PornBox.com

Issue troubling me past few weeks. Friends have said "you look circumcised" from swimming pool etc. Never thought nought of it until recently. I'll supply photo if topic arouses interest. Point is, can guy become 'naturally circumicsed' through sexual activity in teens etc?

Sorry if I sound like weirdo / exhibitionist... as adopted child just wondering could I have been circumcised pre-adoption.

The glans / head is always free.

I'm confused here.

Any opinions?

It sounds like you’re circumcised, buddy. Welcome to the club.

American and/or Jewish? Apparently, if you’re circumcised, everyone assumes you’re either American or Jewish these days.

It is not possible to be “naturally” circumcised in the manner you have described. I guess it’s possible that you have a very retracted foreskin due to some kind of genetic factor, but it really just sounds like you were given the snip-snip. Is there any coloration difference in the upper portion of your shaft just below the glans, compared to the lower portion of your shaft?

Also, you really don’t need to send us a pic, LOL.

Mister Ananas wrote:Also, you really don’t need to send us a pic, LOL.

I totally get you & thanks. I'm no closet weirdo, just to know I was for real. I just thought it through from people more in know than I. Thank you.

You’re on a porn site. If you really want to post a picture of your dick here for some reason, there’s no more appropriate place to do it. Don’t let me stop you, LOL. I’m just saying... I think we can resolve this verbally without whipping ‘em out.

netzerkaiser wrote:

Mister Ananas wrote:Also, you really don’t need to send us a pic, LOL.

I totally get you & thanks. I'm no closet weirdo, just to know I was for real. I just thought it through from people more in know than I. Thank you.

I'm Irish / Scottish, born about '69 / '70, which makes it odd issue indeed.

Mister Ananas wrote:You’re on a porn site. If you really want to post a picture of your dick here for some reason, there’s no more appropriate place to do it. Don’t let me stop you, LOL. I’m just saying... I think we can resolve this verbally without whipping ‘em out.

No issue there, big or small... TY Brother.

netzerkaiser wrote:Issue troubling me past few weeks. Friends have said "you look circumcised" from swimming pool etc. Never thought nought of it until recently. I'll supply photo if topic arouses interest. Point is, can guy become 'naturally circumicsed' through sexual activity in teens etc?

Sorry if I sound like weirdo / exhibitionist... as adopted child just wondering could I have been circumcised pre-adoption.

The glans / head is always free.

I'm confused here.

Any opinions?

The man's foreskin isn't there just for looks. It has a function during sex. Which you can readily see, when you look at how it works when an uncircumcised guy masturbates himself.

When the guy isn't circumcised, then the skin around his cock including his foreskin is movable around his cock like a sheath. And this sheath acts as a kind of mechanical substitute for lubrication.

Only the guy's glans goes in and out of his foreskin and creates some stimulation for him. While the rest of his cock moves only within its own skin. And his cock's skin stays in the same place and doesn't cause any friction either for the guy's hand during his masturbation, or for a lady if he is doing it with her.

It's a clever evolutionary trick that makes sex easy on the lady and pleasant for the guy. And that's why foreskin is something all male mammals have. This isn't just a human phenomenon. It's a highly conserved evolutionary feature and for a good reason too. It serves a vital function for good sex and reproduction.

Circumcised guys can still have reasonably good sex. But their sex often creates friction problems for the lady and even injuries for her, during anal sex. Plenty of lube can compensate for it. But there is a limit to what lube can do. There is no good substitute for nature's solution to the friction problem during sex.

In porn, you can compare how Mike Adriano has anal sex with the ladies and Manuel Ferrara. Mike Adriano is circumcised and Manuel Ferrara is not.

Mike Adriano uses plenty of lube in his videos. But even so, he is always slow on the ladies with his cock. Which shows the limits of what lube can do, when the guys' natural mechanism for reducing friction is damaged. If he does it any harder and faster, then he will injure his ladies. And that's why he doesn't do it.

