PornBox.com

Okay so I couldn't fit what I'm looking for in the subject line, but I love to see LP girls take multiple anal creampies in a row WITHOUT pushing them out in between. As many as possible really - seeing an ass actually overflowing with cum is particularly hot. Know of any such scenes? Ideal girl would be a pretty brunette with natural tits if LP has such a scene. That said I don't like the cum cocktail thing - I'd rather see the girl push the cum out onto the couch or floor. If she licks it up afterwards that's even hotter...

These kinds of scenes are censured by today's porn industry

The closest I can think are:
- Cum Filled Asshole Overload 1
- Overflowing assholes

even though it's only 2 or 3 successive creampies but the movies being within the golden era contain genuine fucking inside - "No tip fucking allowed"

Yeah, I also like this thing asshole filling with cum.

otto1219 wrote:@OKCTwister

These kinds of scenes are censured by today's porn industry

Why is that so and is it a matter of legality or "artistic vision" by the directors? People have been asking for this forever, it seems.

Such trends censoring specific positions like:
i. Reverse cowgirl so we can't see genitalia or facial expressions
ii. Sperm swallowing
iii. Genuine double blowjobs
iv. Female actress stroking their teeth on dicks
v. Simultaneous cumshots swallowing, simultaneous creampies, multiple creampies
vi. Female performer slamming dicks while fucking in the squatting/sitting position
vii. Prolapse and cumfarts
viii. some streaks of shit oozing out of assholes

are deemed too graphic or shocking for the industry
These classical mainstream porn repressions confirm porn is all staged, faked and make believe

Only a novel trend in porn focusing on actions that would make the depraved sexual act an art of its own not a con shall make of porn a cinematographic genre

In short, censoring these acts is a useful hypocrisy to them but I'm confident a new school of thought would break this taboo and take over the industry just like Gonzo did

otto1219 wrote:@OKCTwister

In short, censoring these acts is a useful hypocrisy to them but I'm confident a new school of thought would break this taboo and take over the industry just like Gonzo did

I think you're giving them too much credit to think there's enough conscious thought to lead to hypocrisy. To me, it appears most directors are just slapping the scenes together based on a predetermined timeline with a check box for different positions, many awkward and difficult to capture photographically, unnatural, borderline boring, and watchful of the time so they don't run over their booked times.
I'd be interested in Mister Ananas' thoughts on the topic of "censoring." Of the directors here he's the only one who actually engages the membership with thoughtful replies.

So, you're saying that those scenes you listed (yes, I'd like more of those) are too nasty/controversal for porn, but a foot up a tranny's ass or a piss shower after a facial is not? I like your idea much better than the freakshow circus acrobatics and feigned dominance we are presented with, but censored? I just think they've too often lost the concept of prurient interest with no redeeming social value( ) in a pornographic milieu. Or, just as probable, they just don't care as long as tickets are sold.
That said, I hope your assessment is more correct than mine.

Personally, I don't expect anything close to a well-thought planned strategy from porn directors. Sad but true, a broad majority of them are low flying IQs. Sorry to say that but, cutting the crap, it is a silly business to make crazy money compared to conventional industries where even the qualified, experienced, smart & clever are struggling to sustain their businesses. So I don't expect any endeavor to engineer a rational pornographic construct in a holistic way: like one could construct with the horror movie genre or the action art movement of the 1950s. As you said, it's all turned to mindless copy-pasting, checkboxing and tagging... so its no surprise we're being served insipid spineless boilerplate to nourish sexually frustrated market segments... after all it all comes down to sperm & nonsense:
- Dorcel doesn't like porn without condom so he produced so
- Woodman doesn't like shitty ass juice oozing out of asses while fucking so he edits / wipes them off
- LP thinks drinking salt & water (piss) is extreme kick-ass porn... so may they think... free country

It's their party... as long as they don't get phagocytized by a disruptive market player