Article about xvideos and legalporno
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:01 pmXvideos, the most-visited pornographic website in the world, faces difficulties due to its content, which is being investigated by the police and card-payment companies.
These are wild guesses.
That is why we have looked into the business of the people behind the website, which is located near Prague’s Wenceslas Square. We started gathering testimonies of women who complained about the practices of another company of the same owners, Legal Porno, which focuses on filming extreme pornography. A number of women said they had left the studio injured.
These testimonies were given to them by Woodman who is a notorious pathological liar.
And already we see one of the biggest misinformation of the article : there is no “Legal Porno” studio, and never was. “LP” is a clip store with several studios, most of which are independant, to release their content. There are currently over 90 studios under our umbrella with almost 12,000 models and 40,000 scenes.
Denikn complacently attributes alleged events to a single non-existent Legal Porno studio but in reality they came from a variety of sources. Those studios do not even communicate with each other nor do we tell them what to do. They also sell or release content to other companies.
We have found the complaints about the treatment by the production of Legal Porno on social networks but also on closed forums run by the owners of Xvideos.
They didn’t find them, they were given to them by Woodman. Woodman also provided their contacts.
Other women who were contacted by Deník N and who were promised anonymity have confirmed these accounts. The women said they had suffered injuries during the filming of extreme practices. Many of them said they had had no idea what they would be filming.
Completely false allegations as our shoots for our own studios are always organized in advance. Even Denik wrote in another article that what we do is well known.
However Woodman is known to add extra guys in the middle of his scenes. He is always accusing us of having the same practices as he does.
The production of Legal Porno is operated by GTFLIX TV, which – as the Xvideos server – is located in Prague’s Krakovská Street, close to Wenceslas Square.
Here they again fallaciously try to mix up every studio under one umbrella. There is no such thing as a “production of Legal Porno” operated by one company. The fake notion that LP is just one big company is necessary to Woodman who simply could not defame us as easily without it.
Xvideos servers are not even in the Czech Republic. Only one studio out of ~100 is located in Krakovska...
Both companies are part of the pornographic empire owned by the French siblings Stephane Michael Pacaud and Malorie Deborah Pacaud.
Legal Porno specialises in the most hardcore pornography, for which clients pay well.
Our studios do nothing that hasn’t already been done and published a long time ago. Note that Pierre Woodman does exactly the same things on film.
Here is for the credibility of their provider of information, who criticizes us every chance he gets for “dangerous practices” such a double anal, and even went on TV and several interviews to criticize it.
However, sometimes such shooting represents an extraordinary strain on the bodies and psyche of the actresses. Some of them described to Deník N that they had left the set torn, bleeding and unable to control their bowel movements.
Porn in general can be hard for certain actresses. even vaginal sex can be too much sometimes. There is nothing specific to us here. In any case, if anything becomes too much to bear for our actresses, we always stopped.
In most testimonies, the same motives are repeated over and over again. Before, and sometimes during, the shooting the women did not know what the producers planned to do with them.
False allegations : models want to know what they will do and how much they will be paid, and ask for extras. Only studios specializing in coercion operations such as PW’s castings invite models for anything and try to push them as much as possible.
The women usually had to engage in very dangerous and complicated practices, for example several men having anal sex with a single woman at the same time.
These are not dangerous practices if done right. And no one *has to* do anything. Everything is planned in advance and can be rejected right away, or even during the set.
In addition to publicly available statements, Deník N has obtained testimonies of three women who, independently of each other, shared their experiences with filming for Legal Porno. We do not disclose any details that might identify or endanger them.
Lidocaine against pain
The first witness the reporters spoke to still works in the pornographic industry. She did not leave it although her experience with Legal Porno was one of her first in the industry and, as she says, it has marked her forever. She speaks only very carefully about her experiences: “We had agreed that there would be one guy, but in the end there were three blacks,” says the actress. She says she took the work as she needed money quickly and knew that Legal Porno paid more than other productions.
The woman explained that although she was not raped, she did not feel comfortable because she saw from the beginning that the original agreement had not been kept. However, she needed the money. She describes a similarly difficult situation as other actresses – they feel pressured at the moment, it is often their first experience, they are already on the set where several people are waiting for them, and they cannot refuse once the crew is ready.
We can only speak for our own studios (and of course Denikn makes sure to be as vague as possible in an attempt to smear our company) : our own shoots are always organized in advance.
The filming process was also unexpected for the woman. Among other things, the actress claims that, without prior agreement, she was given local analgesics to relieve pain. „The worst was the ignorance; I was not prepared for it at all. I didn’t know that lidocaine could hurt me when they started putting it in my anus. They didn’t rape me, but I know very well how they behave, everyone knows how they behave,“ says the actress, adding that they pushed her to complete the scene.
“So they put lidocaine in my anus, it burned terribly, they wanted me to complete the shoot, I kept bleeding so they gave me more and more lidocaine as they wanted to finish it, but it still didn’t work, it hurt terribly,” she describes. She says not only the production but also herself wanted to complete the scene. The actress knew that if she were unable to do it, she would get no money. And that is what happened – because of great pain and strong bleeding she stopped the shooting and left empty-handed.
“They really wanted to complete the scene with me, but in the end they stopped when I said no,” the actress adds. “I did not complete the scene. Nobody paid me anything,” she said.