But Manuel Ferrara has no problem doing the asses of his hot lasses hard and fast, without causing any visible discomfort or injury for the ladies. Which shows the natures advantage over any artificial solutions.

And most studs at AnalVids.com aren't circumcised from what I've seen. Circumcision isn't fashionable in Europe, except for religious minorities. And that's partly why these guys can perform so well inside the asses of their hot lasses without injuring the ladies.

I had to do circumcision at adult age due to my foreskin becoming too tight after a few scars.
My partner claims she feels no difference. We always use lube for anal.
My sensitivity has gone down, fortunately, because the sensitivity you have as uncircumcised would be terrible when not protected.
Yes, sex was easier and slightly better before but also sometimes too sensitive.
It is nothing I think of now but to circumsise children is child abuse based on stupid morals.

Circumcision is something like a “mini mutilation”. There are millions of nerve endings in the skin of the foreskin plus an unprotected glans stiffens over time and loses sensitivity. Actually the glans is a mucosa and as such it must be protected. Imo circumcision (unless for strictly medical reasons) is an aberration and violates children's rights.

I agree, although I am afflicted myself.

Guys who have gotten circumcised later in life have arrested to the loss of sensitivity in the glans. I think Rocco in particular has cited it as one of the worst mistakes of his life.

I’ll say also, at least in the United States, the doctors are to blame for most circumcisions. Medical staff are trained to instruct parents that their sons should be circumcised for hygienic reasons, and since most parents trust the advice of their doctors implicitly, along with the fact that circumcision is very common in the U.S., most people just do it without a second thought.

Hygiene's excuse seems stupid to me. This makes absolutely no sense or rigor. And the point is that the circumcision ends up affecting the future sexual pleasure of the child when he becomes an adult. In any case, it is the child, when he is already a teenager or an adult, who should decide if he wants to be circumcised or not, and not to cut his skin as a baby without his consent.

According to this article (in spanish)

https://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2007/12/01/camaredonda/1196505172.html

It is estimated that when a penis is circumcised (that is, when the foreskin that covers the glans is mutilated in part or in full), more than 20,000 nerve endings are removed, more than a meter of veins, arteries and capillaries and 78 meters of nerves. In addition, the muscles of the foreskin, glands, membranes, mucous membranes are destroyed, and the frenulum is also damaged.

Like any surgical alteration of the genitals, it also has its consequences on future sexuality. In the chat last week, a guy asked me about this question, because he is circumcised and often experiences pain during penetration. It is normal, if we take into account that, when the foreskin is amputated, the glands that secrete smegma are destroyed, so the lack of lubrication of the penis causes the skin to be tighter and irritated by friction during penetration.
There is also the problem of keratinization experienced by the skin of the glans after circumcision, due to friction with underwear, which leads to a marked loss of sensitivity.

Yeah, I’m in full agreement with you on this issue. It gets especially weird if you look into the history of circumcision in this country. Long story short: We can blame the Puritans. They thought it would help prevent masturbation or something. Ironically, it probably has the exact opposite effect.

Nature vs Nurtured... Nature always wins...

Definitely circumcised..I try not buy un-circumcised scene like Tony even he is on scene.

netzerkaiser wrote: Point is, can guy become 'naturally circumicsed' through sexual activity in teens etc?

Yes, but only if that sexual activity involves someone biting your foreskin off, sticking your genitals into a meat grinder, or something similar.

Mister Ananas wrote:It sounds like you’re circumcised, buddy. Welcome to the club.

American and/or Jewish? Apparently, if you’re circumcised, everyone assumes you’re either American or Jewish these days.

It is not possible to be “naturally” circumcised in the manner you have described. I guess it’s possible that you have a very retracted foreskin due to some kind of genetic factor, but it really just sounds like you were given the snip-snip. Is there any coloration difference in the upper portion of your shaft just below the glans, compared to the lower portion of your shaft?

On the underside base of the head theres still like an 'elastic band' connecting just under the 'eye' with lower down, even though the 'head' is always uncovered (like in bottom picture from Wiki). I thought if you were circumcised that little 'elastic' band would have been cut?

