PornBox.com

A thread to discuss what you like or not from them.
Feel free to post everything that is not related to the girls themselves.

I start :

Gonzo :
+ good picture and lighting quality
+ good male cast overall
+ good camera work
- too much single girl scenes
- not much variety in outfits

Giorgio / GioLab :
+ extreme action when the models are ok for it
+ story scenes (back in the days)
- boring locations with weird color choices (blue wall, brown couch...)
- random makeup quality
- variety in outfits

NRX :
+ Nice locations and lighting
+ Variety in outfits
+ Little stories in scenes
+ good action overall with varied positions.
- lack of extreme stuff (fisting, extreme piss games...)
- male cast acting good but lacking visually impressive dicks.

Post will be updated soon :

VK :

PAF :

N&F :

Andy Casanova :

Gonzo :
+ good picture and lighting quality
+ good male cast
+ good camera work
+ now and then girls with breasts and butts

- trapped in monotony
- too inconstant

Giorgio / GioLab :
+ good picture and lighting quality
+- good black male cast, medicore white male male cast

- choice of girls not for everyone (very skinny or/and full body tattoos)
- tends to trash and fake porn
- the same again and again

NRX :

+ shoots cute attractive girls

- dicks too small and thin for the camera
- set looks like an old KGB office

pastaga wrote:A thread to discuss what you like or not from them.
Feel free to post everything that is not related to the girls themselves.

I start :

Gonzo :
+ good picture and lighting quality
+ good male cast overall
+ good camera work
- too much single girl scenes
- not much variety in outfits

Giorgio / GioLab :
+ extreme action when the models are ok for it
+ story scenes (back in the days)
- boring locations with weird color choices (blue wall, brown couch...)
- random makeup quality
- variety in outfits

NRX :
+ Nice locations and lighting
+ Variety in outfits
+ Little stories in scenes
+ good action overall with varied positions.
- lack of extreme stuff (fisting, extreme piss games...)
- male cast acting good but lacking visually impressive dicks.

Post will be updated soon :

VK :

PAF :

N&F :

Andy Casanova :

Your cons themselves are boring as fk

Off the top of my head, without reviewing purchased scenes or overthinking/analysing, just my first thoughts, personal likes and dislikes:

Gonzo
=====
book many good girls local and international
steady repeat bookings for good girls
variety of girls including curvier models e.g. Taylee
consistently good lighting and camera
good MUA
scene prices good value relative to other PB studios

no longer any variety in scene locations
churn out too many cookie-cutter scenes
past production hiatus when directors out of town



Gio/GL (Prague studios)
=======================
book many good girls local and international
steady repeat bookings for good girls
consistently good lighting and camera
good MUA
1:1 introduction scenes (personal preference)

rarely any variety in scene locations
churn out too many cookie-cutter scenes
heavy bias towards models wearing lingerie (probably sells well, just my personal dislike)
books quite a few tattooed/alt/enhanced models (good for those girls, just not my cup of tea)
but won't book curvier models e.g. Taylee (personal preference)



NRX
===
Scout many cute new girls
Fresh ideas for scene scripts
variety in scene locations

Patchy lighting and camera quality
sometimes the theme/script ideas overtake and distract from the porn action
Some scenes are dark and use "creative" coloured lighting (personal reference)



VK
===
Cute girls, some new
Variety in scene locations, including outdoor
Consistent camera and lighting quality, experienced producer

None really (but I just enjoy firstanalquest-alike scenes)


N&F
===
Nice small family business studio vibe
Fresh POV and ideas for scripts
Introduce some nice less-known models e.g. Lenna Ross
variety of girls including curvier models e.g. Taylee

Inexperience shows in some lighting and camera cf. Gonzo/Gio (but improving)



Andy Casanova
=============
Introduces some cute new Italian girls
Porn Academy/feeder studio for best girls to graduate to Giorgio's productions
Fresh POV and ideas for comedy scripts e.g Italian TV gameshow wheel-of-fortune thingy

too much teeny/schoolie/almost incest themes (personal preference)
too much yucky male rimming and toe sucking distracts focus from the girl (personal preference)

N&F
+ Introduced great pissing cock sucking ( which is soo much better than guys standing at a distance)
+ Constantly testing new piss concepts like the funny making piss tea in Victorias mouth and the rotating piss fountain etc...
+ Greatly improved close up filming



GG
+ Still makes the best porn in the world with girl on girl pissing and big piss orgies where the girls are active and not just passive receivers.
+ Allowing more guys to taste girl pee

-Too little gape licking by the guys.

