Page 1 of 1

Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 2:46 pm
by drevokocur66
Please stop using Laura Fiorentino in wet scenes. Shameless and despicable spitter that only ruins a wet scene.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 3:48 pm
by nelson_sanchez
not true, producer has to tell her how to act. she is a model she knows how to act. if she can't do it then producer need not give this kind of scene to her.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 4:01 pm
by drevokocur66
nelson_sanchez wrote:not true, producer has to tell her how to act. she is a model she knows how to act. if she can't do it then producer need not give this kind of scene to her.


I am not here to see good acting. I am here to see ass fucking, ass tasting, and piss drinking. Shameless spitter is all she is. Watching her trying to cover up her spitting is down right comical. On a side note, if that is acting, she sucks lol.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 4:14 pm
by nelson_sanchez
drevokocur66 wrote:
nelson_sanchez wrote:not true, producer has to tell her how to act. she is a model she knows how to act. if she can't do it then producer need not give this kind of scene to her.


I am not here to see good acting. I am here to see ass fucking, ass tasting, and piss drinking. Shameless spitter is all she is. Watching her trying to cover up her spitting is down right comical. On a side note, if that is acting, she sucks lol.

it is your money and i'am sure it is not Shameless money. she better get with the program.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 6:08 pm
by heinnapp
I do not really know what you're talking about? Have you seen Laura's last scene with Jureka:

DAP and Pee, Laura Fiorentino and Jureka Del Mar 4on2, Pee Drink, Squirt, Gapes, ButtRose, ATOGM, Creampie and Swallow GIO1837
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/216478

That's wetsex at its best, I'd say, featuring Laura in incredibly hot both active and passive piss sex action:

Image
Image

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 6:45 pm
by fighthardin321
Laura is phenomenal!

Ya she doesn't swallow...

So what she's still in the top tier of nasty performers on here.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 6:59 pm
by smurf90
fighthardin321 wrote:Laura is phenomenal!

Ya she doesn't swallow...

So what she's still in the top tier of nasty performers on here.


She doesn't like the piss, it's easy to tell.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 7:24 pm
by Jocke
I guess most of us do not care and continue to buy Laura's scenes. If swallowing really was a problem, then sales figures would show. I think you are wasting your breath.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 7:29 pm
by AussieRose
this is by far the most pathetic post I've ever seen on legalporno forums. Laura Fiorentino is amazing. You sound like a loser complaining about this it's actually sad I kinda feel a little bit sorry for you

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 9:00 pm
by drevokocur66
smurf90 wrote:
fighthardin321 wrote:Laura is phenomenal!

Ya she doesn't swallow...

So what she's still in the top tier of nasty performers on here.


She doesn't like the piss, it's easy to tell.


Thank you.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 11:05 pm
by Giorgio Grandi
smurf90 wrote:
fighthardin321 wrote:Laura is phenomenal!

Ya she doesn't swallow...

So what she's still in the top tier of nasty performers on here.


She doesn't like the piss, it's easy to tell.


In almost 20 years of porn, I met only one model that like to drink pee and she is not Annette Swartz

In fact, models do it for the money, in the best way they can.
they don’t do it because they like it, no one does it because they like it.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 12:30 am
by drevokocur66
Giorgio Grandi wrote:
smurf90 wrote:
fighthardin321 wrote:Laura is phenomenal!

Ya she doesn't swallow...

So what she's still in the top tier of nasty performers on here.


She doesn't like the piss, it's easy to tell.


In almost 20 years of porn, I met only one model that like to drink pee and she is not Annette Swartz

In fact, models do it for the money, in the best way they can.
they don’t do it because they like it, no one does it because they like it.


Same goes for anal, it pays way better than vaginal.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 11:02 am
by Giorgio Grandi
drevokocur66 wrote:Same goes for anal, it pays way better than vaginal.


I would say that 90% of model I know are getting fucked in the ass also in private life
Maybe they prefer pussy, but they enjoy at least sometimes anal sex

It’s totally a different story comparing to pee drink

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 12:04 pm
by bustylady
Anastasia rose loves Piss drinking... They are doing it for money... But they take money and cheat, when they cheat, director has the right to cut the scene and tell them to do it properly, if she's not ready cancel the movie. Should tell her that the movie won't sell... she will get only one movie & won't recommend her to other studio because of her bad performance... That will do the job... I agree I'm not a fan of Laura, zee twins and other Piss spitters, I don't even watch the trailers :D

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 2:27 pm
by davebowman
Jocke wrote:I guess most of us do not care and continue to buy Laura's scenes. If swallowing really was a problem, then sales figures would show. I think you are wasting your breath.

I certainly don't care if she spits it out rather than swallows. Given the pints of piss that the guys produce, this seems to be pretty much standard procedure with most girls. But then I feel the same way about cum as I do piss - I don't care either way if a girl swallows it, just that she takes it in the face.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 3:18 pm
by drevokocur66
Giorgio Grandi wrote:
drevokocur66 wrote:Same goes for anal, it pays way better than vaginal.


