 5 or 6 with morphotypes 10, 11 or 12.
Example model: Valentina Nappi.

Morphotype 15 263.jpg


Morphotype 16.
Girls slightly thicker than normal.
Natural body.
Generally large or very large butt.
There may be models with different sized tits: small to very large.
Example model: Taylee Wood.

Morphotype 16 17.jpg


Morphotype 17.
Girls somewhat thick in relation to their height.
Natural body.
Generally large or very large butt.
There may be models with different sized boobs: small to very large.
Example model: Laura Boomlock.

Morphotype 17 26.jpg


As a note, to say that most of the girls on Analvids are caucasian. There are some latin girls, but very few asian or black girls.

Year after year there are new models that come and go, but the four morphotypes, especially the first 3, prevail. At this rate most of the women who want to do dp or dap for Analvids will have to settle for appearing in bad amateur videos.

I have observed that Giorgio, with the inclusion of girls like Anna Khrara, Blaze, Taylor Dark or Moona Snake is increasing the variety of women's bodies in his study. But still few different girls show up. Omar, for Gonzo, sticks more and more to the first three morphotypes mentioned. In addition, to the chubby girls, of morphotypes 16 and 17, he films them with clothes. What in my view is a way to please those users who do not like the woman's usual body. In Yummy Studio Luis constantly casts the same girls, of which only Larissa Leite have a different morphotype than 1, 2 and 3. Studios like VK or NRX got off to a good start. But each time their directors bring more models of morphotypes 1 and 2.

I think a lot of girls who would really want to do scenes with dp or dap are not being given opportunities. Not a few of them could sell a lot in the long run.

The post is open to suggestions and opinions. I will regularly post some examples of girls from morphotypes 5 to 17 who either have dated very little in Analvids, or with their bodies covered / censored as well as trying to promote models capable of appearing in major studios.
Last edited by Zeok on Sun Jan 02, 2022 11:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Zeok
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:24 am
Karma: 0

Re: Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Postby Zeok » Sun Jan 02, 2022 1:40 pm

Manéa Valentina.
FCuaZR-XoAw-8Ob.jpg


Good reasons to bring her to any studio.

She is able to do scenes with dp and pee at the same time.

She maybe dares to do scenes with rimming.

She at the moment has not appeared nude in Analvids. It is urgent to film her with the upper part of her naked body.

In this image you can see in green the part of the body that should be uncovered during all sexual action.
738.jpg

Zeok
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:24 am
Karma: 0

Re: Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Postby Zeok » Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:44 pm

Anna Khara.

Anna Khara 1.jpg
Anna Khara 2.jpg


I think Anna Khara is one of the best possible options.

I don't know how tall she is, but she looks tall. She also has a medium-to-large ass, and therefore she would fit into morphotype 8 or 9 on my list.

She has already been filmed for Giorgio, but never naked in a cowgirl position dp or dap. In fact, the only one who has done his homework in this regard is another director whose name I will not say.

It would be interesting to see her again, but 100% naked most of the time, in any Giorgio studio, especially in a waka-waka type scene with many men and she as the only woman.

She is perfectly valid for Gonzo as well. In fact, I do not understand why she has not already appeared in at least three scenes of wet content in said studio

Pissing & anal Fantasy is another studio that could shoot Anna. Pissing & anal Fantasy is another studio that I would like to see Anna in, and surely more users too. A scene of her 100% naked, with a lot of rimming, dp, dap and a lot of wet content would be incredible.

dpk333
Member
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:31 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Postby dpk333 » Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:26 am

No. Just no.
The last thing this site needs is plus size models and normalising overweight women in top shelf porn.
You want to look at fatties? Go join an amateur porn site...plenty of overweight women shaking their flab on there. More power to them, but please don't bring that low quality rubbish here.
Take a leaf out of Hegre or ALSscan - you'll be hard pressed to find women over 55kgs there. Majority 40-50kgs (unless they're super tall). Let's aim to get that kind of quality on here and not turn this into some chubby fetish site