If true, you have a clear indication that studios do not force girls and that they can stop at any time.
Lidocaine is used as a local anaesthetic, most often in dentistry. It may affect the heart rate. Its use in Legal Porno has been confirmed also by one of its directors, who uses the nickname Giorgio Grandi and who wrote about it in an official forum. He reacted to a blog post in which an actress described the practices used during shooting. “I use a gel that contains between 1% and 2.5% lidocaine,” wrote the director.
Pierre Woodman has been trying to fabricate a false narrative about “dangerous numbing creams” but the reality is that Lidocaine gels are sold over the counter and are appropriate even for children a few months old. In reality some models do request it even if it barely does anything. No one was ever forced to use it. Some models even bring it to the set themselves but studios don’t usually like it as it can make the dicks of actors limp.
To the witness who talked to Deník N it never occurred to complain about this treatment. Also other actresses said that the entire industry knows that this production uses rough practices against women. According to the actresses, it is a public secret at which nobody should be surprised.
Another witness told the reporters about a similar experience. After the shooting, she even ended up in hospital. “I had to have an operation but I don’t want to come back to it. I will not tell you more about it,” another actress said.
Again a mystery testimony that could be real or not and have happened with any of the many studios that we do not even own. With almost 12,000 models shot it would be an oddity if nothing had ever happened though.
At our own studio we only had a single problem in almost 10 years. A girl prepared her ass with a ball that she could not get out of her. There is your big horror story pushed by the clowns at Denikn. They were even contacted by this model to not use her like this and Denik ignored her as they always ignore what doesn’t fit their smear campaign.
A very trustworthy source from the pornographic industry described to Deník N that Legal Porno often uses girls that have no experience with shooting and do not know what their bodies can stand.
This “very trustworthy source” is most likely Pierre Woodman who is a long time woman abuser and worse, and has declared war to us (and to many others, contrary to what the clueless Denik reporters claims) almost 10 years ago.
“They get paid much more than at other productions. When you have a new girl or you have her exclusively, you earn more. Now, during the coronavirus pandemic, many new faces have appeared there,” said the source.
Another big lie as during the coronavirus we had almost no new models in the Czech Republic.
Legal Porno shoots not only in Krakovská Street in Prague, but also in other studios in the Czech Republic.
“Legal Porno” does not shoot scenes. Denikn pushes the false idea that LP is one big studio as it helps their allegations. We question whether they even tried to understand the structure.
Every day it launches around seven new videos.
More like a dozen.
“There is not a month, or maybe a week, without a girl having a bad experience. Some agencies do not recommend Legal Porno and do not send girls there. After working for Legal Porno, the girls can’t work, can’t control their bowel movements and need to take a break from filming,” the source added.
Classic Woodman propaganda.
So a model doing double anal with a “LP” studio would have health problems, but not if they do it with Pierre Woodman cheap hotel castings with brand new girls?
In reality models are able to work anywhere before and after. The myth that models should avoid “LP” for their career has been pushed very hard for many years by PW (including with bought, fake video testimonies to scare others) and some gullible persons have come to believe it.
The insider did not wish to disclose their name as the owners of Xvideos control a large part of the production in the Czech Republic. If the insider were blacklisted, it would ruin their business. However, Deník N knows their identity.
So here Denik has someone saying that we hurt the models yet they send us models and are afraid that we would stop taking them should their name be known? Ridiculous as everything else in this article.
Public testimonies
Information about the practices at Legal Porno has appeared on social networks. Several famous people from the industry who have hundreds of thousands of followers have shared their bad experiences. For example, the actress using the stage name Veronica Avluv, who has 268 thousand followers, confided on Twitter in 2019 that she had been injured during a shooting.
“I’ve been nursing a serious prolapse injury from one shoot for Legal Porno. It was supposed to be one of 4. I’ve been dealing with blood and shit since the scene. Can’t believe they can sell my pain online but they can,” she wrote.
Veronica had 37 scenes published. It is alleged that in only one of them, and at a studio that is not ours, something happened between her and an actor. Denikn again makes no effort to present the proper context and facts.
The porn actress Samantha Rone, who has 144 thousand followers, published her experience in 2016. “I wish I was mad about the money. I’m more mad that people can behave and treat other people like that,” the actress wrote.
She contacted the paper to complain about them using her and say it’s wrong but Denikn ignored her. Samantha has 20 scenes published, and worked for 5-6 different studios. Her original message was due to one of these studios (an independant studio) having a very long delay with their payments but it was eventually resolved (everyone was paid). However, we stopped releasing scenes from this studio years ago, for other reasons. This happened in 2016. She worked at our own studio in 2018 and everything went well.
Similar complaints can be found on the official forum of Legal Porno. “At the beginning, everything was O.K. The boys were kind and thoughtful. However, the more scenes I had shot, the more ruthless they became as people just want it rougher, rougher and rougher! In the end I bled so much I had to cancel shootings for other productions because I just could not shoot,” a porn actress wrote on the Legal Porno forum last year. Her account is official, it was authorised by the producers.
“In the morning before the last scene, I woke up in fear. I knew that it would be terrible and stupid and that it would be no good. It was just too much. But it was clear to me that no one cared,” she confided to anonymous fans of the Legal Porno production.
