pastaga wrote:Here's my overall feedback of this difficult year :
Good :
- New italian models like Giada, Mary-Jane, Silvia Soprano...
- New russian models.
- Luis and Natsha etablished in south America.
- New directors in Russia and Prague as well.
- Nice work from Omar and Lady Dee who are slightly more diverse than Luis.
Bad :
- New Giorgio studio not bringing anything new, in fact the old building had more diverse rooms and settings.
- Giorgio's vid getting repetitive : no more themed scenes, special outfits and accessories, almost no big facials...
- 2/3 of the russian newbies already retired (Lottie Magne, Victoria Clockwork, Lina Piggy, Flick Luchik and so...)
- New studios on Pornbox almost every day, some of them releasing old stuff or poor quality vids. There should be some LP "sceal of aproval" (recent, anal action and 1080p minimum), no need to turn Pornbox into XVideos 2. At least just add a global filter for all the amateur productions.
- Still not enough before and after scene BTS.
pastaga wrote:Bad :
- 2/3 of the russian newbies already retired (Lottie Magne, Victoria Clockwork, Lina Piggy, Flick Luchik and so...)
Kaderon wrote:Positive:
- LP could pay salary to many people.
dap-addict wrote:Very nice analysis, pastaga!![]()
I'll come back to it later. Generally I thing they have managed tremendous things despite that difficult year and all those travel restrictions.![]()
![]()
Price rise was feels too abrupt and too high, though, magizi already mentioned it.pastaga wrote:Bad :
- 2/3 of the russian newbies already retired (Lottie Magne, Victoria Clockwork, Lina Piggy, Flick Luchik and so...)
There seems to be no real investment in these girls careers.
Also each Piter director basically has a couple of girls exclusively for his/her studio and is thus basically not able to provide enough work for them. Thus most of them drop out fast again. I know several new Russian girls who can work but 1 scene per month for their agent = studio = director. That means a few hundred $$$ only, lower often than average Russia income. Especially for girls not living in Piter it simply hardly doenst pay like this.![]()
stratogustav wrote:Yeah I dislike tattoos myself. They definitely need some kind of regulations because it seems they are taking advantage of all the girls. It is ridiculous. I don't understand why they have to ruin so many beautiful women for a quick buck.
Some of those girls are truly gorgeous, and it is really sad to see all that beauty go to waste as soon as they start adding more and more tattoos to their bodies.
It is hard to see girls without tattoos on LP, it makes no sense. They would look infinite times better without tattoos, and more elegant as well.
magizi87 wrote:In general I think the bang for buck, is low for a porn website.
The average price for the latest 16 Gonzo scenes is 8.1 tkt per movie.
(excluding the pee scenes, which are probably more expensive).
The 3 month plan for $79.90 USD gets you about 17 new scenes during a 90 day period.
If you stretch it so it actually lasts the advertised 3 months,
you can only buy one scene, every 5 or 6 days.
Or else you run out of tkt almost immediately, lol
That is VERY expensive compared to most competitors.
For example, Blacked updates you with a new scene,
in a similar frequency, but it costs $99 for the whole year.
(compared to the $320 that LP would cost me).
The camera work and video quality of most productions
don't really command a premium price tag IMO ...
stratogustav wrote:By taking advantage I mean is that they are likely easy to sale to. They are still making the decisions themselves.
avanfurwet wrote:magizi87 wrote:In general I think the bang for buck, is low for a porn website.
The average price for the latest 16 Gonzo scenes is 8.1 tkt per movie.
(excluding the pee scenes, which are probably more expensive).
The 3 month plan for $79.90 USD gets you about 17 new scenes during a 90 day period.
If you stretch it so it actually lasts the advertised 3 months,
you can only buy one scene, every 5 or 6 days.
Or else you run out of tkt almost immediately, lol
That is VERY expensive compared to most competitors.
For example, Blacked updates you with a new scene,
in a similar frequency, but it costs $99 for the whole year.
(compared to the $320 that LP would cost me).
The camera work and video quality of most productions
don't really command a premium price tag IMO ...
Agree with the price analysis, but also ...
"Blacked" and other websites are only $99/year if you pay up-front during one of their many "sales". Monthly membership costs more, maybe $20/month = $240/year.
Sites like "Blacked" within the Vixen brand are sold individually, not in multi-site bundles. You can't get e.g. "Tushy" scenes unless you pay again. You can't pick & mix like you can with Pornbox.
Personally I like "Blacked" and "Tushy", I like their glossy look and feel, but they are kind of repetitive and formulaic in the same way as people criticise e.g. Giorgio for.
avanfurwet wrote:stratogustav wrote:By taking advantage I mean is that they are likely easy to sale to. They are still making the decisions themselves.
OK. I agree. But people are free to make bad decisions. And like in that old Lloyd Cole song, sometimes they end up regretting the permanent reminders written there in blue.
avanfurwet wrote:But not all girls are tied to the apron strings of their debut producer/agency. Some e.g. Light Fairy are shooting for many producers. Those models can assess for themselves how much they can earn and how hard they have to work for it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests