PornBox.com

Is it just me that feels like girls have way too much tattoos? Some of these girls look so hot but their random ink on the thigh or shoulder are just killing it!

It would sure be nice, but it mirrors fashion. Until it no longer is fashionable, we will be seeing a lot of it.

Have you guys seen the Fifty Shades Of Grey Hollywood movie trilogy?

Well, that girl has tattoos all over the place:











However to make her look sexier in the movies her nude body appears flawless because they removed them digitally.

Photographers like myself do this all the time, so maybe in the future when the technology is better, and it becomes easier to do these things, we won't have to worry much about that kind of stuff anymore for video either.

It would also be nice if LP started shooting on 120 FPS to get that Gemini Man look, 60 FPS is great, but 120 FPS is much better.

pwnography.qq wrote:Is it just me that feels like girls have way too much tattoos? Some of these girls look so hot but their random ink on the thigh or shoulder are just killing it!

killing it for u not for all

yepp, tattoos are a disease and a «non-buy-that-scene» reason very often in my case too.. but what can you do, these days, it seems fashionable..

Different people see the world through different eyes.

IMO Dakota Johnson's tattoos on her foot and shoulder are pretty.

I'm not so keen on the others, but probably she doesn't care about my opinion.

There is an attractive goth/rock chick look which can be enhanced by (good) tattoos but I'm generally not a big fan of tattoos. The most important thing is that they are done well - which is expensive I'm assuming - and they're done with some idea of aesthetics and overall design. I think the problem is so many of these girls just seem to have random tattoos here and there, and it's hard to work what effect or overall look they are going for, they're just kind of distracting.I don't like tattoos on legs at all, they just look cheap and ugly to me. Tattoos on chests, no! Certain parts of a women's body are attractive enough, they don't need unnecessary decoration!

Once has to be a weak bladder small dick to be put off by LP tattooed chicks

Don't blame the girls, it is usually the guys fault.

A lot of times guys are complete dumbasses and have nothing to talk about, so what they do is they comment on a girl's tattoo.

Do you have tattoos?
How many do you have?
Where do you have them?
Can you show me?
Oh that looks cool
I love tattoos, I think they are sexy
(Gets close to touch it to get something going on)

Basically a bunch of loser guys do that because that's all they got, so the girls start thinking is cool, and it becomes a vicious cycle.

In reality tattoos don't look hot, the girl immediately loses value, and it even ruins a lot of work opportunities for her down the line.

All because of those losers that have nothing to say, and that's all they can came up with.

Some guys are so stupid that because they managed to get something going on with a girl with tattoos now they think they like tattoos.

However in reality it is just their own mind making shit up because deep inside they see themselves having a higher chance with them, and also because it brings them nostalgic feelings. They are basically eating their own shit.

To be fair there are many times when the girls have loser friends that got hooked already and now they get their friends hooked into it because girls usually copy what her other girlfriends do, some even get pregnant at the same time, it is that crazy.

On top of that we also have those tattoo artists that just want to make quick buck and convince the girls that tattoos are cool, sexy and edgy. Those are the worse kind because they ruin the girl for life just for making a little quick cash.

The reality is that it only makes them look "gullible", as if you can basically brainwash them into anything, whether is politics, social causes, and other things.

IMO males are just as susceptible as females to feeling pressure to get tattoos to join in or or look cool or whatever.

And some "in your face" personal-choice tattoos can limit employment opportunities for both men and women in more conservative occupations.

Beyond that, the idea that a person is "ruined" (or enhanced) by tattoos is just a personal preference, not an empirical fact.

avanfurwet wrote:Beyond that, the idea that a person is "ruined" (or enhanced) by tattoos is just a personal preference, not an empirical fact.

That we can definitely agree with.

avanfurwet wrote:IMO males are just as susceptible as females to feeling pressure to get tattoos to join in or or look cool or whatever.

That's true as well.

avanfurwet wrote:some "in your face" personal-choice tattoos can limit employment opportunities.

Not as much as on your face ones!

I agree actually recently there were a topic on this issue on forum. Look for. We need to see clean girls without a tattoo. But it's hard to find maybe east European girls.some of the girls they look like they are painted by babies.

Tito1981 wrote:I agree actually recently there were a topic on this issue on forum. Look for. We need to see clean girls without a tattoo. But it's hard to find maybe east European girls.some of the girls they look like they are painted by babies.

I wish some forum posters would stop referring to themselves as "we". Only the Queen can do that.

However I think this time Tito does have a point about "painted by babies". IMO whoever carved that ridiculous enormous comic-book doodle of a diamond into Tiffany Tatum's arm should be ashamed of themselves. There are probably even worse examples, but that one really bothers me.

I think there is a good mix of tattoed and non tattoed girls on the site.

jerrybb wrote:I think there is a good mix of tattoed and non tattoed girls on the site.

+ 1

Also there are many really nicely and decently inked girls out there.
...and in the end there are other qualities that count!

Agreed,most look rubbish and when the bulk have them its not a turn on