This was written by Florane who was talking to her fans and how they expect her to do hard scenes and that she needs a resting period after doing them. [b]She contacted Denik and asked them to not use her and misrepresent her in their shady article but they ignored her as well.[/b]
None of the girls informed the police about their experiences; at least none of them said so to Deník N. Most of the women said they doubted whether the police would do anything. It is therefore unclear whether the police has ever looked into the possible violence in front of cameras.
“The law prohibits us from providing information on specific persons and other entities,” Eva Kropáčová, spokesperson of the Prague Police, said.
The owners of Legal Porno at first refused to talk Deník N journalists and to answer any of their questions. Then one of the owners, Mr Pacaud, called a reporter. Mr Pacaud said he wanted to clear up certain things and promised to send a reply by email.
Completely false. Mr Pacaud never called, messaged, or spoke to any of the Denikn reporters, in fact he blocked them as they were harassing him.
Then came a reply from GTFLIX TV, but the authors of the reply forbade Deník N to publish the reply and accused its reporters of bias.
Denikn has such little interest in the truth that they didn’t even accept an offer to meet the studio manager to answer questions and published their smear piece right away.
“The accusations are completely made up. For nearly nine years we have been victims of a massive disinformation campaign carried out by Pierre Woodman. It includes forging documents and paying models to make false accusations,” the owners of Legal Porno wrote in their reply. “Tomorrow we will consider filing an information with the Czech Police against you and your newspaper,” the company has threatened.
Denikn conveniently removed the part about us informing them that we have been in a legal battle for years against Pierre Woodman for his countless lies and defamation and that he had been lying to the courts to hide. This would have of course greatly hurt the credibility of their main source of information so they simply removed it. We also informed them that we were aware that Pierre Woodman had been offering to pay for testimonies against us and was also caught forging documents many times.
Denik made absolutely no effort to verify any of this information or to evaluate the credibility of their source.
Ten girls speak on camera
The owners of Legal Porno did not mention the name of the world-famous producer Pierre Woodman by coincidence – they have had disputes for years. Woodman, who is active mainly in Hungary and the Czech Republic, has also pointed out to unfair practices of his competitors.
How much were Jakub Zelenka and Lukáš Prchal paid to lick the ass of Pierre Woodman like this? What does the asshole of a rapist and woman abuser taste like? Apparently they like him a lot.
According to porn-industry insiders, Woodman does not have such a heated dispute with anyone other than the Pacaud siblings.
A gross lie. His forum is filled with venom against countless persons. Even more so if you count his numerous fake accounts. Already 10 years ago the main porn agent in Hungary had the same type of disputes with him, saying with his shooting practices he would have been arrested quickly in the US and that he uses lies and manipulations to trick girls and also locks them up until they finish the shoots.
Woodman, who was contacted by Deník N, handed over to the newspaper testimonies of ten actresses he says he has collected in recent years. All the women in the videos talk about their experiences with Legal Porno productions similarly as the actresses with whom Deník N spoke.
A criminal and lifetime con man handed this “information” to you, and you happily took it.
Deník N will not publish the videos, to protect the privacy of the women. However, the newspaper contacted some of them to verify whether their testimonies were manipulated. The women with whom the reporters spoke confirmed their original statements.
How did Woodman’s videos come about? The producer has said he shoots everything on camera, including interviews with job seekers. He does it to prevent any disputes or accusations. To Deník N he has provided the testimonies of ten girls who, when he asked them about their experiences in the industry, themselves started talking about Legal Porno.
Everything in Woodman videos is staged and fake. The real first castings are never filmed.
One of the girls said that, in order to make the scenes, she drank a cocktail of painkillers. Another woman said that during the shooting she was bleeding from her anus but they did not stop the shooting anyway. They gave her a gel thanks to which she could continue and did not feel pain. She said she did not know at the time that it was a painkiller.
Here Denik conveniently mixes up pain reliever gels which are sold over the counter with pain killer medicine which are not. In any case we (our studios) do not give pain killers to anybody. Denik does not identify who is “they” this model mentions and keeps everything as vague as possible. This is looking like a completely fake testimony.
“They gave me anaesthetics, but it did not help at all. No one raised their voice at me, but when I was crying and said I couldn’t do it, someone came and gave me a shot of vodka to relax,” described one of the women.
According to lawyers contacted by Deník N, in this case – if it happened in this way – a thin line between shooting and rape may have been crossed.
The line between shooting and rape is not thin at all and is very clear. Our actors (in our own studios) are pros and the last thing they want is to lose their livelihood. No one is going to force a girl.
[removed the part about lawyers giving their opinion on the allegations, since they are not real]
According to Sokol, local anaesthetics or alcohol may be used during pornographic shooting if the actress has consented to it and was in a state in which she was able to make such a decision. This means, for example, that she was not drunk.
One of the girls described how, during one of the practices, the actor used force to achieve what he wanted. When shooting anal sex, actresses have to prepare to avoid the intercourse being painful. “At times he held my ass and tried to force a [dildo] in it, so that it would be over fast. But I was already crying and said I did not want to do it, so I ended it,” described the witness.
This statement only shows that this model was not forced at all, and was able to simply not continue.