Gonzo

Pros

Nice looking girls

Cons

Not enough "blacks only" like GIO, blonde Paola Hard could use a lot more BBC scenes, and so Mina, and Kristy Black

Could use longer trains, longer prone bone scenes, many scenes don't even have trains or prone bone

They can always do balls deep more consistently

Giorgio

Pros

Many blacks only scenes, pee stuff too

Cons

Under use many of their best girls, Francesca Palma could have more black pee scenes

Could use longer trains, longer prone bone scenes, many scenes don't even have trains or prone bone

They can always do balls deep more consistently

Natasha

Pros

Some of the best girls

Cons

They can do less cowgirl positions

They can always do balls deep more consistently

N&F

Pros

Great pissing, I love when they actually piss on the girls face and not just the mouth, great outfits, some of the best looks for girls

Cons

Sometimes it's just white dudes it can get boring, at least have one black guy for flavor

They can always do balls deep more consistently

Not enough balls deep anal with Florane and black dudes

Nick Rock

Pros

Great girl next door vibe, Vivian Grace, Liz Vogue, etc..

Nice to see girls doing some rimming

Some long prone bone positions, which is great

Great visuals, great sex positions, good camera work, good use of the girls, very creative, great production

Cons

Some guys do good, but others could do more balls deep, you want to hear those butt cheeks sound from the deep penetration pounding

Valter Karo

Pros

Some of the best girls, nice girl next door vibe

Cons

They could use more deep penetration, the whole penis needs to enter the girls

All studios

Pros

Nice focus on anal

Keep making long videos, long videos are good

Nice to see guys don't use their tongues, no body wants to see guys' tongues, guys tongues are disgusting to see

Cons

More trains on girls, chu chu

More prone bone

More standing up positions, make those legs tremble from anal pounding

More balls deep

Girls could be doing more rimming

More golden showers for girls, make their whole face wet

Gonzo :
+ good picture and lighting quality
+ good make ups
+ good camera work
+ good male casting in general but i think some of them are not good at all.
- too much vanilla scenes (white/black guys in the same scene)
- too long intros, i understand is the director style but could be more short.
- lack of storylines
- not much variety in outfits

Giorgio / GioLab :
+ good picture and lighting quality
+ good lingerie style
+ good camera work
+ good male casting in general
+ Anal fetishes covered well in general
+ Hard stuff sometimes and offers TS porn
- Lack of variety in the locations
- Black team needs be improve it, Dylan is the best, Mike is good too but needs some good fuckers to the crew
- No exists a black team for TS scenes.
- Sometimes random male crew making the action looks "worst".
- variety in outfits
- Too much focused on pee stuff
- Lack of storylines
- Details in the scene: In general fine but positions like standing anal/DAP or prone bone are not often in the scenes. Good facial endings are not shooted regular. The oral jobs are very "bad", i know it depends from the girl but is quite "lame" in general.

N&F :
+ Nice locations
+ Variety in outfits
+ Storylines and creativity
- lighting quality could be better
- too much vanilla scenes (white/black guys in the same scene)
- The action looks soft, is weird because some of the male performers are regulars in others studios, i dont know why but the impression in that when i check trailers. Anal balls deeps are neccessary.

I have 1 pro and 1 con for every company.
Pro - making content that I want to see
Con - making content that I don't want to see.

PAF studio for me is one of the studios that is getting noticed and appreciated a lot about quality, fantasy location and performance
GIORGIO Too commercial scarce actors, on a gang bang at 5 only two are saved the others are only contour

N&F He may have good ideas but can't make a decent one, robotic actors, poor locations and lights, shots too choppy and wrapped out of focus, changed cameramen and actors

GIO:
+ Models
+ Interracial content
+ Many releases
- camera work

Gonzo
+ Models
+ Interracial content
+ Camera work
- less releases

NF
+ Models
- camera work
- less interracial content
- less releases

NRX and VK
+ Fresh models with potential
+ Camera work
- no interracial are all
- pencil cocks

Yummy
+ A lot interracial
+ camera work
+ Fresh latinas/Brazilian models
- Less releases

Natasha
+ Latin fresh models
+ A lot interracial
- camera work
- less releases

zeusanalfreak299 wrote:NRX and VK
+ Fresh models with potential
+ Camera work
- no interracial are all
- pencil cocks

They just started with a black actor today:
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/148794

Well its their Rock Corp. side studio, a bit like GIO's lab, but I think that's enough.