Post a picture

bustylady wrote:Post a picture

Maybe I'll have to. But I'm probably clearing it up with below picture. I have this little membane kind of thing like Czoky Ice below, that seems to join the head with lower part of shaft. If this guy is circumcised, I guess I am. If he's not, I guess I'm not. Thanks for so many great replies.

Its starting to make sense now why the girlfriends I've had in my life thought my penis was cool, even though I, was not proud because it was only 6" when all the monsters in porn or even a few guys you'd meet swimming were a lot bigger. I am guessing now that many of these ladies had only experience with cock like below, in UK, which to me, no matter how big, is kind of gross aesthetically. I guess I would've been far more proud & confident years ago. I'm glad I never had below... to me its revolting.

I mean, if your dick doesn’t look even remotely like that one, you’re definitely circumcised.

Mister Ananas wrote:I mean, if your dick doesn’t look even remotely like that one, you’re definitely circumcised.

Thanks! I'm circumcised! How the nuns did it in adoption centre is beyond me, but sincere thanks Brother! Life is so strange.

It was probably done shortly after you were born. Your biological parents may have chosen to do it. I don’t know your circumstances, though.

robin_reid wrote:Circumcision is something like a “mini mutilation”. There are millions of nerve endings in the skin of the foreskin plus an unprotected glans stiffens over time and loses sensitivity. Actually the glans is a mucosa and as such it must be protected. Imo circumcision (unless for strictly medical reasons) is an aberration and violates children's rights.

Exactly right. I'm American, so I don't often encounter those who know the terrible truth about male genital mutilation, aka circumcision.

FreeBrittanyZamora wrote:

robin_reid wrote:Circumcision is something like a “mini mutilation”. There are millions of nerve endings in the skin of the foreskin plus an unprotected glans stiffens over time and loses sensitivity. Actually the glans is a mucosa and as such it must be protected. Imo circumcision (unless for strictly medical reasons) is an aberration and violates children's rights.

Exactly right. I'm American, so I don't often encounter those who know the terrible truth about male genital mutilation, aka circumcision.

I see that in US even there are clinics that restore the foreskin, but anyway the result never will be same than a real foreskin...

Why do dildos look like a circumcised cock? Hmmm

netzerkaiser wrote:Issue troubling me past few weeks. Friends have said "you look circumcised" from swimming pool etc. Never thought nought of it until recently. I'll supply photo if topic arouses interest. Point is, can guy become 'naturally circumicsed' through sexual activity in teens etc?

Sorry if I sound like weirdo / exhibitionist... as adopted child just wondering could I have been circumcised pre-adoption.

The glans / head is always free.

I'm confused here.

Any opinions?

I do not know about the Magrheb (North Africa) but here in Black Africa the circumscription is an obvious operation for all.

robin_reid wrote:Imo circumcision (unless for strictly medical reasons) is an aberration and violates children's rights.

FALSE

Why do you say that?

Mister Ananas wrote:Also, you really don’t need to send us a pic, LOL.

why not

are u afraid or something

dont u see tons of penises everywhere everytime u watch porn????

rude

circumcision is a hoax

use simple logic

they tell u penises are flawed and badly designed by nature

so they need to artificially be cutted

is disgusting, is a lie, is a hoax

from the point of view of logic is not logical consistent that penises are flawed designed by nature that they need a white collar criminal to cut the skin

maybe some tight underwear or lack of touching ???? give skin problems ????

but i dont know

i think by logic is extremely logical inconsistent to consider penises are flawed so that they need to be fixed with that disgusting circumcision abomination

circumcision makes penises uglier and weaker

is pathethic

scarletxxx666 wrote:circumcision is a hoax

use simple logic

they tell u penises are flawed and badly designed by nature

so they need to artificially be cutted

is disgusting, is a lie, is a hoax

from the point of view of logic is not logical consistent that penises are flawed designed by nature that they need a white collar criminal to cut the skin

maybe some tight underwear or lack of touching ???? give skin problems ????

but i dont know

i think by logic is extremely logical inconsistent to consider penises are flawed so that they need to be fixed with that disgusting circumcision abomination

circumcision makes penises uglier and weaker

is pathethic

Circumcision is genital mutilation. And most people in USA would agree with this statement, when it comes to female circumcision. But many people in USA seem to have a double standard. Because they support male circumcision, rather than call it genital mutilation too.