Another woman alleged that people from Legal Porno forced the shooting of a scene. “They forced me to shoot double anal intercourse. I refused another scene,” said the woman. She said the producers tried to trick her by saying that they would only try a scene and would not film it. The scene was to include anal sex. “I said to them that even simple anal intercourse was painful for me. They told me it wouldn’t be on any video. So we tried it and I said it hurt terribly. I pushed them away and said it hurt. Then I watched previews on Legal Porno and the video was there,” the witness described her frustration.
There are no “people from Legal Porno”.
IF this is a true testimony, which we can highly doubt, it did not happen at any of our studios.
Penalty for failing to complete a shoot
Other women on the videos say that people from Legal Porno pressured them to continue shooting. The producers allegedly threatened the actresses with penalties in the order of tens of thousand of Czech crowns. “I stopped working for them. A woman did not agree with the fact that I wanted to terminate the contract on the spot. The contract stipulated that when I stop [the shooting] early, I must pay a penalty of 70 thousand Czech crowns. Some girls before me left but did not have to pay anything,” a witness said.
The lawyer Sokol stresses that such practice would be unacceptable and the penalties would be unenforceable. “This is similar to someone agreeing in a contract to pour petrol over themselves and set themselves on fire, and paying a penalty if they did not do it. I believe that, in relation to pornography, such clause is null and void,” Sokol explains.
In some aspects, the situation at Legal Porno may be similar to the case of the porn production Czech Casting. In that case, the girls testified that the producers pressured them and threatened them with penalties if they failed to complete their work. The police then charged nine people with human trafficking, sexual coercion and rape. As in the case of Legal Porno, the girls said that before the shooting they did not know what awaited them.
Such penalties do not exist in our studios and we have never heard of such things elsewhere.
The press initially claimed that CzechCasting had them in their contracts for refusing to finish a scene and later changed that to penalties for having their content removed from their sites. In any case it has nothing to do with our own policies.
War of two producers
It is important to bear in mind that Woodman is not unbiased in relation to the situation at Legal Porno. His legal dispute with the Pacauds has a personal dimension. Woodman claims that on the forum of Legal Porno they published pictures of his wife and of his daughter (that picture was allegedly taken when the daughter was a minor) and invited people to visit his daughter. Woodman says this is the reason why he has led a court dispute in France.
We did not “publish” such content. It was posted on our forums by users who strongly dislike him and wanted to give him a taste of his own medicine (doxing is one of his many specialties). We disagree strongly with bringing family into these fights (and doxing in general) and removed the posts.
We (not our users) also claim in our forums that Pierre Woodman shot and published minors and blackmailed models, because we know that for a fact. Note that he never sued us for this as he simply can’t fight the truth in court. It gives you a better idea of why he is trying to feed the press with false information in order to take us down.
On the other hand, the Pacaud siblings, namely their company GTFLIX TV, say in their reply that Woodman has been carrying out a disinformation campaign against them and has been paying models to raise false accusations against them.
Woodman’s MASSIVE campaign against “legal Porno” started about 9 years ago. He spread an unbelievable amount of lies using his forums, phone calls, and countless personal meetings. Originally we decided to ignore him as most sane people would. But it went on. His campaign reached very far as he is a very obsessive person and does a lot of networking. For example, we had people contacting us alarmed about Woodman apparently possessing critical information about us and took pages of notes after a single conversation with him but it turned out completely fake. This has been going on for a long time and the fake allegations are only getting worse.
We have said many times that Woodman is the biggest liar in the industry. Even during these events he went as far as claiming Mr Pacaud went to the police to bribe them which is of course completely false. He just can’t stop lying and Denikn would be well-advised to be more careful with the “information” he provides them.
“Woodman must have taken an interest in your biased articles and we see that the way in which you are trying to obtain information may easily lead to false testimonies,” GTFLIX TV added.
The goal of Denik reporters Jakub Zelenka and Lukáš Prchal is to hurt the XVIDEOS company and owner as much as possible. They are trying to make a name for themselves by influencing credit card companies to take action. They even write a lot of insinuations about child porn in other articles when they were not able to find any.
Woodman saw this, contacted them, and gave them all the crap they needed after their failed articles, to push their smear campaign further.
Denik is trying so hard to cause damage that they even translated their article in english. Something they have never done before, apparently.
However, not only Woodman is pointing his finger at Legal Porno. Also other people from the industry have described to Deník N that Legal Porno wants girls to engage in practices their bodies cannot cope with. In addition, the sources say, the actresses are often very young. According to sources who are familiar with the pornographic industry in the Czech Republic – we do not quote Woodman as an anonymous source in this article – there are cases when girls who have just turned 18 appear at a pornographic shooting where they are asked to be penetrated by several men and to engage in dangerous practices that may cause injuries.
“Double Penetration” is done, and has been done by almost every porn site.
You can sign up for the army and go kill and die at 18. Surely this is a harder and more dangerous situation than to have sex on camera. You are also considered responsible enough to vote.
“Sometimes they end up in hospital and often they are so traumatised that they quit the industry,” an insider told us under the promise of anonymity. A number of people from the pornographic industry have openly admitted that they are afraid to talk about the issues around Legal Porno. The reason is that the Pacauds control a large share of the pornographic market in the Czech Republic and in the world.