Zeok
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:24 am
Karma: 0

Re: Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Postby Zeok » Wed Jan 12, 2022 12:49 pm

dpk333 wrote:No. Just no.
The last thing this site needs is plus size models and normalising overweight women in top shelf porn.
You want to look at fatties? Go join an amateur porn site...plenty of overweight women shaking their flab on there. More power to them, but please don't bring that low quality rubbish here.
Take a leaf out of Hegre or ALSscan - you'll be hard pressed to find women over 55kgs there. Majority 40-50kgs (unless they're super tall). Let's aim to get that kind of quality on here and not turn this into some chubby fetish site


As I do not like to be disrespectful, I will answer with data.

Https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educat ... /bmi-m.htm


Morphotype 5.
Height: low to medium (around 1.60m - around 1.65m)
Normal weight. About 55 kg.
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 6.
Around 1.60m - around 1.68m)
Normal weight. Around 55 kg to 60 kg.
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 7.
Height: tall and very tall. (around 1.70m - around 1.75m).
Slightly low to normal weight. 50 - 60 kg.
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 8.
Height: tall and very tall. (1.75m - more than 1.80m).
Normal weight. About 60 kg.
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 9.
Height: tall and very tall. (1.75 m - more than 1.80 m).
Normal weight. Around 60kg-70kg.
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 10.
A girl example:
Carmen Rose.
5 feet, 7 inches (170 cm) (IAFD.com).
110 lbs (50 kg) (IAFD.com).
BMI: 17.3
Underweight = <18.5

Morphotype 11.
A girl example:
Rita Faltoyano.
5 feet, 5 inches (165 cm) (IAFD.com).
125 lbs (57 kg) (IAFD.com).
BMI: 20.9
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 12.
A girl example:
Lena Paul.
163cm - 5ft 4in (freeones.com).
58kg - 127lbs (freeones.com).
BMI: 21.8
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 13.
A girl example:
Tina Fire.
172cm - 5ft 7in (freeones.com).
57kg - 125lbs (freeones.com).
BMI: 19.3
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 14.
A girl example:
Lucie Wilde.
168cm - 5ft 6in (freeones.com).
56kg - 123lbs (freeones.com).
BMI: 19.8
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 15.
A girl example:
Valentina Nappi.
165cm - 5ft 4in (freeones.com).
Around 55 kg
BMI: 20.2
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 16.
A girl example:
Taylee Wood.
168cm - 5ft 6in (freeones.com).
65kg - 143lbs (freeones.com).
BMI: 23.0
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 BMI

Morphotype 17.
The only morphotype overweight = 25–29.9 BMI.


Btw, if you don't like most women, say so. But don't disrespect them.

User avatar
dap-addict
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 41806
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:57 am
Karma: 1

Re: Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Postby dap-addict » Wed Jan 12, 2022 1:38 pm

Very interesting morphotype examples! :)
A few of them are also missing for me, but generally I am pretty pleased with AVLP-main studio choice. Some of the GIO MILF morphotypes are too chubby in my book, but they are just attractive for others. We all have different needs! But I wouldnt change much here, I'd rather go a bit more towards my ideal of Gauge again.
ex-Eurobabeforum DAPlist responsible - PM contact: dap-a@seznam.cz
TWO DAP SCENES PER DAY! - More true fast balls deep DAP! More 0% pussy! - Dress them to fuck and pop their eyes - Heels on! No condoms!!! - Lets lets get a GONZO non-vanilla successor!!!

dpk333
Member
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:31 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Worrying decline in the variety of female bodies.

Postby dpk333 » Wed Jan 12, 2022 2:20 pm

@zeok

hahaha omg

we don't need a detailed statistical model for something that can be described with a simple flow chart

is the woman underweight?
yes or no.
if yes, she's probably cable of being a *professional model*
if no, she's not and therefore best suited to some normcore amateur site and not LP
if you want normcore looking women. no worries. but this site is like the premier league of porn and hosts some of the hottest women on earth. don't wreck it with a bunch of normcore 3rd division chicks that belong on other sites


Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arnold646 and 27 guests