PornBox.com

otto1219 wrote:bump

does this not appeal?
bottom girl is perfectly positions to orally clean anything plus it has to feel wonderful, and sexy as hell.

This scene is hot, but it's not AnalVids style. It's not anal enough.

It looks like the guy is inside Kay Carter's pussy and not her ass. And two ladies on a guy, without another guy to back him up is also not AnalVids style. There should be another guy taking the ass of the pussy-licking lady from behind.

Some people really take the name of this site too seriously. There's plenty of room/time in a scene to do MULTIPLE positions. I know, that may be a surprise to some of you.

I don't get the people who insist that every single scene posted should only consist of anal and nothing else. What's next, the same people pushing for the vagina to be pixelated like JAV since pussies have nothing to do with anal?

brian6902 wrote:Some people really take the name of this site too seriously. There's plenty of room/time in a scene to do MULTIPLE positions. I know, that may be a surprise to some of you.

I don't get the people who insist that every single scene posted should only consist of anal and nothing else. What's next, the same people pushing for the vagina to be pixelated like JAV since pussies have nothing to do with anal?

A lot of ladies use their pussy to deny guys their nice ass. They say, "Pussy only. No ass!" And this happens a lot even in porn.

So, it's no surprise that many guys see pussy as being against ass. A hot lady having pussy-sex with guys makes her ass look off limits for these guys. It's like she has said a big 'No!' to anal with them. And this is a big turn-off for anal porn-fans. Because they want to see guys take the lady's ass.

Pussy-sex is associated with anal denial. And that's what makes it a turn-off for many anal porn-fans. And there is nothing surprising or unexpected in this. When pussy is against ass, then ass becomes against pussy. One becomes a turn-off for the other. And the only way they can be together is a DP. Because only in this situation, pussy-sex doesn't mean 'No!' to anal.

otto1219 wrote:....
But no pussy at all because someone out there is going to be upset because some line was crossed? Makes you wonder who is watching and why.
....

This isn't about being upset. It's about being turned off. And in porn, a turn-off is a reason not to do it. Because the whole point of porn is to turn on the viewers.

Pussy-sex isn't a turn-off on its own. But it is associated with an anti-anal attitude among ladies. And it's this association that makes it a turn-off for many anal porn-fans.

Pussy-sex often means no ass and no anal. So, when you see pussy-sex, then that's the prediction you naturally make. The lady's nice ass is off limits. She isn't going to do anal with guys. Which is a turn-off right away, even if she takes on the anal guys later on anyway.