Fake statement, from a competing site or agent, most likely.
[cut the rest of the article. Recaps from previous failed articles]
These are wild guesses.
That is why we have looked into the business of the people behind the website, which is located near Prague’s Wenceslas Square. We started gathering testimonies of women who complained about the practices of another company of the same owners, Legal Porno, which focuses on filming extreme pornography. A number of women said they had left the studio injured.
These testimonies were given to them by Woodman who is a notorious pathological liar.
And already we see one of the biggest misinformation of the article : there is no “Legal Porno” studio, and never was. “LP” is a clip store with several studios, most of which are independant, to release their content. There are currently over 90 studios under our umbrella with almost 12,000 models and 40,000 scenes.
Denikn complacently attributes alleged events to a single non-existent Legal Porno studio but in reality they came from a variety of sources. Those studios do not even communicate with each other nor do we tell them what to do. They also sell or release content to other companies.
We have found the complaints about the treatment by the production of Legal Porno on social networks but also on closed forums run by the owners of Xvideos.
They didn’t find them, they were given to them by Woodman. Woodman also provided their contacts.
Other women who were contacted by Deník N and who were promised anonymity have confirmed these accounts. The women said they had suffered injuries during the filming of extreme practices. Many of them said they had had no idea what they would be filming.
Completely false allegations as our shoots for our own studios are always organized in advance. Even Denik wrote in another article that what we do is well known.
However Woodman is known to add extra guys in the middle of his scenes. He is always accusing us of having the same practices as he does.
The production of Legal Porno is operated by GTFLIX TV, which – as the Xvideos server – is located in Prague’s Krakovská Street, close to Wenceslas Square.
Here they again fallaciously try to mix up every studio under one umbrella. There is no such thing as a “production of Legal Porno” operated by one company. The fake notion that LP is just one big company is necessary to Woodman who simply could not defame us as easily without it.
Xvideos servers are not even in the Czech Republic. Only one studio out of ~100 is located in Krakovska...
Both companies are part of the pornographic empire owned by the French siblings Stephane Michael Pacaud and Malorie Deborah Pacaud.
Legal Porno specialises in the most hardcore pornography, for which clients pay well.
Our studios do nothing that hasn’t already been done and published a long time ago. Note that Pierre Woodman does exactly the same things on film.
Here is for the credibility of their provider of information, who criticizes us every chance he gets for “dangerous practices” such a double anal, and even went on TV and several interviews to criticize it.
However, sometimes such shooting represents an extraordinary strain on the bodies and psyche of the actresses. Some of them described to Deník N that they had left the set torn, bleeding and unable to control their bowel movements.
Porn in general can be hard for certain actresses. even vaginal sex can be too much sometimes. There is nothing specific to us here. In any case, if anything becomes too much to bear for our actresses, we always stopped.
In most testimonies, the same motives are repeated over and over again. Before, and sometimes during, the shooting the women did not know what the producers planned to do with them.
False allegations : models want to know what they will do and how much they will be paid, and ask for extras. Only studios specializing in coercion operations such as PW’s castings invite models for anything and try to push them as much as possible.
The women usually had to engage in very dangerous and complicated practices, for example several men having anal sex with a single woman at the same time.
These are not dangerous practices if done right. And no one *has to* do anything. Everything is planned in advance and can be rejected right away, or even during the set.
In addition to publicly available statements, Deník N has obtained testimonies of three women who, independently of each other, shared their experiences with filming for Legal Porno. We do not disclose any details that might identify or endanger them.
Lidocaine against pain
The first witness the reporters spoke to still works in the pornographic industry. She did not leave it although her experience with Legal Porno was one of her first in the industry and, as she says, it has marked her forever. She speaks only very carefully about her experiences: “We had agreed that there would be one guy, but in the end there were three blacks,” says the actress. She says she took the work as she needed money quickly and knew that Legal Porno paid more than other productions.
The woman explained that although she was not raped, she did not feel comfortable because she saw from the beginning that the original agreement had not been kept. However, she needed the money. She describes a similarly difficult situation as other actresses – they feel pressured at the moment, it is often their first experience, they are already on the set where several people are waiting for them, and they cannot refuse once the crew is ready.
We can only speak for our own studios (and of course Denikn makes sure to be as vague as possible in an attempt to smear our company) : our own shoots are always organized in advance.
The filming process was also unexpected for the woman. Among other things, the actress claims that, without prior agreement, she was given local analgesics to relieve pain. „The worst was the ignorance; I was not prepared for it at all. I didn’t know that lidocaine could hurt me when they started putting it in my anus. They didn’t rape me, but I know very well how they behave, everyone knows how they behave,“ says the actress, adding that they pushed her to complete the scene.
“So they put lidocaine in my anus, it burned terribly, they wanted me to complete the shoot, I kept bleeding so they gave me more and more lidocaine as they wanted to finish it, but it still didn’t work, it hurt terribly,” she describes. She says not only the production but also herself wanted to complete the scene. The actress knew that if she were unable to do it, she would get no money. And that is what happened – because of great pain and strong bleeding she stopped the shooting and left empty-handed.
“They really wanted to complete the scene with me, but in the end they stopped when I said no,” the actress adds. “I did not complete the scene. Nobody paid me anything,” she said.
