PornBox.com

I think it might be useful for porn-fans to have some standard way of measuring the hardness of a porn scene. Because it's a quick way to know if the hardness of what the lady does in her scene matches the hardness that you want to see for her.

You can read a description of what the lady does in her scene, and know it that way. But it would be a lot faster and more efficient to have a standard rating that tells right away what the lady does and doesn't do in her scene.


1 out of 10: The most softcore porn you can think of is where the lady only shows you a lot of her cleavage. But she doesn't show you her nipples.

2 out of 10: The lady shows you all of her tits, including her nipples.

3 out of 10: The lady takes off all of her clothing and shows you her tits, pussy, and ass. This might also include solo masturbation with or without toys.

4 out of 10: 1 on 1. Pussy only. No ass.

5 out of 10: 2+ on 1. Pussy only. No ass. Can be a pussy only gang-bang.

6 out of 10: 1 on 1. Pussy and ass.

7 out of 10: 2+ on 1. Pussy and ass, with some DP. Can be a no-holes barred gang-bang.

8 out of 10: 2+ on 1. Ass only. No pussy. Can be an all-anal gang-bang, but no DAP or TAP.

9 out of 10: 2+ on 1. Anal and DAP. Should be mostly anal, but can have some pussy during DAP.

10 out of 10: 3+ on 1. Anal, DAP, and TAP. Should be mostly anal, but can have some pussy during DAP and TAP.


Perhaps this rating scheme can be modified. This is just my suggestion. But I think anal plays a big role in how hardcore the porn scene is. More ass and anal is more hardcore.

So, anal isn't just another category of porn. It's a measure of how much the hot lady gets debauched and how hardcore her scene is.

This metric couldn't be any more wrong and actually explains the nonsense prevailing on Analvids
Any pornstar testimonial (c.f.: Katsuni, Ovidie, Phoenix Marie, etc. interviews) would confirm hardcore is measured by the number of dicks a hole can take in
Anything double is harder than 1-on-1 anal (aka 0% pussy and 100% slowmotion and 100% tip-fucking guaranteed... the fact is pussy fucking is predominantly deeper and more intense than anal fucking which stalls the shagging motion in accordance to the female-friendly principle)

The golden standard goes like thus:
1-on-1 < Double penetration < Triple penetration < Quadruple penetration
and if the girl can multitask with double/triple blowjob and double/triple handjob this makes it even more so hardcore

Finally, how can one ignore critical extreme sex acts like double creampies, double simultaneous creampies, swallowing multiple loads, puking and the very supreme of hardcore: defecating and shit eating.

Furthermore, there is another big revelation I observed on Analvids: the impact of recruiting male actors who are gay or bisexual. At first, I couldn't wrap my mind why Analvids actors are deep into slow motion, female friendly fucking. It then crossed my mind Analvid actors and directors are almost all gay and pussy-repelled. This is why they are into anchoring, tip-fucking and slow motion porn action. Straight actors fuck viciously, fizzling the shit out of a cunt.

Perhaps instead of measuring the hardness of a porn scene, it's better to measure how much the lady puts out with the guys.

This is just another way of saying more or less the same thing. But you can actually measure how much a lady puts out in her scene by how much she gets paid for it. The more she puts out, the more she gets paid.

As long as the fees for various sex-acts are the same for all the ladies, then the more fees a lady racks up in her scene, the more she puts out with the guys. And there is no easy way to fake this measure
or slant it in some biased way. Because both porn-producers and porn-fans need to put their money where their mouth is. They pay more, when the lady puts out more. Which makes it a fair and an objective measure.

Ladies get paid more for anal than for pussy. DP earns an even higher fee. And it's like this for DAP and TAP. And if the lady takes on several guys, rather than just one, then she probably gets paid more for it too. So, how much the lady puts out with the guys is directly related to how much she gets paid for it. And her pay is an easy way to tell how hardcore her scene is, compared to another scene.

Cheaper scenes is where the lady doesn't put out much. And expensive scenes is where the lady really puts out with her cocky guys.

The only problem with the measure might be is when you have more than one lady in the scene. In such a case you need to say how much each lady in the scene gets paid, rather than just report the total for the ladies.

Because when you say how much each lady gets paid, then you know exactly how much each lady puts out. One lady might do a DP, while another just plays a supporting role. And you would see right away which one of them puts out and which one doesn't in their individual fees.

Pornometre?

bustylady wrote:Pornometre?

Yes, PornoMeter is a good name for such a measure.

As long as porn-studios honestly say how much they pay their lady, then this is a good way to tell how much and how well the lady gets nailed. Because porn-studios don't just throw their money around. They pay the lady for putting out. So, when they pay her a lot, then this means that she puts out a lot. Which makes it something to see for her fans.

I like watching rough and balls deep monster cock fucking, but I do not feed that dog, because it's not that safe for girls...

I use body language and facial expressions.

For example, IMO, the hardest scene Evelina Darling has done,
was SZ1983. and no other scene of hers comes close to it.







Her scenes are on the rougher side of the scale.
And she has several triple penetration scenes, and scenes with more guys,
but overall, I think those scenes were "easier".

I also think a scene is harder when the guys look angry and clench their teeth as they fuck



Also, heh, often the hardest moments in LP pornos, are actually 1 on 1 moments.





Not the circus acts.

IN MY OPINION, tho.