I would say that 90% of model I know are getting fucked in the ass also in private life
Maybe they prefer pussy, but they enjoy at least sometimes anal sex

It’s totally a different story comparing to pee drink


My point was, girls will do what they are able, and able to get away with, to make the most amount of money possible. Not because they like it or not. So please, use the girls that are willing to do what they are paid for. You would not continue to make DAP scenes with a girl that is unable to perform DAP. What I value in a scene from a girl the most, is her effort.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 3:22 pm
by drevokocur66
bustylady wrote:Anastasia rose loves Piss drinking... They are doing it for money... But they take money and cheat, when they cheat, director has the right to cut the scene and tell them to do it properly, if she's not ready cancel the movie. Should tell her that the movie won't sell... she will get only one movie & won't recommend her to other studio because of her bad performance... That will do the job... I agree I'm not a fan of Laura, zee twins and other Piss spitters, I don't even watch the trailers :D


OMG, we agree on something!

To be fair, NF studio stopped using piss drinking tag, so now I don't bother even watching the previews.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 4:06 pm
by Jocke
It looks great but I don't think that I am entitled to demand that the girls do things they are not comfortable with.
Not buying what you do not like is a good strategy.
Whining about piss spitting is just tedious.
This is a forum for mutual enjoyment.
Complaints are not very interesting to read.
You, threaten to not buy certain content is just pathetic. Who do you think cares? Do you really think it has any significant economic impact? lol!
The studios produce what sells, not what an individual on a forum prefer.
Attacking specific performers is just bad taste.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 5:05 pm
by bustylady
They are comfortable with taking your money... If they are not comfortable they shouldn't take your money and should stay away from those movies, like some models here, i don't remember their name, they do anal but not wet..

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 8:19 pm
by drevokocur66
Jocke wrote:It looks great but I don't think that I am entitled to demand that the girls do things they are not comfortable with.
Not buying what you do not like is a good strategy.
Whining about piss spitting is just tedious.
This is a forum for mutual enjoyment.
Complaints are not very interesting to read.
You, threaten to not buy certain content is just pathetic. Who do you think cares? Do you really think it has any significant economic impact? lol!
The studios produce what sells, not what an individual on a forum prefer.
Attacking specific performers is just bad taste.


Yah, because girls are sooo comfortable with 2 or 3 dicks inside their ass at the same time. I don't threaten not to buy. LP already has my money. I merely distribute my tickets for the content I like. Tag says, piss drinking, so I buy it. Got burned by Laura's performance in the past, don't want to repeat it again. The only thing with bad taste here, is your douchy reply.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 11:49 pm
by Jocke
Image
Laura and Anna excel, as usual!

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 12:46 pm
by Giorgio Grandi
And I want to add one thought, just for better clarify

Porn doesnt need to be real, porn is fiction, it is not meant to represent real sexual adventures, but it mean to be an exaggerated caricature of reality.
Porn needs to stay as it is, fiction.
If you are looking for real experiences, go into a club, meet people, pay 5 people to have sex as you wish and sit in the corner to enjoy it, or join the action if you prefer so.
Dunno how to explain, reality and porn do not go along.

All this BSs about "if she deosnt drink I dont buy" is totally fine, but it wont change the way the content are produced.
A content can be interesting also if the model doesnt drink for someone, actually for many.
So, overall, buy what you wish, but do not pretend we do stop producing content you do not like because the pool of users doent finish with the few users that write on the forum.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 1:09 pm
by Caveman39
Giorgio Grandi wrote:In almost 20 years of porn, I met only one model that like to drink pee and she is not Annette Swartz


Who was it?
Does she has scenes on this platform?

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 2:36 pm
by jerrybb
Giorgio Grandi wrote:
smurf90 wrote:
fighthardin321 wrote:Laura is phenomenal!

Ya she doesn't swallow...

So what she's still in the top tier of nasty performers on here.


She doesn't like the piss, it's easy to tell.


In almost 20 years of porn, I met only one model that like to drink pee and she is not Annette Swartz

In fact, models do it for the money, in the best way they can.
they don’t do it because they like it, no one does it because they like it.


I agree Laura is one of the best nasty performers. I would think Jureka loves to swallow piss. But Jureka was not interested in Laura's ass in lastest scene. That scene was a real dissapoinment.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 4:14 pm
by heinnapp
Giorgio Grandi wrote:And I want to add one thought, just for better clarify

Porn doesnt need to be real, porn is fiction, it is not meant to represent real sexual adventures, but it mean to be an exaggerated caricature of reality.
Porn needs to stay as it is, fiction.
If you are looking for real experiences, go into a club, meet people, pay 5 people to have sex as you wish and sit in the corner to enjoy it, or join the action if you prefer so.
Dunno how to explain, reality and porn do not go along.