If true, you have a clear indication that studios do not force girls and that they can stop at any time.
Lidocaine is used as a local anaesthetic, most often in dentistry. It may affect the heart rate. Its use in Legal Porno has been confirmed also by one of its directors, who uses the nickname Giorgio Grandi and who wrote about it in an official forum. He reacted to a blog post in which an actress described the practices used during shooting. “I use a gel that contains between 1% and 2.5% lidocaine,” wrote the director.
Pierre Woodman has been trying to fabricate a false narrative about “dangerous numbing creams” but the reality is that Lidocaine gels are sold over the counter and are appropriate even for children a few months old. In reality some models do request it even if it barely does anything. No one was ever forced to use it. Some models even bring it to the set themselves but studios don’t usually like it as it can make the dicks of actors limp.
To the witness who talked to Deník N it never occurred to complain about this treatment. Also other actresses said that the entire industry knows that this production uses rough practices against women. According to the actresses, it is a public secret at which nobody should be surprised.
Another witness told the reporters about a similar experience. After the shooting, she even ended up in hospital. “I had to have an operation but I don’t want to come back to it. I will not tell you more about it,” another actress said.
Again a mystery testimony that could be real or not and have happened with any of the many studios that we do not even own. With almost 12,000 models shot it would be an oddity if nothing had ever happened though.
At our own studio we only had a single problem in almost 10 years. A girl prepared her ass with a ball that she could not get out of her. There is your big horror story pushed by the clowns at Denikn. They were even contacted by this model to not use her like this and Denik ignored her as they always ignore what doesn’t fit their smear campaign.
A very trustworthy source from the pornographic industry described to Deník N that Legal Porno often uses girls that have no experience with shooting and do not know what their bodies can stand.
This “very trustworthy source” is most likely Pierre Woodman who is a long time woman abuser and worse, and has declared war to us (and to many others, contrary to what the clueless Denik reporters claims) almost 10 years ago.
“They get paid much more than at other productions. When you have a new girl or you have her exclusively, you earn more. Now, during the coronavirus pandemic, many new faces have appeared there,” said the source.
Another big lie as during the coronavirus we had almost no new models in the Czech Republic.
Legal Porno shoots not only in Krakovská Street in Prague, but also in other studios in the Czech Republic.
“Legal Porno” does not shoot scenes. Denikn pushes the false idea that LP is one big studio as it helps their allegations. We question whether they even tried to understand the structure.
Every day it launches around seven new videos.
More like a dozen.
“There is not a month, or maybe a week, without a girl having a bad experience. Some agencies do not recommend Legal Porno and do not send girls there. After working for Legal Porno, the girls can’t work, can’t control their bowel movements and need to take a break from filming,” the source added.
Classic Woodman propaganda.
So a model doing double anal with a “LP” studio would have health problems, but not if they do it with Pierre Woodman cheap hotel castings with brand new girls?
In reality models are able to work anywhere before and after. The myth that models should avoid “LP” for their career has been pushed very hard for many years by PW (including with bought, fake video testimonies to scare others) and some gullible persons have come to believe it.
The insider did not wish to disclose their name as the owners of Xvideos control a large part of the production in the Czech Republic. If the insider were blacklisted, it would ruin their business. However, Deník N knows their identity.
So here Denik has someone saying that we hurt the models yet they send us models and are afraid that we would stop taking them should their name be known? Ridiculous as everything else in this article.
Public testimonies
Information about the practices at Legal Porno has appeared on social networks. Several famous people from the industry who have hundreds of thousands of followers have shared their bad experiences. For example, the actress using the stage name Veronica Avluv, who has 268 thousand followers, confided on Twitter in 2019 that she had been injured during a shooting.
“I’ve been nursing a serious prolapse injury from one shoot for Legal Porno. It was supposed to be one of 4. I’ve been dealing with blood and shit since the scene. Can’t believe they can sell my pain online but they can,” she wrote.
Veronica had 37 scenes published. It is alleged that in only one of them, and at a studio that is not ours, something happened between her and an actor. Denikn again makes no effort to present the proper context and facts.
The porn actress Samantha Rone, who has 144 thousand followers, published her experience in 2016. “I wish I was mad about the money. I’m more mad that people can behave and treat other people like that,” the actress wrote.
She contacted the paper to complain about them using her and say it’s wrong but Denikn ignored her. Samantha has 20 scenes published, and worked for 5-6 different studios. Her original message was due to one of these studios (an independant studio) having a very long delay with their payments but it was eventually resolved (everyone was paid). However, we stopped releasing scenes from this studio years ago, for other reasons. This happened in 2016. She worked at our own studio in 2018 and everything went well.
Similar complaints can be found on the official forum of Legal Porno. “At the beginning, everything was O.K. The boys were kind and thoughtful. However, the more scenes I had shot, the more ruthless they became as people just want it rougher, rougher and rougher! In the end I bled so much I had to cancel shootings for other productions because I just could not shoot,” a porn actress wrote on the Legal Porno forum last year. Her account is official, it was authorised by the producers.
“In the morning before the last scene, I woke up in fear. I knew that it would be terrible and stupid and that it would be no good. It was just too much. But it was clear to me that no one cared,” she confided to anonymous fans of the Legal Porno production.