Male circumcision in children should definitely be banned, unless there is some very rare medical reason why it is necessary - the same way female circumcision is in almost every civilised country on the planet. If you want to cut bits of your body off once you are over 18, fine go ahead - that's your decision - but your parents deciding to mutilate your genitals without your consent for 'religious' or 'cultural' reasons is straight up child abuse.

davebowman wrote:Male circumcision in children should definitely be banned, unless there is some very rare medical reason why it is necessary - the same way female circumcision is in almost every civilised country on the planet. If you want to cut bits of your body off once you are over 18, fine go ahead - that's your decision - but your parents deciding to mutilate your genitals without your consent for 'religious' or 'cultural' reasons is straight up child abuse.

Stupid reasoning. Excision is completely different from circumscription. Moreover, the circumscription is not a crime or a murderous act towards the child and the parents have the full right. And also I am delighted to be circumscribed as a child because I do not remember the pain that certainly someone 'one 18 or older might smell. ALL FOR CIRCONSISION

JASON15938 wrote:

davebowman wrote:Male circumcision in children should definitely be banned, unless there is some very rare medical reason why it is necessary - the same way female circumcision is in almost every civilised country on the planet. If you want to cut bits of your body off once you are over 18, fine go ahead - that's your decision - but your parents deciding to mutilate your genitals without your consent for 'religious' or 'cultural' reasons is straight up child abuse.

Stupid reasoning. Excision is completely different from circumscription. Moreover, the circumscription is not a crime or a murderous act towards the child and the parents have the full right. And also I am delighted to be circumscribed as a child because I do not remember the pain that certainly someone 'one 18 or older might smell. ALL FOR CIRCONSISION

You can also find women who will say the same thing about being circumcised. They can say that they like, and they agree with it.

But these women can speak only for themselves and not for any other woman in such circumstances. Because nobody gives you the right to impose on others your personal likes and dislikes, especially when it involves an irreversible amputation and mutilation.

Each person can only choose for themselves something like this. And it shouldn't be done with minors, who aren't able to give informed consent. Because without consent it's a crime, or should be, if it's not.

101mike101 wrote:Circumcision is genital mutilation. And most people in USA would agree with this statement, when it comes to female circumcision. But many people in USA seem to have a double standard. Because they support male circumcision, rather than call it genital mutilation too.

Agreed. It’s important to realize that most people in the United States have never seriously considered the issue. They take it for granted that circumcision must be harmless because they have been told that repeatedly throughout their lives, and because it’s so normal here, which I blame on the Puritans (who pushed circumcision originally) and the doctors and medical institutions of the modern day (who continue to perpetuate the practice).

Even today, doctors still routinely recommend circumcision to parents of baby boys, and the public’s trust in medicine is such that most of them take the recommendation without a second thought. To me, that is medical malpractice. Doctors should never recommend unnecessary medical procedures, and especially not when they involve the irreversible excision of healthy tissue from a patient who is unable to speak for themselves.

If you elect to get circumcised as an adult, that is different, although I cannot imagine that many men would choose such a thing unless they are suffering from some kind of medical condition.

No adult man in the world with a normal foreskin will decide to circumcise. This skin (remember: also with a lot of nerves) helps a lot in many ways; protection of the glans, sensitivity and pleasure.

Well, that’s not entirely true. Adult converts to Judaism do it all the time. Rocco Siffredi did it as well. (There are different stories out there about why he made that choice. Something about an aggressive sex partner who bit him hard enough to take a piece out of it ... but I don’t know if I buy that.)

It does happen and there is historical precedent for it, which is important to acknowledge because it’s part of the problem.