All this BSs about "if she deosnt drink I dont buy" is totally fine, but it wont change the way the content are produced.
A content can be interesting also if the model doesnt drink for someone, actually for many.
So, overall, buy what you wish, but do not pretend we do stop producing content you do not like because the pool of users doent finish with the few users that write on the forum.

Thank you for your clarifying thoughts, Giorgio! Absolutely agree, one should not confuse porn with 'real life'... porn flicks are sort of 'fairy tales for adults', meant for entertaining (sexually liberated) people and not for providing educational or documentary material :p

However, I think that 'good porn' - despite being totally 'fictional' - can in the best case also have positive effects on the lifes of its consumers, for example by inspriring them to have better, more diverse and intense sex, stirring their sexual fantasies, enhancing their passion, helping to liberate them from false moral restrictions, etc. :) ...

So, I'd not totally agree with you that porn is a mere 'caricature', in the sense that it exaggerates sex acts to an absurd degree to create 'a grotesque or comic effect'... it is - or can be - clearly more than that.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 5:50 pm
by bustylady
:eek:

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 7:34 pm
by Jocke
Yes porn is fiction like most things we see on film. However in porn you have people actually having sex and not pretending to have sex like in a Hollywood flick. This makes a difference to the viewer. This is also why gonzo is popular. Sure some people want fictional characters and stories about plumbers regardless how absurd they are, but very many people prefer Laura being Laura and doing nasty stuff without pretending to be anyones stepmother. Yeah, I know her real name isn't Laura and I know that the action is scripted but it is definitely a real person doing real things and expressing real feelings. I have no interest in animated films of any kind. I want it to be as real as possible and this is a direction I think pornography should explore. Having live orgies similar to Chaturbate but with Analvids type of content would be very interesting. No interaction with the viewers is required, at least initially. Knowing that it is recorded and sent live is spicy enough.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 10:31 pm
by Jocke
However, I think that 'good porn' - despite being totally 'fictional' - can in the best case also have positive effects on the lifes of its consumers, for example by inspriring them to have better, more diverse and intense sex, stirring their sexual fantasies, enhancing their passion, helping to liberate them from false moral restrictions, etc. :) ...


I have watched porn for so many years I don't know any longer what is or isn't the root of my personal sex life, but I think my first anal was inspired by porn, my first ass licking probably and my first taste of female pee definitely. I don't think I would have pushed myself that far unless I had seen something like that. "Can you actually do that!"

It would be interesting to hear Giorgio's story of how he got into "advanced" sex.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2021 2:47 pm
by drevokocur66
Giorgio Grandi wrote:And I want to add one thought, just for better clarify

Porn doesnt need to be real, porn is fiction, it is not meant to represent real sexual adventures, but it mean to be an exaggerated caricature of reality.
Porn needs to stay as it is, fiction.
If you are looking for real experiences, go into a club, meet people, pay 5 people to have sex as you wish and sit in the corner to enjoy it, or join the action if you prefer so.
Dunno how to explain, reality and porn do not go along.

All this BSs about "if she deosnt drink I dont buy" is totally fine, but it wont change the way the content are produced.
A content can be interesting also if the model doesnt drink for someone, actually for many.
So, overall, buy what you wish, but do not pretend we do stop producing content you do not like because the pool of users doent finish with the few users that write on the forum.


All that is fine, I merely suggested you use a girl that at least puts in the effort. And not just for piss, that goes for all acts. Performers, directors, studios, managment, owners, customers... it is the effort that counts.

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2021 5:00 pm
by bustylady
It's so hard to find the girls man, that's the problem... I still remember, GG is the first producer who made quality wet movies, GG knows better than us...

Re: Laura Fiorentino, a waste of wet content.

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2021 8:54 am
by Deeprunner
Giorgio Grandi wrote:And I want to add one thought, just for better clarify

Porn doesnt need to be real, porn is fiction, it is not meant to represent real sexual adventures, but it mean to be an exaggerated caricature of reality.
Porn needs to stay as it is, fiction.
If you are looking for real experiences, go into a club, meet people, pay 5 people to have sex as you wish and sit in the corner to enjoy it, or join the action if you prefer so.
Dunno how to explain, reality and porn do not go along.

All this BSs about "if she deosnt drink I dont buy" is totally fine, but it wont change the way the content are produced.
A content can be interesting also if the model doesnt drink for someone, actually for many.
So, overall, buy what you wish, but do not pretend we do stop producing content you do not like because the pool of users doent finish with the few users that write on the forum.


I agree 100%. I always make a point of referring to the performers as actors and actresses because that is what they are and they are putting on a play or movie that is a fantasy If anyone ever 'criticise' it should be from the point of view of improving the performance or its filming. I'm kind of upset over the criticism of Laura Fiorentina because it comes across as personal. I've love her work and look. I always buy the piss version of a scene not because I'm into it but just because its available. I guess there is always someone that wants more and rather than asking for it they get a little negative and nasty to get it.