This was written by Florane who was talking to her fans and how they expect her to do hard scenes and that she needs a resting period after doing them. [b]She contacted Denik and asked them to not use her and misrepresent her in their shady article but they ignored her as well.[/b]
None of the girls informed the police about their experiences; at least none of them said so to Deník N. Most of the women said they doubted whether the police would do anything. It is therefore unclear whether the police has ever looked into the possible violence in front of cameras.
“The law prohibits us from providing information on specific persons and other entities,” Eva Kropáčová, spokesperson of the Prague Police, said.
The owners of Legal Porno at first refused to talk Deník N journalists and to answer any of their questions. Then one of the owners, Mr Pacaud, called a reporter. Mr Pacaud said he wanted to clear up certain things and promised to send a reply by email.
Completely false. Mr Pacaud never called, messaged, or spoke to any of the Denikn reporters, in fact he blocked them as they were harassing him.
Then came a reply from GTFLIX TV, but the authors of the reply forbade Deník N to publish the reply and accused its reporters of bias.
Denikn has such little interest in the truth that they didn’t even accept an offer to meet the studio manager to answer questions and published their smear piece right away.
“The accusations are completely made up. For nearly nine years we have been victims of a massive disinformation campaign carried out by Pierre Woodman. It includes forging documents and paying models to make false accusations,” the owners of Legal Porno wrote in their reply. “Tomorrow we will consider filing an information with the Czech Police against you and your newspaper,” the company has threatened.
Denikn conveniently removed the part about us informing them that we have been in a legal battle for years against Pierre Woodman for his countless lies and defamation and that he had been lying to the courts to hide. This would have of course greatly hurt the credibility of their main source of information so they simply removed it. We also informed them that we were aware that Pierre Woodman had been offering to pay for testimonies against us and was also caught forging documents many times.
Denik made absolutely no effort to verify any of this information or to evaluate the credibility of their source.
Ten girls speak on camera
The owners of Legal Porno did not mention the name of the world-famous producer Pierre Woodman by coincidence – they have had disputes for years. Woodman, who is active mainly in Hungary and the Czech Republic, has also pointed out to unfair practices of his competitors.
How much were Jakub Zelenka and Lukáš Prchal paid to lick the ass of Pierre Woodman like this? What does the asshole of a rapist and woman abuser taste like? Apparently they like him a lot.
According to porn-industry insiders, Woodman does not have such a heated dispute with anyone other than the Pacaud siblings.
A gross lie. His forum is filled with venom against countless persons. Even more so if you count his numerous fake accounts. Already 10 years ago the main porn agent in Hungary had the same type of disputes with him, saying with his shooting practices he would have been arrested quickly in the US and that he uses lies and manipulations to trick girls and also locks them up until they finish the shoots.
Woodman, who was contacted by Deník N, handed over to the newspaper testimonies of ten actresses he says he has collected in recent years. All the women in the videos talk about their experiences with Legal Porno productions similarly as the actresses with whom Deník N spoke.
A criminal and lifetime con man handed this “information” to you, and you happily took it.
Deník N will not publish the videos, to protect the privacy of the women. However, the newspaper contacted some of them to verify whether their testimonies were manipulated. The women with whom the reporters spoke confirmed their original statements.
How did Woodman’s videos come about? The producer has said he shoots everything on camera, including interviews with job seekers. He does it to prevent any disputes or accusations. To Deník N he has provided the testimonies of ten girls who, when he asked them about their experiences in the industry, themselves started talking about Legal Porno.
Everything in Woodman videos is staged and fake. The real first castings are never filmed.
One of the girls said that, in order to make the scenes, she drank a cocktail of painkillers. Another woman said that during the shooting she was bleeding from her anus but they did not stop the shooting anyway. They gave her a gel thanks to which she could continue and did not feel pain. She said she did not know at the time that it was a painkiller.
Here Denik conveniently mixes up pain reliever gels which are sold over the counter with pain killer medicine which are not. In any case we (our studios) do not give pain killers to anybody. Denik does not identify who is “they” this model mentions and keeps everything as vague as possible. This is looking like a completely fake testimony.
“They gave me anaesthetics, but it did not help at all. No one raised their voice at me, but when I was crying and said I couldn’t do it, someone came and gave me a shot of vodka to relax,” described one of the women.
According to lawyers contacted by Deník N, in this case – if it happened in this way – a thin line between shooting and rape may have been crossed.
The line between shooting and rape is not thin at all and is very clear. Our actors (in our own studios) are pros and the last thing they want is to lose their livelihood. No one is going to force a girl.
[removed the part about lawyers giving their opinion on the allegations, since they are not real]
According to Sokol, local anaesthetics or alcohol may be used during pornographic shooting if the actress has consented to it and was in a state in which she was able to make such a decision. This means, for example, that she was not drunk.
One of the girls described how, during one of the practices, the actor used force to achieve what he wanted. When shooting anal sex, actresses have to prepare to avoid the intercourse being painful. “At times he held my ass and tried to force a [dildo] in it, so that it would be over fast. But I was already crying and said I did not want to do it, so I ended it,” described the witness.
This statement only shows that this model was not forced at all, and was able to simply not continue.