It's not at all about taking circus freak show positions
It's about intensity and quantity
DP, TP, QP if done balls deep and intensely are more graphic than mere anal
Also, there is something that Anal 1-on-1 enthusiasts here miserably fail to discern
The world is saturated with women engaging in 1-on-1 actions
Women who indulge in MMF and solo gangbangs are from another league unrivaled by 1-on-1 porn performers
Their degree of slutiness is bitch-like and qualifies them as STD-ridden nympho cum bucket whores
I wish porn viewers could appreciate the significance of this > MMF configuration and how this has nothing comparable to 1-on-1 anal / whatever

magizi87 wrote:Also, heh, often the hardest moments in LP pornos, are actually 1 on 1 moments.

Agreed, balls deep doggy anal is much better than doggy DAP only going halfway.

101mike101 wrote:

bustylady wrote:Pornometre?

Yes, PornoMeter is a good name for such a measure.

The Mohs scale of porn?

magizi87 wrote:I use body language and facial expressions.

For example, IMO, the hardest scene Evelina Darling has done,
was SZ1983. and no other scene of hers comes close to it.

SZ1983_Evelina_Darling_4K1.mp4_20210121_230350.580.jpg

SZ1983_Evelina_Darling_4K1.mp4_20210121_230456.810.jpg

SZ1983_Evelina_Darling_4K1.mp4_20210121_230623.918.jpg

Her scenes are on the rougher side of the scale.
And she has several triple penetration scenes, and scenes with more guys,
but overall, I think those scenes were "easier".

I also think a scene is harder when the guys look angry and clench their teeth as they fuck

GIO649_Kristy_Black_4K.mp4_20201214_203213.535.jpg

Also, heh, often the hardest moments in LP pornos, are actually 1 on 1 moments.

0281.gif

0180.gif

Not the circus acts.

IN MY OPINION, tho.

Like and agree with everything said by this poster. Well done sir xoxo

I don't think you can measure it in porn because you don't really know what happens behind the scenes.

In the 2000s you would hear of girls passing out right after shooting a scene, and just straight up collapsing. I would imagine those were good fucking sessions.

Starrio wrote:I don't think you can measure it in porn because you don't really know what happens behind the scenes.

In the 2000s you would hear of girls passing out right after shooting a scene, and just straight up collapsing. I would imagine those were good fucking sessions.

Perhaps you can't measure it precisely. But you can measure it roughly.

So for example, when two ladies in two scenes do exactly the same things with the same number of guys, then you need to look at how hard and how fast the guys are banging. Which lady gets it more balls-deep. Which lady gets more oral. And which lady gets more anal, and so on. These details are hard to rate in a standard way. So, it would be hard to tell which scene is more hardcore.

But if one lady does only pussy with guys. While another does lots of anal. Then the one who does anal is more hardcore. Or if one lady takes only one one guy, while another takes on 3 or 4, then the one with more guys is more hardcore. These kinds of differences you can easily rate and differentiate and have lots of agreement about it among porn-fans too. And these differences are also directly related to how much the lady gets paid for her scene. So, you can use the lady's pay as a way to rate the hardness of her scene.

There is a reason why ladies get paid more for anal than for pussy. Anal is more hardcore. And it's like this for many other sex-acts. So, the lady's pay can be an easy way to rate the overall hardness of her scene.

101mike101 wrote:

Starrio wrote:I don't think you can measure it in porn because you don't really know what happens behind the scenes.

In the 2000s you would hear of girls passing out right after shooting a scene, and just straight up collapsing. I would imagine those were good fucking sessions.

Perhaps you can't measure it precisely. But you can measure it roughly.

So for example, when two ladies in two scenes do exactly the same things with the same number of guys, then you need to look at how hard and how fast the guys are banging. Which lady gets it more balls-deep. Which lady gets more oral. And which lady gets more anal, and so on. These details are hard to rate in a standard way. So, it would be hard to tell which scene is more hardcore.

But if one lady does only pussy with guys. While another does lots of anal. Then the one who does anal is more hardcore. Or if one lady takes only one one guy, while another takes on 3 or 4, then the one with more guys is more hardcore. These kinds of differences you can easily rate and differentiate and have lots of agreement about it among porn-fans too. And these differences are also directly related to how much the lady gets paid for her scene. So, you can use the lady's pay as a way to rate the hardness of her scene.

There is a reason why ladies get paid more for anal than for pussy. Anal is more hardcore. And it's like this for many other sex-acts. So, the lady's pay can be an easy way to rate the overall hardness of her scene.

Gotta love the way you dodge the hard reality of DP being more hardcore than anal and paying way higher pay rate
That's the anal/0% pussy/gaylord propaganda speaking out from the loudspeaker
and just so you know there is nothing hardcore in 1-on-1 anal, it's just the random uptight girl next door taking it in the ass by her beer belly fuck buddy
No damn anal can rival MMF double pounding / airtight action

101mike101 wrote:So, the lady's pay can be an easy way to rate the overall hardness of her scene.

Indeed easiest just to take the porn sex act based going rates.
Graduation is like this everywhere: solo/mast > pussy only > 1on1 anal > dp/dpp > DAP > TAP
add x$ per stud above the basic 4on1 scene.
if you deem wet = hard, add y$ for wet.

...but than to measure fine hardness grades, check the girls face during her workout.
If she's blurred out it might be hard for her, but only afterwards.
The real girls dont allow for that!