PornBox.com

Lets keep it simple.

In general I'm OK with things. I wouldn't say no to a 5 minutes per scene of super close up ass gaping, though it needs to be well lit (by someone standing behind the camera with a flashlight if necessary), otherwise it's just a big closeup of a black hole.

However, for me I'd rather see as much of the girl as possible. I understand people watch on all sorts of devices, and maybe if you are watching on a tiny phone it would be different - but I watch these scenes in 4K on a huge TV screen, so I can see plenty. What's frustrating is when you have too many close-ups. This is an issue I frequently have with Mike Adriano's work - he will cast amazing looking girls, with huge breasts etc - then for 90% of the scene it might as well be any old scrubber, because all you get is a close-up of the butthole.

Not a fan of closeups for any extended period. They are OK for showing off stretched out holes when changing positions, but otherwise I prefer medium to far views.

I like variation. Seeing the model from a distance all the time is boring. Seeing a gape which you don't know who it belongs to is boring too.

We need an active cameraman who can both zoom in and zoom out. Look at the latest Tushy movies. Extremely well shot close ups. You can count the girls pussy hair. Nice pink gapes and you can see well into the gape.

What I am primarily disappointed with here is that we get a rushed 2 second gape shot at transitions. Why not give us a relaxed 20 seconds with some fingering and gape licking, shot close up?

sometimes à close up on a pussy pissing would be nice

Closeups works really well on pissing inside ass or pussy action, a lot better than full body shots on this matter.



and of course, creampies were made to be shot like this

DPraved wrote:Not a fan of closeups for any extended period. They are OK for showing off stretched out holes when changing positions, but otherwise I prefer medium to far views.

+1

bump