Another woman alleged that people from Legal Porno forced the shooting of a scene. “They forced me to shoot double anal intercourse. I refused another scene,” said the woman. She said the producers tried to trick her by saying that they would only try a scene and would not film it. The scene was to include anal sex. “I said to them that even simple anal intercourse was painful for me. They told me it wouldn’t be on any video. So we tried it and I said it hurt terribly. I pushed them away and said it hurt. Then I watched previews on Legal Porno and the video was there,” the witness described her frustration.
There are no “people from Legal Porno”.
IF this is a true testimony, which we can highly doubt, it did not happen at any of our studios.
Penalty for failing to complete a shoot
Other women on the videos say that people from Legal Porno pressured them to continue shooting. The producers allegedly threatened the actresses with penalties in the order of tens of thousand of Czech crowns. “I stopped working for them. A woman did not agree with the fact that I wanted to terminate the contract on the spot. The contract stipulated that when I stop [the shooting] early, I must pay a penalty of 70 thousand Czech crowns. Some girls before me left but did not have to pay anything,” a witness said.
The lawyer Sokol stresses that such practice would be unacceptable and the penalties would be unenforceable. “This is similar to someone agreeing in a contract to pour petrol over themselves and set themselves on fire, and paying a penalty if they did not do it. I believe that, in relation to pornography, such clause is null and void,” Sokol explains.
In some aspects, the situation at Legal Porno may be similar to the case of the porn production Czech Casting. In that case, the girls testified that the producers pressured them and threatened them with penalties if they failed to complete their work. The police then charged nine people with human trafficking, sexual coercion and rape. As in the case of Legal Porno, the girls said that before the shooting they did not know what awaited them.
Such penalties do not exist in our studios and we have never heard of such things elsewhere.
The press initially claimed that CzechCasting had them in their contracts for refusing to finish a scene and later changed that to penalties for having their content removed from their sites. In any case it has nothing to do with our own policies.
War of two producers
It is important to bear in mind that Woodman is not unbiased in relation to the situation at Legal Porno. His legal dispute with the Pacauds has a personal dimension. Woodman claims that on the forum of Legal Porno they published pictures of his wife and of his daughter (that picture was allegedly taken when the daughter was a minor) and invited people to visit his daughter. Woodman says this is the reason why he has led a court dispute in France.
We did not “publish” such content. It was posted on our forums by users who strongly dislike him and wanted to give him a taste of his own medicine (doxing is one of his many specialties). We disagree strongly with bringing family into these fights (and doxing in general) and removed the posts.
We (not our users) also claim in our forums that Pierre Woodman shot and published minors and blackmailed models, because we know that for a fact. Note that he never sued us for this as he simply can’t fight the truth in court. It gives you a better idea of why he is trying to feed the press with false information in order to take us down.
On the other hand, the Pacaud siblings, namely their company GTFLIX TV, say in their reply that Woodman has been carrying out a disinformation campaign against them and has been paying models to raise false accusations against them.
Woodman’s MASSIVE campaign against “legal Porno” started about 9 years ago. He spread an unbelievable amount of lies using his forums, phone calls, and countless personal meetings. Originally we decided to ignore him as most sane people would. But it went on. His campaign reached very far as he is a very obsessive person and does a lot of networking. For example, we had people contacting us alarmed about Woodman apparently possessing critical information about us and took pages of notes after a single conversation with him but it turned out completely fake. This has been going on for a long time and the fake allegations are only getting worse.
We have said many times that Woodman is the biggest liar in the industry. Even during these events he went as far as claiming Mr Pacaud went to the police to bribe them which is of course completely false. He just can’t stop lying and Denikn would be well-advised to be more careful with the “information” he provides them.
“Woodman must have taken an interest in your biased articles and we see that the way in which you are trying to obtain information may easily lead to false testimonies,” GTFLIX TV added.
The goal of Denik reporters Jakub Zelenka and Lukáš Prchal is to hurt the XVIDEOS company and owner as much as possible. They are trying to make a name for themselves by influencing credit card companies to take action. They even write a lot of insinuations about child porn in other articles when they were not able to find any.
Woodman saw this, contacted them, and gave them all the crap they needed after their failed articles, to push their smear campaign further.
Denik is trying so hard to cause damage that they even translated their article in english. Something they have never done before, apparently.
However, not only Woodman is pointing his finger at Legal Porno. Also other people from the industry have described to Deník N that Legal Porno wants girls to engage in practices their bodies cannot cope with. In addition, the sources say, the actresses are often very young. According to sources who are familiar with the pornographic industry in the Czech Republic – we do not quote Woodman as an anonymous source in this article – there are cases when girls who have just turned 18 appear at a pornographic shooting where they are asked to be penetrated by several men and to engage in dangerous practices that may cause injuries.
“Double Penetration” is done, and has been done by almost every porn site.
You can sign up for the army and go kill and die at 18. Surely this is a harder and more dangerous situation than to have sex on camera. You are also considered responsible enough to vote.
“Sometimes they end up in hospital and often they are so traumatised that they quit the industry,” an insider told us under the promise of anonymity. A number of people from the pornographic industry have openly admitted that they are afraid to talk about the issues around Legal Porno. The reason is that the Pacauds control a large share of the pornographic market in the Czech Republic and in the world.
Fake statement, from a competing site or agent, most likely.
[cut the rest of the article. Recaps from previous failed articles]
